[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 309 KB, 732x558, hitler-next-to-a-bust-of-nietzsche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6898737 No.6898737 [Reply] [Original]

What would Nietzsche have thought about a version of fascism that was not antisemitic or nationalistic?

>> No.6898740

>>6898737
Fascism is inherently nationalistic

That's what makes it so effective against internationalist globalists and commucuks

>> No.6898743

>>6898737
He would not like it.

>>6898740
>effective
HAHAHA

>> No.6898765

>fascism
>not nationalistic
How would that even work?

>> No.6898766

>>6898737
probably would have disliked anything that involved the state

>> No.6899139
File: 13 KB, 250x400, dead-mussolini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6899139

>>6898740
>Implying that Fascism is effective against anything.

>> No.6899155

>>6898737
>What would Nietzsche have thought about a version of fascism that was not antisemitic or nationalistic?
He wouldn't have thought much of it considering Nietzsche was 'antisemetic'.

>> No.6899174

Would Nietzsche support Authoritarian Communism?

>> No.6899182
File: 28 KB, 233x423, camus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6899182

he'd probably be cool with it or not give a fuck.

this is now a philosopher most like you thread.

for me it's Camus, nihilistic intelligent and witha wicked sense of humor.

>> No.6899183

>>6899174
No, Nietzsche repeatedly stated the moral good of an aristocratic society, as well as the necessity of inequality of men. These are the antithesis of Communism.

>> No.6899211
File: 941 KB, 301x169, nothing like smores made over burning nazis tbh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6899211

>>6898740
>Fascists
>Effective against anything

>> No.6899217

>>6898737
There's no such thing as fascism without antisemitism/racism and nationalism. The only thing you'd have left is heavy industrial accelerationism.

>> No.6899229

Have you guys not read Twilights of the Idols?

He denies any sort of democracy or fascism because they hold poisonous ideals, or "idols" as he calls them. That which denies the real world in hope of a different one.

Nietzsche disregards anything idealistic.

>> No.6899247

>>6899139
Daily reminder that the defeat of Italy was brought to you by the US

Commucucks only scooped Mussolini up after he lost the war.

>> No.6899253

>>6898740
>hardcore class cuckery
>effective for anything except selling out the people you supposedly care about the most

>> No.6899254

>>6898737
Of course he would not like it. Have even read Nietzsche? Are you a pleb? He was also very anti antisemitic.

>> No.6899272

>>6898737
>>6898737
Fascism is about a man or group of men taking charge and advancing the interests of themselves and everyone who serves them.
It's rabble rousing. Mussolini was like a corrupt industrial union leader writ large.
Hitler was a more profoundly dangerous version, because he viewed things on a biological rather than economic level.
Basically, the bill needs to be footed by foreign conquest, or else it's just aristocracy, which the masses would never march for.

Nietzsche would prefer aristocracy, and wars waged by and for aristocratic alliances, not by fascist shepherds on behalf of their sheep.

However, Hitler's rabble rousing might have eventually morphed into an aristocracy. Imagine large numbers of slavic labourers in Germany, like black maids in the old Tom and Jerry cartoons.
German citadels in the Russian wasteland, with illiterate slavs tending the fields.
Segregation, bans on intermarriage, ghettos, elite Aryan society behaving like Russian nobles did in the days of serfdom.
It would be a pretty crude, Dixie style aristocracy, but it would just about inch in.

>> No.6899292

>>6899253
>Calling any other system cuckery

Monogamous relationships are patriarchal in nature and remnants of feudalistic power structures. All true revolutionaries embrace cuckolding comrade.

>> No.6899312
File: 69 KB, 800x500, Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-031-2436-05A,_Russland,_Hinrichtung_von_Partisanen[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6899312

>>6899272
Imagine you are a German officer burning a Belarusian village down. You would get a thousand kicks out of that alone after having read and understood Old Nietzsche. "If you see someone falling then kick him." "Do not act as a slave." Even your beloved murican Southern Gentlemen had some fatherly feelings towards their slaves (look at GwtW). Nietzsche said this is wrong. Herd them into a store house and burn it. Because you can. Because you aren't asking questions. You just jump at your prey, blonde beast.

>> No.6899313

>>6898740
>Fascism is inherently nationalistic
No it isn't. It was created in cosmopolitan Rijeka fior fucks sake

>>6899211
They were pretty effective at taking over Europe.

