/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.19189879]

Why do you hate him so much when all he wants is the best for you?

Face it, you will never be in the 1% who see nothing but benefit from rampant capitalism.

[Anonymous No.19189897]

You know you can email him and he will respond. Its pretty cool of him to do that.

[Anonymous No.19189922]

He sees no place in his ideal society for organized religion.

[Anonymous No.19189930]

>>19189922
There is no place in any society for organized religion.

[Anonymous No.19189941]

>>19189897
He replied to me while I was in law school. It was pretty neat. Sent one from my normal email and one from school email. The normal one took like 6 weeks to respond, but he replied to the school email in 40 minutes.

[Anonymous No.19189953]

>>19189941
Pretty credentialist for a self described anarchist.

[Anonymous No.19189955]

>>19189930
And you wonder why we can't get along.

[Anonymous No.19189958]

>>19189879
>best for you
God, you people are so dishonest.

[Anonymous No.19189968]

>>19189922
So he's correct.

[Anonymous No.19189994]

>>19189958
Why?

[Anonymous No.19190016]

>>19189879
if he shills the vaccines and shills the technocrat control matrices to force people to comply to the government because of this "deadly virus" then he does not want what is best for you

[Anonymous No.19190027]

also saying the republicans under blomf are the biggest threat to mankind
this nigga is probably a freemason doing divide and conquer because this is the conjuration of a fantasy justifying permanent authoritarianism

[Anonymous No.19190135]

>>19189941
What did you ask him?

[Anonymous No.19190146]

>>19190016
He is ignorant about the internet. He has no clue how to get information from it compared to his ability to analyze traditional top down media.

[Anonymous No.19190183]

>>19190016
He didn't say that people should be forced to get a vaccine. He said that if people insist on not getting a vaccine, then they should do the decent thing and isolate themselves from others instead of insisting on the right to run around harming people.

[Anonymous No.19190273]

>>19190183
That's completely unsupported by the data and our understanding of how jabbed vs unjabbed people respond to variants.

[Anonymous No.19190325]

Chomsky is the ultimate filter. Not because he is difficult to understand, but because hating him is the only 100% certain sign of mitwitdom.

[Anonymous No.19190329]

>>19190325
You can really easily tell when people have second hand opinions of him but haven't read his works.

[Anonymous No.19190391]

>>19189879
He thinks Anarchism can exist with mass immigration but it wont. Every example of Anarchism was done by a homogenous society. Let the spooks in and Anarchism will collapse.

[Anonymous No.19190392]

>>19189879
I don’t read works by dysgenic individuals, as it surely distorts their sagacity

[Anonymous No.19190416]

>>19189941
Seriously? Haha, I want to email him

[Anonymous No.19190428]

>>19190416
He replied to me with like 5 paragraphs in 40 minutes after asking him a pretty obscure question

[Anonymous No.19190449]

Chuds hate Chomsky because he literally has never lost a debate against a Conservative.

[Anonymous No.19190457]

>>19190449
He never debated any real conservatives. William F Buckley was a talk show host

[Anonymous No.19190470]

Why do you hate him so much when all he wants is the best for you?

[Anonymous No.19190482]

>>19190470
He only wants the best for the White man and I'm no White man

[Anonymous No.19190486]

>>19190470
he wants the best for his bank acciunt

[Anonymous No.19190488]

>>19190482
No he doesnt. What gave you that idea??

[Anonymous No.19190494]

>>19190486
Its called win-win.

[Anonymous No.19190612]

>>19190470
There's no point in "self improvement" when the structure of the economy itself is rigged against you. You will never have the opportunity your parents and grandparents had, because it has been taken from you.

[Anonymous No.19190621]

>>19190612
>there is no point in improvement unless it leads to more money
an ironically hypercapitalist view that you'll never have the self-awareness to break out from

[Anonymous No.19190630]

>>19190621
Peterson's advice relates to asserting yourself in dominance hierarchies, which, in the west, truly consist almost solely in monetary terms.

