book charts

[Anonymous No.18063721]

this one was made by /pol/
what do you think?

[Anonymous No.18063730]

pretty nice

[Anonymous No.18063805]

>>18063721
Cringe. An actual pol blackpill would be that book about Maine(forget the title).

[Anonymous No.18063827]

>>18063721
Evola is not even white by /pol/ standards. Funny.

[Anonymous No.18063858]

>>18063827
What? That’s only Nordicist wewuz types who say that.

[Anonymous No.18063868]

>>18063721
Shittiest chart I’ve ever seen. Like what the fuck is the goal here. Fuck you OP. You make terrible charts.

[Anonymous No.18063884]

>>18063721
kek, this is the worst fucking chart I've ever seen. kys OP

[Anonymous No.18063886]

>>18063858
They all say that. And mock Italians for not being le white.

[Anonymous No.18063894]

>>18063721
Why tf is Stoner on here

[Anonymous No.18063908]

>>18063894
Because /pol/ is nearly entire midwits, Stoner is high literature for them.
Fuck Edith.

>>18063868
There are way worse ones, just take a look at the wiki

[Anonymous No.18063931]

>>18063868
>Shittiest chart I’ve ever seen. Like what the fuck is the goal here. Fuck you OP. You make terrible charts.

[Anonymous No.18063945]

>>18063886
oh shut up, you're so deluded and pathetic

[Anonymous No.18063947]

>>18063721
>Stoner and Book of Disquiet sort of jammed in there at the end for no reason.

[Anonymous No.18063958]

>>18063721
Can you stop making these threads. Do you get off on being told you're dumb? Thats all that ever happens here.

[Anonymous No.18063962]

>>18063868
>Like what the fuck

[Anonymous No.18063980]

>>18063908
>>18063947
/pol/ is full of awkward boring losers and love reading books that present these traits in an aesthetic way.

[Anonymous No.18063989]

>>18063947
>Wife bad
>Hehe dumb crazy woman turned my beautiful trad daughter into a jezebel
Yeah I can see it

[Anonymous No.18063995]

>>18063980
/pol/ has a diverse userbase. You just seem asshurt about /pol/.

[Anonymous No.18064015]

>>18063980
>>18063995
You are both retarded faggots

[Anonymous No.18064033]

>>18063721
Looks more like a based chart

[Anonymous No.18064042]

>>18063945
"Italians are not white. Brown eyes and dark hair = poop color, not white." - /pol/

[Anonymous No.18064066]

>>18063721
Looks like a chart selected entirely on the criterion of whether one could interpret the jacket summary as "modern bad", with no regard for the actual content.

[Anonymous No.18064068]

>>18064042
source?

[Anonymous No.18064071]

>>18063721
>>18063721
I read 4 of them without knowing they were in some way in the same category of Mein Kampf.
ISAIF, Guénon, Évola and Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
And what would be the category of pic related

[Anonymous No.18065330]

lmao marxshits ITT

[Anonymous No.18065438]

Are these the books I must read to convert to Islam?

[Anonymous No.18065456]

>>18064071
They're not related. /pol/ is full of retards, and apparently stupid is contagious because people on this board actually buy into it.

[Anonymous No.18065495]

>>18065438
No, you don't need to read books to convert to islam, just fuck your sister (or your goat) and you're good

[Anonymous No.18065548]

>>18063721
Not bad at all

[Anonymous No.18065630]

>>18065495
Sounds like zoroastrianism to me

[Anonymous No.18066117]

>>18063721
you have to be truly retarded to take Evola or Kaczynski seriously

i wish Evolaposters were permabanned from this board

[Anonymous No.18066123]

>>18063721
retarded list

[Anonymous No.18066129]

>>18063721
/pol/tards trying to justify their retarded knuckle dragging asses with books

[Anonymous No.18066183]

>>18063886
Northern Italians, where most of the population is, are extremely European and not even Meds

[Anonymous No.18066210]

>>18066117
Ask me how I know you were filtered
>>18066129
oof yikes y'all moutbreather chud

[Anonymous No.18066275]

