/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9824583
>An online test is accruate.
Go and take a test derived from Raven's Progressive Matrices culture fair and fuck off you 144-posting spastic cunt.
I will bruteforce your trip in a minute and assign a bot to shitpost as you.
Stop, posting, you fuckwit.
REMOVE, THE TRIP.
LEARN, THE CULTURE.

>>9824473
>I just want you guys to comprehend that you are the laughingstock of the internet.
Which, whilst I don't agree with (>>9824336), although that is stats, factual stats.
I think you'll find that you are the laughingstock you tripfagging newfag.
Fuck off Brandon.

>>9823832
In the same breath:
>You're obviously posting from two browsers.
Lol, fuck off Brandon.

>>9823807
>>9824522
>Anastasi, Anne; Urbina, Susana (1997). Psychological Testing (Seventh ed.). Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall. pp. 326–327. ISBN 978-0-02-303085-7. Lay summary (28 July 2010).
>Silverman, Linda Kreger (1991), "Review of The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy", Gifted Child Quarterly, 35 (3): 153–156,
CONFIRMED, BRANDON HAS A LOW IQ AND HE'S HAD THIS EXPLAINED (AND AGREED WITH IT) BEFORE!
FUCK OFF BRANDON!

>>9823675
Whoa, displaying that 144 IQ and 4.1 GPA!
Impressive!
Look at all of that compsci knowledge you've gotten from college and books...
Oh wait, you don't even understand TCP/IP, let alone AI!
My advice?
Fuck off Brandon.

>>9823648
Fuck off Brandon.

>>9823419
Fuck off Brandon.

>>9823344
Fuck off Brandon.