[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 57 KB, 541x504, unt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919010 No.5919010 [Reply] [Original]

Need to impress a qt who went to the trouble of learning German just so she could read Hegel, cuz she's a Hegelfag.

What's some philosophy I could bring up to look both brainy and turn her on at the same time?

>> No.5919015

>>5919010
Give her some Popper, because Hegel is unfalsifiable nonsense

UNFALSIFIABLE NONSENSE

I HATE UNFALSIFIABLE NONSENSE

>> No.5919016

>>5919010
She's probably a psuedo-intellectual who feels the need to boast about her "interest in philosophy" just to portray her as not another dumb bitch

>> No.5919017

>>5919010
stirner?

>> No.5919018

>>5919010
Marx since he's the most influential post-Hegelian. But you won't impress her, your wikipedia knowledge won't be new to her at any point. You could try to learn more to hold a decent and insightful conversation with her. It will take time, though.

>> No.5919022

>>5919010
quote stirner in german. something like "your pussy is mine, i simply have to take it as i please"

and then rape her, obviously

>> No.5919027
File: 117 KB, 1024x768, 1415650475182.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919027

>>5919010
You could bring up Hegel. :D

>> No.5919029

hit her with some heidegger and see what happens. nice pic btw.

>> No.5919034

>>5919016
You sound insecure.

>> No.5919043

>>5919010

Talk to her about Schopenhauer

be sure to bring some grapes as a gift

>> No.5919095

Speaking about Freud would give you an excellent possibility to talk about sex.

>> No.5919129

>>5919018
Okay, well I have a date with her this weekend and she has a powerful reputation for dumping guys after the first date (no sex either), so I really need something to work with her since she's the cutiest grrl I've gone out with.

>>5919029
Could you give me a run down of Heidegger?

>>5919095
True, true. Might be a bit silly though.

>> No.5919134

>>5919129
>this weekend
That is to say next weekend, technically. In January.

>> No.5919138

http://www.iep.utm.edu/heidegge/

>> No.5919151

>>5919138
Cool, thanks.

She's read Heidegger, so what aspect of his philosophy should I hit her with? preferably something she would have missed or wouldn't see.

>> No.5919154

>>5919010
Good luck, Anon! I actually had a very similar situation (coincidentally she was a Heideggerfag) and guess what? /lit/ helped me to get laid.

>> No.5919157

>>5919154
splendid!

>> No.5919161
File: 21 KB, 397x322, yeah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919161

>>5919010
You don't understand women, do you?

Let me help you: She doesn't wanna hear you talk. She wants you to listen and respond like you fucking care and understand what she is saying.

It'd help if you were sincere about it, too. You don't have six pack abs, so you can't cut corners. Ask her to tell you about Hegel. Listen. Respond. Ask her out. Only way you're getting that poontang without slipping her a roofie. Since you don't have the balls to just ask her out, facing down a couple of felonies for some cheap sex sounds like it's out of the picture.

Treat her like a human being and be up front with your interests. Dumbass.

>> No.5919168

>>5919161
I already did ask her out and she said yes
>>5919129

>> No.5919179

>>5919168

Sorry, didn't have all the details of your life. My bad.

Cut to the chase. Buy roofies.

>> No.5919190

Kierkegaard is clearly your best bet.

>> No.5919201

>>5919190
hehe

>> No.5919227

>>5919190
Kierkegaard's argument against Hegel was awful.

Hegel
>reason matters
Kierkegaard
>no u fag faith is what matters any decent faith has to be totally and utterly irrational!!11

>> No.5919232

>>5919227
if we're going for hegel influenced thinkers who's OP expressed interest in them will help him get a girl, nothing better than the guy who literally wrote his whole body of work because his qt left him

>> No.5919243

>>5919227
i think the joke is that kierkegaard is the most beta of all philosophers and hardly a turn on.

>> No.5919282

>>5919010

OP, the key to seducing her isn't to impress her, but to be impressed by her. She's put a lot of time and effort into making herself into what she believes to be an intellectual. Flatter that. Ask her questions about Hegel. Rephrase her answers to those questions back at her and get really excited. Apply what you learn and ask for her approval. She'll feel like you "get her."

>> No.5919293
File: 75 KB, 541x504, 1419800840253.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919293

buy her some fucking pants

>> No.5919294

>>5919161
Holy shit. Male feminists actually believe shit like this. I'm fucking crying over here.

