[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 486 KB, 1041x1600, 81Qoo0i0r0L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20098292 No.20098292 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.20098398

>>20098292
words on many pages that make you forget you live for nothing for a little while.

>> No.20098403

>>20098292
Kino schizopost

>> No.20098533

>>20098292
Heresy

>> No.20099059

Tolkien from before Tolkien existed

>> No.20099072

>>20098292
Angels having sex.

>> No.20099087

>>20099072
many keks.

>> No.20099190

>>20099087
I still laugh how a single bizarre line in genesis led to angels coming on Earth to have sex leading to special ascending vision which then became a foundation of Kabballah and succubus sex cults among heretics and Jews.
The scribes couldn't have written "the sons of Seth and daughters of Cain".

>> No.20099446

>>20098292
Formerly heavenly beings fucking humans, getting banished to the dark. Schizophrenic descriptions of luminaries. Schizophrenic esoteric prophecy and such. Inspiration. Overall a good read.

>> No.20099512

>>20099190
>"the sons of Seth and daughters of Cain".
They probably didn't write that because that's not what they meant

>> No.20099526

>>20098292
unfiltered jewish schizo kino

>> No.20099534

>>20098292
No one will admit this, but unironically eternal hellfire and damnation when the freaks you summon drag you down with them in the end.

>> No.20099573

>>20099534
My bad, thought this was a Qliphoth thread for some reason. OP, you’re in for ancient aliens hebrew edition.

>> No.20099575

>>20098292
Honestly it's hilarious watching Christians try to explain away why the New Testament quotes from Enoch.

>> No.20099741

>>20099512
Sure, they were succubus chasing.

>> No.20099852

>>20099741
It might offend modern sensibilities, but essentially everyone prior to Augustine interpreted Genesis 6 to refer to angelic entities

>> No.20099974

>>20099852
It was a not uncommon belief but not essentially everyone. Before Augustine st Gregory of Nazianzus, st Ephrem of Nisibis and Eusebius of Caesarea were against it. Among rabbis it was not in favor at all. They went further and the opinion was anathematized by tannaic doctors long before st Augustine.

>> No.20100459

>>20099974
It's pretty hard to square the fact that the phrase "bene elohim" (sons of god) refers to nonhuman celestial beings everywhere else in the OT with the proposition that they were just offspring of Seth

>> No.20101175

>>20099575
I thought it was jasher?