>>18066210
they are both books for people who have some vague malaise about their position in the post-industrial world and identify with kaczynski's inarticulate rage or evola's mysticism

they are not interesting or worthwhile for people who aren't /pol/tards looking for a hugbox

read Debord, Ellul, Lasch, etc instead you mong

[Anonymous No.18066319]

>>18066117
>t. Oversocialized leftist

[Anonymous No.18066338]

>>18066275
Are you a woman? You sound like a woman. Anyway most people have gripes with their position in our current modern world, that's nothing new, but if you can't look past the "inarticulate rage" and "mysticism" to find there's actual substance there, that's on you and not on them. Sorry bud. They're very interesting for providing different angles even if you don't completely agree with them.
>read Debord, Ellul, Lasch, etc instead you mong
Those are not mutually exclusive you smoothbrain faggot, just read both.

[Anonymous No.18066341]

>>18066319
not a leftist, i just don’t have a double digit IQ

[Anonymous No.18066358]

>>18066341
Worse: it's single-digit.

[Anonymous No.18066366]

>>18066358
kek

[Anonymous No.18066367]

Pop quiz! You have two choices

1. Your son becomes pic related, in a country where this is the accepted norm
2. You become an ethnonationalist and your government seizes the assets of all internationalist cabals promoting degeneracy

You must pick one

[Anonymous No.18066372]

Convince me that /pol/ has ever read a fucking book.

[Anonymous No.18066383]

>>18066367
I have the tranny illness deep down even though I don't act on it at all. So my son was always going to inherit it. Regardless of those two choices, the result will be the same for me.

[Anonymous No.18066407]

>>18066338
>our current modern world

ah yes, the classic introduction to the 10th grade term paper

they are mutually exclusive in that they’re not present on this chart. rather, you just have this drivel that was almost certainly included on the basis of the title

but yeah bro enjoy all that “actual substance”. i’m sure that that the understanding of the world you’ve acquired from it isn’t completely banal, worthless, and self-parodic.

[Anonymous No.18066456]

>>18066372
it's not that hard to read a book bro, you're not convincing anyone that you read often.

[Anonymous No.18066484]

>>18063721
i'm so fucking tired of people grouping Ted in with other political ideologies, literally nobody seems to understand Ted even though he's as clear and blatant as you can be. I wish he had written Anti-Tech Revolution before ISAIF

[Anonymous No.18066488]

>>18066407
I didn't make this chart, retard. I'm just replying to a smoothbrain who was filtered hard by Ted K and Evola.
I've read Ted K, Evola, Debord, Ellul and Lasch and all have taught me much in different aspects. You're just proving you read selectively to affirm your worldview instead of to understand different perspectives.

[Anonymous No.18066607]

>>18063721
Would you kindly tell me what is their common theme? A summary of each book would be appreciated.

[Anonymous No.18066616]

>>18066488
>I've read Ted K, Evola, Debord, Ellul and Lasch and all have taught me much in different aspects.

lol sure dude

Imagine thinking anybody’s been “filtered” by Evola.

It’s still unclear why you think Revolt Against the Modern World has merit beyond “durrr even if you disagree with it its an interesting perspective”, which is applicable to everything. I’m assuming it’s because you were casting about for an ex post facto justification for your zoomer rage, and were willing to entertain Evola as he asked you, the reader, to suspend disbelief.

It’s self-evident that the arguments are not good or persuasive. You would lose badly arguing his position in a debate. It falls apart if you think about it critically or put it into dialog with anything else. And I think you know that, so I’m not sure what your point is.

[Anonymous No.18066636]

>>18063827
/pol/ isn't one person with one set of beliefs they agree on nothing.

[Anonymous No.18066649]

>>18063886
Can’t handle the banter Luigi? I’m not even a /pol/tard but I know the working definition of “white“ is Europe and the European diaspora.

[Anonymous No.18066669]

>>18066616
Then don't believe me, retard. Most people who shit on Evola were filtered because he goes beyond the materialistic (and it's clear you are a purely materialistic faggot that was filtered by either his kind of any kind of metaphysics).
>Hurr durr I can't see it therefore it's not real
Really my dude?

