[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 3.46 MB, 4000x3000, 16568905914513398786572071977496.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624313 No.20624313 [Reply] [Original]

I had apprehended the bourne of indivisibility's yields. This condition had been presaged a mere month ago. It had come to me by way of my dawn's crepuscular fulgur. Now I lay before the opaque vestiges of a most serene realm. I sought to behold the preternatural symphony as it erupted from the veil's seams. The embers shone resplendent and invited my gaze unto their flaming speckled hues. I took a few cautious steps towards the edge of space and came to know then of the reckless cause which had most recently lead me astray. Fortune had thus dispensed her shares.
----------------
I came up with this a while ago. Verse is my medium of choice yet I decided to see what I could articulate with prose.

>> No.20624324

*led

>> No.20624343

this is a joke right
tell me this is bait

>> No.20624374

I'm ESL, anon. Could you explain what you wrote in simpler terms

>> No.20624397

>>20624343
Why do you figure it's a joke? Says more about you than it does about my writing.

>> No.20624420

>>20624397
>Says more about you than it does about my writing.
someone's a little touchy, eh? little surprise from the man who tried to cram as many $1000 words as he possibly could into his paragraph.

>> No.20624429

>>20624420
*woman
You haven't come across many $1000 words then. This was pretty basic.

>> No.20624439

>>20624420
By my standards of course.

>> No.20624446

>>20624313
use /wg/

don't need a new thread for your passive voice thesaurus tweet

>> No.20624451

>>20624429
your writing is pompous, grandiloquent and pretentious and serves no other purpose than to make yourself look smart.

>> No.20624452

>>20624446
Passive voice?

>> No.20624466

>>20624451
That is true of most thinkers held to high esteem. They were most certainly derided in their time. Your remarks don't faze me. All reasoning ends in an appeal to self-evidence.

>> No.20624473

>>20624451
You're calling yourself out.

>> No.20624479

>>20624466
>>20624473
it's dogshit.

>> No.20624482

>>20624479
I won't take your word for it.

>> No.20624503

Insufferable trash

>> No.20624505
File: 11 KB, 242x242, 16628984625.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624505

>narcissist posts labyrinthian self-indulgent maze of a thesaurus-post
>doesn't even use /wg/
>makes a whole thread committed to said thesaurus-post
>gets called out
>can't handle it
>"i am a WOMAN"

>> No.20624509

>>20624429
>*woman
Were you "assigned male at birth" by any chance?

>> No.20624515
File: 36 KB, 400x386, pain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624515

>OP makes bait thread
>namefags
>pretends to be a woman
>several anons rage

>> No.20624517

>>20624452
look it up

>> No.20624521

>>20624515
if its bait its pretty good bait
im willing to believe someone could be this far up their own asshole

>> No.20624525

>>20624509
Nope. Why is it so hard to believe?

>> No.20624532

>>20624525
Oh no, don't get me wrong. It is very easy to believe that you are a woman. It's just that it would make an equal amount of sense if you were transgender, given the severe prevalence of narcissism within that demographic.

>> No.20624536

>>20624532
I'm sociopathic at best.

>> No.20624543

It's sad to realize that when a woman tries to write she will never reach further than either this or Rupi Kaur.

>> No.20624544
File: 89 KB, 800x450, 139035361828.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624544

>>20624536

>> No.20624547

A book is a mirror: if an ape looks into it an apostle is hardly likely to look out.
---------
That line perfectly encapsulates the reaction my work elicits. You don't know any better.

>> No.20624548
File: 239 KB, 965x999, 1656346903691.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624548

>>20624466
>thinkers held to high esteem
Entertaining such a such a concept is evidence of your writing being shit

I once quoted Socrates to my poet friend: "Socrates once said that the unexamined life is a life not worth living", to which he gloriously retorted: "And I say - my will against his".

>> No.20624554

>>20624543
O primeval effigy!
'Tis from Thy Light wherefrom the Sun derives its pride!
'Tis by recourse to Thee alone that the Sun dares peek and hither shone!
Thou art anterior to the Sun's spoiled germination.
A calamitous seed, wholly divorced from Thy intention, bounded forth from the earth's lowly invention -- 'twas Thy gleaming resplendor stirred the Sun into brilliance's vector.
It sought to produce but one tenth of Thy spread!
Look then what has resulted!
The totality of the earth is illumined by one tenth of Thy Light!
O!
The earth cannot brave this Thy Light which is anterior to embodiment: 'tis the wellspring of Nature's betrothal to phenomena's sundries.
Thy Light erodes the earth's hem and thus instills magnificently active rest.

