[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 641 KB, 1000x2520, 1621893358354.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18312680 No.18312680 [Reply] [Original]

Post charts to help you find your next book

>> No.18312691
File: 2.82 MB, 2000x2100, 1621893466488.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18312691

>> No.18312704
File: 2.34 MB, 1396x1852, 1621893520114.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18312704

>> No.18313840
File: 838 KB, 2241x1444, 1621905540803.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18313840

>> No.18314206

https://mega.nz/folder/kj5hWI6J#0cyw0-ZdvZKOJW3fPI6RfQ

>> No.18315442

>>18314206
To be honest, most of the charts you collected are trash. Most of the charts exist on the internet are basically trash tho.

>> No.18315445

I never understood why we have chart threads.
One can just go to the wiki and get them there.

>> No.18315500
File: 1.45 MB, 2368x1577, classicskafkaonshore.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18315500

>> No.18315505
File: 815 KB, 1944x2808, classics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18315505

>> No.18315522
File: 1.16 MB, 1570x2046, 74AA0CEA-254C-48C6-9B2C-DF88FD3C90BD.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18315522

>> No.18315525
File: 1.24 MB, 1820x4348, top 100 books truelit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18315525

>>18314206
This guy has a lot more

>> No.18315599

>>18315525
Somehow even worse than /lit/'s list.

>> No.18315898

>>18315505
So r/trulit is just /lit/ with a bigger hard-on for Shakespeare

>> No.18315978

>>18315442
You sifted through 7gigabytes worth of charts to conclude they are mostly trash.

>> No.18316007
File: 1.23 MB, 1820x4348, lit-top100-2014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316007

>>18312680

>> No.18316012
File: 2.73 MB, 1820x4348, lit-top100-2015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316012

>>18316007

>> No.18316019
File: 3.05 MB, 1820x4352, lit-top100-2016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316019

>>18316012

>> No.18316023
File: 1.34 MB, 1500x3500, lit-top100-2017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316023

>>18316019

>> No.18316028
File: 990 KB, 1500x3242, lit-top100-2018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316028

>>18316023

>> No.18316033
File: 1.14 MB, 1644x3041, lit-top100-2019.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316033

>>18316028

>> No.18316034
File: 94 KB, 738x995, lit-top50-agg14-19.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316034

>>18316033

>> No.18316341
File: 361 KB, 1920x1080, American Civil War Reading List (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18316341

>>18316034

>> No.18316536

>>18315978
Sure not. I used induction.

>> No.18317009
File: 3.81 MB, 6161x5009, Guenon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18317009

Does anyone have the philosophy reading chart that was built around argument/counter-argument/counter-counter-argument for three periods of history? I think it was structured like
>Plato, author who disagreed, author who agreed
>DesCarte, author who disagreed, author who agreed
>Some modernist, author who disagreed, author who agreed
And the point was to read the arguments, then go back through and read the counter-arguments, then go back through again and read the counter-counter arguments.

Also, I'll post some stuff I have.

>> No.18317017
File: 3.87 MB, 3952x3808, Goethe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18317017

>>18317009

>> No.18317041
File: 246 KB, 1024x768, On Urban Planning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18317041

>>18317017

>> No.18317044
File: 95 KB, 564x746, Four Fields of Economics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18317044

>>18317041

>> No.18317061

Anyone have a starting w/ the Greeks chart on hand?

>> No.18317398

Ezra pound chart?

>> No.18317946

>>18315525
Ulysses sucks dick.

>> No.18318037

>>18315442
That is not my personal collection of charts.
And the other anon is right, the fact that you took the time to sift through all those tabs and came to that conclusion, the issue might be you.

>> No.18318195

>>18318037
Not to say everything in that Mega folder is good or useful, but to denounce it entirely is foolish.

>> No.18318587

>>18312691
Strassler didn't even translate Thucydides. He took Crowley's. Best translations imo are Hobbes (preserves the drama of Thucydides) and Jowett