[Anonymous No.19190642]

>>19190630
so? you were making a judgement on a broad concept based on your own values

[Anonymous No.19190663]

>>19190612
Defeatist attitude is not helpful. I get what you are saying and I even agree. But since I decided not to kms, I will still looksmaxx and go to the gym and learn as much as I can. Nothing else to do really.

[Anonymous No.19190692]

>>19190642
These systems are pyramid shaped. They are designed to keep those at the bottom disenfranchised and to monopolize the gains for the top only. My point is that the only way to succeed is to drop out of that game. Self improvement as he defines it is simply participating in a corrupt system. "Stand up straight" and "Take on responsibility (without any of the attendant rewards)" are not useful pieces of advice. No amount of room cleaning will change your soul crushing enslavement to a system that will call you an essential worker while treating you as utterly disposable.

[Anonymous No.19190743]

>>19190457
Perle, Dershowitz, Bolkenstein and Scott Thompson were conservatives

[Anonymous No.19190755]

>>19190621
Actual socialists have always been materialists. Money is extremely important and the whole hippie "woah you can be even happier without money man" bs is just a memery.

There's a limit to where money stops increasing your contentment of course, but below that limit money is important.

[Anonymous No.19190761]

>>19190692
anon, i was just pointing out some basic, honestly even trivial gap in your middle school discourse, not really asking you to expand on it. apart from that, your line of reasoning is all over the place, but there's no harm or actual social consequences to it so i don't really care about it. good luck waiting for capitalism to collapse because you refused to brush your teeth

[Anonymous No.19190776]

>>19190743
Libs and libertarians are not conservatives. Also you just posted politicians and media people. He never would have dared to debate a real academic conservative. Chomsky said about Roger Scruton who I wouldn't even pick to debate Chomsky that he was worth reading and an example of a reasonable form of conservatism.

[Anonymous No.19190830]

>>19189879
I don’t hate him. I pity him. I mean Foucault literally figuratively literally put his entire fist inside him over whether language provably has meaning. And if you can’t understand that sentence it proves my point. Figuratively. Literally. Also shoot your boss.

[Anonymous No.19190834]

>you will never be a beneficiary of the demiurge
good

[Anonymous No.19190852]

>>19189879
this senile faggot wants me to be completely ostracized from society
how am I supposed to not hate him for that and many other reasons?

[Anonymous No.19190855]

>>19190852
I hope I catch the coof again one day, happen to find him and cough all over his faggy mug

[Anonymous No.19191421]

>>19190776
> muh no true Conservatives

Honestly Scruton is pretty shit in debates and Chomsky is so autistic with facts that you can't really beat him on that front. You have to bait him into speaking about intangibles, like Foucalt did and raped him.

[Anonymous No.19192108]

>>19190488
He's against all forms of protest so we would have had to deal with segregation to this day. He also minimizes the effects of climate change which impact non-white developing countries the most.

[Anonymous No.19192144]

>>19189879
>best for you
Voting democrats is the worse for everyone.

[Anonymous No.19192364]

>>19192108
Climate change or global warming? Which is it?

[Anonymous No.19192377]

>>19192364
Learn what those terms mean

[Anonymous No.19192407]

>>19190692
Listen to him some more. Then you might understand. His point about roomcleaning is that you have no business criticizing the economic system when your sink at home is full dirty dishes. Being a punk hating on da capitalizm is a cope. You avoid your own fixable problems and instead focus on some macro bs you can never change in your current state. Like all those bitches downtown protesting global warming. Which is even funnier when you know that women are responsible for 80% of all spending decisions. But thats a story for another day.

[Anonymous No.19192422]

>>19190392
>sagacity
to translate for people who aren't poofs

>I don't read what is written by people who have a bad impact on the generations after them. Since it harms their good judgment...

Dysgenic: having or exerting a detrimental effect on later generations through the inheritance of undesirable characteristics

Sagacious: showing keen mental discernment and good judgment; shrewd.

