[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.4356400 [View]
File: 59 KB, 599x480, uglycunt1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4356400

Randomness thread
Randomness thread
Randomness thread
Randomness thread
Randomness thread
Randomness thread
Randomness thread
Randomness thread


Good heavens, just look at the time.
Randomness is more complicated than most science philosophers think.
You gotta invent alot more to define randomness from scratch.

Consider the following:
The hyper-cosmos (multivariate and everything else) could have:

1) always existed
2) created out of nothing

Both are paradoxical to our intuition.

If something is created out of nothing then "nothing" isn't nothing, thus the hyper-cosmos always existed.
And please dont confuse "nothing" in the way Lawrence Krauss is using it, he never implied pure nothingness, just space and low level QM.

The only current sensible answer is that universe always existed, which is a struggle with infinities.
Adding God in the big picture only complicates things further.

But then again, all the above is just human intuition and all those concepts are arbitrary, it may be that the answer lies well beyond our mental grasp.

So does, "absolute randomness" exists?
So far we dont have any proof of that.
And if you think Uncertainty Principle constitutes as "true randomness" then you should study actual physics instead of getting hyped over new age shit.

Also sage cause i's randumb

>> No.4331296 [View]
File: 59 KB, 599x480, uglycunt1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4331296

>>4331280
What is the likelihood?
>>4331274
I know, yum
>>4331283
I dont wanna die.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]