/sci/ - Science & Math

Right after I found out that people at Penn State had plagiarized me (and after I made several remarks about Ashtekar et al.), the FBI swarmed Penn State because people heard the flesh-on-flesh slapping sound in the locker room where Sandusky was fucking a10yo boy in the ass, and then they described the anal sex slapping sound on TV all day for several months, and then all the plagiarists kept their jobs. That was (and is) the gayest thing I've seen on TV in my life, and it was 100% about jewish plagiarism.
>jews rape kids

>>15845316

It's pretty much like how Weinstein's Geometric Unity is just the MCM, and Poplawski's universe in a black hole is just the MCM, etc, etc, etc.

>>12745379
I don't know what you mean by that.

I had a whole section in my book about the many people who already stolen my ideas before I even arrived at the unit cell >>12265402

My understanding was that the Bogdanoff research got falsely backdated an uploaded to the internet as a way to try to steal credit for what I did by way of falsified time stamps. My suspicion is that their 1999 theses didn't exist until around the time John Baez started talking about them online some time after I got rejected for submitting this to arXiv in September 2009:
>Modified Spacetime Geometry Addresses Dark Energy, Penrose's Entropy Dilemma, Baryon Asymmetry, Inflation and Matter Anisotropy
>https://vixra.org/abs/1302.0022
This isn't one of my suspicions that I'm sure about but I think so. Pic talks about a lot of other people who used my research without due attribution, with lack of attribution being plainly unethical.

What Wilczek didn't steal but calls time crystals in a deliberate attempt to act like he's talking about something other than my idea. What basically everyone who ever saw tried to steal from me except everyone who I ask to publish it who all tell me it's worthless garbage.

Wilczek calls it a time crystal. Weinstein calls it geometric unity. Very many other people call it very many other things.

What Weinstein calls Geometric Unity. What Wilczek calls time crystals. What very many other people call very many other things.

>>12189916
I'm mad that everyone who sees my research outside of a journal says, "OMG! This is great and I should steal it," but everyone else, including the people at arXiv, allegedly says, "This is trash and it would be a waste of space in the bun next to my desk."

>>12167610
>>12167613
both of them followed the program of Ashtekar to take what I wrote and "improve it" by dressing in unhelpful technical jargon.

>>12136882
When I loaded that PDF, the TeX timestamp said 2019 even though the arXiv timestamp still said 2013. That looks dirty as fuck to me because, as i understand, the arXiv stamp gets printed onto the PDF at the time it is submitted. I don't have the original. I just looked at the paper when I heard he won that prize and I immediately recognized the M3 operation and what Hairer's colleague must have meant he said "the work was done by aliens." After I saw that version 1 of his paper was uploaded about six months after I published M3, I wanted to study how the revisions to his paper reflected his having stolen more and more from me as I continued to have new ideas in the years 2013-2020.

FYI

>>11888737

>>11619041
pic is relevant: a chapter from my first book.
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598

>>11006215
>it could well be an extension of the ideas of quantum foam from topological string theory
I can tell you for sure that when people engaged in plagiarism-like activities to rebrand my research with their own new content appended, they were definitely using "spin foams" as the label. Particularly: when that talk given in October 2009 at LSU, just after I published in September 2009, was "accidentally" misdated to October 2008, and then out of several archive files of the physics talks at LSU, only the one with the mis-dated spin foams talk was "coinceidentally removed," that talk was given about "spin foams."

I detail all of this at length in my free book, Section 3.2 (pic rel):
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1712.0598

Pernambuco/Recife is no random place in the world. I think my favorite person was (is?) from there. Why he's buying my semen from those who would poison his daughters while they cuck me instead of asking me to do the direct deposit totally escapes my understanding.
You all say, "Obviously the women all say no to him, look at his rhetoric. Duh, what a fucking idiot." However, if I approached the women paying top dollar for my semen, then I could use that exact same rhetoric to say, "Ay, guh u wan sum fuk for free instead?," and they would all say yes to me and bend over with their pants down. It is nothing but the malice of my enemies to keep me separated from those who would pay top $$$ for my cum, and would love the chance to say yes if I offered them some for free.

Pic related from my book, this section goes into a lot of detail about how it was obvious all along
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1712.0598