/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.19611125]

Is this guy, or any of the other neoractionaries really, worth reading?

[Anonymous No.19611178]

>>19611125
no.

[Anonymous No.19611203]

>>19611125
>>19611178
Agreed. No.

[Anonymous No.19611261]

>>19611125
His ideas are definitely worth understanding but his actual writing is terrible. It takes him 1000 words to say what he should be saying in 100, so you end up with every post of his reaching into the tens of thousand of words across hundreds of posts.

Nick Land is schizo dribble and the CCRU gets even worse.

BAP is a bit more entertaining and well written and his ideas on space are actually sort of novel, so if you are going to read just 1 of them I'd go with him.

Anything by Hank Oslo and the Myth of the 20th Century guys is usually somewhat insightful. They have some roots with a lot of the now-dead NRx blogs from a decade or so ago so honestly he could probably hook you up with some good recommendations if you're actually curious.

[Anonymous No.19611279]

>>19611125
Absolutely. His style isn't for everyone, but UR is definitely worth reading.

[Anonymous No.19611292]

>>19611261
Are you fucking kidding me? Land is way more Novel than BAP could ever be

[Anonymous No.19611359]

>>19611125
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>You need to read me, because I'm the only one who has completely escaped from ideology. It's called the Clearpill™ - and no it's not the same as doing nothing. It's this totally new form of praxis that works by staying indoors and writing 10,000 word essays until an edgy billionaire notices and decides to fund your projects; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>You need to read the other neoreactionaries, because I am too smart for ordinary humans to comprehend. It's called the IQ communications gap - and no it's not cheap trick to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you. Just ask Vox. You could even ask him to explain Sigma Males™ while you're at it; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>You also need to get into this thing called Urbit to help decentralize the internet. No you can't just build a new kernel with P2P as standard. You need an entire virtual machine written in a new language running on your existing OS and a new blockchain to manage addresses - and no this isn't just a way to get you to buy my new cryptocurrency; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>The whole world needs to be broken up into privately owned patches run by sovereign corporations. No this wasn't tried before in the Belgian Congo or the East India Company territories, and no it didn't produce such a dystopian nightmare that states had to take over; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>Democracy is the worst thing that ever happened. This was all perfectly explained by Lord Henry Tarquin Richelieu Montgomery Cholmondeley-Warner IV 8th Earl of Piddleminster Upon Sea in 1695, a freer time than ours - and no slavery is not incompatible with freedom; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>My father's rabbi thinks I am just repackaging the default Jewish survival strategy of the last 3000 years and repackaging it to sell to disaffected gentiles as a new political science. He's wrong of course. He just doesn't understand the immense complexity of my socio-economic-geopolitical ontology; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>Some have claimed that I take an entire long-ass blog to say what a bunch of drooling skinheads can tell you in 14 words. They're wrong of course - and no I'm not going to explain why. You'll just have to subscribe to my substack and figure it out yourself; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>No I didn't ride my motorcycle to this photoshoot - that would scuff my nice shoes. Why did I wear a motorcycle jacket then? I just picked up the first jacket I saw in a way that way completely unpretentious and non-gay; but I digress...
>Um, um, um, er, um, well, you see...
>but I digress...

Also read my poetry:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aa2UJX_EpQ

[Anonymous No.19611500]

>>19611125
if you want the essay equivalent of someone inhaling their own farts, sure, definitely

[Anonymous No.19611507]

>>19611359
very based takedown

[Anonymous No.19611510]

>>19611125
I'm pretty sure you are able to absorb anything these guys have ever put on paper simply by experiencing society.

[Anonymous No.19611563]

>>19611510
You could also listen to Charlemagne's summary:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6YZt4IXLYPzeTNaLkoTzbvLrN7TZNYT

[Anonymous No.19611952]

>>19611563
charlemagne is pretty based, I've found his videos really informative for understanding this section of the right

[Anonymous No.19611979]

>>19611125
>Remember "Everything bad in Western Civilisation ultimately comes from the Catholic Dark Ages"? It's back, in "Calvinism" form!

[Anonymous No.19611986]

>>19611125
No.