U havin a giggle there m8

[Anonymous No.19192429]

>>19189879
Because he’s a sentimental old man that lacks tragedy

[Anonymous No.19192432]

>>19189879
He's complicit in the genocide of Palestinians thanks to his Democrat shilling and urging others to vote the same.

[Anonymous No.19192447]

>>19192108
When did he dismiss protests?

[Anonymous No.19192461]

>>19192108
Blacks did a lot better under segregation. Fuck niggers lmao. And fuck global heating nonsense. Only a leftist would be arrogant enough to believe man is so hecking powerful he can irreversibly kill the planet in less than 100 years. A single volcano shits out more c02 than you can imagine. co2 is what plants breathe lmao. Retard

[Anonymous No.19192553]

>>19190755
>There's a limit to where money stops increasing your contentment of course, but below that limit money is important.
And where is that limit to you?

[Anonymous No.19192565]

>To be in the top 1% globally, you’d need a minimum of around $936,430, according to the 2019 Global Wealth Report from Credit Suisse

That is a very reasonable/typical net worth for a middle-aged person in the United States or Europe. Capitalism is working for the first worlders quite well.

[Anonymous No.19192587]

>>19189994
probably alluding to some jewish conspiracy

[Anonymous No.19192591]

>>19192461
>Only a leftist would be arrogant enough to believe man is so hecking powerful he can irreversibly kill the planet in less than 100 years.
What about all those nukes? They won't kill the planet, they will kill human life as we know it though.

[Anonymous No.19192595]

>>19192447
>This happened in the 60s, as far as I can tell, that we got this misbegotten idea that the way to conduct yourself as a responsible human being was to hold placards up to protest to change the viewpoints of other people and thereby usher in the utopia.

[Anonymous No.19192598]

>>19192565
>Capitalism is working for the first worlders quite well.
Enjoy your emmigrants and twerk dance.

[Anonymous No.19192603]

>>19192461
the american education system, ladies and gentlemen

[Anonymous No.19192615]

>>19189941
he replied to hotmail email in about a day

[Anonymous No.19192622]

>>19190470
But he doesn't. Peterson defends the power elite.

[Anonymous No.19192628]

>>19190146
>facebook and twitter are the real sources of information

[Anonymous No.19192630]

>>19189879
Is this the guy that calls having a job being a wageslave?

>noo you can't quit then you will starve!!
Absolutely crazy that anyone takes this guy seriously

[Anonymous No.19192631]

>>19190273
Do you have the right to risk infecting other people?
>>19190329
It is spreading to the left too, I have found supposdly leftwing people honestly repeating the lies about Cambodia and Faurisson
And they would reject actually reading the man, just laugh it off
Pretty sure they were tankies

[Anonymous No.19192634]

>>19192595
That's not really the carte blanche dismissal you think it is - he's talking about the sexual revolution (birth control) and the 1968 student riots, not segregation. The issue was one of youth (students protesting) and culture (Althusserian hippies) - implying cures for a disease they didn't diagnose.

[Anonymous No.19192641]

I’ve become more sympathetic to him since the Zizek-Peterson debate happened. After watching an hour of that meandering nothingness, I became very cynical about psychoanalysis and the continental tradition generally. It’s nice to have an authoritative voice that is skeptical of “theory” when it has taken root in the way that it has.

[Anonymous No.19192643]

>>19190027
is mason newspeak for Jew?

[Anonymous No.19192652]

>>19190852
I mean we all want you guys gone.

[Anonymous No.19192658]

>>19192595
this "set your house in perfect order" shit is probably the most offensive of all of Peterson's many platitudes. the insinuation that only high-functioning individuals can opine on any subject pertaining to the society they live in is in essence a censure of all the people who are on the receiving end of institutional violence or otherwise afflicted by factors outside of their control. in addition, the notion that high standards of living primarily (or even exclusively) come from the self is completely ridiculous and the fact that the man behind it is pretty much known for self-sabotaging only makes it more so.

