[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 428 KB, 1400x2100, 81GpcDXuHyL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19930367 No.19930367 [Reply] [Original]

what does /lit/ think of Chapo Trap House?

>> No.19930385

Read Sakai

>> No.19930386

i think they're fundamentally disingenupous/stupid, in that if you're going to be irreverent and ironic as a political angle you should at least own up to it and admit you're a piece of shit like the cumtown guys. these morons are just cognitively dissonant, in denial of the fact that they exist in a way that makes their own ideology impossible.
also, I don't read books to collect ideologies, that's fucking retarded, I just read to have fun.

>> No.19930410

These the people outted by Caleb Maupen recently? Or are they not a part of “bread tube”?

>> No.19930514

>>19930367
this is a cumtown board

>> No.19930537

I'm gay

>> No.19930571

>>19930367
A masterpiece. A marvel of proletariat literature. A light in the dark of capitalism that illuminates what the working class is capable of when they put pen to paper.

>> No.19930580

>>19930514
More of a Matt and Shane guy these days.

>> No.19930612

Part of the new wave of lightweight American leftoids, certainly not the worst though as they don't really try to pass themselves off as serious.

>> No.19930824

>>19930514
Cum town fucking sucks

>> No.19930843

>>19930514
Cumtown is so racist it's not even funny

>> No.19930847

>>19930514
Cumtown isnt even racist so its not funny

>> No.19930883
File: 3.84 MB, 1201x1201, 1639761871311.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19930883

>>19930514
>>19930824
>>19930843
>>19930847
>hehe yeah dude liberals are all gay faggots
>why yes I voted for Hillary, how could you tell?

>> No.19930940

Red fascists.

>> No.19930959

>>19930883
So many leftists didn’t vote for her that the orange one became President. See?

>> No.19931039

>>19930386
A good take on /lit/, nice

>> No.19931102

>>19930940
would be based if true

>> No.19931108

>>19930367
Americans and leftism do not mix well.

>> No.19931122

It goes in the same aisle as a Bill O'Reilly book.

>> No.19931132

>>19931108
You’ve bought their propaganda, anon. The nation has a long history of leftism and the liberal establishment attacking it at every turn.
Just look at this little squiggy >>19931102

>> No.19931147

>>19930367
All these "late stage capitalism" retards are retards. They assume the revolution will be left wing, but why? Revolutions happens when you asphyxiate hard skill workers, particularly farmers, to the point they must rise up. Farmers are getting politicized all around the world, but not with leftist politics. All these leftist retards should look up what happens when the revolution comes from right wing farmers.

>> No.19931469
File: 6 KB, 274x184, index1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19931469

>>19931147
true. revolution always leads to reactionary politics. happened in america. happened in USSR. happened in china. the only option is to rebel

>> No.19931487

>>19930367
the second the Natostations embraced the exiles they deserve only the slow magma of the coming eruption

>> No.19931541

>>19931147
I don’t think they assume the revolution will be left wing. Trump proved that. They hope that it is left wing. They want the working class to adopt leftist ideology and thus bring about a leftist revolution, but I think even they would acknowledge that the right has been more effective when it comes to propagandizing to and mobilizing the working class.

>> No.19931554

They might occasionally have a good take but I wouldn’t take them seriously as political thinkers. They’re pop politics packaged in irony and cynicism for doomer millennials and zoomers. I would never be caught dead reading a book with their branding.

>> No.19931571

>>19930410
No because they weren't mean to him on Twitter.

>> No.19931796

Are they even still around? Nobody cares about them now that the Trump era is over. Libtards (yes that term includes you too "leftists") have gone back to watching netflix now that familiar old Biden is back in office.

>> No.19931823

old and fat

>> No.19931826

nothing gets my dick harder than reading communism from a bunch of neets

>> No.19931859

>>19931541
>They hope that it is left wing.
They already lost that battle. Leftism has very little influence over the blue collar workers who actually create wealth. Leftism may have some influence among urban proletarians, but so what? Urbans zones nowadays are almost completely focused in a service economy. Do all those morons on /r/antiwork don't get that they are useless and that don't have any leverage? Farmers can stop a country, truckers can stop a country, people working on energy can stop a country, and so on. It's hilarious some guy with a philosophy degree who works at a McDonald's at day and posts in /r/latecapitalism at night thinks he will have a role to play in the coming revolution, which may not ever come anyway. The modern left despises rural workers and they are fucked for it because those are the only ones who can make a revolution happen.