>> No.5919302

>>5919282
What exactly do YOU believe an intellectual is?

>> No.5919307

foucault, derrida, deleuze
for leftists

>> No.5919315

>>5919010
Give her a bit of the Kant Hegel Kierkegaard did I just make your nipples hard.

>> No.5919316

>>5919307
She's actually conservative Christian, although she still reads leftist thinkers, especially Marx.

>> No.5919321

>>5919316
is she russian by any chance?

>> No.5919324

>>5919294
>Male feminist
>Recommends date rape

Checks out

>> No.5919326

>>5919315
>all that doubt

>> No.5919331
File: 6 KB, 200x200, hegel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919331

Tell her about dialectics

Bitches love dialectics.

>> No.5919335

>TFW no qt German idealist gf

>> No.5919337

>>5919010
fuck that
just post the bottom half of that picture

she's a mermaid, right?

>> No.5919342 [DELETED] 
File: 79 KB, 500x333, large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919342

>>5919337
not op but enjoy.

>> No.5919350

>>5919342
Is that what vaginas look like?

>> No.5919353

>>5919350
That's what photoshop looks like.

>> No.5919355

>>5919342
do any of you guys see the vagina

>> No.5919360

>>5919350
No they're actually more cylindrical and protrude anywhere from two to twelve inches from the pelvis and are rather fleshy. All the ones I've sucked, anyways.

>> No.5919365

If she's more into the social side, Marx
If more the metaphysical\mystical side, Heidegger

>> No.5919368

>>5919360
>tfw thirteen inches

>> No.5919381

>>5919151
Didn't see this till now. Try on the way to language, "I fear I may destroy what I'm talking about while talking about it" and sit there in silence. If you feeling savvy discuss presencing.

>> No.5919384

>>5919342
apparently not a mermaid
i am disappoint

>> No.5919392

>>5919368
pics or you're lying
nobody i've seen outside of porn has a thirteen inch pussy

>> No.5919397

>>5919384
sorry:(

>> No.5919415

>>5919016
>automatically making assumptions like this when it comes to female readers
I'M NOT SEXIST I SWEAR

>> No.5919420

>>5919415
I doubt he would deny it

>> No.5919428

>>5919294
His fucking post sounded like what an MRA would say
It sounds like something straight from /r/theredpill
The only part of his post that would even be remotely ''feminist'' would be that last sentence about treating her like a human being but that goes without saying for anyone with an ounce of morality.

>> No.5919431

>>5919415
>I'M NOT SEXIST I SWEAR
pretty sure he would cop to that, bub

>> No.5919433

>>5919316
Hit her up with that Dostoevsky bruh
Not philosophy but it's still a safe choice if she has conservative values.

>> No.5919436

>>5919428
>treating her like a human being
>implying all human beings deserve to be treated equally

>> No.5919437

illustrate the dialectical nature of history by slapping her with one hand and then the other

>> No.5919442

>>5919436
>>>/pol/

>> No.5919446

>>5919129
>a run down of Heidegger

lol

>> No.5919448

>>5919227
you're a fucking simpleton if you think his refutation was that shallow

>> No.5919456

>>5919161
>arrogantly says "You don't understand women, do you?"
>proceed to give retarded 4th grade advice

>> No.5919459

>>5919448
you're the only simpleton here, simpleton

>> No.5919464

>>5919227
Kierkegaard's beef with Hegel had nothing to do with rationality, it had to do with the importance of the individual and the minute everyday choices of the individual over the generalizations of the crowd.

>> No.5919467

>>5919442
nice argument
i'm a liberal btw
keep living in that blind, hypocritical generalization of anyone who opposes your opinion of yours, just like the racists and sexists that you combat oh so valiantly. i swear, modern justice advocates are as close-minded and pig-headed as the people they scorn for being close-minded and pig-headed

>> No.5919474

>>5919232
>because his qt left him

But he left Regina, not the other way around. This detail is so important you would think one would remember it even when skimming a Wikipedia page.

>> No.5919475

>>5919467
>>>/pol/

>> No.5919476
File: 36 KB, 400x604, FzpM0H_KvsU.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919476

>>5919010
Is this by any chance the girl you are talking about?

>> No.5919477

>>5919467
>calling me a modern justice advocate simply because I believe men and women should be both treated as human beings
is that really so much to ask?

>> No.5919483

>>5919475
>>>/tumblr/
what business would a liberal such as myself have doing on /pol/?

