Can anyone explain what all the hype is about?

[Op No.20335919]

I keep hearing about this nigger but he sounds fucking retarded
>muh monism
>muh single substance
>muh geometrical reasoning
how tf motion exists with one substance, how does something of one substance perceive something of the same substance if they're the same shit? Literally retarded logic lmao...

[Anonymous No.20335974]

>>20335919
seconding

[Anonymous No.20336942]

>>20335919
Did you read his works?

[Anonymous No.20337283]

>>20335919
>Ethics
>it's about metaphysics
What did the cookware worshipper mean by this?

[Anonymous No.20337296]

>>20335919
He had some merits but I think Descartes was more or less right about this one

[Anonymous No.20337402]

>>20335919
Just another hack shilled by jews

[Anonymous No.20337827]

>>20335919
>how tf motion exists with one substance
The substance has many modes.
>how does something of one substance perceive something of the same substance if they're the same shit?
By one mode affecting another.
Please read past page 3 next time you call a philosopher retarded.

[Anonymous No.20337828]

>>20337283
You thought you were clever writing this, but really you just exposed that you haven't read past the first of five sections lol

[Anonymous No.20337847]

>>20337402
Please tell me what is "hacky" about a guy who derives his own metaphysics, physics, epistemology, psychology, ethics, and politics using a rigorous and clear axiom-theorem style?

[Anonymous No.20337852]

>>20337296
More or less right about what? It's easy to make vague claims to make it look like what you're talking about, but it seems more like you're just discounting Spinoza because you are too lazy to read him.

[Anonymous No.20339187]

>>20335919
Via descent, traversal, and return.

[Anonymous No.20339231]

>>20335919

It's just the idea of constructing a philosophical system in the context of modernity and jews, taking Euclid as exemplar. It's an amusing intellectual experiement, nothing more. It reduces to unsatisfactory leaps about god and language which are used to concoct a worldview.

The real value of the treatise is in its back half (and definitely not in its first), where he sets up simple and arbitrary RGB emotional admixture states in terms of three "primary colors": pain, pleasure, desire. He couches a treatment of human emotions in terms of these three (which need not themselves be primary, of course).

t. has understood the Ethics correctly and feels pleasure thereby

[Anonymous No.20339251]

>>20337852
I've read the Theological-Politico and Ethica but you wouldn't know because you don't have empirical proof I've done so, like I don't have empirical proof of your heterosexuality

[Anonymous No.20339259]

>>20337847
The part where his metaphysics is dumbed down neoplatonism