/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11078360
You’re not going to come even close to accomplishing that.

Check the wiki.

>>11078362
most likely, but i still want to try

>>11078285
There will be a catastrophic economic slowdown in our lifetimes due to tech stock speculation.

no

>>11078285
What do you mean lifetime? Are you accounting for the life-extension revolution anon?

>>11078341
>engineer in software
Ah... guess what, compared curriculums and it's software engineer, don't know how I didn't think of that before.

>>11078341
That’s what most CStards are going to do, its just called software engineering, they’re even dumber than CSniggers and often only spend two years at university.

>>11078346
Ah, here software engineering is 5 years and makes emphasis on math.

>>11078346
But what should I pursue if I wanna grasp something deeper than CS or american software engineering related to software development?

>>11078357
computer engineering and then do low level embedded stuff

no admixture from other hominids

>This window will close in 3 seconds...

>>11078258
>>This window will close in 3 seconds...

>>11078258
>announcing a report or sage

>want one of the best modern jobs in the best modern economy in the most prosperous time in human history
>bitch about a company trying to vet you properly

cancer

>get interview for a data science role
>show up an hour and a half late
>they ask me some softball questions about what I like to work on in my spare time
>get the job
>hold a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering
>mfw
>

>>11078195
Do you unironically actually have good professors or something cuz I could only count on one hand how many professors I had that were actually decent in teaching the material

>>11078307
Yeah, i learn stuff all the time, even from the ones that can barely speak English. I even go to a state school lmao

>>11078182
You’re paying to be disrespected by an enormous powerful institution enabled by both the state and legions of upper middle class striver morons.

>>11078182
The trick is to ask questions. People learn differently. Some learn by being explained what to do others learn by being explained what not to do. With room for error ofcourse. Most people learn by excitatory reflexes as you get older they get more attuned or tuned out.

One of my professors whom quit his career to teach always said he had a very smart friend whom went crazy from knowing too much. Ultimately you must create vacant spot for learning. Or else you’ll see yourself playing with acetylcholinase in forcing your brain cells. We first learn through vibration, sound, visual. Then we are told where to put these little symbols and maneuver an idea around. However when we go into a tabula rasa state (all you have learned via memory or repitition is forgotten) we realize we are indulging in our egos. There is nothing there but a ball of mass vibrating sensations. Working upto a headache.

The idea is there are no dumb questions. We can all learn from what not to do as most questions usually involve application. It’s presumptuous for a professor to get mad because they wouldn’t be applying the basic fundamentals of learning. Some people need sensationalization its serves its purpose in better memory preservation. But some are just numb from the repetitive cycles unless they keep their life in margin with new discoveries (incl history) applications and even applicative formats (styles). Means they are dedicated to what they do inside and outside the classroom. What I realize looking at Asian math that they don’t treat their numbers as definite but indefinite. Perhaps there is a psychology behind it.

>>11078331
It Latin America they teach numbers with Roman numeral applications. Another theory. They don’t really teach fundamentals in US education or theory. Just application for work. And lots of neglected presumptions. I guess it’s all introduction. You won’t need to apply it fully until your job entitles it. However then you realize you are familiar with some of the stuff. And good to know you at least know the basics. You won’t remember four full years of school completely. It’s not expected.

>>11078177
another bump for science and percieved observed values

>>11078177
bamp

>>11078201
>>11078207
>>11078213
This is a slow board, you don't have to bump it every minutes, everyone will be able to see your shipost don't worry

>>11078232

>>11078177

>>11078175
ayylon on suiwatch

>>11078193
Everything depends on scale. Artificial meat vs plant-based meat is a good example. Doesn't matter if your SV startup can make some lab meat when the competition is pumping their product through every fast food joint in the world.

Waymo is slow to scale.

>>11078174
thank you

You don't

>>11078165
I think you could get better answers if you specify where did you fell behind and which level do you want to catch up to.

>>11078165
sabotage everyone else

>>11078165
>studying
>not deriving everything from first principles during the test

>>11078087

>>11078250
It's funny, the forehead is literally the home of the prefrontal cortex (the third eye), and exactly where one would put an enhancement chip if one had the capacity to.

Oh the irony. However, there are other alternatives, like putting one in the spinal cortex like in that series altered carbon. Then what? No more prophecy.

>>11078167
You can't steal it from a distance if it uses public key crypto to prevent replay attacks
> implying it will
Who am I kidding..?