>> No.5919486

>>5919474
>thinking anyone here has actually read Kierk

>> No.5919488

>>5919467
>I'm a liberal btw
>you're a reactionary btw
>you know you want to be a tripfag btw
>leave this fucking board please just do us a favor btw

>> No.5919491

>>5919483
>>>/leftypol/

>> No.5919494

>>5919477
yes men and women of all races should be treated as humans but believing every human being should be treated equally is absurd. not every human being is the same so why would you treat them all the same?

>> No.5919495

>>5919483
>>>/pol/

>> No.5919496

>>5919486
>thinking you have actually read Kierk

>> No.5919499 [DELETED] 

>>5919477
>Human being treatment includes affirmative action, wealth redistribution, public school victim theories, no fault divorce, and culture of censorship

leftist, not even once

>> No.5919506

>>5919010
Turn to german literature aka Schnitzler. He wrote some 10/10 horny shit

>> No.5919508

>>5919494
Nobody ever talked about treating EVERYONE equally though so you're kind of conversing alone here.

>> No.5919511

>>5919499
how did that follow from his post

>> No.5919513

>>5919496
>anyone

>> No.5919514

>>5919488
i am a liberal though. i voted left last election, will most likely vote clinton next election. i support gay marriage, i'm against guns and religion in government as well as conservative family values. paint me however you like but just remember that you've provided no real argument

>> No.5919517
File: 239 KB, 600x432, 1356827952802.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919517

>>5919514
>will most likely vote clinton next election

>> No.5919518

Cultural Capitalists, please go, you embarrass yourselves

>> No.5919519

>>5919514
>i am a liberal
>votes democrat
>is american

>> No.5919522

>>5919508
okay so what's this whole "treating women like human beings" thing then? why is that relevant when "treating someone like a human being" is different and on an individual-to-individual basis?

>> No.5919529

>>5919302
My use of belief isn't meant to indicate suspicion, but to highlight the psychological element of her practice. I would happily call her an intellectual.

>>5919316
Even better. She'll want to convert you.

>> No.5919531

>>5919519
it's the closest party we have m8

>> No.5919535

>>5919522
So you don't believe we should treat women like human beings yet you call yourself a liberal.
What fucking version of liberalism are you following where human beings don't all benefit from individual rights?

>> No.5919537

>>5919531
>taking either of the major parties seriously
>inb4 you feed me some line about "throwing away your vote"

>> No.5919539

>>5919514
>democrats
>left

>> No.5919540

>>5919514
How the fuck can you be against guns. It's like you're a literal retard.
>Also against conservative family values
Seriously, you should see a shrink. What is wrong with you?

>> No.5919549

>>5919535
Did I miss something because I am pretty sure he said women should be treated like human beings but not every individual person, whether or not that person is a woman, equally. This is reasonable, people like Ann Coulter don't deserve respect.

>> No.5919552

>What's some philosophy I could bring up to look both brainy and turn her on at the same time?

I'm starting to think 4chan is little more than an aggregate of luckless losers. Inexperienced and teenaged males who oscillate from vim to despair, depending on just how likely their current attempts to desperately get laid are.

It's not a big deal. I'm certain I can even bring myself to kind of respect a sad schmoe who needs to (and does) exert so much energy and planning just to get his dick wet, if and when I stop to consider the bastard.

It just disturbs me to know the company I keep--still, glad for the way it explains the board's zeal for Murakami. Mark my words well, guys: there is no piece of ass out there fine enough for a foray, however brief, into Murakami. Respect yourselves.

>> No.5919556

>>5919535
i don't think treating anyone like a human being is relevant because treating someone like a human being is specific to the individual. human beings are all unique therefore should all receive unique treatment, not some generalized idea of what a human being should be treated like.

>>5919537
No I agree, our political parties are a joke but the lesser of two evils etc etc blah blah

>>5919540
this is where a >>>/pol/ would be appropriate

>> No.5919563

Now listen up you mewling infants, I'm only gonna say this once.

Stop putting the pussy on a pedestal.

You maggots aren't REALLY in love with these girls, you're in love with a retarded fantasy existence you've built up around them. "Oh, if only she were mine, my life would finally be complete!" Wrong. You'd just be a loser with a girlfriend, at least until she gets tired of all your co-dependent faggotry and dumps you.

That girl is NOT your perfect soulmate. She's a cock-gobbling whore like all the rest. She farts, she shits, she has stupid opinions. She says things that she thinks are so fucking cute but they only make you want to smash her in the face with a brick.

