[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 10 KB, 279x200, aaaaaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505313 No.8505313 [Reply] [Original]

All I have to do is look up a thesarus, throw a bunch of terms together i.e fancy words and then i will be celebrated like he is

>> No.8505327

>>8505313
You don't understand his conception of what philosophy is and what concept-creation entails.

Go back to /r9k/ and /pol/ and stick to your SJW, cuck, Chad, Stacy, roastie, shill, etc. terms

>> No.8505331

>>8505313
Anon its ok to admit you're not intelligent and that there's some writers you just can't understand. Everyone has their limits, for some they can't walk and for you its advanced philosophy, you're no less valuable as a person

>> No.8505333

>>8505327

Deleuze is someone that said little by saying alot

Wittgenstein was someone that said alot by saying little

>> No.8505339

>>8505333
2/10, too obvious

>> No.8505342

>>8505331
>you're no less valuable as a person
Triggered.

>> No.8505343

>>8505331
it doesn't take "intelligence" to understand Deleuze

describe to me Grothendieck's concept of Schemes and how it relates to Algebraic Geometry, what are the Sheaves as well


Oh sorry your not smart enough to understand that

you realize how silly your argument is

>> No.8505348

>>8505339
there is a reason why Wittgenstein is celebrated as the greatest philosopher of the 20th century

and Deleuze isnt even in the top 20

>> No.8505370

>>8505343
The difference is quite clear in that I've never made any slight attempt to read Grothedieck, if you were intelligent however I wouldn't even need to clarify that

>> No.8505371

>>8505343
>>8505348
Holy fuck! /lit/ absolutely BTFO

Will they ever recover?

Rationality and logic: 1
Women and nonwhites: 0

>> No.8505375

>>8505348
>Deleuze isnt even in the top 20 of philosophers in the century of Deleuze.

>> No.8505418

>>8505375
lol

telling me i am not intelligent to understand Deleuze

yet you don't know how to describe the equations that Grothendieck used to come up with his concept of Schemes

>> No.8505424

>>8505370
because you don't have any mathematical understanding what so ever

>> No.8505436

>>8505424
No I don't, and since I have mental capacity above a six year old I don't go around telling people which Mathematician is good or bad

>> No.8505452
File: 113 KB, 600x450, Alot-vs-a-lot1-600x450.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505452

>>8505333
>>8505313

Do you people just randomly pick up Anti-Oedipus as a starting book and then enjoy your anger at not understanding anything?

>> No.8505455
File: 249 KB, 406x403, 1440052288370.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505455

>>8505418
>telling me i am not intelligent to understand Deleuze

Bane?

>> No.8505463
File: 6 KB, 393x131, 35e79aec2c29ce5998769b1ecfefe88d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505463

>>8505313
>insecurity, the threat

>> No.8506822

>>8505348
there's a reason why deleuze is the most cited author in the xxi century, alongside with foucault and bourdieu

and wittgenstein isnt even in the top 100

>> No.8506825

>>8505343
>>8505418
Math is for plebs

>> No.8506835

>>8506825
This, its by definition the simplest application of logic