[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.31 MB, 720x720, fluid druid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7100143 No.7100143 [Reply] [Original]

Who are some authors with weird sexual kinks, like Joyce being somewhat into farts?

>> No.7100157

>>7100143
>Joyce being somewhat into farts
What makes you think this?

>> No.7100158

>>7100157
you new? you new.

>> No.7100161

>>7100157
How do you not know?

>> No.7100164

>>7100158
>>7100161
I've heard this before many times, I've just never read Joyce so I'm not sure if it's just a meme

>> No.7100166

I'm new...

>> No.7100172

>>7100143
>Joyce
>somewhat into farts

The man was pretty huge on farts.

Men with sexual obsessions other than "beautiful women with beautiful bodies and beautiful minds" are the scum of the earth.

They're the ones that would have gotten weeded out in caveman times, getting clubbed and stabbed to death whenever they got caught in the middle of their deviant behavior.

>> No.7100182

>>7100172

I can't tell how you feel about this. Really! You seem to be raging against the main stream and then you take on this righteous tone. Now that I add it up it just kind of sounds like you're a fetishist who hates other fetishists.

>> No.7100187

>>7100182

By mainstream I mean the idea that men should worship women, which isn't actually mainstream but some people think it is, and by righteous tone I mean you suggest it's a good thing fetishists may have been beaten to death

>> No.7100193

>>7100143
I'm a published poet and my entire diet revolves around having the biggest cumshot possible because painting my girlfriend's face is my fetish.
I hope that in the future it'll be possible to look up a person's internet history and they see all my webms on /gif/ and all my posts about being a one man bukkake.

>> No.7100198

>>7100193
>I hope that in the future it'll be possible to look up a person's internet history and they see all my webms on /gif/ and all my posts about being a one man bukkake.
I wouldn't be surprised by this considering scholars have no trouble releasing Joyce's private letters for the world to see.

>> No.7100200

>>7100164
>To NORA
>Dublin 8 December 1909
>My sweet little whorish Nora I did as you told me, you dirty little girl, and pulled myself off twice when I read your letter. I am delighted to see that you do like being fucked arseways. Yes, now I can remember that night when I fucked you for so long backwards. It was the dirtiest fucking I ever gave you, darling. My prick was stuck in you for hours, fucking in and out under your upturned rump. I felt your fat sweaty buttocks under my belly and saw your flushed face and mad eyes. At every fuck I gave you your shameless tongue came bursting out through your lips and if a gave you a bigger stronger fuck than usual, fat dirty farts came spluttering out of your backside. You had an arse full of farts that night, darling, and I fucked them out of you, big fat fellows, long windy ones, quick little merry cracks and a lot of tiny little naughty farties ending in a long gush from your hole. It is wonderful to fuck a farting woman when every fuck drives one out of her. I think I would know Nora's fart anywhere. I think I could pick hers out in a roomful of farting women. It is a rather girlish noise not like the wet windy fart which I imagine fat wives have. It is sudden and dry and dirty like what a bold girl would let off in fun in a school dormitory at night. I hope Nora will let off no end of her farts in my face so that I may know their smell also.

>You say when I go back you will suck me off and you want me to lick your cunt, you little depraved blackguard. I hope you will surprise me some time when I am asleep dressed, steal over to me with a whore's glow in your slumberous eyes, gently undo button after button in the fly of my trousers and gently take out your lover's fat mickey, lap it up in your moist mouth and suck away at it till it gets fatter and stiffer and comes off in your mouth. Sometimes too I shall surprise you asleep, lift up your skirts and open your drawers gently, then lie down gently by you and begin to lick lazily round your bush. You will begin to stir uneasily then I will lick the lips of my darling's cunt. You will begin to groan and grunt and sigh and fart with lust in your sleep. Then I will lick up faster and faster like a ravenous dog until your cunt is a mass of slime and your body wriggling wildly.

>Goodnight, my little farting Nora, my dirty little fuckbird! There is one lovely word, darling, you have underlined to make me pull myself off better. Write me more about that and yourself, sweetly, dirtier, dirtier.