>> No.20624557

>>20624466
>That is true of most thinkers held to high esteem
If pompous, grandiloquent and pretentious is the qualifier of a "high thinker," then by god, you may be the most enlightened person on the planet.

>> No.20624567
File: 101 KB, 746x717, end_me.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624567

>>20624554

>> No.20624575

>>20624536
You are fucking annoying even on an anonymous board

If you weren’t born with xx chromosomes you will never be a woman

>> No.20624578 [DELETED] 

>>20624575
I do have XX chromosomes. Fucking nigger.

>> No.20624581

>>20624578
>Fucking nigger.
>maybe if i act like them, they will give me validation

>> No.20624584

>>20624567
What's your fucking problem, cretin?

>> No.20624585

>>20624581
Kek
>>20624578
Please delete this thread and go on with your life

>> No.20624592
File: 11 KB, 444x279, woman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624592

>>20624584
lmao fucking saved

>> No.20624598
File: 213 KB, 398x335, 16312849713.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624598

>>20624581

>> No.20624610

>>20624585
How do I delete it?

>> No.20624616

>>20624543
I'll rape your mother.

>> No.20624621

>>20624616
>I'll rape your mother.
>this must be like a hazing thing. i've seen that people on 4chan like to be offensive. maybe if i act like them i can be like one of the guys

>> No.20624629
File: 73 KB, 850x400, 35796123875.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624629

>>20624536
>I'm sociopathic at best.

You're no longer 14, is it not time to reevaluate the things you said when you were? Then again...

>> No.20624649

>>20624621
>THINK, anastasia, THINK
>ah, a your mom joke!
>but no, that's not sufficient
>it must be more offensive so they can like me
>what is the most anti-feminist thing i can think of?
>all women are ... no, that's too mild. i gotta win them over somehow
>come on, anastasia, you're the greatest writer of this generation!
>eureka!
>"I'll rape your mother."
>surely, now, i will join the ranks of anonymous

>> No.20624666

>>20624629
I have not yet spoken my last word about women. I believe that if a woman succeeds in withdrawing from the mass, or rather raising herself from above the mass, she grows ceaselessly and more than a man.
- Arthur Schopenhauer, Schopenhauer and the Wild Years of Philosophy.

>> No.20624667

>>20624313
It's way too verbose, unless that was a deliberate artistic choice, which in that case you should really try to frame it as such. There's no need to use a thesaurus for every other word. Although I personally like the way certain things are described, such as
>The embers shone resplendent and invited my gaze unto their flaming speckled hues
I think that sentence in particular has good balance. Try to make every other sentence you write like that one. Just try to tone it down on the big words. It doesn't make you seem smart, it just makes you seem like you're trying too hard.

>> No.20624678

>>20624667
I take this post back. After reading this thread and seeing that you are a woman, I have changed my stance. You should leave this website immediately and never write anything again.

>> No.20624681

>>20624667
And this? -- Born under the baneful auspice of a most fateful twilight.

>> No.20624685
File: 620 KB, 593x580, 360584184676.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624685

>>20624678

>> No.20624689
File: 25 KB, 640x640, gigi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624689

>>20624678

>> No.20624692

>>20624678
I've only just begun at 23. I'm awaiting the coming of a new divinity.

>> No.20624703

>>20624678
Ingress back into your mother's putrid cunt.

>> No.20624706

>>20624681
If verbose and masturbatory is what you were going for, good job!
>>20624692
>I've only just begun at 23
Yes. We can tell.

>> No.20624708

>>20624681
Much of what you write is terribly pretentious. You certainly can write in good, balanced prose if you're capable of overusing such many big words, you just seem to fall into the common misunderstanding that using complex vocabulary automatically makes your writings good. Diction is a tool, and that tool has to be used properly.

>> No.20624720

>>20624708
were she to strip away the big words, she'd discover that her writing is entirely devoid of any substance. there would be nothing left. big ask of a narcissist.

>> No.20624733

>>20624666
You've really proven how withdrawn you are, betty
>>20624429
>>20624466
>>20624536
>>20624578

>> No.20624741

>>20624720
The underlying motive of the passage is my attemp at articulating a fleeting intuition.

>> No.20624752

>>20624708
I don't fall prey to misunderstandings -- much less common ones -- of any sort, pleb.