[Anonymous No.19612234]

>>19611261
>One session involved Nick Land “lying on the ground, croaking into a mic”, recalls Robin Mackay, while Mackay played jungle records in the background. “Some people were really appalled by it. They wanted a standard talk. One person in the audience stood up, and said, ‘Some of us are still Marxists, you know.’ And walked out.”
>https://archive.md/ATJyF

[Anonymous No.19612236]

>>19611125
His ideas are genius, but, honestly, you're better just watching that youtube channel where some guy explains them, because while his writing is fun, it's not systematized at all.

[Anonymous No.19612296]

>>19611125
Who's this ugly thing please?

[Anonymous No.19612351]

Moldbug's intellectual credentials are stellar. Trust that over the seething pseuds ITT.

[Anonymous No.19612384]

>>19611125
>5'6 skinnyfat computer nerd wants a might makes right society
I deadlift 550 pounds. I could tear his spine apart without breaking a sweat. Should I ever experience the patent absurdity of this sickly little body of flab and failure kvetching about aristocratic ideals, I would laugh in his face and snap his neck like a twig.

[Anonymous No.19612395]

>>19611359
Basado e rossopillatto

[Anonymous No.19612636]

>>19612384
>wants a might makes right society
Not only have you not read him, you probably haven't even read his wiki page

[Anonymous No.19612656]

>>19611125
Isn't that a Jew? Of course he's not worth reading.

[Anonymous No.19612662]

>>19611125
no and no

[Anonymous No.19612672]

>payed 200 dollars for a book
>all I got was poetry

[Anonymous No.19612831]

>>19612672
This pisses me off too.

[Anonymous No.19612868]

>>19612831
too be fair, both corona and his wife passing upset his plans, I understand that, but I want a guarantee that I will get the book (if it ever comes out) if I don't renew my subscription again

[Anonymous No.19612890]

>>19611125
No, not really. Land's pieces are sometimes entertaining but this faggot is just awful.

[Anonymous No.19612907]

>>19611125
No, just read Carlyle.

[Anonymous No.19612910]

>>19611125
Idk but Hoppe is.

[Anonymous No.19612919]

>>19611359
Absolutely destroyed.
Also his poetry is fucking awful.

[Anonymous No.19612923]

>>19612636
>he thinks corporate totalitarianism in a legalistic framework isn't just the nerd's way of saying might makes right
Gee, I wonder how this legalistic framework in a non-democratic society will be established, upheld and developed? Might it be.. might?

[Anonymous No.19612941]

>>19612910
Yep. Moldbug is a blathering meme even among nrx today. HHH is clear.

[Anonymous No.19612970]

Moldbug's syncretism is only remarkable as a bad conscience 90s shitlib. Read his sources - they're interesting - he is not. His coof apologetics were the nail in the coffin, to say nothing of his glow-in-the-dark Yale bombing suspect brother or 7th floor State Dept. subverter heritage.

[Anonymous No.19613045]

>>19611125
for you?
no.

[Anonymous No.19613065]

>>19611979
Actually, most of the shit we still deal with is a byproduct of biblical literalism via the Catholic Counter-Reformation (Council of Trent).

[Anonymous No.19613119]

>>19612923
>Gee, I wonder how this legalistic framework in a democratic society will be established, upheld and developed? Might it be.. might?

[Anonymous No.19613229]

Crypto-Vogon.

[Anonymous No.19613246]

>>19612923

[Anonymous No.19613271]

>>19611125
He's a faggot. I never read him, but I can see it in his eyes.

[Anonymous No.19613295]

Yes. Now don't be an ADD retard zoomie and stay away from the youtube vids until you've actually read him. If you think his writing is dense or boring or pretentious like the other illiterate retards in this thread then you may actually hate Carlyle if you decide to read him. If your brain is really that smooth however, watch Anamnesis' videos on him. They are much more in-depth than pretty much anything else out there.

[Anonymous No.19613305]

>>19612384
Internet tough guys are quite possibly the cringiest nerds on the internet.

[Anonymous No.19613309]

>>19611125
>don't like Moldbug at all
>skim his website b/c autistic polack friend keeps raving about the guy
>see a fucking blogpost that is basically a personal ad where Moldbug is looking for a girlfriend
>explore the matter further
>it actually fucking worked and he managed to get his kike claws on a cute /lit/ girlfriend half his age from a fucking blogpost
>realize I am before greatness and have been this entire time
Moldbug is extremely internet, I have no other way to put it. You can only appreciate him if you spend your entire life on the internet.