>JIM

http://loveletters.tribe.net/thread/fce72385-b146-4bf2-9d2e-0dfa6ac7142d

>> No.7100205

>>7100182
>You seem to be raging against the main stream
How am I doing that?

>sounds like you're a fetishist who hates other fetishists
I don't know if I sound like that, but I have absolutely zero fetishes.

When I see a beautiful female I can appreciate many things about her.
How her feet/farts/poo/pee would smell is not among those things.

Tbh I feel sorry for fetishists. They have this retarded, uncontrollable (I'm assuming) desire that's a HUGE part of their lives, yet knowledge of this fetish by their peers would very likely completely destroy their social lives.

>> No.7100208

>>7100193
I'm a published author (not prestigiously, but still) and literally all I want in life is to get famous and then leak my weird crazy fetishes to the public, so that women who lust after artsy types will come and indulge them for me.

>Fetishism, for instance, a practice which like most of the sex perversions is confined to men, is clearly a conceptualizing or symbol-making activity. Man’s vastly greater commercial patronage of pornography is analogous. ... Serial or sex murder, like fetishism, is a perversion of male intelligence. It is a criminal abstraction, masculine in its deranged egoism and orderliness. It is the asocial equivalent of philosophy, mathematics and music.

>> No.7100212

>>7100143
This is the letter in question, as you see he is a sodomist:

To NORA
Dublin 8 December 1909
My sweet little whorish Nora I did as you told me, you dirty little girl, and pulled myself off twice when I read your letter. I am delighted to see that you do like being fucked arseways. Yes, now I can remember that night when I fucked you for so long backwards. It was the dirtiest fucking I ever gave you, darling. My prick was stuck in you for hours, fucking in and out under your upturned rump. I felt your fat sweaty buttocks under my belly and saw your flushed face and mad eyes. At every fuck I gave you your shameless tongue came bursting out through your lips and if a gave you a bigger stronger fuck than usual, fat dirty farts came spluttering out of your backside. You had an arse full of farts that night, darling, and I fucked them out of you, big fat fellows, long windy ones, quick little merry cracks and a lot of tiny little naughty farties ending in a long gush from your hole. It is wonderful to fuck a farting woman when every fuck drives one out of her. I think I would know Nora's fart anywhere. I think I could pick hers out in a roomful of farting women. It is a rather girlish noise not like the wet windy fart which I imagine fat wives have. It is sudden and dry and dirty like what a bold girl would let off in fun in a school dormitory at night. I hope Nora will let off no end of her farts in my face so that I may know their smell also.


You say when I go back you will suck me off and you want me to lick your cunt, you little depraved blackguard. I hope you will surprise me some time when I am asleep dressed, steal over to me with a whore's glow in your slumberous eyes, gently undo button after button in the fly of my trousers and gently take out your lover's fat mickey, lap it up in your moist mouth and suck away at it till it gets fatter and stiffer and comes off in your mouth. Sometimes too I shall surprise you asleep, lift up your skirts and open your drawers gently, then lie down gently by you and begin to lick lazily round your bush. You will begin to stir uneasily then I will lick the lips of my darling's cunt. You will begin to groan and grunt and sigh and fart with lust in your sleep. Then I will lick up faster and faster like a ravenous dog until your cunt is a mass of slime and your body wriggling wildly.


Goodnight, my little farting Nora, my dirty little fuckbird! There is one lovely word, darling, you have underlined to make me pull myself off better. Write me more about that and yourself, sweetly, dirtier, dirtier.


JIM

>> No.7100214

>>7100212
see: >>7100200
there's more than one letter where this is evidenced.
delete this.

>> No.7100215

How do fetishes develop?

What does a fetish say about a person?

>> No.7100220

>>7100212
>>7100200
>be woman
>get off mostly from erotica
>date world's most renowned author thinking I'll get some primo erotica
>FARTS FARTS FUCK MY DIRTILY IN THE SHITTER OI M8 FARTS FARTING FARTS ARSE FARTS ARSE SHIT BUTTS ARSE FART

>> No.7100226

>>7100220
Except for fart erotica it was written pretty well. I always found these letters pretty endearing and sweet, if naughty.