[Anonymous No.19192661]

>>19190391
>we cant do something because are people near me with different skin pigment
Anon you have to grow up
The power elite want you hating the disadvantaged
But consider a practicality: how many migrants would there be if western capitalism weren't exploiting countries and creating wars that force people to flee?
Why don't you want to do something that would stop this, improve conditions in their home countries, and thereby reduce the rate of immigration?
Is that just a bit too complex for you?
Is it a bit too cucked to look at things from other peoples perspective and consider why they are leaving and what our societies are doing to contribute to that?
Do you just want to sit in your own shit and hate others because that is who highly paid pundits working for corporate media have told you is who is to blame for all your problems?

[Anonymous No.19192663]

>>19192631
>It is spreading to the left too, I have found supposdly leftwing people honestly repeating the lies about Cambodia and Faurisson
I will read only one book by Chomsky. What is it?

[Anonymous No.19192672]

>>19192658
My man, you've been filtered by Peterson of all people (see: >>19192634). You have my sympathy.

[Anonymous No.19192673]

>>19192634
It can be applied to segregation all the same. The only reason Jordan Peterson shits on the feminist movement and women in general but not the civil rights movement is because he knows it would be far too controversial.

I remember there was an interview he did with some aussie comedian and JP confidently took the freedom of association position on the hall gay wedding thing, but once the comedian counter that by applying the same principle on racial segregation JP reluctantly agrees that the government should step in.

[Anonymous No.19192674]

>>19190457
>Buckley
>not a conservative
Buckley founded National Review, he wrote in defense of segregation and apartheid and Americas interventions in the Cold War
Honestly though the man was just Tucker Carlson with a thesaurus

[Anonymous No.19192698]

>>19192652
Nice of you to show your true colours.
You're just asking to be minecrafted, though. Not extremely smart to push someone into a corner with nothing to lose.

[Anonymous No.19192702]

>>19192630
what is wrong with owning the means of production?

[Anonymous No.19192705]

>>19192672
a post utterly without substance

[Anonymous No.19192712]

>>19192702
undemocratic
unsustainable

[Anonymous No.19192715]

>>19192663
Political Economy of Human Rights or maybe Manufacturing Consent

[Anonymous No.19192723]

>>19192712
>everyone participating is undemocratic
how?
>unsustainable
Mondragon
>>19192715
Fateful Triangle is another one

[Anonymous No.19192737]

>>19192673
You're thinking of Jim Jefferies. Hilariously, he's a hypocrite:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=odCQhAezB_Q&t=0s
That's mostly irrelevant. That the argument could be applied doesn't meant that it was - you can't just impute that motive to Peterson (who I also dislike, but for reasons involving Jung and hereditarianism). Let's be a bit more charitable.
>>19192705
If you like.

[Anonymous No.19192739]

>>19192723
oh, you mean social ownership of the means of production.
>Mondragon
cooperative or not, every successful corporation is an example of a functioning, centrally planned micro-economy.

[Anonymous No.19192742]

>>19192723
>Mondragon
Distributist.

[Anonymous No.19192744]

Jordan Peterson is a Koch shill.
He first came to prominence at Rebel Media, which was founded by another Koch shill Ezra Levant - Levant did his internship at the Charles G. Koch Foundation and then worked at the Koch funded Fraser Institute, their primary think tank in Canada. It has received funding from the Middle East Forum, which the Kochs fund.
Peterson also often recommends Koch linked groups like IHS, cites the Cato Institute sponsored HumanProgress, addresses the Koch funded Manhattan Institute and Heritage Foundation, pals around with Dave Rubin, and appears at TPUSA events with Kirk, Shapiro and other Koch linked speakers.

[Anonymous No.19192753]

>>19190016
>shakes pill bottle

[Anonymous No.19192759]

>>19192739
>>19192742
Mondragon is worker ownership
>a functioning, centrally planned micro-economy.
How does this discredit Mondragon or any other worker owned business?
Anarchism does not preclude planning.