>> No.20624758

>>20624752
I planned to shoot up my highschool when I was 14 years old and even I was never this edgy.

>> No.20624761

>>20624733
Withdraw into yourself and look. Become a self-contained isthmus.

>> No.20624763

>>20624741
the underlying motive of the passage is to fondle your own ego and hope that people will think you're smart and special.
>>20624752
didn't you say you were 23? you're absolutely nailing the edgy teenager vibe in any case.

>> No.20624765

>>20624758
Why didn't you do it?

>> No.20624778

>>20624765
The date I planned turned out to be a Saturday instead of a Friday and the gun I planned to used turned out to be a BB gun

>> No.20624780

>>20624778
"Turned out". Sure.

>> No.20624784

>>20624780
What happened to deleting the thread, Becky?

>> No.20624789

>>20624778
You should have been more diligent. What a shame.

>> No.20624792

>>20624784
I thought I'd rape your brother and record it instead. He cried like a bitch.

>> No.20624793

>>20624397
>wrote this using a thesaurus

>> No.20624797

>>20624792
>if i keep up being deliberately offensive, they will see that i'm actually just like them and they'll give me validation

>> No.20624802

>>20624792
>still trying to fit in
So how old were you when your dad left you?

>> No.20624808

>>20624802
He never left. I killed him as he slept. No regrets.

>> No.20624809

>>20624808
>"23"

>> No.20624817

I can't delete it.

>> No.20624824 [DELETED] 

so i guess the only thing we learned from this thread is that your personality is as vacuous, vapid and try-hard as your entire personality.

>> No.20624827

so i guess the only thing we learned from this thread is that your personality is as vacuous, vapid and try-hard as your writing.

>> No.20624829

>>20624824
That's merely your supposition.

>> No.20624839

I wonder if she'll come out soon with a "haha I was just joking." Sorry, I meant "henceforth from my esophagus rumbles mirth in a great deluge for I have bested thee all in a great ruse of pretension."

>> No.20624842

>>20624313
holy adjective batman

>> No.20624844

If you're going to make a post under a name, use a tripcode next time, or else an anon will just impersonate you and say a bunch of based shit.
I love sucking cocks and eating out nigger assholes. I want to be Hitler's femboy cumslut and gas the jews to death with my braps.

>> No.20624846
File: 12 KB, 220x200, 12435818327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20624846

>>20624842
bro read the thread

>> No.20624853

>>20624313
Spare the sententious talk, it's picayune and unctuous.

>> No.20624857

>tfw no developmentally stunted gf that still acts like an edgy teenager

>> No.20624861

>>20624844
Heeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyyy.

>> No.20624862

Unironically good thread. I mean the writing is unsubstantial, fustian garbage, but good thread tho.

>> No.20624863

>>20624861
Man, this didn't go so well huh :( I tried so hard but still they don't like me! ME! Ugh, I need another Starbucks.

>> No.20624878

>>20624844
Okay, I'm using a tripcode now. Any retard nigger pleb that posts using my name after this isn't me.

>> No.20624880

How do I delete a thread?

>> No.20624882

>>20624878
This is an impersonator. How do I achieve a tripcode?

>> No.20624899

>>20624515
This

>> No.20624909

I would pronounce that this bread was epic, but I fear that statement is not verbose enough to properly quantify just how grandiloquent is actually is.

>> No.20625295 [DELETED] 

Can someone delete this?

>> No.20625444

>>20624313
>I apprehended the bourne of indivisibility's yields.
Whom/What bourne, "that bourne..."
>This condition presaged a mere month ago that came to me by way of my dawn's crepuscular fulminance. Now I lay before the opaque vestiges of a most serene realm. I sought to behold this preternatural symphony as it erupted from seams in the veil, embers glimmering resplendent invited my gaze unto their burning glory.
Embers don't shine brightly, unlike maybe coals.
>Stepping cautiously toward the edge of space I was initiated into the origin of the reckless cause which most recently lead me astray. Fortune had thus dispensed her shares.

Even purple prose has to be efficient. This is still prolix -- if you have a first draft, see what can be done shaving off a fifth of the word count before anything.

>> No.20625461

>>20624313
Your prose is unnecessarily complicated and doesn't add anything. In fact, a lot of what you wrote falls apart under scrutiny since some of your word choices simply don't make sense

>> No.20625466

>>20624313
Good writing isn't crammed full of fancy words you found by looking up synonyms on google
It probably stems from the fact you appear to be Greek, and therefore the English language is obviously far too complex for you. Maybe try writing in Greek next time?

