/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11696546
Why would you lie about them? Not mentioning they aren't stellar is not the same as lying. If the professor asks, you can try to come up with an excuse or just say you were going through some personal stuff or whatever, but don't lie. Even better, you can be honest and say you were bad back then but now you have restudied the things you were struggling with and that sparked your interest (depending on the prof, you could want to be ready to provide evidence for this!) and show that you are motivated to learn! Consider the following chain of events: You go to the prof, lie about your grades, get accepted as his student, do what you were supposed to do, receive your degree, stay in the same uni, get a master's degree/go directly for a phd whatever is the way to go in your country, graduate, apply somewhere for a phd or a postdoc position depending on your current highest degree at that point, get rejected because you got caught lying and the prof told you are not trustworthy. Do you want that to happen? Remember, you are a student. Your mission is to learn, and failing is a part of that. If you can show that what you used to be is not what you are now, I see no reason why the prof wouldn't accept you.
tl;dr:
>don't mention your grades unless asked and then show that you have improved from those days but don't lie

We've been looking at this all wrong. We shouldn't invest in making penises bigger, we should invest in making bussies smaller

>>8163722
A kids consent doesn't mean anything, kids can be controlled and manipulated, they can't make rational decisions like grown ups. Homosexuality usually means an attraction between persons of the same sex, as in two consenting adults with enough maturity to make the decision.

What two consenting rational human beings do in the private of their own home shouldn't matter at all to other people. People taking advantage of easily manipulated kids should matter to us. This seems pretty easy to understand, one is morally wrong the other is just pretty nasty if your not into it.

Also, what kind of sperg uses the term "greetings"

I think it depends on the choice function t. For any reasonable choice function, there is a turing machine that computates the number given by H and the proof that it does is smaller than 10100 characters. However of course, you could choose a t that gives you f_2,1:=F^n(101000) or some shit, so I guess it's not clear wich is bigger. Mine is dependend on the choice function t while his is dependend on the implicit goedelization, so yeah, I guess there is no way to tell without fixing the t and the goedelization.

>>6594651
>>6594717

There are actually female mathematicians. I think in undergrads there are a lot of male students that just do it because they are socially inept and take there pride from being good at math (wich they mostly aren't). This is less common with females. As more of these geeks realize they actually have to work hard and are not gifted in any way, just more ugly, they also get less and it tilts back quite a bit. Of course there are still more males and amongst the really old fucks in our mathematical colloquium there are basically no female fucks, but yeah, I think there are more female mathematicans than one might assume.

Fun Fact: Emmy Noether had no funny name, but was female.

>>6554611
What if P=1? Or What if he reffering to that complexity stuff?