>> No.19931866

>>19930514
This is a Red Scare board you gay faggot

>> No.19933076

>>19931859
You forgot about ports dumbass, not a lot of those in rural nowhere

>> No.19933385
File: 52 KB, 1251x299, ports.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19933385

>>19933076
Dem ports is unio'n territory, boyo. No libs allowed.

>> No.19933397

>>19930959
yes, but more boomers voted for Trump

>> No.19933691

>>19930367
Vote-blue-no-matter-who leftists that all have the same voice and the same lisp

>> No.19933869

>>19930385
fuck off

t. commie

>> No.19933879

>>19933385
“min efficiency”

fuck off

>> No.19933880

I do not understand why you people waste time on shitty political podcasts of all things, just read a fun novel or go watch a film, why listen to drooling retards talk about gossip for hours on end

>> No.19934004

>>19931147
Saying that the next revolution will be proletarian is not the same as saying that it will be "left wing".

>> No.19934015

>>19931541
>Trump proved that.
what exactly did Trump prove? he didn't particularly side with those right-wing proles, all he did was enrich himself and his cronies, hardly a revolution.

>> No.19934021

>>19931147
This. It seems all the commies who realize this somewhat are trying to distance themselves from the urbanoid retard types and shift their positions to a more appealing a socially conservative economic populism.

>> No.19934046

>>19934021
>a socially conservative economic populism.
That's romantic nonsense and was thoroughly destroyed by Lenin. However, it is right to say that a proletarian revolution is necessarily immoral and not necessarily progressive.

>> No.19934109

>>19931147
>>19931541
>>19931859
>>19934021
>>19934004
There will be no "revolution" because the proletariat today is unable to fully seize the means of production on it's own. The modern economy is too complex. Production is decentralized, ownership is centralized. Even Imperialism in it's traditional form is dying. The division of labor has reached such an extent that no one actually knows what's going on anymore, without global trade the factories in Asia, Europe and the Americas would stop churning. If revolution were to be attempted today it would either end in starvation, it would be co-opted or crushed with 21st century firepower. France in 1968, China in 1989, Argentina in 2001, the Naxalites, even Democratic Confederalism today; It didn't, hasn't, and isn't going anywhere.
Leninist revolutions that captured the state degenerated, the fundamental mechanisms and function of the modern state - as described by Engels - corrupted them; Even Lenin was forced to pass liberal reforms after resisting them first, Mao appointed industrialists, Vietnam degenerated, North Korea did, as did Eastern Europe, and all other global examples. Revolutionary movements were either co-opted or smothered in their infancy.
The revolutionary class is the peasantry, but they have been greatly diminished due to advances in productivity, right-wing populism mostly amounts to rural workers (most of whom are already being displaced by billionaires), just take a look at how much farmland Bill Gates alone acquired in the past decade before you start talking about how "farmers" are the revolutionary class, many billionaires are doing the same thing..
What's left is a mostly apathetic population too reliant on wage labor to push for anything other than luke-warm SocDem reforms. Everyone is being exploited and engaging in exploitation themselves.
Foucault put it best when he said that "Marxism exists in nineteenth-century thought like a fish in water: that is, it is unable to breathe anywhere else".

>> No.19934163

>>19930386
>if you're going to be irreverent and ironic as a political angle you should at least own up to it and admit you're a piece of shit
But they do.

>> No.19934200

>>19930367
They're past their prime, but still fun. They're at their best when they're clowning on MAGA pigs. Their best work is talking about stuff like the villages or shit like Ben Shapiro's fiction book, or just being around MIGApedes at CPAC. They really went downhill with Trump out of office.

>> No.19934251

>>19930367
Subhuman champaigne socialists.

>> No.19934382

>>19934163
That’s my fault for using piece of shit I specifically; what I mean is they should own up to it by honestly presenting themselves purely as mindless entertainment than as a political resource.

