[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.5225205 [View]
File: 351 KB, 1024x768, LIBERALS UPSET BECAUSE THEY CAN'T OUTWRITE ME.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5225205

>Except stereotypes are not inaccurate. There are many different ways to test for the accuracy of stereotypes, because there are many different types or aspects of accuracy. However, one type is quite simple — the correspondence of stereotype beliefs with criteria. If I believe 60% of adult women are over 5' 4" tall, and 56% voted for the Democrat in the last Presidential election, and that 35% of all adult women have college degrees, how well do my beliefs correspond to the actual probabilities? One can do this sort of thing for many different types of groups.

>And lots of scientists have. And you know what they found? That stereotype accuracy — the correspondence of stereotype beliefs with criteria — is one of the largest relationships in all of social psychology. The correlations of stereotypes with criteria range from .4 to over .9, and average almost .8 for cultural stereotypes (the correlation of beliefs that are widely shared with criteria) and.5 for personal stereotypes (the correlation of one individual's stereotypes with criteria, averaged over lots of individuals). The average effect in social psychology is about .20. Stereotypes are more valid than most social psychological hypotheses.

>Which raises a question: Why do so many psychologists emphasize stereotype inaccuracy when the evidence so clearly provides evidence of such high accuracy? Why is there this Extraordinary Scientific Delusion?

[...]

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rabble-rouser/201210/stereotype-inaccuracy

>> No.3636703 [View]
File: 351 KB, 1024x768, 1303454077489.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3636696

>I KNEW THIS REALLY SMART BLACK GUY ONCE, ERGO, THEY'RE ALL SMART!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

You have to watch your retard levels, they're nearing full.

>> No.3539556 [View]
File: 351 KB, 1024x768, 1303454077489.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3539556

>>3539550


So one guy automatically disproves statistics? That's not very scientific of you, that's quite retarded.

>> No.3431367 [View]
File: 351 KB, 1024x768, 1277557350792.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3431367

>>3431356
>it's an interesting thing when a man will defend to the death the group that hates him most- his own.

I know what you mean.

>> No.2458073 [View]
File: 351 KB, 1024x768, 1277557350792.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2458073

around blacks never relax

ni­gge­rs gonna nig

>> No.2068118 [View]
File: 351 KB, 1024x768, 1252475480545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2068118

>>2068111
funny because Black people hold the obesity record in the states.

and virtually none of them are the Nubian goddesses like in your picture.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]