/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.22320143]

Massive amount of anti-Kant/Kantian posts on this board as of recent in a very similar style. Who is waging a campaign against Kant and why?

[Anonymous No.22320148]

it's me (I hate him)

[Anonymous No.22320151]

>>22320143
Because we are autists and we want to do speculative metaphysics like an autists

[Anonymous No.22320167]

>>22320151
>All I want are questions, never answers

[Anonymous No.22320258]

>>22320148
Nietzsche was just a second rate Kant.

[Anonymous No.22320260]

>That two descriptions are required for an actual entity: (a) one which is analytical of its potentiality for 'objectification' in the becoming of other actual entities, and (b) another which is analytical of the process which constitutes its own becoming.
>That how an actual entity becomes constitutes what that actual entity is; so that the two descriptions of an actual entity are not independent. Its 'being' is] constituted by its 'becoming.' This is the 'principle of process.'
This btfos Kant, because it means the entity can't have its nature in itself perverted when it is represented, in fact, the thing itself is defined by how it gets objectified by others, and this is intimately linked to its own inner nature.
>That every prehension consists of three factors: (a) the 'subject' which is prehending, namely, the actual entity in which that prehension is a concrete element; (b) the 'datum' which is prehended; (c) the 'subjective form' which is how that subject prehends that datum.
>That the first analysis of an actual entity, into its most concrete elements, discloses it to be a concrescence of prehensions, which have originated in its process of becoming.
This btfos Schopenhauer. The subject is nothing more than the actual entity in which an experience is present, but the actual entity is nothing more than its prehensions. Thus the subject is cognized whenever you cognize your own experiences.