[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 174 KB, 800x769, DBC4A8D0-C25D-448B-B33B-90955F782866.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21900511 No.21900511 [Reply] [Original]

Is there a writer who synthesizes the philosophies of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche?

>> No.21900546

>>21900511
The film Amadeus

>> No.21900547

No

>> No.21900601

>>21900511
Diogenes

>> No.21900669

>>21900511
I'll get back to you on that...

>> No.21900787

spinoza gets as close to both the quiet asceticism of schopenhauer mixed with the life affirmation of joyfulness of nietzsche. they of course both equally loved him

>> No.21900847

Alfred Rosenberg

>> No.21901599

>>21900511
my diary desu

>> No.21901640

>>21900511
Wagner, but Nietzsche was the one doing the synthesising.

>> No.21901647

>>21900511
Impossible because Schopenhauer had a generally positive view of Christianity whereas Bitch-szche was an atheist man baby.

>> No.21901782
File: 121 KB, 720x683, nietzsche story 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21901782

>> No.21901791

Early Nietzsche was extremely influenced by Schopenhauer and took many of his assertions for granted. In his introduction to The Birth of Tragedy (written many years after the original publication) in which Nietzsche criticized the work, he explicitly faults it for being too influenced by Schopenhauer, he if you read the work you will see it presumes you have read The World as Will and Representation. The term “life-denying” is originally Schopenhauer’s, it is intended as positive. Nietzsche initially approached Schopenhauer and tried to reevaluate him by turning his values on their head: instead of life-denial, now life-affirming and embracing the Will. Nietzsche would use this as a starting point that he would build on later, with his conception of the Will the same as Schopenhauer’s until he matured as a philosopher more

>> No.21901804

>>21901599
this

>> No.21901813

>>21901647
Schopenhauer was also an atheist (The Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason is, as much as anything else, an argument against the prime mover) and his major criticism of Hegel is that the latter has corrupted philosophy to serve Christianity in exchange for state support. Schopenhauer likes Christianity but hates Islam, whereas Nietzsche likes Islam but hates Christianity; neither of these positions by either should be taken as a statement of belief in God, but rather reflections of their values systems of life-denying vs life-affirming

>>21901791