>> No.7100229

>>7100220
>The two parts of your body which do dirty things are the loveliest to me. I prefer your arse, darling, to your bubbies because it does such a dirty thing. I love your cunt not so much because it is the part I block but because it does another dirty thing. I could lie frigging all day looking at the divine word you wrote and at the thing you said you would do with your tongue. I wish I could hear your lips spluttering those heavenly exciting filthy words, see your mouth making dirty sounds and noises, feel your body wriggling under me, hear and smell the dirty fat girlish farts going pop pop out of your pretty bare girlish bum and fuck fuck fuck fuck my naughty little hot fuckbird's cunt for ever.

>> No.7100230

>>7100226
>written pretty well
Not at all man.

It was just a bunch of Edwardian-style "yeah baby I'll do this to you and then you do that to me, oh yeah".

>> No.7100313

>>7100230
Who's Edward?

>> No.7100317
File: 193 KB, 800x1127, 800px-Edward_VII_in_coronation_robes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7100317

>>7100313
This is Edward.

>> No.7100320

>>7100317
dang he looks cool

>> No.7100328

>>7100215
My fetish is other people's fetishes. So meta tbh

>> No.7100470

>>7100212
After all that shit he ends it with JIM. Made me chuckle.

>> No.7100473

>>7100205
I'd cure it if I could

>> No.7100475

kafka fapped to sonic porn and some weird shit

>> No.7100508

Murakami obviously has a ear fetish

>> No.7100552
File: 312 KB, 640x384, Le Fart Fetishist Face.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7100552

>>7100229

>tfw no qt3.14 fuckbird

>> No.7100926

bump

>> No.7100991

>>7100143

Well, Marquis de Sade and Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, obviously.

>>7100172

Lrn2tolerance.

And the list of people who would've gotten weeded out in caveman times is pretty damn long, and I don't see how it is in any way relevant today what cavemen would think of your behaviour. Seriously, what were you thinking when you wrote that?

>> No.7101010

>>7100991
>Lrn2tolerance.
I do tolerate people with fetishes, I just pity them.

>And the list of people who would've gotten weeded out in caveman times is pretty damn long, and I don't see how it is in any way relevant today what cavemen would think of your behaviour. Seriously, what were you thinking when you wrote that?
Sometimes people go caveman still.
Especially in non-sissified countries, you'll get a right pounding for being a sexual deviant.

And even in our Western, sissified countries, you'll catch some pretty good flack for being into scat for instance.

>> No.7101013

>>7101010
>being this pleb

>> No.7101020
File: 1 KB, 240x114, 101010.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101020

>>7101010
101010

>> No.7101031

>>7101020
>101020
perfect

>> No.7101042

>>7101010

If you're merely pitying them, scum of the earth seems a hard phrasing.

I see no reason to care enough to pity them. If they're consensual and having fun, why the pity? Seems like misplaced self-righteousness.

>Sometimes people go caveman still.

Some probably do. I don't associate much with slavs or the lower castes though.

>Especially in non-sissified countries, you'll get a right pounding for being a sexual deviant.

Sounds like an awesome dichotomy, care to elaborate on what countries aren't sissified? Poland, perhaps?

Yeah, scat will probably get you branded. It's pretty hardcore too though. Swinging, latex/leather, dominance and submission, bondage etc, not so much though.

Maybe those things are pretty vanilla too, I really couldn't say.

>> No.7101043

Ted Hughes was into bestiality. He tried to get Sylvia involved in it and the experience traumatised her. Even a famous poem that she wrote about, called "Teddy" -
Big bear, bug bear, bear everywhere
Clawing, pawing, mauling
You bastard, you, and Teddy too
For big bear cock
Up my
vagoo

>> No.7101052

>>7101042
>If you're merely pitying them, scum of the earth seems a hard phrasing.
Well I loathe them too.

>I see no reason to care enough to pity them.
You don't have to get exposed to fetishism a great deal to quickly develop a strong opinion about them.

If fetishists cared as little about their precious scat as I care about fetishists, there wouldn't be any fetishists.

>Swinging, latex/leather, dominance and submission, bondage etc
Getting outed for/being open about any of these will undermine your credibility in a hurry.
Depending on your job and social standing, your life as you know it could be ruined.