>> No.6899318

>>6899272
tl;dr, again: Nein, Nietzsche was no Randian. No need to draw on the fantasies of a Robert Harris to make the Nazis conform to you American reading of Nietzsche. It is blatantly wrong and they knew him much better than you.

>> No.6899327

>>6899292
>Monogamous relationships are patriarchal in nature

I disagree.

>remnants of feudalistic power structures

Some "feudalistic power structures" rely on polyandry. This can be seen in Tibet and India.

>> No.6899333

>>6899313
>They were pretty effective at taking over Europe.
It was super effective. The Baltic, Ukrainian and Hungarian fascists still fondly remember their successive take on colonizing delicious Siberian Lebensraum, kek.

>> No.6899339
File: 95 KB, 640x853, 1435979400914.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6899339

>>6899229
Have you not read the doctrine of fascism? It distinctly addresses this exact subject.

>>6899254
>Would Nietzsche like a system of political thought that put him as their godhead, where the heads of state adored his writing, and which tried to incorporate much of his ideas into practice as they could
>"Of course not"

>>6899333
>Lets ignore the elephant in the room to validate my opinions

>> No.6899347

>>6899327
>implying Marz understood how societies outside of Europe were run

I'm paraphrasing Engels who made the quote about monogamous relationships being patriarchal in nature and remnants of feudalistic power structures. You should read your own works.

>> No.6899356

>>6899318

Where are you getting Ayn Rand from? Nothing mentioned in the post has anything to do with libertarianism.

>> No.6899371

>>6899356
You are reducing him to elitism which is nothing out of the usual if you are a hamburger munching Amerifat.

>> No.6899380

>>6899371
>stupid Yurocucks can only speak in memes

What a shocker

>> No.6899397

>>6899183
but isn't the inequality of men what drives the "weaker" to strive to get ahead?

Also do you know where he talks about the aristocratic society?

>> No.6899402

>>6899327
>Some "feudalistic power structures" rely on polyandry. This can be seen in Tibet and India.
Gibe source. All "polyandrous" (i.e. matriarchal with enforced "father"hood) societies I am aware of are either Hunter-Gatherers (the Iroquois), Fishers (the Ede) or some weird-ass shit like Mercenaries (Manipur) whereas where you have Agrarian societies you also have draconic laws on overriding nature's ambiguity in determining fatherhood. That does apply for the China, Greece, Israel, Mesopotamia, Mesoamerica and pretty much every other agrarian society that left any record.
>>6899339
>>Lets ignore the elephant in the room to validate my opinions
Tell him to hoot cause I don't see no elephant.

>> No.6899403

Two responses and the projection levels are off the charts.

>>6899312
"Do dumb thing."
"I am oober."
"These real quote."
"Dodd is get."

>>6899318
Uh, what? I have not read Ayn Rand because I am not a used car dealer from Toppaskocknawaugh, Kansas. Or American.
But I gather it's a capitalistic knockoff of Nietzsche.
What I'm describing is slavery/serfdom, which is non-capitalistic by nature.

>> No.6899407

>>6899402
>with enforced
durr
NO enforced fatherhood

>> No.6899409

>>6899347

>implying Marz understood how societies outside of Europe were run

Marx actually wrote about India, Asia, and Africa.

>I'm paraphrasing Engels who made the quote about monogamous relationships

Engels definitely was an advocate of free love. But Marx was rather conservative in his personal life, and wrote:

>"Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives."

>You should read your own works.

I'm pretty sure I'm not Marx or Engels, so how can they be my work?

>> No.6899416

>>6899402
>Gibe source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry_in_Tibet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyandry_in_India

>> No.6899417

>>6899403
>"Do dumb thing."
>"I am oober."
>"These real quote."
>"Dodd is get."
This is applied Nietzscheanism. Yes. The Marxist were not any better. Same goes to the Utilitarians and Lockeans. How do you kall some dude who follows his Rousseau?
>But I gather
where?
gibe link.

>> No.6899426

>>6899402
I'm obviously referring to the Nazis you dense shit.

>> No.6899429

>>6899416
Das ist kein Source, du Dudelsack.

>> No.6899434

>>6899292
I would describe monogamy as fraternal rather than patriarchal.

It's fundamentally about ending sexual competition between men - there's enough women for every man to take a wife, unlike in polygamous systems which favour the cream of the cream.

