[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 41 KB, 374x374, D8CRtMS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19029945 No.19029945[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How the fuck do we classify historical knowledge? Is it a priori? Analytic? Synthetic?

>> No.19029956

YES.

>> No.19029958

>>19029945
History since Herodotus has been fictive; it may have elements of facts but they are mediated or filtered through storytelling tropes.

>> No.19029985

A chinese take on this matter: https://www.lzjscript.com/archives/751

>> No.19029987
File: 101 KB, 873x1332, 1F0429D5-4F61-4C2F-B4A5-4A1A709BAC81.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19029987

>>19029945
Be weary of the historians and their culture’s agenda

>> No.19029999 [DELETED] 

>>19029958
Does this mean we can epistemologically treat human action in general as fictive

>> No.19030000

>>19029945
Is this a real fucking question? A posteriori synthetic like all empirical observations. What are you receiving your history in a mystical trance?

>> No.19030003

>>19029945
How can you class historical knowledge as knowledge before experience lol, it’s obviously synthetic as historical knowledge necessitates experience by definition