[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 30 KB, 643x343, Pronouns-HTWG.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6151620 No.6151620 [Reply] [Original]

Why are all popular literary works limited to traditional pronouns?

>> No.6151860
File: 7 KB, 630x152, 1424122287407.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6151860

ftfy
"They" is the gender neutral when addressing a person of unknown sex - of which there are objectively two.

Get over it.

>> No.6151895

>>6151860
why so close minded? genders are just social constructs pleb, if you were right then you might as well get rid of He and She

>> No.6151930
File: 320 KB, 480x480, 1404363378796.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6151930

because people violently reject trannies

>> No.6151947

>>6151930
This is why we need a cultural revolution. look at what capitalism has done to us

>> No.6151954

>>6151895
No.

>> No.6151961

>>6151947
that proletarian ruffian looks quite vital, healthy and sure of his place in the order of things. the tranny pampered by a liberal nanny state, which is to say socialism, looks decadent, frail and useless. so i would say we, in fact, need more capitalism!

>> No.6151972

>>6151620
There is a polish sf book, Perfect Imperfection, that uses non-traditional pronouns for post-human beings.

>> No.6151975

>>6151930
That thing didn't even put its guard up.
I wonder what the context was, though, any link?

>> No.6151980

>>6151947
We already had a cultural revolution in 1968.

>> No.6151982

>>6151620
Half of these looks like nigger slang or weird English accents. I can't believe people sincerely thought of this.

>> No.6151986
File: 66 KB, 800x585, 1349907411066.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6151986

>>6151930
the natural order of things

>> No.6152019

>>6151961
capitalism is why that beautiful soul looked so frail sister, open your eyes

>>6151980
there were no radical changes

>> No.6152073

Number of reasons
>New pronouns are not really in common use
>There are comparatively few trans writers, or writers who would choose to use such pronouns
>Of such writers, even fewer are good/renowned. I'd go so far to say as they don't really exist.
>They mutilate the English language.

>> No.6152290
File: 630 KB, 3872x2592, Be5Uj6q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6152290

>>6151620
"they like themselves" is the chief flaw of the singular they, say "they like their self" or don't use it at all

>> No.6152310

>>6151620
My guess would be, nobody who's proficient enough with their brain to write a "popular literary work" takes this shit seriously.
>bait