Compare Macedonian monarchy and polygamy to urban Greek monogamy and aristocratic councils ("democracy.")

>>6899371
That wasn't me, by the way.
Reducing him to elitism? Reducing him to elitism.
We're talking about politics. His politics were unambiguously elitist.

>> No.6899440

>>6899429
>Das ist kein Source, du Dudelsack.

There are sources at the bottom of each page, you mongoloid.

>> No.6899443

>>6899417
>where?
>gibe link.
Do you really expect me to humour you?

>> No.6899444

>>6898737
Fascism is not antisemitic.

Austria was fascist before the Anschluss and yet there was no anti-jewish discrimination.

>> No.6899447

>>6899426
They have been polyandrous? Because their wives and daughters have been "at the disposal" of Thyssen & Krupp? Stop talking in riddles if you've got anything to say.

>> No.6899461

>>6899409
>Marx actually wrote about India, Asia, and Africa

I know he did, I'm saying he didn't have a good grasp of them besides a rudimentary skim of the surface

>> No.6899475

>>6899440
>you mongoloid.
I indeed am a mongoloid (central asia) and we mongols have been fiercely monogamous as well or this is what Giovanni Carpinus and Rubrouck had to say about our society in the days of Mongol conquest. There: you have two sources in support of a society of genocidal tribal pastoralists being monogamous. You just dropped two wiki links without saying anything as if you had one extra chromosome.

>> No.6899476

>>6899447
I'm very clearly responding to your post >>6899211, and then >>6899333. That's how conversations work.

Like it or not the Nazis took a pretty big chunk of Europe before Stalin stopped them.

Acting like an immature prick isn't funny or intelligent. If you can't carry a simple discussion fuck off.

>> No.6899488

>>6899155
>Nietzsche was 'antisemetic'.

He wasn't. He was anti-antisemite, and he criticized what he saw as the legacy of the Jews, but he also considered most people in his time were a Jewish as the Jews themselves. And he also praised some of the Jews' works, like the Old Testament.

>> No.6899497

>>6899476
The post is not mine, faggot. You should apply eugenics to your balls. Think of the Volksgemeinschaft.

>> No.6899511

>>6899247
The defeat of Italy was pretty much brought to you by Italy.

>> No.6899518

>>6899488
>praised some of the Jews' works
...as faggot slave morality brought from Egypt and enforced upon the heathen masters. That's some praise, yeah.

>> No.6899548

>>6899511
The merryfats have all been spooked out of their wits about the commucucks getting elected in Italy and so they have blessed electoral fraud which encouraged Stalin to act in the very same way in Romania and in the other states in Eastern Europe. I wonder how they've glossed over that episode in the "Orthodox" school of cold war historiography.

>> No.6899563

>>6899518
I see you are so well-trained at not reading things that you couldn't even read my whole post. What are you even doing on /lit ? Making sure the meme "nobody on /lit ever reads" stays accurate ?

>>6899548
I'm just talking about how Mussolini pissed himself when the Allies started debarking on his country from North Africa.

>> No.6899593

>>6899476
The U.S. did more to stop the Nazis

>> No.6899610

>>6899548
The Eastern European states didn't want Stalin or the USSR lording over them

>> No.6899623

>>6899593
And that's just great. Really top class stuff. Gold star, ten thumbs up. You can go home now.

>> No.6899632 [DELETED] 

>>6899593
Yes. Indeed.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Because if they get into power in the first place then they couldn't be "stopped" either, amirite?

>> No.6899633

>>6899623
>i-if only I had a downvote here to make him go away ;_;

>> No.6899640

>>6899632
Can you please articulate your point in your post?

I have no idea what you're trying to tell me.

>> No.6899656

>>6899633
So, are you saying that I use reddit or asking if I do?
Random question - are you good with eye contact?

>> No.6899668

>>6899640
who are you talking to?
>>6899610
red bolshevik herring?

>> No.6899679

>>6899475
>I indeed am a mongoloid (central asia)

I actually meant "mongoloid" in the mentally challenged sense. Though, you could be a mongoloid in both the mental and ethnic sense.

>There: you have two sources in support of a society of genocidal tribal pastoralists being monogamous.

When did I say that tribal pastoralists couldn't be monogamous?

>You just dropped two wiki links without saying anything as if you had one extra chromosome.

