[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 53 KB, 791x1186, The_End_of_History_and_the_Last_Man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18577755 No.18577755 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.18577771

Read the article. If you like it, then read the book.

>> No.18577780

How has it been BTFO'd? So far, Liberalism has only grown in power. Most young people are woke. Not even a pandemic or the worst wealth inequality in history has resulted in people revolting against liberal democracy. As for why things are so degenerate, the second part of his thesis is a Nietzschean interpretation of the post-1991 world, and that is clearly how history turned out. So he was correct.

>> No.18577796

>>18577780
>using only a handful of countries (5, 6 at most) that dominate media, as examples supporting his argument deapite 190+ nations being recognised by the UN
Try again cunt.

>> No.18577799
File: 100 KB, 800x1230, BF6F055C-1F46-4B3A-AC91-D809C6CED8A5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18577799

>>18577755
Why do people keep asking about it? It’s full of idiotic hubris from all that I’ve heard.
Yes, read the article if you must. No need to waste your time on a whole book of nonsense. Like Sowell’s

>> No.18577802

>>18577771
Will do thanks.
>>18577780
Wasn't a part of his argument that most or all of the world would become a liberal democracy and security competition between nations would eventually cease? Liberal democracy has a challenger in chinese communism.

>> No.18577804

>>18577780
>Nothing interesting happens anymore!
What is 9/11? What is covid?

>> No.18577838

>>18577802
>Liberal democracy has a challenger in chinese communism

No it doesn't. Nobody gives a shit about China outside of China. Most people have no interest in adopting a one-party Marxist-Leninist state, and no one is interested in Chinese culture. American culture however is swallowing the entire world through social media. Liberal hegemony is still dominant, even most leftists claim China "isn't real socialism" and are far more interested in trannies, pronouns, and skin color than they are in communism.

>> No.18577945

>>18577796
You mean other 190 countries such as Botswana that was strongarmed to decriminalise faggotry or Poland which could serve as an example that evidently shows that indoctrination through american media is stronger than indoctrination through the local church?

>> No.18577989

Fukuyama is a pc gamer, so yes it's worth reading

>> No.18577996

This book can be classified as [Right alarmism], so you can't really debunk it.

>> No.18578024

>>18577989
Does he play Pharaoh (1999)?

>> No.18578047

>>18577838
fukuyama himself has said that chinese style authoritarianism(and russian) may prove his thesis wrong.

none it matters though, fukuyama is a hack when it comes to hegel, kojeve(who is far more relevant in continental philosophy) gives a far better argument concerning the end of history.

>> No.18578062

>>18577755
Fukuyama hasn't been BTFO'd. He never said liberal democracies were amazing, just that we weren't going to be able to create something new after it. He did say that we can devolve to previous states, such as fascism, communism, feudalism and so on.

But answering your question, you're better reading Spengler. Caesarism is coming.

>> No.18578080

>>18577755
Fukuyama has harshly distanced himself from The End of History, he's outright said that his newer works in The Origins of Political Order and Political Order and Political Decay are a revised, "rewritten" version of The End of History. Doubly, the End of History was never about American democracy, which Fukuyama views as decaying, it is about European democracy, especially the stable social democracies.