>> No.7101117

>>7100205
>They have this retarded, uncontrollable (I'm assuming) desire that's a HUGE part of their lives

this is both the crux of your argument and where it falls apart

>> No.7101122

>>7101117
What's wrong with it?

>> No.7101133

>>7101122
the assumption that it's uncontrollable or a huge part of their lives. to the extent that it is, it's no different from ordinary sexual desire, meaning that it isn't to a meaningful extent.

>> No.7101136

>>7101122
I have a couple fetishes but it's not anything at all I can't control.
I don't know, it's like, just a couple things that spice up sexual interaction.
Nothing that major.

>> No.7101139

>>7101133
But it is beyond their control, as far as they know anyway.
They're mentally too weak to recognize that they can simply not have a disgusting fetish. And that's part of the whole problem.

>it's no different from ordinary sexual desire
But it is.
That's why they're fetishes.

>> No.7101146

>>7101136
If your fetish isn't at least at the level of "I want to suck farts out of your dirty ass", then this all doesn't really apply to you.

>> No.7101150

>>7101052
Credibility and social standing are a joke.

If you've gotten yourself into a position wherein your fate is dependant on what other people think of you, then you have made a grave mistake.

>> No.7101152
File: 42 KB, 500x437, 1399562671973.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101152

>>7101150
>Credibility and social standing are a joke.
If you have neither, sure.

>> No.7101159

>>7101152
It's not a schema I, or anyone particularly wise or worthy operates on.

If you're a dickhead, I'll beat you up in a toilet stall m8, I don't care if you're the CEO of shit your pants incorporated. >:^)

>> No.7101163

>>7101159
>If you're a fetishist, I'll beat you up in a toilet stall m8

>> No.7101164

>>7101152

True virtue is better than the appearance of virtue, etc etc

>> No.7101167
File: 28 KB, 540x361, 849079.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101167

>>7100143
idk if these are sexual kinks
>forces his women to take mdma then lack his teeth for hours

>> No.7101168

>>7101164
what?

>> No.7101169

>>7101163
You've sprung my trap, that was my fetish all along!

But only if you're a cute grill in leather thigh-boots

>> No.7101171

>>7100172

tfw I want a patrician mistress to have me on a leash and make me perform cunnilingus/analingus on her continuously before tying me up and riding my dick

Do I qualify for scum that would be stabbed by cavemen if I lived 4000 years ago (lol wtf, srsly)?

>> No.7101175

>>7101168
Basically, just because you're lauded as king shit, doesn't guarantee that anyone outside your bubble of influence will give you the time of day, nor should they.

Especially if you're an obvious louse with entitlement issues.

>> No.7101176

>>7101171
Nah, you're just in the ridiculous category.

If you're in any kind of high-level position, a pic of you in such a situation could ruin your life.

If you're just a common Joe, worst is you'll never live it down with your friends/family.

>> No.7101177

>>7101171
That's normie-tier, tbqh.

>> No.7101181

>>7101175
I have no idea what you're trying to say.

>> No.7101190

>>7101181
Well son, if two people can't explain it to you working in tandem, then you might just be too stupid to understand.

>> No.7101192

>>7101146
http://fetishfuel.wikia.com/wiki/Examples_of_Common_Kinks,_Tropes,_Clich%C3%A9s,_and_Fetishes
1, 2, 10, 13, 14, only a bit of 16/17/18, 19, 24, 37, 45, 47, 48, 49, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 103, 104, 115, 117, 118, 122, 136, 137, 145, 176, ...
most of this is pretty tame
but it's more than just some fart fetish tbh

>> No.7101194

>>7101190
Or maybe you just suck balls at making a point.

>> No.7101200

>>7101194
You aren't getting any more of my time sweetheart, you haven't earned it ;)

>> No.7101205

>>7101146
>>7101136
>If your fetish isn't at least at the level of "I want to suck farts out of your dirty ass", then this all doesn't really apply to you.

such retarded arguments

why would sucking someone farts be inherently prejudicial to one's hapinness? If you don't get sick by smelling farts, and if that leads you to a better sexual experience, really what's the problem?

