/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.18088178]

Books that explain how a Western Marxist political ideology never took hold in Western industrial capitalist liberal democratic states to which it was tailored but instead it prevailed in Eastern Slavic and Asian feudal authoritarian shitholes?

[Anonymous No.18088197]

the big sleep

[Anonymous No.18088247]

>>18088178
Funny you should ask because is basically the central idea of Lenin's work. So read Lenin I suppose, particularly Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism. It's also Lenin's birthday today, 151 years)))

[Anonymous No.18088259]

>>18088178

[Anonymous No.18088399]

>>18088178

[Anonymous No.18088413]

>Eastern Slavic
Eastern Darwinists focused on Mutual Aid instead of Social Darwinism
>Asian feudal authoritarian shitholes
Confucianism

[Anonymous No.18088423]

>>18088178
>first half of 20 sentury
>liberal democratic states
just dispose yourself

[Anonymous No.18088434]

[Anonymous No.18088441]

There is a chapter in Death of the West that explains it pretty well.
Simply put the culture was too strong. That’s why cultural Marxism was concocted by Gramsci and Horkheimer and Marcuse

[Anonymous No.18088442]

>>18088178
>capitalist liberal democratic states

[Anonymous No.18088451]

>>18088178
If you ever wonder why the Poles are doing something but not anybody else, that's a good sign it's fucking stupid.

[Anonymous No.18088578]

but it did. the soviet union was socialist, nazi germany was socialist, the european union is socialist. different sides of the same coin.