[Anonymous No.19613322]

>>19612970
>His coof apologetics were the nail in the coffin
They don't contradict anything he said. It's mostly just butthurt lib conspiracytards with mommy issues or catholicucks who are dead set on deluding themselves into thinking the fucking vax is replacing the eucharist or something

[Anonymous No.19613323]

Why are software engineers so ugly

[Anonymous No.19613327]

>>19612970
>is coof apologetics were the nail in the coffin
Like what exactly? He's never said Covid was anything but a practice in mass retardation.

[Anonymous No.19613331]

>>19613309
nice.

[Anonymous No.19613348]

>>19613309
https://graymirror.substack.com/p/uncle-yarv-0-dating-call
holy kek my sides

[Anonymous No.19613404]

>>19611261
>dribble
Stopped reading there.

[Anonymous No.19613414]

>>19613327
>Like what exactly?
I quote
>No state has succeeded in ignoring covid completely; it is just strong enough to be unignorable, just weak enough to be debatable.
If you don't deny that Covid 100% doesn't exist you are a libtard to the new retard-right.

[Anonymous No.19613433]

>>19613348
>I’ll convert to anything for the right girl
What a fag. Why would you listen to this guy?

[Anonymous No.19613453]

>>19613348
>>19613331
>>19613309
>>19613433
God I wish I could get a 20 year old pug-ugly-cute girlfriend just by writing a fucking blog post. I do that all the time on here for nothing.

[Anonymous No.19613454]

>>19611125
yes he is very good
this thread is full of coping libtards

[Anonymous No.19613485]

>>19612234
That sounds like so much fun

[Anonymous No.19613502]

>>19613433
Correct. Patriarchy is a "mandate of heaven" as Confucius would say. If you don't actually believe in God and just converted for a woman, why would she respect you?
>>19613453
You need to start an online cult then.
>>19613485
Yeah, I wish I was there too.

[Anonymous No.19613523]

>>19613453
he can do better tbqh

[Anonymous No.19613544]

>>19612910
>t. hasn't gone from Mises to Carlyle
https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2010/02/from-mises-to-carlyle-my-sick-journey/

[Anonymous No.19613646]

>>19613523
he's a 50 year old man with a jewish monster face
he's lucky to get even that

[Anonymous No.19613655]

>>19611261
What's the deal with trannies and nick land/accelerationism?

[Anonymous No.19613657]

>>19611125
He is a bit hard to read, but understand all the actual right-wingers in power read this guy and use his language (the cathedral).

So /lit might not think he is worth it, but the people who actually matter are taking him seriously

[Anonymous No.19613734]

>>19611125
C A Bond although you're gonna have to look hard to find his stuff outside of his pretty great book because he scrubbed his stuff from the internet after some chimpout.

Spandrell.

[Anonymous No.19613793]

>>19613655
Land is a sort of Marxist intellectual from the 90s, and a lot of his more cyberpunk themed work from that era has been influential among the more literate trannies.
from his essay titled, meltdown:
>[[ ]] Meltdown has a place for you as a schizophrenic HIV+ transsexual chinese-latino stim-addicted LA hooker with implanted mirrorshades and a bad attitude. Blitzed on a polydrug mix of K-nova, synthetic serotonin, and female orgasm analogs, you have just iced three Turing cops with a highly cinematic 9mm automatic.
>The residue of animal twang in your nerves transmits imminent quake catastrophe. Zero is coming in, and you're on the run.
He's always asserted such people are the future. This slots into his antihumanitarian views rather opposed to the typical humanitarian transgender activism. " these freaks are the future" as opposed to "these people aren't freaks"
It's a weird match ofc, for him to have a tranny following especially these days, but I guess some of them like how he keeps it real and articulates the debased psyche of a transgenderite.

[Anonymous No.19613804]

>>19613655
Sadie Plant (CCRU philosopher and former gf of Land) created gender accelerationism (g/acc). Trannies adopted her ontology, as it basically allows them to claim they are normal and non-trannies are the freaks.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!bGBGaUpA8kS No.19613862]

>>19613804
I didn’t get any of that from Ones and Zeroes

[Anonymous No.19613896]

Is he actually judging the passage prize contest? also worth asking, did anybody else hear of/submit to it?

