/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12621376
They did build a more reasonable shuttle.
14 people died before they bothered though.

>>12084106
What they fail to remember here is that X-37 is the one who intercepts.

>>11731212
And how many times did they end up even using that hypersonic lift flight profile?

Fuck what a dumb design decision, especially now that with X-37B we know they could have just built their own specialized craft and not constrained the shuttle design like that

>>11397274
This is what we have to settle for instead of the X-33 or Venture Star because a bunch of cocksuckers couldn't face their own obsolescence and had to hold back the next advances in American spacecraft and engine design

What's the payload /sfg/?

Are you ready, /sci/?
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M6Zvi-fFv4&feature=youtu.be

Webcast starts in 11 hours.

Is this thing testing the EM Drive?

>>7384190
if there's a 3% chance the world will end each day the world would eventually be very likely to end

the chance on any given day is only ever 3% though

also, that doesn't seem to be a paradox, even if it were true.

>>7193852
>Gonna need a citation for that one.
ok i dont find it right now, maybe im wrong