[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1.81 MB, 230x250, 1407035385719.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5238766 No.5238766[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Best philosopher ever=Arthur Schopenhauer

FACT

>> No.5238800

>philosophers and philosophy degree holders
>it's a fact because I say so
Why are mathematicians so much superior to philosophers?

>> No.5238802

>>5238800

Why are physicists so much superior to mathmemagaytians?

>> No.5238806

>>5238800

Just so you know, this is /lit/.

>> No.5238807

>>5238802
Physics is just math with more greek letters.

>> No.5238809

>>5238766
>>5238664
Stop samefagging

>> No.5238815

>>5238809

I'm not

>> No.5238839

>>5238800
Why are /sci/fags so insecure? You guys need to go back to your containment board and stop derailing intellectual thought with your empiricism vs. philosophy nonsense

>> No.5238842

>>5238839

This

>> No.5238843

>>5238839

Should I read On the Basis of Morality?

>> No.5238855

I like how this pseudo intellectual board tries to praise these new age philosophers when in reality they're just agreeing with professional politicians.

Really brings to shine the /lit/ community, just hoards of circle jerks and poor posts in attempts to sound clever. There are literally threads dedicated on how to look smart in public and how to be an "intellectual".
As people here like to feel special, it's understandable that this board suffers from so many tripfags and namefags.

With all this comes ignorance and thus denial.

>>5238839
There's the ignorance.
People have to make strawman arguments to fight this so called scientific community of 4chan.
No real arguments against what you call "empiricism" but that doesn't matter, all you're trying to do is save your internet identity.

The IQ here is below /pol/.

>> No.5238856

>>5238839
>empiricism vs. philosophy
as if empiricism isn't a philosophical stance and as if it necessarily leads to a faith in science... science fanatics are juss the worse

>> No.5238857

>>5238855
>>5238807
>>5238800

Hi samefag

Fuck off

>> No.5238858

>>5238839

And I think you philosophers - that aren’t talented neither in science nor in art but still want to be perceived as intellectually significant- should have a specific board for your own kind and leave /lit/ forever.

Your threads are a waste of space. You guys (and the people who make David Foster Wallace and Tao Lin threads) are extremely annoying.

>> No.5238864

>>5238858
>you philosophers - that aren’t talented neither in science nor in art
(:

>> No.5238872
File: 27 KB, 666x408, 2987.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5238872

>> No.5238873

>>5238857
>posting in a thread more than once is samefag
Right.
>>5238864
That was insecure. lol

>> No.5238876

>>5238872

No all they both need is a giant dick stuffed in their mouths.

>> No.5238877

>>5238872
>analytic philosophy
>Please define...
I think that's mathematics.

>> No.5238886

>>5238877
THEY ARE CLOSELY RELATED

>> No.5238892

>>5238886
No.
>Please define
>logically
These are math.
Everything else it mentioned is philosophy.

>> No.5238893

>>5238872
>continental philosophy

>> No.5238895

>>5238766
I have realized that this guy looks like Peter Capaldi, uh.

>> No.5238899

>>5238892
2wrong4me

>> No.5238900

>>5238872
This picture is hilarious
Also, the history of an idea is important because it helps to understand why/how an idea was formed in order to best select your axioms when following a line of logic.
Every logically consistent universe that contains the God of the Bible begins with the tacit assumption that the Bible is correct, and, because the idea that the Bible is correct is outdated, these logics should be disregarded, despite being sound

>> No.5238903

>>5238899
I haven't heard an argument that mathematics is somehow analytic philosophy as you call it.
What you're doing now is ignorantly shitposting because you have no real argument to take mathematics for granted.

>> No.5238907

>>5238903
Logic and mathematics are not the same thing. You should be ashamed, because I am.

>> No.5238911
File: 58 KB, 402x500, 1311948270220.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5238911

>>5238766

>> No.5238919

>>5238907
Logic is a field of mathematics.
You might think it isn't because you use "logically" in a different fashion, but logic is a field in mathematics used to express proofs and validity. You mostly see logic symbols in math which is used in group theory mostly.
Definitions, axioms, theorems are all logic and thus mathematics.

>> No.5238935

>>5238919
Mathematics is a field of logic buddy

>> No.5238939

>>5238766
OP is correct and there's not really anything anyone can do about it.

>> No.5238944

>>5238935
Sorry but it really isn't.
The pre greek "logic" was all math, what you mean is informal logic, which is what the greeks and many philosophers studied.

Classical logic is a field of mathematics.

>> No.5238968

>>5238939
You think you two(?) could've taken the time to come up with a way to prove this.

Too bad. Maybe next thread.

>> No.5238979

>>5238944
Yeah and classical buttsex is a field pedophilia, so what?

We aren't living in "pre greek" times buddy, we are POST greek and POST classical logic

Welcome the present: math is part of logic. Q.E.D.

>> No.5238986

>>5238968
I care about my special snowflake identity on an ignorant and pseudo intellectual board on an imageboard on the internet.

I think my opinions matter.

>> No.5238991

>>5238979
Yeah, and the only "logic" the greeks were working on was as I said "informal logic", real logic is a field of mathematics.

>> No.5239108

>>5238939

Thank you based anon.

>> No.5239111

>>5238939
Stop samefagging, OP.

>> No.5239116

>>5238766
Yes, especially his ethics.

>> No.5239120

>>5239111

I'm not