[Anonymous No.19613905]

>>19611125
>Moldbug
Meh
>Land
Worth the read if you can actually comprehend how verbose he is
>Hans Herman Hopped
Absolutely worth it

[Anonymous No.19614874]

>>19613305
No, that's clearly neoreactionaries.

[Anonymous No.19615407]

>>19612923
What's interesting is that there have always been thinkers whose entire political philosophy is just them asserting that they should be in charge of society. Moldbug is just doing that with tech industry dweebs while a social science academic like Ibram Kendi wants to create a government department run by social science academics that would monitor and control the rest of the government and society. It's so transparent that you think that thy would have just gone into politics instead.

[Anonymous No.19615421]

moldbug is a retard!!!

[Anonymous No.19615435]

>>19615407
>wtf you just want power to enforce some kind of order upon the world
And?

[Anonymous No.19615444]

>>19615421
Yeah, I ultimately have to agree. Recognizing that we are in a state of cultural decline is just a result of being the slightest bit honest with yourself. Moldbug's failure to recognize that the people responsible for a significant portion of that decline are the tech dweebs that he wants to rule over us. The dweebification of art, culture, and especially the sciences has left us intellectually, creatively and spiritually malnourished, and empowering the people responsible for it isn;t go to turn it around.

[Anonymous No.19615470]

>>19615435
There's a difference in believing that some sort of order should be enforced on society and coming up with some needlessly elaborate way of saying that you and your demographic/position should be the ones running the show. There really isn't much to be gained from reading the latter, while I can think of plenty of worthwhile examples of the former.

[Anonymous No.19615493]

>>19615444
You know that feeling you get when you see someone talk about something after they've entirely missed the point of it? That's the feeling I get reading your post.

[Anonymous No.19615505]

>>19615493
You're just reading commentary from someone who understood something better than you and projecting your lack of understanding onto them.

[Anonymous No.19615509]

>>19615505
No, I'm reading someone comment on a motorcycle repair manual saying that it doesn't seem helpful repairing your blender.

[Anonymous No.19615514]

>>19611125
not with that face

[Anonymous No.19615517]

>>19615509
No, you're a person whose confused a blender repair manual for one on motorcycle repair and are too stupid to realize your mistake even though you've been corrected.

[Anonymous No.19615518]

>>19611261
>BAP is a bit more entertaining and well written and his ideas on space are actually sort of novel, so if you are going to read just 1 of them I'd go with him.
For what it is worth, BAP just restates Deleuze's psychical nomadism.

[Anonymous No.19615521]

>>19612384
okay larper

[Anonymous No.19615535]

>>19615517
>Read book titled "My plan for commodifying everything, including government and culture"
>Leave it thinking "It tried and failed to explain how to solve the problems caused by commodifying everything like as government and culture"

Just because someone's right wing doesn't mean everything they write is on the same level or of the same kind as Tucker Carlson's Guide to Owning Libtards. Pay more attention to what you read.

[Anonymous No.19615540]

>>19613655
it appeals to the self destructive nature of trannies

[Anonymous No.19615546]

>>19615535
And I'm arguing that his plan is going to exacerbate the problems that he's trying to solve because he doesn't understand what the problems actually are, which is why he's not worth reading.

[Anonymous No.19615562]

>>19615546
How do you actually read a book where a guy says he's trying to solve problem X, writes all about problem X, then come on here and argue that he's actually trying to solve problem Y and did a bad job because he doesn't know what problem Y is? Apply that to any other book.
>This lawn mower assembly guide is actually a cookbook for pasta, and it's a particularly bad one because the author doesn't talk about how to make pasta. I don't even think he understands what pasta is.

[Anonymous No.19615575]

>>19615562
Because one of the major reasons for trying to solve problem x is its contribution to problem y, and the manner in which his solution would not remedy problem y (and perhaps may even exacerbate it) makes that solution dumb.

[Anonymous No.19615578]

>>19615562
lol wow

[Anonymous No.19615580]

>>19615470
Fair enough. I don't disagree with you from a literary perspective (why the fuck would I care about why X should be in power if it's not going to benefit me, or if I can't become X?), but rather I'm pushing back against this Conservative notion of
>wanting power is bad!

