/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16104584
>just by comparing their memories.
they're identical that's the point, all of them move with copying the brain structure.

>>15978858
>I hope this is a wakeup call for humankind to change it's perspective on how it treats itself.

>>15972927
>Moon is not where the spacecraft is now

>>15957115
imagine cancelling hawking radiation, btfo black fucking holes, because of a midget troll top kek

>>15942288

>>15926835
>8 boosters

>He thought getting a PhD would get him money

>>15573530
>i'm going to keep humiliating you on sci
pretty sure you are the attrition faggot from now on

>>15551692
>freely choosing

>>15529256
Dude i heard from one of these indoor farmer startup guy in george gammon channel
Some sort of nasty black mold got in the water and attacked his brain stem he was lucky to be alive

>>15512950
Kek. Yeah. Why can't they find planet x with this.

>>15512911
Just unwind the curves nigga ahaha

>>15249125
Reminds me of the time they offed hundreds of people by putting them on ventilator during the rona

>>12582305
>Always have some retarded side hustle related to nursing (youtube, tiktok, porn, facebook page)
>side hustle related to nursing
>porn

>>12270206
the target is always moving. first the mask doesn't do shit. no wait who cares if the masks helps you should stay home i don't wanna wear stupid masks.

>/pol/ creates coal.fax to track down coalburners
>site becomes a bbc fetish forum

>>12195429
ScrubX

>>12120547
boing

>>12099676
Does climate affect how people think, and in turn they vote in democrats who turn reliable energy production sources away?

>>11896918
Pretty sure this is not actually a big factor. Sure, we know much more than we used to but also the knowledge we now are aware of is MUCH more organized and concise. There used to be whole books written about subjects that modern textbooks only take a chapter to cover. The irrelevant subjects (which were thought to be relevant in the past) have been discarded or adapted as a small part of another subject.
I think if you put Galois or Abel in today's world they would be able to reach the forefront of research as quickly as they could back then.
Look at Abel's wikipedia page
>When Abel entered the university in 1821, he was already the most knowledgeable mathematician in Norway. Holmboe had nothing more he could teach him and Abel had studied all the latest mathematical literature in the university library
>all the latest mathematical literature
How many books do you think that is? I'd wager it's certainly over 20.
On the other hand, let's look at how many books you need to read to reach the forefront of a subject today, e.g. Algebraic Topology. The knowledge is so well systemized that you could certainly do it in way less than 20 books. Ask pretty much any expert in any field today what books a beginner needs to read to get to their level and I'll wager it will be less than 20 books.
So, you have no excuse for being dumb. A lot of you could come close to Abel if you just put in the time. Read, read, read. Do the exercises.

>>11745085
mfw they have demo-2. and both crew-1 and crew-2 done before starliner even has it's first manned flight next year

I Am Smarter Than You

I have to do a five minute presentation on an ongoing research topic in my field. The point is to "dumb" down an going research topic or paper for a scientific community that isn't necessarily mathematicans. Are there any papers anyone would suggest to make my presentation about? I'm a junior undergrad math major so the topic should be understandable for me, any math topic should suffice as long as it isn't too complex. If i had a preference I would choose ongoing research on mathematical optimization or operations research. Any suggestions or starting points would be really help.

>>11624704
wonder what drugs he's on today

>>11599624
how the fuck would that even work