/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.7183876]

What is the most /lit/ pet?

[Anonymous No.7183892]

Any pet that is not a dog is retarded, dogs are the only species we have an evolutionary relationship with. We met thousands of years ago and figured it out we could survive better in this dangerous world together

[Anonymous No.7183893]

>>7183876

[Anonymous No.7183894]

>>7183893
truth

[Anonymous No.7183895]

>>7183892
http://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/essays/cd.aspx

[Anonymous No.7183896]

>>7183892

Dogs are too needy though. Getting a dog means constant responsibility for years and years. Cat's however just do their own thing.

[Anonymous No.7183898]

Rats are the most patrician

[Anonymous No.7183903]

>We have but to glance analytically at the two animals to see the points pile up in favour of the cat. Beauty, which is probably the only thing of any basic significance in all the cosmos, ought to be our chief criterion; and here the cat excels so brilliantly that all comparisons collapse. Some dogs, it is true, have beauty in a very ample degree; but even the highest level of canine beauty falls far below the feline average. The cat is classic whilst the dog is Gothic—nowhere in the animal world can we discover such really Hellenic perfection of form, with anatomy adapted to function, as in the felidae.
>Puss is a Doric temple—an Ionic colonnade—in the utter classicism of its structural and decorative harmonies. And this is just as true kinetically as statically, for art has no parallel for the bewitching grace of the cat’s slightest motion. The sheer, perfect aestheticism of kitty’s lazy stretchings, industrious face-washings, playful rollings, and little involuntary shiftings in sleep is something as keen and vital as the best pastoral poetry or genre painting; whilst the unerring accuracy of his leaping and springing, running and hunting, has an art-value just as high in a more spirited way. But it is his capacity for leisure and repose which makes the cat preëminent.

[Anonymous No.7183911]

>>7183895
>but for the cat I have entertained a particular respect and affection ever since the earliest days of my infancy. In its flawless grace and superior self-sufficiency I have seen a symbol of the perfect beauty and bland impersonality of the universe itself, objectively considered; and in its air of silent mystery there resides for me all the wonder and fascination of the unknown.

If you feel that way about cats you're literally retarded, no way a human with a functioning brain woud describe cats like that...

[Anonymous No.7183917]

>>7183903
>Puss is a Doric temple
Didn't this guy name his cat Niggerman?

[Anonymous No.7183930]

>>7183917
Yes. And he loved that cat. Probably wished that everyone could have one.

[Anonymous No.7184060]

>>7183917
Wasn't his cat technically. But a stray cat that wandered freely in his neighborhood.

[Anonymous No.7184065]

a lobster

[Anonymous No.7184092]

>>7183896
If youre to fat and poor to own a dog then dont. Simple as that. If you dont have the time then dont. Dog is much more of a warriors animal. Cat is for the lazy shit who occasionally thinks "oh shit i haven't fed that thing in like a week, oh fuck the litter box!"

[Twiggy !zf/ZW7mGp6 No.7184104]

shouts outs to hermit crabs

[Anonymous No.7184112]

A horse, by far.

[Anonymous No.7184115]

15 poodles

[Anonymous No.7184169]

I have a ball python

[Anonymous No.7184193]

My aloof cat.

[Anonymous No.7184195]

human

[Anonymous No.7184212]

>>7183893
Nice cover...

[Anonymous No.7184252]

Man.