/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11287591
>not knowing math isn't real but that using symbols, place values, a horizontal reading direction, a vertical direction, isn't just great for communicating emotions reliably but when used for counting with a base, is the only way to discreetly describe recordable and proportional cause and effect.

Math isn't real anon, the arbitrary values of constants of nature in this phase space, the amount of entropy, and axioms of math very much are the only "real" things. The same of time, except not for the whole universe but reference frames. You're illusioned by functionality only having one dimension of time giving the observer a definite present by the brain linearly increasing the value of X you see as time. But human time does put a disjointed set of moments into an undeniably anthropic order for an observer, so there must be order of events and true cause and effect perhaps with free will being our way to use the present to increase probabilities of certain futures like a train choosing it's prebuilt choice of tracks. Time as we know it, is second dimensional stopping relatively at the edge of the observable universe, our historical horizon diverging from the big bang phase. The whole universe and whatever supercedes it is 3 dimensional time akin to a computer keeping an accurate clock independent of what's inside or dilations in processing speed.

… part 2 of 2