And I dunno if you've noticed mate but for the past 35 years Western capitalism has needed one bail out after another following a string of boom-bust cycles and collapses thanks to financial deregulation.

[Anonymous No.19192768]

>>19192744

[Anonymous No.19192773]

>>19192698
Lol you guys aren't gonna do shit.

[Anonymous No.19192781]

>>19190852
Do you have a right to willfully endanger other people?

[Anonymous No.19192790]

>>19192759
I'm not arguing with you. I just don't think Mondragon makes evident on its own the sustainability of social ownership of the means of production. I think it could be argued that Mondragon's ownership model does not constitute in "social ownership" but instead just a larger private bubble.

[Anonymous No.19192801]

>>19192773
Why don't you just leave us alone? Why are you being so cruel? This isn't behaviour descriptive of a healthy individual.
>>19192781
I'm not going to argue with that pilpul, sorry, it's just too weak.
Do you have a right to willfully endanger other people when you drive a car?
Either way, you fell for the big pharma money trap, and you will be on indefinite boosters for the rest of your life. Not only that, but the corporations making billions from your willingless to be a part of the human trials of an experimental medicine, are completely void from any liability whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.19192805]

>>19192759
>And I dunno if you've noticed mate but for the past 35 years Western capitalism has needed one bail out after another
What you're on about?

[Anonymous No.19192813]

>>19192759
>Mondragon is worker ownership
In a distributist manner.

[Anonymous No.19192820]

>>19192801
>Either way, you fell for the big pharma money trap, and you will be on indefinite boosters for the rest of your life.
Do tell me with some reliable data already, should YOUNG people take the vax or not?

[Anonymous No.19192831]

>>19192820
Didn't Merck just release a new pill formulation (essentially Drumpfian Ivermectin) this week?

[Anonymous No.19192833]

>>19192820
Of course not. Why should they take multiple shots of an experimental medicine with no long-term case studies whatsoever? Instead of simply encouraging a healthy lifestyle for younger people to boost their already strong immune system?
What is currently is absolutely evil and cruel.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/finland-pauses-use-moderna-covid-19-vaccine-young-men-2021-10-07/

[Anonymous No.19192840]

>>19192790
>I just don't think Mondragon makes evident on its own the sustainability of social ownership of the means of production.
How? It is worker owned and it has sustained itself for decades, it hasn't been bailed out by the government TWICE like Citibank has.
This is evidence
But it doesn't _feel_ good to you lol
> I think it could be argued that Mondragon's ownership model does not constitute in "social ownership"
>"social ownership"
That is the second time you have made this substitution.
What I and Chomsky have said is worker ownerhsip.
What is your game? What is this goal posting shifting?
>>19192801
>I'm not going to argue with that pilpul, sorry, it's just too weak.
You cant drive on the wrong side of the road, you cant walk down the street swinging your arms, you certainly cant say you have a right to do this and other people should just avoid you if they dont like it
So why do you think you have a right to endanger other people during a pandemic?
If you dont want to get a vaccine then you have an obligation to not endanger other people.
Children, the elderly, those with weak immune systems or who cant take a vaccine, etc are placed in danger by you
Not to mention your own health
>>19192805
Refuting your claim about the validity of capitalist private ownership

[Anonymous No.19192844]

>>19192833
currently happening*
>>19192831
>Drumpfian ivermectin
I bet you took the piss out of people who suggested it, calling them horses or what have you.

[Anonymous No.19192847]

>>19192813

[Anonymous No.19192850]

>>19192801
>This isn't behaviour descriptive of a healthy individual.
Neither is your extended petite bourgeoisie temper tantrum. If you act like a child you'll be treated like one. Regardless you guys aren't gonna do shit. So keep threatening to kill people on your Chinese cartoon message board.

[Anonymous No.19192856]

>>19192833
>Why should they take multiple shots of an experimental medicine with no long-term case studies whatsoever?
Because that's all we have at the moment? Because otherwise the government will fuck you up?

