/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11271116
>more people=more ideas=more inventions.
sure, but we're discussing cost of living in small towns vs cities which is a matter of density. and with telecommunications tech we can share ideas without needing to be squeezed into a tiny landmass. and despite an overall smaller pop than the eu the us has far more innovation. notice how there is nothing in europe like silicon valley. all you guys have is sap. meanwhile the us has google, ibm, apple, ms, intel, amd, etc, etc.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180124113951.htm
>long term losses
opposed to mortgaging and renting to afford living in a city? lol, no. outright owning property you actually have something you can sell and land typically appreciates in value.
>I have repeatedly told you that meme sources from shitmerica
correlates with outcomes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation
so much for meme source.
>That graph proves nothing.
i see statistical reasoning isn't taught properly in europe.
>How about comparing the costs?
moving goal post. overall it's cheaper to live in the states. not only because of taxes, the premium you guys pay on everything and it's shittier quality. lmao.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasoline_and_diesel_usage_and_pricing#Typical_gasoline_prices_around_the_world
>That does not apply to us,we have actual buildings with actual purposes.
this seething lmao.
>he only reason why we are slightly worse off are the world wars,communism
totally not your fault there at all. huh, hanz?
>https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/neighbour_1
outdated, the nice thing about murrican english is it is more efficient and is minimizing superfluous letters and silly archaic spelling. it makes more sense to spell light as lite.