>> No.19934433

>>19934382
feel like I might still be being vague…
reading through Ben Shapiros shitty book is not funny (obviously beb shapiros going to write shitty fiction, just laugh at the premise, don’t read the whole fucking thing) and it’s a cheesy political move equivalent to when tucker Carlson brings on trans Reddit mods to embarrass themselves. Further, if the autistic retard writing the book we’re black and talking about how evil America is, they’d clearly be lauding it unironically. It’s just boring and gay.

>> No.19934551

>all these lefty grifts and protests seemingly died overnight after joe

Who could have seen that one eh?

>> No.19934572

>>19934551
Chapo is still around though. And they're not particularly friendly to Joe Biden. They portray him as an avatar American decay and collapse, and a symbol of the nation's resignation to those things.

>> No.19934582

What would upper middle class white people know about revolution? These people have never held a loaded gun before. They are Fabian liberals. They only know how to destroy institutions with academic cancer. There is no Le based revolution coming, queers. Just decay until Haiti tier conditions are reached.

>> No.19934584

>>19934382
their irreverence is important to their political utility. that's their whole thing . thats what amber meant when she coined the term dirtbag left

>> No.19934588

>>19930367
anti-intellectual + not really funny. I don't see the point

>> No.19934594

more of a grill stream guy

>> No.19934680

You guys ever check out hexbear? It's just trannies that can't curl soda cans.

>> No.19934699

>>19934584
that's called a grift, anon.
forming an identity around nothing but image and apathy is what children do. when you charge people for it on patreon, that is a gift.
again, at least the cum boys will tell people on the show how bad the show is, and not deny the obvious. the chapo gang is putting out books because they want to be an industry. it's disgusting desu

>> No.19934710

The only chapo listener I've encountered was a wealthy DSA lesbian who started crying when I said a workers' revolution can't rule out violence against the bourgeoisie according to Marxism

>> No.19934744

>>19930580
Same

>> No.19934746

"let's try to incorporate Jim Goad style art and prose into our gay utopian movement: the book"

What DSAtards fundamentally do not understand is that blacks, fags, and feminists fundamentally do not like or understand humor and interpret "edginess" as the preserve of straight white men.

Doomed movement from the beginning.

>> No.19934755

I normally avoid podcasts as reddit/normie crap but I enjoyed a few information-heavy episodes of Fash the Nation lately. But then I tried to find more episodes like those ones and they talked about fucking winter weather for 20 minutes and I was like yep it's a podcast again.

>> No.19934772

>>19934015
>I get all my info from biased leftwing sources
You're laughably incorrect too, btw.

>> No.19934780

>>19934772
How about you reply to my question instead of making assumptions? what exactly did Trump do for the average rural worker?

>> No.19934789

>>19934746
Who exactly is Jim goad? I like his Counter Currents articles but I just assumed he was some guy. Do people know him beyond these circles?

>> No.19934824

>>19934572
Still keeping the grift going. I guess there are still some NPC r3ddit followers stupid and aimless enough to prop up this cancer. If you listen to this there is a 100% chance that you're a loser in high school with rainbow flags on xer laptop, or you are some sort of fucked up faggot tranny or soyy boy with nothing going for you apart from your wageslave job and virtue signaling.

This is why the "workers" will never be on your side. People who make money, own land and have children have a much more mature and discerning hold on reality. Which is to say, their views are what today would be considered "right wing". Some might even be "far right"! Oy vey! They don't want their neighbourhoods filled with violent black monkeys or half-witted, inbred muslim savages who have evolved (if we are being generous) to the level of medieval peasants.

>> No.19934863
File: 57 KB, 1500x841, projection.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19934863

>>19934824
>there is a 100% chance that you're a loser in high school with rainbow flags on xer laptop, or you are some sort of fucked up faggot tranny or soyy boy with nothing going for you apart from your wageslave job and virtue signaling.

>> No.19934875

>>19934780
He brought back millions of jobs to middle america by reinvigorating key industries like manufacturing and oil, he subsidized farming, he lowered taxes and gave child tax credits, he didn't start any new wars and sent thousands of troops back home, he didn't attack the constitution or cuck to politically correct mobs who hate white, rural Americans, etc. So if you honestly think Biden or Obama were better for these people you are an absolutely delusional retard.

Any 15 year old who has combed through /pol/ for an hour is more knowledgeable than you, yet here you are running your stupid mouth, demanding people answer your idiotic, clueless question. It says a lot about your character, but if you had told me that you were a libtard I would havr been able to induce the mostly same.