Those two links have plenty of sources documenting polyandry in India and Tibet. Apparently you are unable to scroll down and look at links. Let me help you out.

http://www.case.edu/affil/tibet/tibetanSociety/marriage.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/17/world/asia/17polyandry.html

>> No.6899682

>>6899656
Natural extrovert

>> No.6899687

>>6899656
>So, are you saying that I use reddit or asking if I do?
I'm implying that you do? That was very obvious
>Random question - are you good with eye contact?
I'm fantastic, thanks for asking. Are you good at sex?

>> No.6899695

>>6899687
It would have been more obvious if you had said:
"You must use reddit, because..."
And then you would explain why you drew that conclusion.
Why did you draw that conclusion?

>> No.6899703

>>6899695
Because trying to dismiss away conflicting opinions in such a cowardly manner is a very redditesque thing to do

>> No.6899719

>>6899695
No, the implication was very obvious to anybody familiar with 4chan and in full possession of adult reading comprehension skills.

>> No.6899727

>>6899703
Timidly tooting your own horn probably isn't any better.
I wouldn't know, I don't read reddit.

>> No.6899731

>>6899719
And the implication would have been more obvious if it took the form of a non-implied form of communication, known as direct statement.

>> No.6899756

>>6899731
Random question, do you suffer from autism?

>> No.6899804

>>6899756
No. But you suffer from being led around by the nose.

>> No.6899810

>>6899756
>Gets BTFO
>A-autism, right guys?

>> No.6899823

>>6899810
Seriously if you can't understand the implication of that post, you don't belong on a literature board and probably do suffer from Autism.

>> No.6899839

>>6899679
>Those two links have plenty of sources documenting polyandry in India and Tibet.
Polyandry in mercenary India I have linked myself. Above. Sames for fishermen and hunters.
>http://www.case.edu/affil/tibet/tibetanSociety/marriage.htm
>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/17/world/asia/17polyandry.html
Nice googling skills for Trisomy 21.
The article on Tibet is exciting indeed but where are all the "feudalistic power structures relying on polyandry"? Comrade, they are living in monastic communism!

>> No.6899840

>>6899823
He clearly grasped the implication, which was that I have autism.

I have statement for you. I don't really "do" implications.
You want to win pretty badly. You're even willing to invent victories to celebrate.

>> No.6899868

>>6899840
I usually do win threads, I'm already getting ready to notch up another rally mark on my scoreboard.

You didn't understand the post ergo you are bad at comprehension.

quod erat demonstrandum

>> No.6899886

>>6898737
Again stop misinterpreting Nietzsche on nationalism.

He would have liked it, as long as it's goal was to dominate other states.

>> No.6899890

>>6899868
Could you elaborate?

>> No.6899909

>>6899868
If you were going to demonstrate that he was bad at comprehension, doesn't that open you up to conflict of interest to create incomprehensible posts to "win"? Or do you just not understand QED

>> No.6899920

>>6899890
Elaborate on what?

>>6899909
But the post (>>6899633) is clear, therefore this line of questioning only serves to demonstrate a lack of understanding on your part as well.

A further tally mark and QED

>> No.6899934

>>6899839
>Polyandry in mercenary India I have linked myself. Above. Sames for fishermen and hunters.

Cool. I don't really know what that has to do with my argument though.

>Nice googling skills for Trisomy 21.

So now you don't want direct links?

>where are all the "feudalistic power structures relying on polyandry"?

Where it says that polyandry is used to transfer estates and property.

From Goldstein:

>Since both these sons had demand rights over land, the usual stem-family-producing mechanisms such as primogeniture obviously could not operate. Although I cannot discuss in detail the decision-making process, let it suffice to indicate that almost always such a situation resulted in a fraternal polyandrous marriage."

>"Polyandry produces economic units well adapted to complex economic patterns, which in most parts of Tibet included both intensive farming and maintenance of significant herds of yak, sheep, goats, and other animals."

>Comrade, they are living in monastic communism!

But traditional Tibetan society has a variety of social classes. So it fails the basic definition of communism.

>> No.6899937

>>6899920
Or maybe I didn't acquire context because I'm disconnected from the conversation. You just sound like a depressed person being an asshole to avoid his negative feelings.

QED is used in proofs to demonstrate that a mathematical statement is right. Since you're not proving a statement a priori to the statements you're replying to, the analogy doesn't work.

