/sci/ - Science & Math

how did he get to that number?

>>16148199
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40222341-the-complete-guide-to-perspective-drawing

for more wisdom visit my blog (google the name)

>>16148183
>more fractions
Why does you division look so fucked up?!

>>16148183
Is this really worth your time? Did you skip that much in middle school? Are you following a website or something?

>>16148196
Thanks anon

>>16148201
I'm just following the khan academy courses. I'm just doing everything in order so it's
>arithmetic
>basic geometry
>pre algebra
>algebra basics
>algebra 1
>high school geometry
>algebra 2
>trigonometry
>statistics and probability
>high school statistics
>college statistics
>college algebra
>precalculus
>differential calculus
>integral calculus
>college calculus ab
>college calculus bc
>calculus 1
>calculus 2

Probably going to take way too long to go through all of them....

>>16148216
I'm just studying one hour everyday so its not that much time. Yes I feel like I basically retained nothing all through elementary school, middle school highschool and college. I was a terrible student and never did shit because I hated school.

>>16148128
Technically a bit, in that quantum tunneling plays a (small, but measured) role in the electron transport chain during cellular respiration, and the exchange force of oxygen in rbc. Standard simple quantum chemistry.
But I'm sure that what this bait thread actually wanted to say is that Entanglement plays a major role in consciousness. And for that, the answer is plain no.

>>16148172 me
>that's a bitch position unworthy of respect.
more clearly that rocks or power grids have consciousness

Penrose's theory is false, and the fact that he actually knows something about quantum shit only makes it worse because it gives ammo to Deepak Chopra types.

>>16148193
even if it were true, that still doesn't imply synthetic brains aren't possible, as we could just add the required quantum effects. my concern is less with how exactly and more with how do we make it last way longer.

even if consciousness is "enabled" to some quantum effect, (You) are still encoded as the memories and experiences which shaped who you are. quantum effects aside. even if consciousness would be enabled to quantum effects, doesn't prove it ties you to some unique soul. may be just a required condition to enable our conscious state. it's still determined by the matter arrangement lol

for me, it's money

>>16148102
stress lines on our forehead from always being the smartest person in the room

>>16148102
Constantly feeling like a retard because you have more awareness of how little you actually know and how little you actually understand.

>>16148014
lower thermal resistance between brain and ambient

>>16148057
>STEMcels now cope as high T
KEK

>>16148014
They're bald so they have to compensate by being scifi smart

this is the truth everybody knows this

>>16148075
Tooker is batshit crazy.

>>16148014
smart people don't take dht blockers because it will cause early onset dementia in those prone to it.

If you define human as "Homo sapiens", then yes. Homo sapiens interbred with other species of humans such as Neanderthals and Denisovans

>>16147992
Yeah, they're called black "people"

I just want a human/chimp kid, is that so bad?

>>16148083
good luck getting a human gf

>>16148090
its ok the chimps will do

>>16147971
depends on activity. if chilling at home easy mode daily doesn't make sense.
if you slaving on plantation you better take a shower you smelly fuck.
also take a shower before sex no matter what.

>>16148069
stinky post

>>16147996
This.
>>16148069
Sweat, masturbation, touching hair etc.

Incorrect. It reduces the risk of prostate cancer.

>>16147971
I don't think you're going to win over 4chan with daily showers m8. Men in general aren't known for personal hygiene and particularly nerds insecure about their masculinity may refuse to wash properly because it's gay.

>Posting fake quotes on the internet

What's funny is you actually want the small guy in front
That's the legend himself Charles Proteus Steinmetz.
Look upon him in awe he took tesla's intuited knowledge about electricity and made it something mortals could comprehend.

>>16147925
yes but how TF did Tesla intuit that shit? He invented it from nothing.

>>16147925
rare based mutant

>>16147925
>Charles Proteus Steinmetz
what a goddamn chad. Peter Dinklage (our gens midg chad) needs to play him in a biopic.

>>16147917
This board doesn’t exist to provide ammunition for your braindead arguments. Fuck off, stop making these threads, and maybe go try look it up yourself

>>16147876
What? There is absolutely no way that Columbia University is "completely free of Jews"...