I realized that you aren't worth replying to, btw.

>> No.19934887

>>19934863
It isn't, why would I have rainbow flags on binders, be trans, or virtue signal gay libtard beliefs when I am a Traditionalist? Go back to r3ddit, you aren't smart or funny. My profiling of you was perfect and you know it.

>> No.19934893

>>19934780
Not that guy but Trump's most important achievement was just being Trump and getting elected, as far as I know /pol/ people don't give a fuck about his actual "achievements" since he was mostly cucked by neocons and the Jewish lobby. But the significance of his election, its sheer unexpectedness and how the technocratic oligarchy, "new elite," managerial class, "Davocracy" (etc.) reacted to it, by flailing absolutely pathetically, is so powerful as to outweigh all the neocon and shabbos goy shit he did.

He doesn't matter, what matters is that he proved Samuel Francis right by running on a Middle American Radicals (MARs) ticket and winning, and that the elite was forced to show its full hand and prove that it has no way of dealing with this. Trump was basically Pat Buchanan's movement (which Buchanan never had), but without Buchanan at the head of it, while Buchanan's actual run for president was the opposite. Trump proved Buchanan and Francis right.

The significance of Trump can be seen in how he restructured what had formerly been the most stagnant, dead-end oligarchic uniparty consensus in American history. For example, someone like Tucker, who sees which way the winds are blowing, is now explicitly pushing Buchananite "economic nationalism," which can very easily become national-socialism (a term Francis used), or some similar form of national syndicalism on an illiberal-antibourgeois basis. This is having knock-on effects on less imaginative and less ambitious people in the former Republican sphere, like Charlie Kirk, a typical bowtie Young Republican if not for Trump, who because of thought leaders like Tucker can now see the writing on the wall too. Even if people like Kirk are total opportunists, doesn't matter, they are pushing the overton window simply by chasing clout and office. That's how you wage war against the system, you exploit the same cynicism it normally exploits to keep things stagnant in order to make it brittle instead.

And right over the horizon from the Kirk types is Fuentes. Fuentes is a minor figure currently, but Greg Johnson had a good article on him today or yesterday saying that his chief value is that he is a bridge between the Kirk neo-populist wing of the Republican party and the avowed ethnonationalists. Fuentes is to Kirk as Kirk is to Tucker.

>> No.19934895

>>19934780
Lel. Is it your first week on 4ch or are you just stupid?

>> No.19934896

>>19934887
name one (1) tradition

>> No.19934898

>>19934893
The one way to defuse the Trump phenomenon would have been to steer all its potential energy into a dead end like a neo-Reaganite wave, so that the real problems aren't solved, but all the boomer dads and Young Republicans out there think they are because they have another charismatic blip to feel good about and think they accomplished something. They could have been bought off with civic nationalism and a renewed libertarianism (the usual astroturf ideology, designed to contain white working class dissent by directing it toward a mythological "free market" and away from national-socialist/syndicalist organising). But again, the beauty of Trump is not just that he mobilised the MARs, he also showed how inept and sloppy the elites are at counter-mobilising, because of their arrogance. He showed they are a paper tiger.

The worst thing that ever could have happened was Trump beating Biden. It would have vented all the potential energy into that meaningless neo-Reagan shit and we would have gotten another 1990s political theatre episode, delaying the rupture of American society long enough for the elites to keep doing whatever it is they are doing (wealth transfer, degrading and demoralising people's minds and souls, moving to safer areas while letting the heartlands rot etc.).

The best thing that could have happened did happen: Biden won, using typical Democrat gerrymandering and sleaze that was widely perceived as a final slap in the face from the oligarchy to the MAR constituency, the crony oligarch media completely discredited itself to degrees that even I would never have dared hope for, and all the fairweather friends of liberty, millions of ivory tower academic dickheads and glorified pundits like Chomsky, who normally have a centripetal (i.e. status quo maintaining) effect on politics were whipped up into histrionic frenzy and severed from the MARs as credible thought leaders.