You can't possibly prove your point, anon, just drop it and save yourself from anonymous embarassment

>> No.7101233

>>7101194
>>7101181

The point is that one should not try to make "credibilty" and "social standings" one's main objective of life, and instead strive to be the best possible version of himself, and only be friends with people with the same mindframe. Giving too much attention to what others think of you will ultimately hinder your own hapinness and personal gain.

That's the whole thing behind the "appear just vs be just" argument in a certain famous Plato dialogue...

>> No.7101234

>>7101200
The only thing I can make out of it is "even if you have social standing, there are lots of people who don't care about you".

A statement which has no point whatsoever.

>>7101205
>what's the problem?
The problem is how pathetic fetishists are, with 99.9999999...% of them desperately try to hide their fetish from family, friends, and acquaintances.
Like I said, I pity and loathe them.

>> No.7101240

>>7101233
>one should not try to make "credibilty" and "social standings" one's main objective of life
I never said otherwise.

>"appear just vs be just"
That's my whole point against fetishists.
Fetishists have to create the appearance that they don't like to suck farts out of dirty asses for sexual pleasure.
They're slaves to the retarded whimsy of their minds.

>> No.7101241

>>7101234
Yeah, because they are fucks like you who will drag them for miles for it.
Besides, it's a private matter entirely, and I don't see the issue at all with having secrets such as these, esp. about an issue as intimate as sex.

>> No.7101244

>>7101241
>fucks like you who will drag them for miles for it
Actually, I'll be one of the people trying to do damage control for them.
But stay angry I guess.

>> No.7101251

>>7101244
By doing what exactly? You gonna hold some intervention for them?
Why give so much of a shit about it?

>> No.7101255

>>7101234

Social standing is only useful when dealing with people who are playing by your rules: and anyone can drop the game at any time, and decide you aren't worth shit, and they'd be perfectly within their rights, whether this context is a boardroom meeting or an argument in a bar.

Real respect: the kind that isn't just feigned, comes from personal qualities with worth beyond money and "being the boss": Being in charge is not the same as being worthy of loyalty or respect.

>> No.7101259

>>7101176

K. Thanks for the righteous judgement.

I doubt your presumptions though. Where are you from? Seems to me to be a country with a hilarious sense of faux machismo.

>>7101177

I actually thought so too.

>> No.7101261

>>7101234

>how pathetic fetishists are
>I pity and loathe them

good god how many fedoras do you keep in your closet?

>Fetishists have to create the appearance that they don't like to suck farts out of dirty asses for sexual pleasure.They're slaves to the retarded whimsy of their minds.

yes, they have to "create the appearance" of being "normal" and "adjusted" with every fiber of their body, otherwise their mental health issues will manifest themselves and they won't be able to control their urges to smell dat ass.

or maybe they just like to do that in the bedroom when nobody else is watching, and like any other sane human being on earth they have no need to scream their "quirkiness" to the world.

If a fetish doesnt influence one's ability to enjoy life, how is it any bad?

Again, you are just embarassing yourself with your edgy and poorly constructed views.

>> No.7101270

>Kafka
> Feminization

>> No.7101294

>>7101251
If an acquaintance of mine got outed for having a fart-sucking fetish for instance, I'll try to downplay the hilarity when people are making fun.

>>7101255
Now I know why you weren't making sense to me: you think in purple prose.

>>7101259
>K. Thanks for the righteous judgement.
Because it's not ridiculous for a man to want to be leashed and punished by a woman?

That shit is a staple of comedy.

>>7101261
>If a fetish doesnt influence one's ability to enjoy life, how is it any bad?
I'm not making a judgment call about it being "bad".
I'm just saying it's a loathsome thing. And fetishists themselves agree, or they wouldn't be trying to hide that shit from the people around them.

>> No.7101308

>>7100200
DELETE THIS

>> No.7101310

178, 180, 181, 182, 183, 189, 195, 201, 203, 204, 205, 209, 212, 215, 220, 221, 223, 224, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 233, 237, 238, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 260, 261, 279, 281, 287, 288, 289, 291, 294, 296, 297, 298, 300, 309, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 321, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 332, 333, 336, 337, 338, 339, 341, 342, 344, 346, 347, 348, 352, 357, 364, 365, 266, 267, 368, 369, 370, 374, 380, 381, 383, 384, 391, 393, 396, 399, 401, 402, 405, 408, 409

>> No.7101321

>>7101294
>I'm just saying it's a loathsome thing

ok, how is it loathsome then?
What is "loathsome"? Something that society chastises in the individual?

