/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10708201
NTP's results are understated. They used multiple antennas in a reverberation chamber to maximize the probability of destructive interference and depolarization of the field, thus reducing effects. NTP was designed to fail. The fact that it still showed clear results is just further damning, well beyond what people are aware of.

Here's more information. Put together a full description, history, how it works, so on. For some reason whenever I post in these threads, they seem to be suddenly deleted.

http://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF

Put simply, it's a matter of transduction and amplification. The same way all of the other senses work. How can a signal well below the threshold of ambient thermal noise produce biological effects (what was dubbed the "kT paradox")? Because structures in biological systems are designed to resist random noise and selectively amplify polarized or periodic signals. How can non-ionizing radiation damage DNA? As a downstream effect of excessive calcium signalling ultimately leading to oxidative and nitrosative stress. In the case of 2.45GHz, and other frequencies near the maximum dielectric loss of water, they can damage DNA kinetically, as continuous wave exposure has been noted to make the DNA molecule "thrash about violently", with indications that it actually breaks it off its histones. Part of the frequency band used by wi-fi is used to cook food for a reason.

There are a few other mechanisms, but the major one is altered calcium flux, probably as a result of action on the charge groups composing its voltage sensing subunit, thus activating it. The most important thing is it's not speculation. There's now well over one hundred years of hard data, all the way back to d'Arsonval, Tesla, and others. We know what this stuff does.

That's that, then.