>> No.20625531

I'm having a hard time deciding which is worse between the thread and OP's writing.

OP, your writing makes me physically and spiritually ill. You are trying way to hard to make your writing seem smart. Most of the best prose ever written uses common words with maybe a more obscure word here and there for the sake of precision or aesthetics. Flow is also a lot more important than cramming as many big words as you can into a sentence. Half the words in your writing make me trip and stumble trying to understand what the hell you're actually trying to say, instead of pleasantly gliding me through your writing. There's no purpose to what you're doing. You're just actively hamstringing yourself with a futile ego trip. Your writing as is would never be publishable, and even degen consumers on the internet who will read almost anything will not want to touch it.

>> No.20625614

>>20624313
Op thanks for making this thread, holy shit was it enjoyable. BTW using words like "fulgur" makes your prose real fucking purple. Lovecraft has a much less purple prose and people find him unreadable.

>> No.20625640

amazing thread

>> No.20625945

>>20624313
The quality of a piece of writing isn't measured by the author's vocabulary.

>> No.20626510

>>20624554
Leave the shakespearing to Shakespeare, bitch.

>> No.20626533

Ngl tho, I've always wanted to bang a chick who talks like she's in a Shakespeare play.

>> No.20626543

>>20624313
Despite your claim to verse, I'm not seeing much influence of it in this writing. The flow is halting and fragmentary. When posed with the decision of sacrificing flow or a specific word, you seem to exclusively choose using the word. Prose isn't an excuse to write poorly. I'm not one of those "people" who think everything needs to be clear and concise. I think that the criticism of writing as if you were a Victorian aristocrat, often leveled against people who don't bow to contemporary convention, is dramatically over-applied. Here, however, it's the real deal. You are consciously aping a style many, many centuries out of vogue, and you have not been alive for many, many centuries. The problem is not one of zeitgeist, but one of authenticity. This writing is simply inauthentic, because it relies so heavily on stylistic choices that made sense in contexts and—crucially—lived experiences that are literally forever out of reach of its author. It reads more like a little game you're playing than an earnest, artistic self-expression. It's more like an engineering exercise than it is art, which further adds to the dissonance of the experience because the people whose style you're imitating were nothing if not earnest in their self-expression.

I think your writing is almost directly analogous to a suburban white girl, who's never even looked a chocolate skinned nigger in his jaundiced eye, aping the speech patterns of the Kansas City ghettos.
>yo wut up my lugubrious niggas
You're not black. You grew up in Orange County and attended all-white private schools your entire life. Stop playing make-believe.

>> No.20626975

Can someone delete this thread?

>> No.20627080

>>20625531
This is what happens when untutored eyes gaze upon a supernal work.

>> No.20627081

>>20626975
Find Christ.

>> No.20627085

>>20627080
Nah - you're not a bad writer but you're the opposite of good.

>> No.20627109

>>20627081
He is insufficient in all respects. Go fuck yourself.

>> No.20627121

>>20627109
Is it finny to you that I can tell in your prose that you haven't read the Gospels?

>> No.20627122

>>20627081
Find the butthole from whence you egressed and crawl back into it on all fours.

>> No.20627129

>>20627121
I've read the Apocrypha. The Upanishads, Plotinus, Proclus, etc.

>> No.20627136

>>20627121
How can you tell?

>> No.20627157

>>20626975
No, this is how you learn from your mistakes.
>>20627109
>Find Christ.
>He is insufficient in all respects.
But I do unironically love the way you talk. Just don't share your work outside of a pretentious poetry club or something and you'll be fine. /lit/ will not be kind to you.

>> No.20627168

>>20627157
This experience has been thoroughly demoralizing. I'm a bit down. Frankly, I stand by my work's value irrespective of any naysaying cretins. :(

>> No.20627174

>>20624521
To be fair, you are autistic.

>> No.20627176

>>20627157
If my writing comes off as pretentious maybe that's an indictment of the plebeian reader and not of me.
------
The profundity of truth varies with the seeing power of the spirit which seeks it.

>> No.20627186

>>20627176
>maybe that's an indictment of the plebeian reader and not of me
No. It's not. See: >>20626543. Your writing is inauthentic. Full stop. This is the real reason why it rankles so many people. It is absolutely steeped in mimicry rather than authenticity. You are putting up a front and assuming airs. Poetry is in the business of truths. Say something true instead of playing games and expecting cock rubs.

