[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 35 KB, 400x387, 1613462844833.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21287498 No.21287498 [Reply] [Original]

Nothing leftist is worth reading since it has no bearing on reality. Just stick to the Bible, Nietzsche and Plato.

>> No.21287623

>>21287498
>Nothing leftist is worth reading.
>Names three leftist sources.
Wdhmbt?

>> No.21287634

>>21287498
>Nietzsche
have you people actually tried reading him as your first delving into philosophy? i remember how hard i got filtered at 16 when i had barely read anything beyond extracts from kant and some plato in hs.

>> No.21287759

>>21287498
First half is right. Second half is pro bait

>> No.21287775

>>21287634
>have you people actually tried reading him as your first delving into philosophy?
"He that writeth in blood and proverbs doth not want to be read, but learnt by heart.
In the mountains the shortest way is from peak to peak, but for that route thou must have long legs. Proverbs should be peaks, and those spoken to should be big and tall."

>> No.21287783

it would be fair to say nothing political is worth reading.

>> No.21287785

>>21287498
A pendulum, swinging to one side, swings back to the other.

>> No.21287787

>>21287785
this is a metaphor for my balls hitting your chin

>> No.21287805

>>21287498
>Nothing leftist is worth reading
David Graeber's "Debt: the first 5000 years" and "Bullshit Jobs" is a solid anthropological/historical analysis.
Nitzan and Bichler's "Capital as Power" is groundbreaking in dismantling the mainstream economics' tenets, even if you don't subscribe to their left-leaning commitments.

Also,
Althusser's "On The Reproduction Of Capitalism. Ideology And Ideological State Apparatuses" is interesting, even if I don't agree with it.
Marcuse's 'One-Dimensional Man' has salvageable components and valid points to consider.

>> No.21287818

>>21287787
Ironically, this proves my point in the least expected way possible. The masculinity of the right, stretching for extremes of manliness, becomes homoerotic, and therefore, leftist.

Fascinating.

>> No.21287830

>>21287818
it was just meant to be gay
>being gay is leftist
liberal reactionary statement, off to gulag

>> No.21287849

>>21287818
Homosexuality is when you are left wing. The more left wing you are, the more homosexuality you are

>> No.21287856

>>21287498
You literally can’t think for yourself. Run off to your pastor.

>> No.21287859

>>21287498
This is the same as saying, don’t speak to anyone just watch TV for information.

>> No.21287866

>>21287498
But the bible has been scientifically refuted, it has self contradictions all over, and blatantly plagiarises other books. Why would anyone stick to such a mediocre book?

>> No.21287882

>>21287498
I dunno man, Capital directly or indirectly influenced more than half of the planet in this or that way. Plato? Nietzsche? Pff.

>> No.21287898

>>21287882
>Capital directly or indirectly influenced more than half of the planet in this or that way.
>Plato?
Plato's Laws influenced the bible authors to the point of plagiarism.

>> No.21287900

>>21287498
Nietzsche is an atheist you idiot

>> No.21287908

>>21287900
Nietzsche is the Antichrist.

>> No.21287912

>>21287900
he called himself one but anyone that has read him understands otherwise

>> No.21287934

>>21287912
Read literally every text published by him and am 100% certain, without a shadow of a doubt he was an atheist. There is nothing nor anyone but the reincarnation of the man himself telling me he was lying in all of his texts that would convince me otherwise.

Christcucks pretending Nietzsche was a theist are the most delusional of delusional idiots.

>> No.21287937

>>21287934
I didn't say he was christian

>> No.21287970

>>21287937
Did I?

>> No.21287976

>>21287830
It isn't that being gay is leftist, but nearly all gays are leftist, therefore the more gay you are, the higher your correlation to the left. Sorry, faggy ol bean, you can't escape the trap you created for yourself with your own genitals.

>> No.21288304

>>21287634
You can dive into Nietzsche immediately without having read any other philosopher and "get" him.
This is not true of Kant or Hegel though.

>> No.21288789

>>21287970
You implied he was, you dolt.

>> No.21288826

>>21288304
>You can dive into Nietzsche immediately without having read any other philosopher and "get" him.
That's only partially true. Check this:
Meyer M. - "Reading Nietzsche through the Ancients. An Analysis of Becoming, Perspectivism, and the Principle of Non-Contradiction" (2014)

There are some pretty autistic debates, concerning the Heraclitean ontology of becoming. And they require you knowing Plato, Aristotle, their interpretation of Protagoras and Parmenides, Nietzsche's (historically inaccurate) opinion on them, and opinions of some guy named Afrikan Spir, who influenced Nietzsche on the topic.
What's at stake is whether you "get" Nietzsche as po-mo 'everything is an opinion, man', or as a legit naturalist with a nuanced and complex attitude to scientific epistemology.

>> No.21288842

the bible is a waste of time

>> No.21288863

>>21287498
>directionbrain
>believes in "reality"
Yep, it's pseud time.