If that is your definition, then we can always say that what society says or thinks about an individual is of little importance, since a lot of society's customs are known to be ridiculous and far removed from what is rationally "good".

Or you could define loathsome as being something truly Bad (in the metaphysical sense) that causes hatred and/or disgust in any man, and obviously that is not the case since many people who doesn't like smelling butts are tying to argue in favour of smelling said behinds.

>> No.7101325

>>7101321
>ok, how is it loathsome then?
Farts are gaseous waste.
It smells bad.
You're not supposed to like the smell, as it indicates something that is bad for you.

So when someone likes to suck farts (to get a boner no less), that's pretty loathsome to me.

>> No.7101355

>>7101325
People do all sorts of things that are objectively worse for them than huffing fart gas without attracting much malign attention.

Like smoking and drinking to excess.

Can you as such see the flaw in that logic?

Furthermore, your insistance on your/society's reaction being a logical one, rather than as I suspect it to be: a largely instinctual and reflexive one, makes me question your angle of attack regarding this subject: fetishism is not logical.

>> No.7101361

>>7101325
>It smells bad
>purely subjective judgments that mean nothing
great thread guys

>> No.7101364

>>7101355
And likewise, heavy smokers and drinkers will try to hide their excesses to escape stigmatization.

What aren't you understanding here?

>>7101361
Lol.
Except this kind of bad smell is an evolutionary trait.

You're supposed to avoid shit to stay healthy, that's why we evolved to dislike its smell.

>> No.7101367

>>7100143
W2c qt?

>> No.7101382

>>7101364
You clearly associate with an entirely different sort of people.

Most of my immediate acquaintances are quite open about their vices and proclivities: they are bold vigorous folk who feel no shame.

>> No.7101383

Basing your aesthetics off evolutionary instincts is top pleb, just to let you know.
Also, aesthetics > ethics

>> No.7101398
File: 90 KB, 511x448, 1430371859123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101398

John Green is a cuckold. He'd eat cum-ridden cereal out of an unwashed bowl. His wife walks all over him and keeps him on a leash. This is apparent in videos with them where he acts as if around his scorning mother. Some say he gets audience pussy, but the truth is he is the pussy.

>> No.7101405

>>7101398
why care tbh

>> No.7101407

>>7101382
Are you trying to tell me it's a good thing, or even a common thing to openly talk about how you like to suck farts out of assholes?

>> No.7101408

>>7101405
its the thread about caring about this tbh fam

>> No.7101409
File: 14 KB, 207x212, 1439485781299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101409

Discussions like this make me feel pretty good about my fetishes, I'm normie-tier af tbqh fam. I like feet, asses, pretty hair, jewellry, redheads, and petite girls. Shit, I could still whack it to a Macy's catalog

>> No.7101418

>>7101398
>having sex with someone is like eating cheerios
He sounds like a 2006 Guido.

>> No.7101423

>>7101364
Actually, most peopel I know will be pretty open about other vices (like vidya, drugs, even masturbation) if asked while doing absolutely NOTHING to hide common / accepted ones, like drinking or smoking (both fags and weed).

Also, I have talked about fetishes with all of my closest friends, I even dated a girl from college for a while based on that.

You just sound like some bible-ring repressed fuck who thinks sex should only be had with the lights off, for reproduction purposes.

>>7101383
This man gets it, railing on fetishes is the equivalent of avoiding Ulysses or modern art because "It's weird"

>>7101407
It's common enough, workmates discuss this sort of thing, tbh. Also, it's not good or bad, unless you go anal about it.

>> No.7101424

>>7101418
...in that each time the bowl of cereal is pretty much just as good as the first

>> No.7101428

Proust enjoyed impaling rats with nails, then he would masturbate over them.

