[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 40 KB, 484x578, Heidegger_1955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20108509 No.20108509 [Reply] [Original]

I'm 6 pages into the first 25 page lecture in "On Time and Being" by this piece of shit Nazi fuck and I'm already getting filtered by German autism. I really want to read the Eggman can you guys help me out with some pointers? I need the cheat codes

>> No.20108522

I'd never waste my time on such crap

>> No.20108527

Get one of those "guide to German autistic crap" books or read the wiki article.

>> No.20108532

lmao

>> No.20108560

>>20108527
Do you have any suggestions?

>> No.20109416

>>20108509
Don't read the next sentence until you are certain you understand what Egghider is trying to say in this one.

>> No.20109461

Heidegger wasn't really a Nazi, he just wanted to be left alone in his career.

>> No.20109582

>>20108509
Why would I help someone who types like this? It's all so tiresome.

>> No.20110163

>>20109461
Heidegger said the final solution couldn't come soon enough

>> No.20110175

>>20110163
horseshit

>> No.20110191

>>20110175
Not him but Read Heidegger‘s Blackbook, he’s says Jews are agents of modernity who’s involvement in politics, finance, and technology are going to end up being killed by non-Rootless people and claims the Holocaust was completely their fault, kek.

>> No.20110198

>>20110191
Based

>> No.20110255

>>20108509
stop trying to read heavy authors and books to flex on people who don't care about you. high nigger is a very specialized thinker. Are you going to read and understand hilbert's 7th problem with your understanding of maths? Yeah you know what a number is, just like you can read english. But that doesn't mean you're going to grasp the underlying material.

>> No.20110302

>>20110191
which ponderings? im reading an interview with the publisher of the blackbooks where he is denying all accusations of antisemitism towards the egger.

>> No.20110308

>>20110302
nevermind I found them

>> No.20110434

Yo, I've studied the original German text in uni and I think I can help you out, but my notes are on my laptop which I can't access until April. Do you have discord or anything of that sort? I would hit you up and we could talk about it in a week or so.

>> No.20110474

>>20108509
>Only God can save us now
Kinda summed up Western Philosophy/Theology

>> No.20110477

>>20110191
where is the lie?

>> No.20110522

>>20110191
sounds about right

>> No.20110545

>>20110434
nepyope#9798

>> No.20110553

>>20110545
Sent

>> No.20110572 [DELETED] 

Look up Dreyfus' Being and Time course on archive.org, unfortunately you can't find the syllabus which tells you which sections to read for every lecture anymore. One of his tricks is to read the preface later, not first, because the preface is famously difficult.

You're getting filtered because you aren't familiar with what used to be common knowledge of Aristotelian concepts, known even by non-Aristotelians and anti-Aristotelians because they're useful for thinking with. He's just saying that the highest genus of beings, things, has been misapprehended as itself a sort of being or thing (a "genus," in this case the highest genus), so that a sufficient explanation of "what is being?" is mistakenly taken to be "the highest category of beings." And he wants to turn our attention to the problem of Being, to make it problematic again instead of letting it hide in ossified beings like "the highest category of beings," by showing how beings actually come to be the beings they are for us, with a phenomenological description of our experience of things in general.

>> No.20110882

>>20108509
Lookup Graham Harman's Introduction to Heidegger. He breaks down and explains Heidegger's concepts so well that you don't need any prior philosophical reading to understand it. Seriously, if you read Graham Harman's book and still have no understanding of Heidegger, then don't bother reading him. It's that simple.

>> No.20111385

>>20110191
lol

>> No.20111728

>>20110882
I'll check it out thanks