/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11233971
we don't have politically nor economically viable solutions, you can't have both. You can have nuclear+solar+wind+ hydro for the energy, teach people to stop wasting so much, learn people to recycle, find a solution to plastic, etc.
But there are some bigger problems that will kill us before climate change, Bacterial resistance will be a huge problem in a few years, soils that are no longer fertile + Soil erosion and degradation, combined with the loss of agricultural land to urban sprawl and a booming global population will fuck us hard in few decades. Geopolitical tensions between some nations like India/Pakistan, North korea and South, China/India, China/Japan.

>>9105491
tfw society thinks creative people are those that work in arts and crafts, like to make foto's for their instagram, vote hillary, are gender fluid, give their hair aposematic colouring, spend all their income by the end of the month on clothes and somehow think the clothes reflect on their identity,
\to the average self proclaimed creative person,
creativity is not the act of creation or ingenuity.
It is letting yourself drift away on your emotions without selfreflection.
simply to blindly act out what comes to you.
because if there is no reason that compelled you to do it, then it must be creative right?

The obvious falacy is that the reasons that cause your behaviour do not care about wheither you know of their existence or not.
creativity should be definable without regarding the perception of the artist.
all forms of "creativity" that rely on perception of the artist are no more than a form of mental mastrubation.

>>9038739
you must be confused.
the person you quoted is not OP.
I am OP.
but still you must be confused.
because the cat in the picture is not my cat.
I just saved the image a long time ago.

>yfw existence is a social construct.