[Anonymous No.19192860]

>>19192844
Actually, no - Trump and his sympatico don't really interest me, I only phrased it that way for context (because that's how others will phrase it after efficacy reports come out). IDK

[Anonymous No.19192864]

>>19192850
>Neither is your extended petite bourgeoisie temper tantrum.
Hahahah where did this come from?? Why did I upset you so much? I simply don't want my rights taken away from me for not wanting to be a part of the human trials of an experimental vaccine.
You're going down a very evil path btw.
>>19192856
>Because that's all we have at the moment?
Are you genuinely retarded? Have you ever considered losing weight? Or eating healthily? Do you seriously still believe that this is similar to Ebola? You're completely delusional and full of fear, those 18 months of isolation must have really done you in.
>Because otherwise the government will fuck you up?
How liberal of you.

[Anonymous No.19192866]

>>19192847
Distributism is not anarchism, no matter how you put it. Different values, different mentalities, different operation.

[Anonymous No.19192890]

>>19192864
>How liberal of you.
This is besides the point, I know. I'm not a liberal btw. But being pragmatical, how will you find a job in the near future?
This fight is already lost. Go hide in the woods, you'll be one of the few survivors of humanity when shit finally hit the fans with the vax.

[Anonymous No.19192894]

>>19192840
stop tweeting at me. I'm not defending capitalism. when I said "unsustainable" I was talking about private corporations.
"worker ownership" is widely construed as a form of "social ownership". the terms are compatible.

my angle is simple. I just want my fellow leftists to be better at arguing. as I've said, you cannot prove the feasibility of worker coops just by pointing at a successful one.
how does Mondragon's success and growth compare to the largest privately owned or public traded companies?
can the model work in every market or industry? what about those with high up-front finance requirements?
can you say without a doubt that the economy would function if every company was a cooperative?

[Anonymous No.19192908]

>>19192890
>how will you find a job in the near future?
Why are you trying to intimidate me? Do you seriously think that it's already game over? Do you not expect to be any kind of pushback whatsoever against this medical apartheid? Why would I ever want to work for someone that advocates for that anyway?
>This fight is already lost.
It really isn't, your sociopathy is showing by the way. This is far from over, and your silly intimidation pilpul is only making my resolve ever stronger.
It's really interesting to see the tyrannical side of human nature rear its head, once the individual knows it's on the side of where the power is currently located.

[Anonymous No.19192927]

>>19192603
Yeah, no I'm german eggshully. And the thing about the volcano is from episode one of the bbc documentary Earth: Power of the Planet (2007). Nigger.

[Anonymous No.19192931]

>>19192840
>You cant drive on the wrong side of the road
I can when there aren't cars driving on it, if there are then I will not since it's an immediate threat to my person
> you cant walk down the street swinging your arms
I can easily, I see no personal reason to but if I desired so nothing could stop me or change my decision unless it would come with immediate threat to my person
>So why do you think you have a right to endanger other people during a pandemic?
Because I do, and I want to (I hate fat and old people and believe they should all die), and I'm going to keep making fake cards and spreading it among the public.

[Anonymous No.19192933]

>>19192801
>Do you have a right to willfully endanger other people when you drive a car?
you are expected to follow an increasingly extensive set of rules in order to maintain the privilege of driving.
americans have no concept of freedom. it's a magic incantation they can conjure up whenever they are personally inconvenienced.

[Anonymous No.19192943]

>>19192737
Retard.
First off I don't give a fuck if you dislike that aussie or think he's a hypocrite. That has zero bearing on the argument.
Secondly it doesn't matter if JP himself didn't explicitly make the argument. The argument itself logically follows from what JP has said about other things. You can infer the argument from his philosophy. If JP believes people should be permitted to discriminate against gay people it necessarily follows that he must also think the civil rights act was wrong if he were to be consistent.

[Anonymous No.19192958]

>>19192943
>Retard
Yeah, dismissed. I'm out.