>> No.20627187

>>20627136
>>20627122
>egressed
>And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
>>20627176
>The profundity of truth
All truth is infinite and thereby equally profound.

>> No.20627203

>>20627187
>>And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues.

Why did you quote this?

>> No.20627207

>>20627203
>>20627187
This thread seems really, really samefaggy.

>> No.20627208

>>20627203
You misunderstand what writing is.
>Jesus said, "Whoever drinks from my mouth will become like me, and I myself will become like them; then, what's hidden will be revealed to them."
Gospel of Thomas (heretical for Orthodox)

>> No.20627211

>>20627186
My poetry is not a caricature. A more finely attuned reader told me the fragment in question seems to embody the concept of henosis.

>> No.20627215

>>20627211
You're basically using Plato's idea of wisdom = work towards the truth and creating a complex prose pyramid but instead of the truth at the top it's your ego or vision of the world. It's not cruel and you don't know you're doing it but I used to do... pretty much the exact same thing.

>> No.20627223

Got to agree with some of the other anons. What is your target audience? If it's pretentious assholes then by all means post it on a Reddit forum made for that audience. Have you ever taken a writing class. College level? A professor will tear you to shreds if you were to submit this.

>> No.20627231
File: 3.73 MB, 540x317, -334895762b.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20627231

>>20624313

>> No.20627233

>>20627223
I contend that the poetry I posted here dwarfs anything written in the past century.

>> No.20627236

>>20627211
Well, my business isn't henosis. It's writing, and the quality thereof. So, as a reader with good taste and superior competence with the medium you're in the process of mangling, it really doesn't matter for shit what your prose does or doesn't embody right now. What you say in the literate arts is always, always, always secondary at best to the way you say it. You are saying it poorly.

>> No.20627237

>>20627215
I'm cognizant of what I'm doing. Don't think otherwise.

>> No.20627240

>>20627233
>last century
Robert Lowell, Wallace Stevens, Auden, and some of Yeats are all better. It's not bad but also it's not really saying anything other than Platonism. Also, we're in a poetry resurgence era, had a deadzone for a century or two, and we're going to see the Romantics surpassed imvho

>> No.20627253

>>20627207
27 unique IPs bro

>> No.20627257

>>20627240
>Robert Lowell, Wallace Stevens, Auden, and some of Yeats are all better
Savanah fucking Brown is better. To put Yeats in even the same fucking hemisphere as OP's writing is an insult to mediocre poets everywhere.

>> No.20627291 [DELETED] 

>>20627257
Dost Thou dare fashion a means by which I may descry Thy glory upon the sky's crest?
My earthly senses are not attuned to ever gaze upon the stature of Thy heavenward boons.
Undo the thread which encircles Thy Holy bourne -- scatter offerings unto the porcelain sky's breadth!
Bring Thy hands over the Sun and invest the Moon with concordant song.

>> No.20627305

Say what you all want, this bitch is the most elegant troll I've ever seen.
>>20626543
This is probably accurate on her "sample writing", but everything else she's posting has character, something half you pretentious fuck-wits don't understand despite it repeatedly smacking you over the head.

>> No.20627316

>>20626543
Alongside authenticity exists profilicity and sincerity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-dlpZHBabw

>> No.20627319

>>20627305
I'm not a troll.

>> No.20627329

hahaha this thread has to be bait

>> No.20627335

>>20627319
I'm not a troll.
>>20627237
>cognizant

And I'm cognizant of your fancy-ass.

>> No.20627344
File: 34 KB, 710x781, 1651514747377.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20627344

>>20627233
You must have the most superficial understanding of what makes any sort of literature good if you seriously think that. I would like to believe that you are trolling but since I have interacted with people who share your sentiment before I'm inclined to believe that you are being earnest here.
I'm going to spell it out very clearly for you: using lots of big words does not make what you write good. It's even worse when there's very little of substance hidden beneath those big words. The point of language is to communicate ideas. This means that for whatever you write there needs to be a theme or a plot or an argument within it. Simply throwing together a bunch of "smart"-sounding words gets you fucking nowhere. Moby Dick is considered a great work of literature, not because Melville uses a lot of big words, but because he captures and expresses transcendent themes about the nature of life. Your writing is terrible because you use a lot of big words but express absolutely nothing worthwhile within it - and that's not even touching on just how terrible the prose is aside from the overuse of a thesaurus. Your writing is the literary equivalent of a cargo cult. You assume that literary form entails literary function instead of vice versa. Putting together a bunch of scrap metal to look like a helicopter does not magically make the scrap metal into a helicopter.