You need to let go of your ego.

>> No.6899955

>>6899937
>Or maybe I didn't acquire context because I'm disconnected from the conversation. You just sound like a depressed person being an asshole to avoid his negative feelings.
>You need to let go of your ego.

Lel, nice reddit tier Internet psychology you try hard, this is all just banter though

>> No.6899956

>>6899920
The aspect of your post you felt I didn't understand.

Or are you on your way out?

The post at issue is not clear because it is not a statement.
If it were a statement it would be:
"You use reddit."
We determined that the second implication behind the statement you implied with the first implication was that my statement was cowardly, in which the post becomes:
"You are a coward."

Which begs the question, what aspect of my praise for your abrupt display of patriotism did you find cowardly?

>> No.6899965

>>6899934
>"Polyandry produces economic units well adapted to complex economic patterns, which in most parts of Tibet included both intensive farming and maintenance of significant herds of yak, sheep, goats, and other animals."
If that's no communism then what?
>But traditional Tibetan society
Try to find Tibet on a map and then return with the name of this highly traditional kingdom (entangled in those "feudal power structures") it belongs to.
http://www.case.edu/affil/tibet/booksAndPapers/old.age.security.pdf
Here you can see they have a village and a monastery. The two classes are peasants and nuns.

>> No.6899977

>>6899937
>QED
What does it mean anyway?
Qambridge Engleesh Dikshanary?
kek.

>> No.6899979

>>6899955
Just trying to help. I think it would help you to let go of all that anger you're holding onto right now. Not concern trolling.

My first reaction to your posting is just not to reply, and one I have no qualms taking at any moment, so if you feel like swinging your ePenis around, you will do it alone.

>> No.6899987

>>6899313
>They were pretty effective at taking over Europe.

So effective, in fact, that Hitler killed himself in despair at having no more lands to conquer.

>> No.6899988

>>6899956
Ah, finally we can get to the point.

You see initially you tried to dismiss me and ask me to go away because of your frustration, a rather cowardly act.

Secondly I said the U.S. did more to defeat the Nazis to way it against your statement that Stalin defeated the Nazis because the Allied war effort included a multitude of nations and factions. My statement was not made out of patriotism, rather it was made to weigh against how ridiculous yours was by being ridiculous in itself.

But once again this is all probably over your head.

>> No.6899995
File: 25 KB, 320x263, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6899995

>>6899979
Thanks for the diagnosis doctor.

>> No.6899996

>>6899977
Quod demonstratum est

Which was to be demonstrated

>> No.6900011

>>6899979
>y-you're mad!

>>6899995
>y-you're from reddit!

Both of you are dumb tbh

>> No.6900022

>>6900011
This thread is one long shitpost of people getting butthurt. Everyone here deserves to be banned.

>> No.6900034

>>6899988
I did not make any statements about World War 2.
You have probably taken me for somebody else.
I dismissed you because your posts are erratic, illogical, and belligerent in a boring way.
Then I asked inane questions in a way that you would reliably find too challenging to ignore.

>> No.6900036

>>6900011
Well at least you can feel superior to both of us.

>> No.6900039

>>6899965
>If that's no communism then what?

Feudalism?

>Try to find Tibet on a map and then return with the name of this highly traditional kingdom (entangled in those "feudal power structures") it belongs to.

I don't see your point. The annexation of Tibet by the PRC doesn't mean that the traditional society of Tibet was completely abolished. These source you just linked was conducted decades after the Dalai Llama left Tibet, yet still shows polyandry existing. Even if it were the case that traditional Tibetan society has ceased existing, it doesn't disprove my argument (that a feudal power structure relied on polyandry).

>Here you can see they have a village and a monastery. The two classes are peasants and nuns.

The paper actually mentions monks and emperors as well. There are also of course Tibetan aristocrats and farmers with varying degrees of wealth.

>> No.6900042

>>6900034
It takes two to tango, and I don't mind chatting

>> No.6900111

>>6900039
>The annexation of Tibet by the PRC doesn't mean that the traditional society of Tibet was completely abolished.
And the best place to learn about the traditional Russian demostroi is, of course, Post-War Stalinism. DUDE
>The paper actually mentions monks and emperors as well. There are also of course Tibetan aristocrats and farmers with varying degrees of wealth.
Where? Saying who established the monastery or what?
>(that a feudal power structure relied on polyandry).
Gibe proof they had electric power transmission in the feudal era. Anyhow. That is ought to prove what altogether again, that if you are Tibetan then Cuckoldry is outlived and reactionary?