>>16147876
id suck her cute little chipmunk cunt desu

>>16147876
>this is the best education in the world

>nazis arguing amongst themselves how leftists are the REAL anti-Semites but also Hitler was right but also nazis are leftist but we love nazis because they hate leftists and also Jews, which is good actually when we do it
Christ it's just so tiresome

Why is this thread on /sci/?

Sage

>>16147893
I don’t know why this is the subject de jure here. I guess because your fat uncle Albert saw a graph on his Facebook feed.

>>16147882
It devolves into "you can't prove anything exists" as every philosophical discussion does.

>>16147900
Ironic

>>16147861
but I didn't have global warming.

>>16147844
It's an evolutionary biology question

>>16147854
you're /pol/shilling through your teeth.
>muh jewish fairy tale tards are breeding
>muh idealized asian waifu's aren't breeding
>muh catabolic collapse.
Fuck off.

religions are eugenic vehicles those that embody the ideals of the religion tend to reproduce more
first you must identify the religion and its ideals

>>16147838
>I'm evolutionary terms what's happening to the species?
Brown religious low-IQ conservatives do all the breeding, so that's what's in future for humanity.

>>16147871
>the future is conservative

>>16147772
Radioactive nuclei decay without cause. It's totally spontaneous, totally random.

Everything, besides that, nothing.

The universe.

>>16147772
God

OP posted something sensible but people who replied were tardy and gout. I give up with sci - gonna leave this board today.

Hawking radiation

>>16148151
Every. Single. Time.

>>16148140
it looks blue and white from space. what you posted isnt a satellite image

>>16148164
stop noticing things anti semite

>>16147738
No, you dont learn english as a non english speaking person, you just pick some of it up by watching tv.
the anglo's screaming ESL faggot all the time is just a bonus.

>>16147689
is that why BE4 worse in every concievable way, including ISP?

Remember, it's just a couple of undergrads in a few departments at a small number of schools doing this. It's nothing to worry about. Just stop paying attention to them and you'll have nothing to worry about.

>>16147955

>>16147523
All we can really say is that at some point the universe was a lot smaller. The evidence for this is the CMB, age and types of distant stars, and the fact that the temperature of space throughout the universe is basically the same, because distant points in space are currently too far apart for temperature to be in equilibrium unless at some point they were closer to one another

>>16147615
so there is no evidence that the universe has a beginning at all?

>>16147853
No. Just that it was smaller. And because of the current state of the universe and the way expansion is assumed to work then the universe likely expanded from a very small space, possibly smaller than a single atom. That helps explaining why stuff is so uniform over the whole observable universe, extremely rapid expansion from an extremely small size. That's the big bang theory of course, but it doesn't say where the universe came from, only that at some point about 13 billion years ago it was a tiny ball of pretty much just energy, it was too dense and too hot to form atoms etc. So that ball of energy either appeared out of nowhere, or it was there forever, or it was the end state of a possible previous universe, or some other unknown reason.

>>16147523
one model is that it's pulsing, and could have been for insanely many cycles. supposedly there could be some leakage from previous one, in CMB. but it becomes a question of how much anyway, so we won't be able to peer back 5 cycles ago at some Earth-like planet or something.
or could be like a full reset for everything including causality, right after completely collapsing and right before starting expanding again.

>>16147523
Good question. Led me down a small rabbit hole.
As >>16148020 said, our direct measurements are that the universe was smaller and hotter before, which our models then turn into a timeframe.
But we do also have entropic measurements of the CMB; roughly ~10^89 Kb. It's likely too difficult to create an entropic evolution model into a timeframe, but it should be able to give a maximum constraint. This is where the lack of large primordial black holes plays a big role. As the universe ages, more and more of it will be in large entropy gravity wells. This is a constraint against infinity for our universe.
However, this doesn't necessarily rule out that there was universes before ours, before our cosmic inflation, that kept entropy the same but reduced its density, before our big bang, that returned gravity and black holes to the universe. And there may well be echoes of the prior universe! https://www.livescience.com/63392-black-holes-from-past-universes.html