[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 811 KB, 3300x2550, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6277796 No.6277796 [Reply] [Original]

>there are "people" who think Rosa won't win this

Marx-madness.com

>> No.6277810

Why is Subcomandante Marcos there? He's not a marxist, neither is Negri

>> No.6277866
File: 145 KB, 452x750, spurdoclap.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6277866

>>6277810
Stalin is Stalinist okay :DDDDD

>> No.6277869

How come Sartre didn't make the list?

>> No.6277877

>Marxist "people"

>> No.6277920

>>6277796
>Negri
>Zizek
>Debord
>Deleuze
>Stalin out in the first round

Clearly building a socialist state, destroying fascism and inspiring revolutions throughout the world is nowhere near as impressive as writing some wank revisionist theory no one will ever read.

Will American students ever stop pretending to be Marxists?

>> No.6278093
File: 127 KB, 460x594, trotsky (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6278093

>tfw Stalin BTFO

>> No.6278099

On a side note, what the fuck happened to that favorite authors poll? OP got to round three and then just tapered off.

>> No.6278106

ugh, this is pathetic

>> No.6278112

>>6277796
>Soon to be Zizek vs Gramsci
Bets?

Gramsci's a bit out-dated comparatively.

>> No.6278122

>>6278112
Zizek has no place beating either Althusser or Gramsci

>> No.6278127

>>6278122
I would prefer if you did not.

>> No.6278138

>>6277920
truly disgusting results

>> No.6278144

>No James Connolly
>Loads of non-marxists

kay

>> No.6278165
File: 88 KB, 931x924, CAEsf6wUUAAbE3A.jpg-l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6278165

>Reminder that comrade Stalin is back from dead and destroying ISIS

>> No.6279171
File: 1.55 MB, 400x286, 1426538542031.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6279171

>Frankfurt School passes.

>> No.6279208

Was suprised Badiou went out already, Ranciere unfortunately had no chance against Gramsci

>>6277810
How is Negri not a marxist?
>In 1969, together with Oreste Scalzone and Franco Piperno, Negri was one of the founders of the group Potere Operaio (Workers' Power) and the Operaismo (workerist) Communist movement. Potere Operaio disbanded in 1973 and gave rise to the Autonomia Operaia Organizzata (Organised Workers' Autonomy) movement.

>>6277920
>Stalin out in the first round
Teenager detected, I would vote for Laclau "The Revisionist" over Stalin anyday

>>6278112
>>6278122
It's gunna be between Gramsci and Althusser


I think it's going to be Deleuze, Luxembourg, Engels and Lenin in the gang of four.

>> No.6279227

>Federici beat Hampton
>Marcuse beat Firestone
if this ends up being Trotsky vs Zizek i leave the left

>> No.6279230
File: 22 KB, 599x248, B_iunBiUYAIWb-z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6279230

Where's Xi?

>> No.6279235
File: 134 KB, 625x468, e12216778617ac2903c1e62da9151bb130f2590f8b1f2e1e5b1ba15d86ee0cc7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6279235

#TeamGramsci

>> No.6279242

>>6279235
https://libcom.org/library/amadeo-bordiga-myth-antonio-gramsci-john-chiaradia

>> No.6279249

>>6279242
>It demonstrates clearly how that darling of the academic left, Gramsci, was nothing other than Stalin's hatchet man

How is that a bad thing?

>> No.6279266

>>6279242
>https://libcom.org/library/amadeo-bordiga-myth-antonio-gramsci-john-chiaradia
And yet the left Academia keeps on rolling

>> No.6279274

Engels will surely win this right?

>> No.6279281

>>6279242
>>6279266
his being paid of by Stalin does not mean that his theories are any less relevant. Hegel was paid off by the Prussian state.

>> No.6279295

>>6279281
the text isn't just a one sentence "he was paid by Stalin," it focuses on Gramsci's political role in the CPd'I

>> No.6279298
File: 937 KB, 2556x1722, enver-fucking-hoxha.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6279298

>> No.6279324

crowning a champion of Marxism is unmarxist.

checkmate atheists.

>> No.6279390

>>6279324
crowning a champion would be unMarxist. But we're having an election, where the masses decide for themselves (and hopefully it's based on merit and a philosophical basis, not mere popularity)

>vote Mao

>> No.6279401

>>6279390


>merit

sounds like a dogwhistle for hierarchal power structures to me comrade.

>> No.6280306

>>6279298
Victory to Hoxha, and therefore to the Class.

>> No.6280310

>>6279295
Marx's role in the I International was appalling. We still use his ideas as tools to ball peen hammer the rich's babies in their faces.

>> No.6280340

>Bukharin lost in the first round
>every postmodernist won
You are all disgusting.

>> No.6280352

>>6277796
>horkheimer beat bukharin
>slavoj zizek

what

>> No.6280401

>>6280352
Balibar beat Poulantzas, Newton beat Lukacs, Anderson beat Postone, Althusser beat Wright, Benjamin beat James, Guevara beat Hobsbawm, Davis beat Tronti.

Hoxha for win.

>> No.6280423

>>6280340
Pomo's who did not get through:
Ranciere didn't win (Although he was against Gramsci unfortunately)
Spivak
Lefebvre (Never discussed here on /lit/ compared to Althusser)


I just voted for all the today's popular marxist Academics
>>6280352
Nothing wrong with Zizek

>>6280401
>Balibar beat Poulantzas
Will be beaten by Engels, holy fuck why did they Include Engels?
>Althusser beat Wright
Structuralist revival with Balibar, Zizek, Badiou and Ranciere in Academia, no suprise

>> No.6280434

>>6280340
don't like at me, i made a point of voting up every old bolshie possible

>> No.6280442

>>6280423
Lefebvre ain't pomo, bruh.