[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 437 KB, 1377x1600, Spinoza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22822542 No.22822542 [Reply] [Original]

>Plato btfo
>Aristotle btfo
>Hegel btfo
>Kant btfo

Literally right about everything. What's the point of reading any other philosophy?

>> No.22822909

Reading Wittgenstein, Spinoza, and Plato is all anyone needs to never get anywhere.

>> No.22822941

>>22822909
Why go anywhere if you got it all?

>> No.22822951

>>22822909
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.22822961

>>22822542
>dude what if nature did everything
>also what if nature is actually 'god'
>remember that democratic freedumb for merchants and libtards is indispensable
Bravo, bravo! Encore!

>> No.22822969
File: 613 KB, 1250x1250, bq-5c0d4cdf4df8c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22822969

>>22822951

>> No.22823166

>>22822961
>he doesn't understand spinoza
if you'd actually read the ethics you'd know that extension is one of the infinite attributes of god, and that god can only be known to us through thought and extension; in this way spinoza both prefigures kant and also disproves him

>> No.22823169
File: 25 KB, 600x375, come on now.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22823169

>>22822909
>implying spinoza doesn't disprove plato in book 1 of the ethics
>implying that wittgenstein is real philosophy

>> No.22823226

>>22822542
He's Jewish

>> No.22823251

>>22823169
I like all of them, but people on this board attach themselves too much to them whether it’s the “Philosophy hasn’t moved since Plato.” “It’s all one.” “Wittgenstein solved it all.” threads. It’s either that or the occasional Kant or Hegel person.

>> No.22823261

>>22823251
you can't "like all of them," you fence-sitting retard. if one of them is right then the rest of them are wrong.

>> No.22823341

>>22823261
I am a fence sitting retard, otherwise I would have chosen one already, but picking one too quickly is also a part of the trick. Plato makes me ask the most questions, Spinoza comforts me, and Wittgenstein makes me hate that I’m wasting my time on any of this at all. I wish I could pick one.

>> No.22823402

>>22823251
Those threads are just (you) bait, not real discussion

>> No.22823677

>>22822542
Can you explain how Spinoza BTFO of Kant?

>> No.22823686

>>22823226
Disowned by his family and faith. Besides there are based jews. 9% of american jews don’t support israel.

>> No.22823705

>>22823166
>and that god can only be known to us through thought

Refuted by Hume

>> No.22823982

>>22823402
No shit, why else would they be here daily. That doesn’t stop people in the thread from agreeing. And they’re going at it in the post with idiots like me who are too autistic to resist the sentiment.

>> No.22824003

>>22822542
OP has never read Hegel. Hegel adresses Spinoza in The Pheomenology of Spirit and says that: If nature (as natura naturans and natura naturata) creates everything, then there simply is no spirit, the Selbstbewusstsein, to be found. And you wouldn't want to assume a world without spirit, would you, anon?

>inb4 nature = God, thus there is a spirit for Spinoza

Spinoza was called an atheist and had to fear for his life at his time for reducing 'God' to nature. Just a play with words he tried to save himself.

Nice bait, fag.

>> No.22824017

>>22824003
It was obvious for naturalists, but we live in a post tech age

Still extension of your nature into technology has potential

>> No.22824247

>>22824003
>we have to have spirit because it sounds all nice and fuzzy! we can't get rid of it !
so this is the power of Hegelian "philosophy"

>> No.22824686

>>22824003
>he thinks that Hegel understood spinoza
>he thinks that just because a philosopher mentions another then that means they’re destroyed