I'm ambivalent about Trump running, if there were any better candidate I'd hope he doesn't, but then there isn't one yet. On the one hand, Trump will probably cuck to neocons again and do nothing, while dissipating and wasting the energy of the renascent white working class. This will set the country up for another astroturf Obama minority grievance candidate 4 years later, threatening to restart the Eternal 1990-2000s again. But on the other hand, the sheer ineptitude of the oligarchy and their media and "public intellectual" lackeys indicates to me that they will just go more insane this time, so that after a second Trump presidency, the presidency won't even matter anymore, because MAR self-consciousness will reach its critical mass and realise the federal government is political spectacle, and an authentic American renaissance can occur that sweeps the Augean stables clear of the last century and a half of accumulated horseshit.

Anyone who thinks in le blue team vs. le red team terms is a useful idiot living in warmed over '90s propaganda.

>> No.19934904

>>19934699
>but image and apathy
thats not it

>> No.19934911

>>19934896
The one where you tie the noose and end your pathetic life for being trans (a mentally ill pervert in a dress). Tis a sacred rite, faggot. You're doing god's work, "sista"!!

>> No.19934920

>>19934911
Fuckin checkd and kekd

>> No.19934927

>>19934911
is this a bit or are you actually schizoid?

>> No.19934939

>>19934927
>le chapo tard is thrown off by irony
pottery

>> No.19934947

>>19934109
Revolution will happen, it simply won’t be like the revolutions of the 21st century i.e. it won’t be a bunch of peasant storming the castle, but rather activists and our friends in high places restructuring the world economy until it becomes socialist.

>> No.19934963

>>19934789
he was famous for five seconds as a transgressive writer for a book called the redneck manifesto and then he beat his whore girlfriend half to death and went to prison and everybody stopped responding to his calls so now he can only make money being a minor rw mascot while insisting he's beyond politics or whatever

>> No.19934989

>>19934947
why would your friends in high places advocate for socialism?

>> No.19935003

>>19930367
One of the increasingly popular strains of pseud, very disconcerting

>> No.19935033

>>19930367
unironically hilarious entertainment, but little more than that. i would buy them a beer because there fellow travellers but obviously we disagree on many, many things.

>> No.19935048

>>19934989
>why would the ultra wealthy want to consolidate total power by destroying competition and ruling over a slave megaclass?

>> No.19935058

>>19935048
pick up a history book

>> No.19935063

>>19934927
The word that you are looking for is "schizo" and not "schizoid," you unforgivably fucking moronic fellow reddit leftist. Did you know that around 41% of trannies who mutilate their incel genitals commit suicide, m'dude?

>> No.19935099

>>19935058
I have on many occasions, stupid. And now you should go read what the weforum wants in the near future, it's probably right up your ally, since you seem pretty stupid and naive. You probably won't do it though, because who cares what the international crony capitalist leaders actually want, right? We can just ignore them and pretend to be le ebin socialist revolutionaries!! This is why I say you're stupid, it's nothing personal. You are blind.

>> No.19935133

>>19930367
>>19930514
what's with those names? are they ironic?

>> No.19935144

>>19935099
The abolition of private property, we know.

>> No.19935183

>>19934947
The revolution will happen when hyper inflation hits and a charismatic leader appears to tell hard skill workers it's been enough, that they must take things from the elite to stop the economic and moral decadence.

>> No.19935192

>>19935048
You know those in power are liberals, not leftists, right? You obviously haven't read Mark Fisher.

>> No.19935220

>>19935063
well whatever, take your meds and touch grass etc

>> No.19935253

>>19935192
>I'm not a liberal I just ironical support them!!!
If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck but thinks it's a goose it'll kill himself 41% of the time.

>> No.19935399

>>19934963
>"everybody stopped responding to his calls"
>Lmao are you even well connected? Do you even get invited to the the real parties, the inner circle parties?
>"he can only make money by..."
>Lmao are you even wealthy? Lol can't you just have your dad talk to someone and get you a six figure desk job that allows you to roleplay that you're still a college aged activist into your thirties?

surprisingly revealing of the mindset of the trust fund left. didn't someone reveal that the chapo crew themselves are all suspiciously solvent perpetual members of the new york dadmoney partying with failed "artists" class

>> No.19935460

>>19935048
Except this is literally the world we live in right now. Ultra wealthy already have destroyed competition and rule over us. The slide into infinite gig economy just continues. There is no need to push socialism to accomplish this goal.

>> No.19935475

>>19935133
First, yes. Second, no.