>> No.7101429

>>7101423
>doing absolutely NOTHING to hide common / accepted ones, like drinking or smoking
Drinking is socially accepted, yes.
Being a drunk isn't.

>It's common enough, workmates discuss this sort of thing
Workmates will NOT say things like "Yeah, I like to suck farts out of assholes."
Not unironically.

>> No.7101433

>>7100220
DOVER
O
V
E
R

>> No.7101434

>>7101429
>bible-ring

>> No.7101450

it is shameful that the Joyce letter was published. I do miss the sensibility that forced De Quincey to thus hesitate:

I here present you, courteous reader, with the record of a
remarkable period in my life: according to my application of it, I
trust that it will prove not merely an interesting record, but in a
considerable degree useful and instructive. In THAT hope it is that
I have drawn it up; and THAT must be my apology for breaking through
that delicate and honourable reserve which, for the most part,
restrains us from the public exposure of our own errors and
infirmities. Nothing, indeed, is more revolting to English feelings
than the spectacle of a human being obtruding on our notice his
moral ulcers or scars, and tearing away that "decent drapery" which
time or indulgence to human frailty may have drawn over them;
accordingly, the greater part of OUR confessions (that is,
spontaneous and extra-judicial confessions) proceed from demireps,
adventurers, or swindlers: and for any such acts of gratuitous
self-humiliation from those who can be supposed in sympathy with the
decent and self-respecting part of society, we must look to French
literature, or to that part of the German which is tainted with the
spurious and defective sensibility of the French. All this I feel
so forcibly, and so nervously am I alive to reproach of this
tendency, that I have for many months hesitated about the propriety
of allowing this or any part of my narrative to come before the
public eye until after my death (when, for many reasons, the whole
will be published); and it is not without an anxious review of the
reasons for and against this step that I have at last concluded on
taking it.

Guilt and misery shrink, by a natural instinct, from public notice:
they court privacy and solitude: and even in their choice of a
grave will sometimes sequester themselves from the general
population of the churchyard, as if declining to claim fellowship
with the great family of man, and wishing (in the affecting language
of Mr. Wordsworth)

Humbly to express
A penitential loneliness.

It is well, upon the whole, and for the interest of us all, that it
should be so: nor would I willingly in my own person manifest a
disregard of such salutary feelings, nor in act or word do anything
to weaken them; but, on the one hand, as my self-accusation does not
amount to a confession of guilt, so, on the other, it is possible
that, if it DID, the benefit resulting to others from the record of
an experience purchased at so heavy a price might compensate, by a
vast overbalance, for any violence done to the feelings I have
noticed, and justify a breach of the general rule.

In Joyce's case we cannot say that this was altogether worth it for the "benefit resulting to others". We had only our damned curiosity to satiate.

>> No.7101514

>>7101294

>Because it's not ridiculous for a man to want to be leashed and punished by a woman?

There's actually no punishment in it. But since you consider cunnilingus inherently degrading, I'm guessing you're eastern European or from the Balkans. Am I right, or not even close?

>> No.7101521

>>7101514
>There's actually no punishment in it.
You said you were on a leash and being forced to perform cunnilingus.
Sounded like "punishment" to me. The kind of punishment meant to give men boners.

>> No.7101537

>>7101521

Different perspectives I guess. Forcefulness is hot. Punishment isn't.

Verbal degradation is instant boner-kill to me.

>> No.7101540

>>7101537
You're arguing semantics.

When you as a human get put on a leash, that alone constitutes some kind of punishment.

>> No.7101553

>>7100200

With the 1st one he is toying and teasing her with the terror of gossip, notice the 3rd person

>I think I would know Nora's fart anywhere.

She would've been terrorized by the notion that he goes around saying this, or

>I hope Nora will let off no end of her farts in my face so that I may know their smell also.

Which might be a strange Dublinesque sense of humor they developed.

I think it's wicked that we read these letters anyway. Why are they public.

>> No.7101554

I swear this guy must be autistic.

>> No.7101592

nabokov

>> No.7101594

I get the feeling that Ian Fleming enjoys spanking women.

>> No.7101597

>>7101540
Unless it's a reward.

>> No.7101603
File: 205 KB, 620x465, emma-watson_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101603

Fitzgerald had a foot fetish.