She's also fucking that other guy, the guy you think is so wrong for her but is actually ten times the man you'll ever be. But you can't see this because you're too blinded by angst and self-pity to realize just how pathetic you really are.

Face it son, you're the 3rd wheel for a reason. Friendzone level 99. Hell, for all intents and purposes you might as well be the gay friend. Why? Because she doesn't even see you as a MAN. And she probably never will if you continue these dumbfuck crybaby circlejerks about all your bullshit heartache and angst.

Here's an idea, man the fuck up and stop romanticizing your failures. Its not too late to grow some hair on your nuts and start taking responsibility for your life. Go out, find a slutty chick, fuck her brains out, repeat. Leave the basement and live a while out in the real world. Then go back and take a hard look at your little fairy fucking princess...I can almost guarantee that you'll realize she's just an average cumfunnel and wonder what the hell you ever saw in her.

Or you can continue whining and feeling like a victim of the world's injustices. I really don't give a shit either way. I've got bitches to fuck.

>> No.5919564

>>5919540
>republicunts

>> No.5919567

>>5919556
literally vote 3rd party

>> No.5919593

>>5919563
https://archive.4plebs.org/s4s/thread/1540115/

almost

>> No.5919605

>>5919556
>human beings are all unique therefore should all receive unique treatment, not some generalized idea of what a human being should be treated like.
So you think the state should go through the trouble of creating a particular set of laws for every individual? You realize that's basically impracticable, right?

>> No.5919617
File: 179 KB, 805x1000, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5919617

>>5919563
This. 2D > 3DPD

>> No.5919633

>>5919605
i said nothing about the state

>> No.5919643

>>5919227
>>5919243

Confirmed retards.

>>5919010
>>5919161

Best advice here sans roofies.

Take interest in her interests as her interests but show more concern about the manner in which she approaches them not the subject-matter itself. You get no points for presenting a hack-job rendition of Hegel's philosophy. You get points for being human and appreciating her as a human. Don't read anything regarding Hegel. Learn it all from her. Don't prepare ready-made questions. If you're interested in philosophy and have in interest in learning more, you'll have sincere and authentic questions to ask when the time comes up. Most importantly, to reiterate, show interest and appreciation in her manner of approaching the topic more so than the topic itself.

Finally, talk about shit other than fucking philosophy. I doubt she just wants to lecture on a date of all places. Make sure you present yourself as someone with genuine interests outside of her but always divert attention from that. It's -her- task to be pretty, not yours. You're above that. You don't have to bring anything to the table other than a genuine or properly faked validation of her.

Oh. And Always Be Closing.

>> No.5919652

>>5919563
well someone knows how to suck all the fun out of the room

>> No.5919663

Ask her if she wants to help take pictures for the revolution by reading Hegel while doing handstands. Tell her pornography and privacy are trappings of the bourgeoisie and to get naked first.

>> No.5919669

>>5919552
+1

Needed to be said.

>> No.5919671

>>5919010
> need to impress
why impress if you can't do it already?

>> No.5919679

>>5919669
+1

>> No.5919682

>>5919552

It took you this long for you to realize this?

We are all losers here.

>> No.5919684

>>5919617
+1
>>5919682
+1

>> No.5919692

>>5919633
Political opinions that fail to address the state are senseless. You either want an impossibility or don't realize why what you want is impossible.

>> No.5919693

>>5919552
>Murakami

Are you objectively an idiot?

Murakami is never discussed here. I keep hearing people say that /lit/ has a hardon for him, and there is no evidence.

>> No.5919731

>>5919693
not anymore discussed at least

>> No.5919772

>>5919556
>i don't think treating anyone like a human being is relevant because treating someone like a human being is specific to the individual. human beings are all unique therefore should all receive unique treatment, not some generalized idea of what a human being should be treated like.
I think this should apply specifically to the education system. Sometimes it feels as if the public education system caters towards the lowest common denominator while the truly gifted ones get neglected.

>> No.5919810

>>5919442
would you treat a paedophile the same way that you treat a small child?

>> No.5919832

>>5919810
most people treat others the way they perceive them. mostly visual. morality is a fiction. etc etc

>> No.5919835

>>5919692
why?
and it's not restricted to "political" opinion. it's a life opinion anon, as it stands alone by itself outside of politics. the idea that every idea has to be applicable to government is silly. the government is not a human, it's an idea itself.

