/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.21960247]

Which books should I read to explain to me why homosexuals and transsexuals are alright and the dislike of them is unfair and childish?

[Borderline No.21960320]

>>21960247
You sound like a closeted faggot. Try watching a sissy hypnosis video.

[Anonymous No.21960444]

>>21960320
I have a wife and kids

[Anonymous No.21960455]

>>21960247
Homosexuals are fine and can be perfectly healthy well-adjusted individuals. Transsexuals on the other hand are almost by definition highly deranged and delusional individuals who are dangerous to themselves and in our society at least to others as well. Ironically homosexual children are the people they threaten the most. Gay writers like Andrew Sullivan have written eloquently about how the current trans hysteria is turning into a new form of conversion therapy.

[Anonymous No.21960470]

>>21960455
I asked which book explains why dislike of transsexuals is unfair, not for anti tranny/homo post #5 million

[Anonymous No.21960474]

>>21960247
>Which books should I read to explain to me why homosexuals and transsexuals are alright and the dislike of them is unfair and childish?
Just keep smelling your own farts.

[Anonymous No.21960479]

>>21960444
prove it

[Anonymous No.21960483]

>>21960470
>please give me books to reinforce my priors
Stop engaging in motivated reasoning

[Anonymous No.21960486]

>>21960479
You care more than I do

[Anonymous No.21960489]

>>21960483
You’re projecting. I have already entertained the anti trans/homo standpoint as its 25% of all posts on this website. This is why I request something on the alternative view.

[Anonymous No.21960588]

>>21960489
Giving equal weight to 4chan posts as you would to a book really shows how you desire be nonpartisan. How about you entertain "the alterative view" by browsing some trans subreddits and or leftypol.

[Anonymous No.21960601]

>>21960588
More projecting?

I have read dozens of anti trans/homo articles and a couple of books at the recommendation of anons, find it rather unconvincing and now seek the alternative view

[Anonymous No.21960625]

>>21960601
You're using the word projecting wrong. I hope you find the answer to why homos are "alright." The question is certainty one that deserves an entire book to tackle. Terrible bait thread do better next time.

[Anonymous No.21960635]

I'm my opinion, abnormal sexual impulses should not be normalized, and if someone has such impulses they should do their best to suppress them. Aside from venereal diseases particular to homosexual activity, the act itself is harmful to the body even if precautions are taken.

Trigger warning for a disgusting topic:
The anal mucosa is thinner, and anal sphincter muscles are more easily worn out, than those of the vagina. This is why anal whores and fags often shit themselves when they reach old age. There is no safe way to have homosexual penetrative sex because the anus is not a sex organ and is not structured for such use.

Anyway, I have no books for you, OP. Check the NYT best sellers list .

[Anonymous No.21960709]

>>21960625
Projecting is ascribing your own thoughts and actions to others. I have a mere interest in the arguments around the pro side of the subject, and you enter the thread to aggressively push the con side of the subject, while accusing me of motivated reasoning. Seems like you're the one who's motivated here.

[Anonymous No.21960718]

>>21960455
Gays are only based when they repress and hide it like Henry James. This lends them a kino tragic aspect.

[Anonymous No.21960732]

>>21960718
This. The only good gays are the repressed ones.

[Anonymous No.21960754]

>>21960247
Judith Butler Gender Trouble or whatever it's called