>> No.19935809

>>19935192
They support whatever benefits them, so they push leftism on the lower classes. Liberal and leftist isn't much of a difference btw, considering virtually every leftist openly and fervently supports all the cancer pushed by the neo-lib establishment (vaccines/mandates, supression of dissidents, anti-white culture, open borders, carbon tax, lgbt freakshow shit, etc., all while they consume whatever tripe netflix or amazon prime feeds to them). These people pose no threat to the establishment whatsoever. In fact they are oversocialised, very good little social enforcers. The type of people who will make sure you stay up-to-date on your booster shots and tell you not to say "fag".

>> No.19935814

>>19935460
>consolidate
What is with these redditards who know less than the average kiddie browsing /pol/ for the first time? You are bluepilled retards that need to lurk more.

>> No.19935819

>>19935220
Weak cope, redditcuck.

>> No.19935836

>marxtards think a more refined materialism is revolutionary
HAHAHAHAHAHA what a bunch of dumb slaves

>> No.19935948

>>19934789
>>19934963
Goad came out of the 90s Portland scene. He had a website in the early 2000s that was very influential, albeit low traffic. He was like a Weev, Maddox, Lowtax kind of early internet personality. He's still good friends with Patton Oswalt. His type of humor predated if not directly influenced the sort of stuff you'd see on the FYAD board on Something Awful. Dirtbag left humor is basically FYAD.

>> No.19935987

>>19934109
Very good post and I completely agree. The current global socioeconomic system we are in now is far to complex to be taken over. Revolts will either be crushed or appropriated by the system. If one, against all odds, is successful, the entire system will collapse from the turmoil of a revolution. The only way the global system can collapse is from its own weight. The best book to read on how this would happen is Limits of Growth.

>> No.19936012

>>19934947
>but rather activists and our friends in high places restructuring the world economy until it becomes socialist.
Civilization has been restructuring itself since its inception. It doesn't solve any fundamental issues, all it does is transfer pain from one point to another. Those "friends" in high places will fuck the ever living shit out of you for a modicum of power

>> No.19936013

>>19930367
They've done a great job of making the Democratic Party palatable to the young and disenfranchised White man.

>> No.19936018

>>19935948
dirtbag left wishes it was FYAD, dirtbag left is LF imitation of FYAD ten years after FYAD hosted a birthday party for ozma (fat)

>> No.19936025

>>19936013
Maybe in 2016. Then they got called racists sexist Bernie bros. The democrats are the party of resting bitch face upper middle class white women. Psaki is the ultimate AWFL.

>> No.19936042

>>19935399
i'm an eastern european neet recluse and my dad's a forklift mechanic but i'm glad i could provide you with so much insight into the thinking of wealthy new yorkers

>> No.19936106

>>19936042
why do you types always have some story about your dad working with machines to quickdraw as proof that you're salt of the earth

if i hear about one more manager-developer upper middle class sweeping iron shavings off a rough wooden table and operating a lathe to put food on the table for his kid (who attends berklee music college and listens to post-NPR NPR podcasts) i'm going to stop believing you're all exception-to-the-rule, comfortable-but-father-is-self-made-first-generation-rich-i-swear members of the middle class!!!

>> No.19936123

>>19936013
>Democratic Party
>palatable to the young and disenfranchised White man.

Top kek

>> No.19936132

Someone needs to write a chronology of early internet communities and culture

'90s relics
Usenet
GameFAQs
IRC channels
RSS like Drudge Report
Yahoo! GeoCities (very influential but mostly forgotten)

early '00s
Something Awful
4chan - 4chan became popular with people who were banned from Something Awful
FARK
Myspace
fanfiction.net
deviantart
Livejournal
Ebaumsworld (got nuked by youtube)
neopets
blogspot
reddit
Yahoo! Answers

post iphone internet
Tumblr- very much the heir Livejournal
Facebook - usurped Myspace
Twitter
everything else

>> No.19936231

I honestly cant take people who have never picked up a gun and their revolutionary rhetoric serious. Just stick to posting guillotines on twitter

>> No.19936240

>>19930367
>>19934200
They are most funny when they are shitting on the institutional Democratic party and it's members. Their shitting on Neoliberal Conservatives/warhawks is usually too self-serious and angry to be very funny and their shitting Conservatives usually falls flat. I still listen to every episode because it's like a fun surprise. Will this be a hilarious hour long screed about how evil Hillary Clinton is or how ineffective Obungler is? Or will it be complaining about something they read on twitter about what someone said Ben Shapiro said.