>>19615546
Moldbug, like all neoreactionaries, yes even the BASED cathedral enjoyers who want a return of MONARCHY and the POPE, believes that the institutions of the present day are fundamentally legitimate. He just wants to open them up, toy with the innards, and put new people in charge. He understands this just fine. That's why he's not a White Nationalist after all (well, that and the whole Chosen thing). That's the point: his thesis isn't supposed to smash Liberalism open and spew its guts on the floor so that something new can come about. Rather, it's about how Liberalism would work better if Bill Gates were the King and the Pope got to tell your kids about how pederasty is holy and racism is a sin.

[Anonymous No.19615591]

>>19615575
>Because one of the major reasons for trying to solve problem x is its contribution to problem y
According to you, or the guy who wrote the book you're pretending to understand?

[Anonymous No.19615621]

>>19613523
They're both ugly lol

[Anonymous No.19615782]

>>19615580
>why the fuck would I care about why X should be in power if it's not going to benefit me, or if I can't become X?
I'm a serious asshole. I shouldn't be in power and whoever holds power shouldn't benefit people like me. There are better worlds than those which incentivize behavior such as mine...
Nietzsche's ideas about life aren't as generalistic as you might think

>conservative notion of blablabla
wutt?? stop throwing around all these concepts without either further explanation or the footnote that you're actually a giant retard who hasn't spent 3 minutes of his existence deeply thinking about terms like "power"

[Anonymous No.19616418]

>>19613804
>her ontology, as it basically allows them to claim they are normal and non-trannies are the freaks.
can I get a link to this? sounds insane

[Anonymous No.19616421]

>>19615444
Moldbug does not want tech dweebs to rule, he emphasizes this over and over--his type of nerd would not be the rulers

[Anonymous No.19616749]

Yarvin: no

Other reactionaries: yes

[Anonymous No.19616756]

>>19615518
I haven't read much Deleuze, did he also have a Borat gimmick

[Anonymous No.19616760]

>>19611125
Curtis' writing style is actually really fun. He would have made a good political columnist for a magazine like Rolling Stone or Playboy if he had different views.

[Anonymous No.19616763]

>>19611359
>>Democracy is the worst thing that ever happened. This was all perfectly explained by Lord Henry Tarquin Richelieu Montgomery Cholmondeley-Warner IV 8th Earl of Piddleminster Upon Sea in 1695, a freer time than ours - and no slavery is not incompatible with freedom; but I digress...
this is true though

[Anonymous No.19616921]

>>19611125
He isn't but I am. I'm post-neo-reactionary homo-Evolo-Guénonian and I refuted him in My Diary Desu.

[Anonymous No.19616989]

>>19616921
Post excerpt

[Anonymous No.19617041]

>>19616989
Here's a very old unfinished poem I found randomly skimming through My Diary.

Too tired to cry
Too sick of lies.
Damned be your presence
Too mad to cry...

In two weeks we were told
That it would be over.
Was forced to grow old
Many weeks later.

I yearn for that time
Prior to disaster.
But I'm sick of your lies
You slandering bastards.

Every Politician is
A beggars for votes
Schizo said "Be Wary"--
And I took note.

When we took up the mask
You took off yours.
You revealed who you were--
Schizo was true.

You took all our Wages,
Made whores of our Women.
Polluted the Earth
And tell us to be Serfs?

How dare you tell us
What we shouldn't eat?
How dare you tell me
"Eat bug not Meat"

How dare you tell me
"A Man is a Woman"
How dare you defend
My People's subversion?

You take away futures,
Contaminate pasts.
Destroy our families,
Preach degeneracy in class?

As Brutal they were
The Axis were Right.
I'm sick of ye untermensch,
And your denial of Life.

The Rights you get
Are the Rights you deserve.
Deny my Life
And I deny yours.

Acceptance and Tolerance
Are not one and the same--
We have pity, you thrive,
When over, you'll die.

I'm Sick of your resentment
Sick of your hate,
That which destroys,
That which negates.

Sick of your (((Markets)))
Sick of your (((Trade )))
Sick of your Fetish
Propaganda Parades

You pierce our eyes
Tell us to trust you.
When Real Eyes Realize,
You say "We'll Arrest You"

Do we not have Ears?
Do we not have Tongues?
Do you not think we Pray for
Your Demise from Above?

Schizo taught Above
Is Beyond the Mind;
Beyond the Sensation,
Of Space and Time

[Anonymous No.19617061]

>>19615518
I think that's incorrect simply because I doubt BAP has read Deleuze, he was a neoconservative academic and they certainly aren't the people to read such things.