>> No.20627397

>>20627344
Based.

>> No.20627403

>>20627344
If you can't glean the esoteric subtext in the passage I posted then I can safely say your faculties are drearily deficient.

>> No.20627411

>>20624313
>the bourne of indivisibility's yields
It's shit and you should feel bad.

>> No.20627425

>In this episode, /lit/ bullies a pretentious midwit

>> No.20627434

>>20627411
It is not.

>> No.20627438

I had apprehended indivisibility's bourne. This condition had been presaged a mere month ago. It had come to me by way of my dawn's crepuscular fulgur. Now I lay before the opaque vestiges of a most serene realm. I sought to behold the preternatural symphony as it erupted from the veil's seams. The embers shone resplendent and invited my gaze onto their flaming speckled hues. I took a few cautious steps towards the edge of space and came to know then of the reckless cause which had most recently led me astray. Fortune had thus dispensed its shares.

>> No.20627444

>>20627344
>Simply throwing together a bunch of "smart"-sounding words
So that's all you gathered then.

>> No.20627468

>>20627434
See the first line of this post: >>20624946
>You don't get to decide if you have talent. Other people do.
Shakespeare is a good writer, not because he thought he was a good writer, but because many people across hundreds of years thought he was a good writer.
In some circumstances with uncontestable delusion of grandeur would be be based, in the traditional sense, but you are not based because you are clearly seeking external validation to confirm such delusions. This is much rather a textbook example of narcissism. You want to believe that you are a literary genius, so you come here and try to fit it, and when you get honest criticism that doesn't conform to your desires, you start to lash out and double down on your delusions. If you want to believe that you are one of the greats, go ahead, just don't expect others to also believe that you are one of the greats until you can actually prove you are worthy of such opinion. Go to Reddit if you want to have people suck your womanly balls and tell you how great of a writer you are for using pretentious prose.

>> No.20627471

Lol your writing is mid and not bussing fr pmm

>> No.20627478

>>20624313
Wow this is great. Your mastery of vocabulary pushes boundaries and makes for an interesting read. It was a tough read but I felt satisfied by the end. You have tons of talent.

>> No.20627492

>>20627478
I'm doubtful of your honesty.

>> No.20627504

>>20627468
>but because many people across hundreds of years thought he was a good writer.
How is this a sound criterion?

>> No.20627513

>>20627504
It's not any less valid than your criterion of just claiming you are a good writer.

>> No.20627516

>>20627468
>>20627468
>you start to lash out and double down on your delusions.
I'm being somewhat amenable though.

>> No.20627540

>>20627468
>not because he thought he was a good writer.
Is that so?

>> No.20627546

>>20627513
Posterity might prove me right.

>> No.20627617

>>20627492
You should have more confidence in yourself. It is a unique read.

>> No.20627625

>>20627617
Your comment doesn't align with the rest. It threw me off. Thanks for the feedback.

>> No.20627630

>>20627617
:)

>> No.20627675

>>20627630
I was just being ironic. You really either are a troll or a retarded woman.

>> No.20627695

>>20627675
I was right to doubt your honesty then. Your comment indicated a modicum of lucidity.

>> No.20627699

>>20624313
i couldn't write this bad if I tried. Waldunian

>> No.20627717

Op, care to explain the meaning of your passage? I'm starting to wonder if you are not just a clever troll after all, once I put some effort into reading it.

What I've gathered is its talking about feelings of limitations that were overcome in some moment of revelation, enlightening you to a more satisfying frame of mind.

Or something like that. It's hard to say since there is nothing particularly concrete that stood out, so the rest is centered around some vague notion. Maybe I'm just too stupid to get it, don't know.

>> No.20627724

>>20627717
>Maybe I'm just too stupid to get it, don't know.
This is easily the most perceptive observation you've made so far.

>> No.20627731

>>20627717
>What I've gathered is its talking about feelings of limitations that were overcome in some moment of revelation, enlightening you to a more satisfying frame of mind.
This be the gist.

>> No.20627754

>>20627717
>centered around some vague notion.
It emulates your existence.