>> No.19936277

>>19935399
Does Chapo even mention Virgin Texas anymore? Don't they pretend he doesn't exists after he was accused of "assault" by someone named (((Jennifer Seberg)))? There was another Chapo-adjacent trust fund leftist essayist that Curtis Yarvin (Moldbug) had a hard on for who was cancelled. I can't remember his name but he was big online and then suddenly disappeared after someone accused him of rape.

>> No.19936378

>>19936106
berkley? what he fuck are you even on about, you american retard? i'm a slav living in a commieblock. i grew up in poverty with other kids in my school buying food for me out of pity. i think political twitter might have fried your brain

>> No.19936380

>>19930514

No, we're Hollywood Handbook chads

>> No.19936400
File: 89 KB, 635x635, 1644890228357.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19936400

>>19931147
>farmers will rise up
Only around 5% of population in the first world works in agriculture

>> No.19936434

>>19936277
what the hell is it with leftist men and constantly raping everybody

>> No.19936443

>>19936434
>(((female))) accusers
It's hard to say what's really going on. Leftist men are more awkward /beta on average and women interpret beta behavior as literal rape.

>> No.19936445

>>19933879
But it's absolutely true, the longshoremen are lazy fucks who actively fight new technology so they can remain fat happy retards as long as humanly possible. And they, along with the teachers' union, control politics in LA.

>> No.19936464

>>19934893

Kino post

>> No.19936489

>>19936434
purely socioeconomic factors

>> No.19936500

>>19934893
Meh. Trumps biggest accomplishment was indirect. Trump's presidency proved that all of the alphabet agencies and non-elected bureaucratic organs of government indeed work together as a shadow government. Before Trump, 'deep state' was just a conspiracy theory. Now there is irrefutable evidence of the deep state and we have a rough outline of how it operates. Even if the MARs are an emergent political force, none of that matters because democracy in America is a sham.

Chuck Schumer: “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday to get back at you. So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he is being really dumb to do this"

>> No.19936516

>>19934893
>Tucker Carlson
>Thought Leader
I don't even dislike Cucker Tarlson, but the notion that he's at the forefront of some Republican synthesis is laughable.

>> No.19936532

>>19936516
Why is it laughable? No dog in this fight I'd just like to see something more substantive.

>> No.19936816

>>19936516
Thought leader doesn't necessarily mean high intellectual. Tucker is currently functioning as an organic intellectual of Buchananism, that's all.

>> No.19937046

>>19936516
>>19936816
Tucker is smarter than the MSNBC talking heads but he's still an upper tier midwit. "The smartest pundit on TV" is not high praise.

>> No.19937047

>>19930367
leftist soiboi faggotry. SMELLY FUCKING NIGGERLOVERS like them and fags that think being a heckin reddit commie is edgy and cool in the year of our lord 2020+2.

>> No.19937054

>>19934904
you're right it's just image, because the apathy serves the image

>> No.19937125

>>19936532
He's an opportunist and nothing more.

>> No.19937196

>>19930514
Actually we're Trueanon

>> No.19937212

>>19937046
He's smart because he knows how to get people riled up, but he doesn’t really believe in most of the things he spews

>> No.19937425

>>19937212
So the same as Rachel Maddow.

>> No.19937435

>>19936277
Virgil left the podcast a few months before he went corporate dem with Briahna Joy Gray. They were no longer on speaking terms.

Sam Kriss was not accused of rape. He was accused of being a creep. Sam and Amber had their own podcast

>> No.19937667

>>19934755
I'd never listened to them before but I recently discovered this really interesting series of episodes that explores the influence of Arthur Finkelstein
https://fash-the-nation.libsyn.com/dont-fink-me-bro-ftns-ultimate-finkelthink-deep-dive
Any other good information-heavy episodes like this?

>> No.19937713

I listen to Chapo a couple of times a week. They're OK but they're not consistently funny.

>> No.19937733

>>19930580
based

>> No.19938065

>>19937425
Maddow is not self-aware