>>11078167
>t. doesnt know the first thing about cryptography

>>11078272
>>11078279
It is the same shit as cards which security lasted like 3 months before being released.

Multiresistant bacterial strains, impaired immune systems, mentally ill people and drug addicts that do not seek help until it's too late.

>>11078054
If you got into your school's minimum grade for STEM you'll be fine
If you want to be smart in STEM subjects in general you're no fucking good until you finish a STEM course and contribute anything meaningful to Science for future (You)s to ask the same fucking question in an Anonymous Mongolian basketweaving forum

>worst sat score was in stem
>go into stem field anyway
>will have degree by next spring

>>11078034
>david icke
Nice try reptillian

>>11078034
>Scientists believe we are living in a simulation.
no, most scientists don’t
>David Icke
stopped reading there. >>>/x/

>>11078034

>>11078034

>>11078034
Anon. If you only knew.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK_ke_LgOfU

>>11078038
>3 hours go by
>still stuck on question 1
Make sure you have solutions. The only way to get better is to memorize them. Even if you solve a problem yourself, your method will be clumsy as fuck and it is good to have solutions

>>11078059
What kind of problems are you trying to solve?

>>11078019
Thx, how Long would a mathlet need to finish the first two ones?

Also is there a meme Graph with German books?
Oh and are there any good online courses/YouTube playlists/udemy courses (besides Khan Academy)?

>>11078069
Look for whatever you can get over at your university's library and pick what you understand the best.
If you've not touched any Math problems in years, you might want to go hard on studying middle school/high school-level Algebra and Geometry before touching any Calculus books.

>>11078069
>a mathlet
The average mathlet?
>the first two
High School and Freshman?

Around four years, since that's most of the material in your average maths bachelors.

>>11078245

>>11078235
>If you take the government cuckpill, you die waiting for NASA to even build a single ship, let alone a fleet of them*
Fixed that for you.

What do you guys think of this?

>>11078343
Ah interesting, so the ablative layer is what actually forms your combustion chamber and de-laval nozzle? It should work assuming you can quite accurately predict ablation and lay down your ablative walls accordingly, if any ablation is uneven the burning propellant will presumably exacerbate uneven burning creating unequal flow over it's surface as the shape of chamber, throat and bell become distorted.

>>11078361
>Ah interesting, so the ablative layer is what actually forms your combustion chamber and de-laval nozzle?
Thank you, and yes. The idea being that the ablator can be easily made on a lathe and easily integrated into the rest of the engine. Whereas the more typical design for an ablatively cooled engine would have made the ablator from a composite wrap around a mandrel which is then integrated (or even just wrapped on the engine itself) and all of the headaches from having to attach composites to metal.

>It should work assuming you can quite accurately predict ablation and lay down your ablative walls accordingly, if any ablation is uneven the burning propellant will presumably exacerbate uneven burning creating unequal flow over it's surface as the shape of chamber, throat and bell become distorted.
That is an issue, but I believe that this design can be made robust enough. Also, most of the understanding on how ablators behave require extensive testing which this design is suited for with how easy it is to replace the ablator. The design probably isn't really suited for a rocket, but could work as a test stand article to train on and study liquid propellant engines.

lemme git gud

Don't you just pee it out without it breaking down ?

>>11078101
>>11078111
>search it
>only reference is another /sci/ thread
Wot m8, is this a new schizo meme I dont know about?

>>11078133
that can’t be blue board safe, delet before ban

>>11078005
It should be context dependent. Scientists have to present a position on issues of health, climate change etc, that requires expert opinion. Even based in fact, they need to present opinion
In the more causal, it's fine to slip a joke in about congress or the token celeb face for either party during a talk or whatever, so long as it's not detracting from the science they are they to convey. The detraction I assign to the presenter, most people aren't going to fixate on one joke about their topic of triggering, and those that do are ignoring the science, so the presenter has to present appropriately.
OP pic is fine, because there is no good scientific justification for patriarchal societies. It's fine then for the scientists to commune it is not a scientifically defensible thing. People that reject the science because it hurts their feelings

>>11078005
Science in a free economy is already hierarchical when grounded by a high ceiling of mathematical encryption. It already has its own system.

>>11078005
No. Science itself is apolitical. People can do whatever they want in free time.

>>11078096
>secretly
Anon, I...

>>11078092

I can't agree with this. I would unironically rather be on the street than not have my fucking mind.

>>11077983
The same thing that happens after every injury. It desperately tries to recover.

>>11077983
Psychiatrist gets paid

>>11078114
ironic