>> No.5920104

>>5919810
Sure, I'd screw a pedophile.

>> No.5920125

>>5919810
yes, why not?

>> No.5920272

>>5919835
If you want to separate your idea of how the world is from the way society is governed, you're going to be very wrong and you'll never get anything done.
Life opinions like that one are vapid.

>> No.5920434

>>5919415
How could I be sexist if it's true? Face it. Women just aren't capable of critical thinking. They have to be spoon fed someone else's ideas and thoughts just to hold "their own" opinion.

I'd rather swallow sulfur than deal with a women who has to show off her "intelligence" all the time

>> No.5920451

>>5920272
all I see are baseless claims anon

>> No.5920497
File: 36 KB, 666x408, Analytic Philosophy vs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5920497

>>5919010
You won't get a qt3.14 by talking about Continentals son.
If you want to get her wet talk to her about Kripke's meaning and necessity. Any Analytic Philosopher will do really. You will be plowing that pussy in no time.

Trust me on this, I have verified this hypothesis many times before.

>> No.5920504

>>5919514
>I am a mindless sheep who can't think for myself

>> No.5920515

>>5919129
The fact that you feel the need to impress her show how bad your going to fail. Just go and have fun, if you blow it so what? Dates and relationships are mutual, if you only give things to her on the first date you've failed, you need to take something out of it as well. Exhaust her someway, preferably physically

>> No.5920518

>>5920434
>Women just aren't capable of critical thinking. They have to be spoon fed someone else's ideas and thoughts just to hold "their own" opinion.

>Thinking men are exempt from this.
Kek.

>> No.5920529

>>5920518
no matter how dumb a man is, at least they can come up with original ideas and not think as concretely as a woman

>> No.5920539
File: 90 KB, 522x436, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5920539

>>5920529
You are far past the point of stupid

>> No.5920552
File: 100 KB, 600x448, thisnigga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5920552

>>5920529
lol holy shit

>> No.5920718
File: 101 KB, 351x398, 096r75edrycgvhbkj.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5920718

>>5919034
>>5919415
>>5920518
>>5920539
>>5920552

>Falling this hard for bait

>> No.5920726
File: 62 KB, 709x765, 1416517875013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5920726

>it's a woman thread

>> No.5923128
File: 752 KB, 646x364, tanya.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5923128

>>5919010
Can anyone name girl in pic?

>> No.5923907

>>5919010
>went to the trouble of learning German just so she could read Hegel

Why do I get the feeling this is more so she can say she can read Hegel in the original German rather than actually getting closer to the original word of someone one might admire?

I don't know if she's more vain or you are for wanting to impress somebody like that. I won't berate somebody for wanting to learn a foreign language for a singular purpose but I earnestly hope she utilizes the full breadth of her knowledge yet I sincerely doubt that will be the case.

>> No.5923915

>>5923907
>Why do I get the feeling this is more so she can say she can read Hegel in the original German rather than actually getting closer to the original word of someone one might admire?
because you want to hold onto your pre-existing misogynist notions. im glad you just went with it and assumed it was true in your next sentence too.

>> No.5923931
File: 543 KB, 1235x1662, 243242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5923931

Bet she doesn't know about Hegels dark side

>> No.5923933

>>5923128
>time for me to get punished...i-i guess..

>> No.5923964
File: 488 KB, 500x333, full.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5923964

>>5919337

>> No.5924001

>>5919552
Who the fuck even brought up Murakami in this thread? If anything you should be saying the exact same thing but about Kant or Hegel.

>> No.5924019

>>5923964
>no penis
I'm sad.

>> No.5924033

>>5919010
Adorno gets you all the chicks you can handle, brah.

>> No.5924064

>>5924033
>post-marxist watered down Frankfurt reactionary
>for a hegelian matriarch

>> No.5924075

>>5923915
Except it has nothing to do with gender; it has to do with sincerity. I know you were too focused on your point of attack to notice, but I considered both she and OP to be equally as vain.

Also this is a literature board. Unless you use proper language skills I won't consider any further replies you make.

>> No.5924079

>>5924064
Frankfurt School were the only ones to actually honor Hegel's legacy you retarded pleb.

>> No.5925755

>>5919514
i enjoyed your post.

>> No.5925983

>>5919010
And did the girl in the photograph impress you with her intellect? You've already lost OP.

>> No.5926292

>>5919540
are you mad?

>> No.5926330

she sounds like a fag find someone normal