[Anonymous No.19617091]

Nrx was sad and pathetic when it came out and its sad and pathetic now.

This guy is loved by the elites, they masturbate and cream themselves to his ideas and want nothing more than new Roman style Latifundia management of the economy. If you think people like him got into power and started shaping instutions it would not look like 18th century Germany or England. But modern China on steroids. Nothing of what Moldbugman says is new or novel, what is new is that Bezos and Zuckerbergs of today salivate over his ideal dream state.

[Anonymous No.19617263]

>>19617091
Zuckenbergs and Bezoses are already getting the benefits of living in this state but don't get the responsibilities and have a room to dodge it because we have the illusion of "government". People always forget this part, if you let Moldbug have his way then suddenly censorship on Facebook stops being a matter of "private platform", Bezos would be seen as responsible for externalities of some of his actions without the excuses that he has no power to change it etc. They already have huge influence over politics and policies(the general public has some influence over politics but little if any over policies), the patchwork just acknowledges the fact and, since they have a formal role etc. then suddenly all the dodges they do right now to avoid responsibilities of the rulers are taken away.

Meanwhile people like you will just prefer to live in dreamworld where if only you manage to vote in the right politicians or bring in the right revolution(even more naive opinion) you will set it all straight, because you will have teh public government fighting teh private vipers, now it will never happen, but it gives you a sense of moral superiority over solution that forces vipers to wear a crown(and as it's known, the king doesn't sleep in it)

[Anonymous No.19617332]

>>19611261
>hank Oslo
>Myth20C
Absolute Chad take. Hank is the biggest brain on that show.

[Anonymous No.19617342]

>>19611125
No.

[Anonymous No.19617359]

>>19611125
no, read these instead.

[Anonymous No.19617519]

>>19617342
That's a great quote though. Describes the current state of affairs perfectly.

[Anonymous No.19617526]

>>19611178
fpbp

[Anonymous No.19617678]

Ok he sounds literally unbelievably based, at least from his quotes

[Anonymous No.19618549]

You need to understand that Yarvin is crypto-based & deliberately illegible to most people. He literally advocates a doctrine of "Taqiyya" in one of his posts, a Muslim practice of lying to avoid persecution.

consider this passage:
>The second problem is that yeomen are inherently sedentary, and human populations not deeply selected by the agricultural revolution may be poorly adapted to any kind of sedentary existence. These populations can only express their potential by existing as nomadic autochthons—hunter-gatherers, essentially. Otherwise they fail to thrive.

>Columbia does not currently have any autochthonous tribes, but “down on the rez” it has a lot of humans of recent autochthonous descent, who are indeed failing to thrive. They seem to need more freedom and challenge than agriculture-adapted populations, probably because tending crops is boring as hell. This tedium became a test that your nerdy, manlet ancestors passed, which is why your teeth hardly fit in your puny jaws. But for those without the evolved Sitzfleisch to endure boredom, man has only alcohol.

>The paradox is that while urbanized observers, from Tacitus to Fenimore Cooper, too often for accident portray a more ancestral population as an inherently superior race of lords, pre-agricultural populations are like Italian racecars: specialized. They do very poorly, except in their adaptive environment. Yes, this is probably a DNA thing. (For the skull-caliper buffs out there, domestication also decreases brain size in animals.)
You think a 110 iq liberal journo skimming is posts for a hit piece will understand what he's saying here? You won't understand how heretical this is until you understand it, at which point it's too late

[Anonymous No.19618586]

>>19618549
Where was this from?

[Anonymous No.19618840]

>>19618549
Seriously though, what is he trying to say here? I get the part where most of us are bred for slavery, but I'm not getting the part about injuns and aryans. That a borderless global empire is ideal for them, or that there's no place for them in this world anymore and they're not coming to save us?

[Anonymous No.19618854]

>>19617332
Hank episodes are always the best. Nick Mason is pretty funny too but he's just an edgelord.

[Anonymous No.19618875]

>>19617678
Kaczynski made this point as well. Everyone is too over-socialized.

[Anonymous No.19619037]

>>19611359
>Clearpill

this is the way reactionaries wanting to apply the apolitical state of mind to their shitty ideology, of course they can´t help themselves by acting like leftists at the end of the day

[Anonymous No.19619046]

>>19612636

[Anonymous No.19619070]

>>19613309
he´s the karl marx of the 21st century, what do you expect?