>> No.6900128

>>6900042
On 4chan you can even tango alone. (You verbed this word?)

>> No.6900182

>>6900111
>And the best place to learn about the traditional Russian demostroi is, of course, Post-War Stalinism. DUDE

Poor comparison, considering the fact that Russia underwent a vast amount of industrialization, while Tibet is still a fairly rural and agrarian society.

If you seriously believe that polyandry appeared after the annexation of Tibet, you should read more closely.

>Where?
Page 54.

>Gibe proof they had electric power transmission in the feudal era. Anyhow. That is ought to prove what altogether again, that if you are Tibetan then Cuckoldry is outlived and reactionary?

This paragraph is incomprehensible.

>> No.6900203

lmao u guys are such cucks

>> No.6900233
File: 134 KB, 900x535, attach[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6900233

>>6900182
>Page 54.
It says how they call llamas over there and not whether they actually do possess power.
>Poor comparison, considering the fact that Russia underwent a vast amount of industrialization, while Tibet is still a fairly rural and agrarian society.
OK. Take a rural region of Stalin era Russia. What does it teach us about Russian feudalism?
>This paragraph is incomprehensible.
What's a stake? What are you argueing anyway? I join the discussion too late to get what's going on.

>> No.6900240
File: 44 KB, 402x599, salome_ree_nietzsche[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6900240

>>6900203
>the mote and the beam

>> No.6900307

>>6900233
>It says how they call llamas over there and not whether they actually do possess power.

They are called "possessing power" because they are related to Tibetan emperors.

>OK. Take a rural region of Stalin era Russia. What does it teach us about Russian feudalism?

Not much, considering that serfdom was abolished over 50 years before the 1917 Revolution.

>What's a stake? What are you argueing anyway? I join the discussion too late to get what's going on.

If you don't know a person's argument, you shouldn't argue with them.

>> No.6900394

>>6898740
But one of the primary goals of National Socialism was military expansion, imperialism and the unification of Europe under as a single Reich.

>> No.6900429

>>6900240
Fun fact: The two people to the left were not aware of Nietzsches presence when the photo was taken.

>> No.6900440

>>6900429
i'm one sneaky bastard ain't I? heheee

>> No.6900466

>>6898743
>>6899139
>>6899211
>>6899253
Surely you can agree National Socialism was effective against the desolate economic and social conditions of Germany following World War I. Germany had approximately 6-7 million unemployed, the highest recorded amount of unemployment in European history. It had astronomically high Zimbabwe levels of inflation, not to mention tremendous social decay in Berlin (More than 20 different types of prostitutes including 10-12 year old children, bestiality, ect).

Hitler's massive infrastructure projects (Autobahn, planned restructuring of Berlin) lead to employment and unprecedented economic revival to the point in which Germany quickly surpassed its neighbors as one of the most economically powerful nations in Europe.

>> No.6900482

>There's no such thing as fascism without antisemitism/racism and nationalism.

I agree with the Nationalism part, but racism isn't a necessary component of Fascism. Fascism can base its power upon a hatred of other nationalities without involving racism e.g. the French are subhuman and must be dominated as opposed to the blacks or the jews are subhuman and must be dominated.

>> No.6900487

>>6900307
>Not much, considering that serfdom was abolished over 50 years before the 1917 Revolution.
Yuo haev the wisdom of falcon. but i'd have picked something more obscure to consider for no reason at all, like the young pushkin getting measles.
>If you don't know a person's argument, you shouldn't argue with them.
Of course you should if you they are wrong on a particular point. Like "traditional" "feudal power structures" in the People's Republic of China.

>> No.6900497

>>6900429
or his presence with him for the two years following the photo

>> No.6900500

>>6900394
The primary goal of national socialism was the Endsieg.

>> No.6900507

>>6899272
You're right. The only way in which Nietzsche's ideas could be articulated within a political and social system is through a popularist transitionary movement like Fascism. You cannot go from Liberal Democracy to Aristocracy without something in between.

>> No.6900524

>>6899313
>No it isn't. It was created in cosmopolitan Rijeka fior fucks sake

Total non sequitur.