[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 52 KB, 220x314, 220px-Philipp_Mainlaender.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9912076 No.9912076 [Reply] [Original]

Why there are so few authors holding negative opinions on sexuality in general? It isn't hard to see how stupid the act of sex really is, but most of the great authors were libertines or at least saw sex as a positive thing.

>> No.9912085

Why is it stupid?

>> No.9912091

Seems to me that for whatever reasons the sexual component of our lives is beyond reproach and has good thinkers spinning fairytales to place it in good stead. They probably understand that it must be this way.

>> No.9912095

>>9912076
Because literature was their way to a wet groupie pussy. It's been like this since ovidius.

>> No.9912106 [DELETED] 

>>9912085
Look at who does it:
Libcucks
women
niggers
kikes

A disgusting act

>> No.9912108

>>9912076
because sex is necessary for humanity to exist and therefore pretty fucking important you virg

>> No.9912111

>>9912085
Just think about it. Imagine a guy pounding a girl. Imagine his dog-like movements and how he is completely devoted to them. There isn't anything beautiful about it.
I'm not even talking about the implications of depravity or reproduction or anything like that, only only of the act of sex.

>> No.9912118

Thoreau is your guy

>> No.9912120

>>9912111
>posts most antinatalist philosopher ever (even took the 'kys' meme seriously)
>I'm totally not talking about reproduction here

>> No.9912126

>>9912120
I tried to articulate on how I think that sex is stupid. I could go on discussing it's implications, but I don't think that this is even needed, given how stupid the pure act of it already is.

>> No.9912129

>be ugly
>never get a girlfriend
>never have sex
>decide that means sex is bad

hmmm

>> No.9912130

most authors are slaves to the demiurge and they want his realm to appear as worthwhile as possible, so attacking sex would be counterproductive for them

>> No.9912136

Not much to say about sex. Take it in moderation, that's about it.

>> No.9912137 [DELETED] 

>>9912111
The fantasy is in your head. What you get off on is in your head. On your account, giving your dying mom a hug is 'stupid', because it's just 'movements'

>> No.9912154

>>9912126
its only stupid if you want to crater the human race like an incel faggot. Otherwise in its fragile indignity its beautiful as we're made to lower ourselves to complete wretches to promote the gift of life.

>> No.9912183

>>9912137
Hugging is beautiful. From opening your arms up to another person, exposing yourself like carnivore would do in an act of submission, to the contact of the bodies (that is intimate, but at the same time immaculate) and the pressure exerted in the hugging itself. Sex is like a hug, but with some retarded ass pounding that means nothing thrown in the middle of it.
A video of two monkeys hugging would be a joy to see, but a video of they having sex would be just funny at best, disgusting at worst.

>> No.9912256

Agreed OP. Sex is merely an addiction that is innate. Like any addiction its completely undignified and pathetic to anyone who recognizes it as an addiction.

>> No.9912267 [DELETED] 

>>9912076
Kevin Mcdonald actually has some interesting points on this in Culture of Critique.

>> No.9912280

>>9912076
Les Fleurs du Mal

>> No.9912428

>>9912267
out, shill, out

>> No.9913111

>>9912076
Most of the greatest Western thinkers were either bachelors or completely celibate.

>> No.9913117

>>9912076
few authors hold negative opinions on sex because humans generally like sex because its pretty amazing if you do it right. Very simple.