[Anonymous No.19619086]

>>19618586
post titled: #5: the land, its people and their dogs
>>19618549
Context from the rest of the post would make it clearer. What he is essentially saying here, is that the great American social engineering project of governing interchangeably autochthons with liberal urbanites and traditionalist communal farmers is a doomed experiment due to underlying biological factors. He's not demeaning any goup, only asserting their differences & different needs.
Or more generally, a modern Empire needs to use regional autonomy to differently govern a variety of genetic castes. Such a proposition is race-realist and anti-egalitarian in nature. It's not presented in diction that could trigger antiracist red-flag responses but it easily could be. He's basically advocating for a novel system of segregation, based on social class (which happens to align with various genetic factors but is expected to be somewhat flexible).

[Anonymous No.19619105]

>>19617091
>and want nothing more than new Roman style Latifundia management of the economy.

so the US will be the new south america? isn´t that against American Spirit? the free enterprise commercial driven ethos?

[Anonymous No.19619130]

you should also read Carlsbad19, he´s recently disowning Yarvin because of the covid posts

https://carlsbad1819.wordpress.com

and also read Karl Ludwig von Haller

[Anonymous No.19619189]

>>19618549
>a Muslim practice of lying to avoid persecution.
sounds Jewish to me

[Anonymous No.19619191]

I view him more as a literate friend who can reference and recommend books outside of my purview. I agree with others that his writing never really gets to a point, so I've stopped really reading it.

[Anonymous No.19619241]

>>19611125
From a /lit/ perspective, his essays can be painful but he introduces you to so much that it is at least worth it to follow the hyperlinks (Carlyle, Machiavelli, etc).

From a /pol/ perspective, he purposely writes like that to filter those who shouldn't be reading his shit, but his content idea of updating Carlyle and Machiavelli for the present day genius.

From an nRX perspective, he is literally the core and driving force, but he's half jew so they will do anything to find flaws in him (until he publishes his next essay they can nut over).

His poetry is bar worse than Nabokov.

[Anonymous No.19619254]

>>19611952
Charlemagne's videos are definitely pretty based, but listen to any of his live stuff to find out why he can never be the face of this movement. He comes off like a whiny bitch.

[Anonymous No.19619260]

>>19612907
Carlyle legitimately hurts to read. I'd rather read moldbug than endure Carlyle

[Anonymous No.19619272]

>>19613414
You are just as bad as covitarians. Gas the NPCs, monarch now.

[Anonymous No.19619337]

>>19619130
>he´s recently disowning Yarvin because of the covid posts
I don't think he was ever with him. He doesn't like him because he's a catholic fundamentalist. And like so many right wingers he latches on to any random anti-thing which covid is now.

[Anonymous No.19619341]

>>19619337
Also, he's probably antisemitic and Yarvin's dad was a jew so...

[Anonymous No.19619543]

>start listening to BAP podcast with Moldbug
>five minutes in they discuss theory that black scalp skin is pubic skin, thus the tight curly hair
Is this really the best the dissident right can do?

[Anonymous No.19619568]

>>19619543
it's super effective

[Anonymous No.19619764]

пpocтo пocмoтpи нa eгo eблo a пoтoм пoдyмaй пoтoм eщё paз пocмoтpи нa eблo и пoдyмaй

[Anonymous No.19619773]

>>19611359
>t. secretly got filtered by le lmao Moldbug

[Anonymous No.19619804]

>>19611359
i actually like his poetry

[Anonymous No.19619823]

>>19612384
Fucking BASED

[Anonymous No.19619858]

>>19611125
Worth listening to

[Anonymous No.19620257]

>>19619543
>no fun allowed only my autism theories of utopia

[Anonymous No.19620354]

>>19619543
I found that extremely funny
interesting point about the elusive qualities mulatto chest hair

[Anonymous No.19621037]

>>19619543
Arguably the most advanced discussion I've heard in recent years. It must have gone over your head. Don't despair you'll get there some day.

[Anonymous No.19621432]

>>19618840
those who haven't been farming for the past thousands of years cant handle the boredome of modernity

[Anonymous No.19621706]

>>19611125
Only Land, all other neoreactionaries I've come across are faggots in a bad way