/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18991495]

>/pol/ loves it because it's anti semitic
>normies hate it because it's anti semitic
Opinions on the jew people aside, is it worth reading?

[Anonymous No.18991505]

>>18991495
Denying that Jews control banking and media is anti-semitic, it lessens their achievements.

[Anonymous No.18991509]

>>18991495
Meh, it feels like a /pol post in parts but is ok for letting the reader know about the influence of central banking. Not all of it is solid though and sometimes the author tries to fit the boogeyman of Jew into every bad scenario. Mild hitler apology as well.

[Anonymous No.18991530]

>>18991509
>Mild
Kinda cringe then, I only read strong Hitler apologia.

[Anonymous No.18991532]

>>18991495
Yes.
Life is anti-semitic.

[Anonymous No.18991639]

>>18991495
It's worth reading, but the parts on WW2 and Hitler's motivations are so completely misguided and ignorant that it puts the rest of the book into question. The man who wrote this clearly never read Mein Kampf or any other books related to Hitler's reasons for going into war, so one has to question whether he's truly educated on any of the subjects he writes about. If he's so laughably wrong about Hitler, what's to say he's not equally wrong about Cromwell for example?
The book simply has no credibility in the eyes of a neutral, skeptic reader and that's very much unfortunate.

[Anonymous No.18991652]

>>18991530

[Anonymous No.18991670]

>>18991639
I haven't read this book but given who the author was and what he was interested in, I would think he was certain to have read Mein Kampf. What exactly does he say that makes you so sure he hadn't?

[Anonymous No.18991698]

if Jews control central banking, then how come Muslims run the federal reserve ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nwzJFRsmTo

checkmate, chuds

[Anonymous No.18991725]

>>18991670
>ignores German financial struggles and short-term sustainability of their socialistic economical system; neglects to inform the viewer of just how vulnerable and dependent on foreign conquest the quality of life was, claiming all was well
>reiterates German pro-war propaganda of Polish massacres of German civilians, ones which never happened, actual propaganda and false flags based on our best knowledge and known German motivations of wanting to go to war
>claims Germany was FORCED into a war, while in reality Hitler himself wanted to seek Lebensraum in the East to support a industrial-agricultural balance within a singular Reich that would stop the international Jew from taking advantage of a singular nation's inability to both sustain its industrial and agricultural necessities (Hitler intentionally went to war for the sake of autarky, entirely ignored by author, proving he did not read relevant books and either knew fuck-all about Hitler or lied)
It's simply a question of the author willing to write down and publish information he is clearly not well-read on. Even a dilettante like me can poke holes in his WW2 history, so why would I ever assume he is correct about anything else either? The book is supposed to offer a history of central banking, but what he writes on Hitler leads me to question everything else he has put down into text. It's either a travesty or a warning sign.

Read the book yourself; it's available online, see how you like it, but remember that the author is willing to have ignorance published.

[Anonymous No.18992077]

>>18991495
OP is a regular shill. The book is garbage. It makes wild claims without evidence. The whole thing is, 'trust me bro, this is how it really wuz!' The first paragraph of the introduction contains a fake Orwell quote.