I can't blame him, I have a thing for feet too.

>> No.7101606
File: 83 KB, 521x493, Emma-Watson-Feet-1341380.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101606

>>7101603

>> No.7101615

>>7101540
>You're arguing semantics.

What the hell is that even supposed to mean

>> No.7101625

>>7101615
He's being stupid, but that phrase usually means arguing over definitions -- it also usually implies that if the arguers at hand had words that meant separate specific things that in each of their minds means one specific thing, no argument would be going on.
see: http://lesswrong.com/lw/np/disputing_definitions/

>> No.7101648

>>7101597
To some, getting told they've been a bad boy and then whipped is a reward.
It's still stylized punishment.

>> No.7101652

>>7101615
It means he's arguing an irrelevant detail about a word instead of the actual point.

>> No.7101674

>>7101648

>It's still stylized punishment.

>iz a reward
>but iz punishment 2

Why insist
Why

>> No.7101690

>>7101674
Some people like to get "punished", for instance by getting leashed and told what to do.

Sure, in some way it's not really "punishment" when you actually like it, but it's still supposed to be punishment in some way.

Stop arguing this stupid semantic bullshit.

>> No.7101697

>>7101690
No, it's by definition not punishment, even if the actions therein resemble same.

>> No.7101700

>>7101407
Pretty much, yeah.

I've had candid conversations about the pros and cons of banging shemales with my work colleagues, with no unfortunate repercussions.

If you're a born victim of course they'll make fun of you, because they'd find something to make fun of you for anyway.

Hell, I had a perfectly pleasant conversation with a girl from London I'd met at a music festival about how we both fantasize about being gang-raped.

Then I shagged her in my tent and took her to see Rammstein.

It's all about the circles you move in and what level of "realness" is tolerated.

Personally, I like it cranked up to max.

>> No.7101722

>>7101697
>"Yes, punish me mistress!"

Even if he likes it, it's "punishment" in some way or another.

>> No.7101729

>>7101700
>candid conversations about the pros and cons of banging shemales with my work colleagues
>we both fantasize about being gang-raped

Because you were totally being unironic right?

>> No.7101740

I pity people without any fetish. Your potential sexual high is shades below mine, and you probably had/have a boring childhood/uncreative mind.

>> No.7101745

>>7101740
>Your potential sexual high is shades below mine
What makes you think that?

>> No.7101762

>>7101740
>links sex to feces
>thinks others had a warped childhood

Top lel

>> No.7101769

>>7101762
What? I don't link sex to feces and I said they had a BORING childhood, not warped in any way. Reading comprehension of a 5 year old seriously...

>> No.7101770
File: 144 KB, 265x199, Pussy Patrol.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7101770

>>7101729
Deadly serious chap.

They were both quite humorous exchanges, but the best jokes always have a ring of truth.

Plus, genuine folks appreciate the letting down of the mask.

Hell, as a result of my general openness about such topics I've accrued a formidable list of the kinks, perversions and obsessions of my peers, because they know they can confide in me without judgement.

I know who amongst my friends was molested as a child, but secretly gets turned on by it, I know who gets off on wearing women's clothes, and I know who sniffs underpants.

And I neither judge a one, nor disperse their identities, because to me, friendship is still being able to look a person in the eye when the masks come off.

>> No.7101774

>>7101770
Not reading your blog m8

>> No.7101783

>>7101774
A shame, you could benefit from it >:^)

>> No.7101795

>>7101770
yet writers are snitches so they should all be worried

>> No.7101817

>>7101795
An astute observation, but I can live with myself as long as I file off the identifying marks, so to speak.

Archetypes are useful, and the real meat of a human mind is in the things normally kept under wraps.

Everything is fodder for the creative process.

>> No.7101834

>>7101783
lol get fucked rv truck

>> No.7101854

>>7101745
Lets say intimacy is about breaking boundaries with somebody. Sex is a societal taboo, but it's a taboo almost everybody shares in at some point, they just tend not to advertise it too much. A fetish usually involves deeper boundaries, deeper acceptance and so deeper intimacy.

>> No.7101928

>>7101834
You a 'ho, pedalo. >:^)