[Anonymous No.19192963]

>>19192958
>>Retard
>Yeah, dismissed. I'm out.

[Anonymous No.19192965]

>>19192943
>If JP believes people should be permitted to discriminate against gay people it necessarily follows that he must also think the civil rights act was wrong if he were to be consistent.
Do you honestly think we should have gay quotas in the colleges?

[Anonymous No.19192975]

>>19192958
Yeah go be a retard somewhere else.

[Anonymous No.19192984]

>>19192927
why would you admit that you don't even have a valid excuse to be this stupid
>According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide.
follow your leader and swallow some cyanide, untermensch

[Anonymous No.19192986]

>>19192963
>>19192975
I don't know what you want from me, anon(s). I'm not interested in a discussion that begins or ends with invective. -Sorry-

[Anonymous No.19192988]

>>19192965
I don't believe there should be racial quotas in colleges for black people neither, but the provisions of the civil rights act that protect people from discrimination based on race and sex was absolutely necessary back then and it makes sense to expand that to gay people as well.

[Anonymous No.19192990]

>>19192986
Ok retard, you're a sensitive little sweetheart.
Happy now?

[Anonymous No.19192996]

>>19192986
that's entirely reasonable

[Anonymous No.19193006]

>>19192908
>Do you not expect to be any kind of pushback whatsoever against this medical apartheid?
We went over this. There won't be. Keep being delusional retard.

[Anonymous No.19193007]

>>19192986
You said you were going to gtfo, so gtfo already.

[Anonymous No.19193049]

>>19193006
Enjoy your endless clotshots you guillible faggot.

[Anonymous No.19193056]

>>19192988
>was absolutely necessary back then and it makes sense to expand that to gay people as well.
Do you think religious texts should be censored too?
So many of them badmouth what they see as degeneracy, and I have to remind you we're already in the realm of language when we talk about gay oppression, these days.
So where does it stop?

Plus, why do you think black people's rights and gay people's rights are one and the same?
Where is your gay Apartheid?
What is your "historic bill"?

[Anonymous No.19193072]

>>19193049
Enjoy not being able to do anything. But I guess you were prob a shut in before anyway lol.

[Anonymous No.19193110]

>>19193072
>Enjoy not being able to do anything.
>he still thinks that i'm essentially going to be thrown into a pit, unable to do anything whatsoever
You're just trying as hard as you can to feel happy with the decision you made to be a part of the human trials of an experimental medicine. You'd feel absolute euphoria if it meant all unvaxxed were to get shot in the head, wouldn't you? Let's not beat around the bush here.
Don't get too excited now, you don't want your heart to give in :^)

[Anonymous No.19193133]

>>19193072
Your veins are essentially sand paper now, HAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.19193146]

>>19192661
Have you ever thought it weird how almost every person who told you this comes from an infamously ethnocenthric group who have a vested interest in other groups not having an ethnocentric view as strong as theirs?

[Anonymous No.19193163]

>>19193110
Amazing how you guys claim your gonna fight back even a little push back turns you into weeping faggots. You guys couldn't organize a reading group. Nevermind anything else. Posting is politics retard.

[Anonymous No.19193168]

>>19193163
Edgy little boy aren't you? full of seethe and bitterness.
I truly hope you're no older than 16

[Anonymous No.19193169]

>>19193163
*Posting is not politics retard.

[Anonymous No.19193171]

>>19189953
The faggot is pro vaccine mandates. He stopped being an anarchist a long time ago.

[Anonymous No.19193177]

>>19193168
So your not gonna fight back. Gotcha. Nothing surprising.

[Anonymous No.19193181]

>>19192631
Yes, I have the right to live as normal without people accusing me of witchcraft.

[Anonymous No.19193190]

>>19193177
It's as if you're egging me on and motivating me, cheers kid. Congrats on fucking up your life entirely by giving into the psyop fear that's been fed into your skull for 16 months.
Remember, NO REFUNDS! Make sure you make daddy big pharma more money by getting in the queue for your boosters, sweetheart xx