[Anonymous No.18066681]

how could someone read guenon and still be obsessed with politics?

[Anonymous No.18066702]

>>18066616
Pretty much everyone who has something negative to say about evola got filtered by him.

[Anonymous No.18066718]

>>18066702
Nah Evola's not infallible and I disagree with some of his takes, especially political, but people like him who shit on Evola completely were definitely filtered.

[Anonymous No.18066790]

>>18066669
>and it's clear you are a purely materialistic faggot that was filtered by either his kind of any kind of metaphysics

lol I’m a practicing Catholic

You realize you’ve proved my point, right? You literally have no defense of this book other than to suggest that being filtered = being unwilling to suspend disbelief to entertain explicitly anti-rational mystical dogshit. Like yeah bro, I guess I got filtered by Long Island Medium for thinking that shit’s made up and retarded.

[Anonymous No.18066813]

>>18066790
Aha so you're just extremely salty because Evola (rightly) shits on catholicism lmao, that explains a lot. I'll admit I had you wrong but this makes even more sense.
>being filtered = being unwilling to suspend disbelief to entertain explicitly anti-rational mystical dogshit.
>that shit’s made up and retarded.
Hmm sounds just like catholicism huh
Jesus christ the jokes write themselves
>You literally have no defense of this book
I do but you wouldn't accept it anyway since you've made up your mind beforehand

[Anonymous No.18066881]

>>18066813
>taking unsubstantiated shots at Catholic theological and metaphysical thought
>unironically believes Evola is epic

top lol

>I do but you wouldn't accept it anyway since you've made up your mind beforehand

Um no sweetie you obviously don’t. Because the arguments are clearly bad to anybody who’s willing to think about them critically. I’m also skeptical that you understand or are capable of articulating them.

oh no bro you just have to believe me this book is epic even though i can’t defend it!!!

[Anonymous No.18066979]

>>18066881
>I do but you wouldn't accept it anyway since you've made up your mind beforehand
>Because the arguments are clearly bad to anybody who’s willing to think about them critically.
Jesus christ, retard.

[Anonymous No.18067008]

why is lit so insecure about pol?

[Anonymous No.18067496]

>>18066484
most people read to learn and not to partake in some cult around the writer.

[Anonymous No.18067505]

>>18066607
wtf use google retard

[Anonymous No.18067944]

>>18063721
This list is not just trash, it is straight up boring

[Anonymous No.18067960]

>>18066383
fucking retard
i will never understand why people are against letting the trannies sterilize themselves

[Anonymous No.18067966]

>>18063721
mein kampf is extremely boring and rambly
for a man who was so good at giving speeches, he wasn't a good writer

[Anonymous No.18068300]

>>18063805
The Way Life Should Be. Good book.

[Anonymous No.18068330]

>>18066790
What do you think of the Christian mystics? They wrote about a lot of the same things as Evola.

>explicitly anti-rational mystical dogshit
Rationality has no place in mysticism or theology. Christian or otherwise.

[Anonymous No.18068567]

>>18063868
absolute seething

[Anonymous No.18068570]

>>18068330
I don't really engage with it. Rationalism does have a place in theology, though. The premise that a lot of Christian theologians start from is that God created a rationally ordered world and through reason we can better understand Him and His works.

[Anonymous No.18068621]

>>18063721
Zarathustra really needs to be removed from that list. Nietzsche hated nationalists, and often called them stupid for lacking creative abilities or talents.

[Anonymous No.18069796]

>>18066183
Yes but Evola was sicillian.

[Anonymous No.18069810]

>>18063721
What the fuck do Pessoa, Williams and Ted K have to do with /pol/??????

[Anonymous No.18069844]

>>18063721
The book of disquiet and stoner are genuine art while the rest are rebellious high schooler stuff. They’re still interesting reads tho

[Anonymous No.18069964]

>>18066616
>Imagine thinking anybody’s been “filtered” by Evola
Yes
There are several people who know nothing about platonism,neoplatonism/gnosticism,western esotericism,occultism,''hinduism'',hermeticism or alchemy who have very strong opinions about him.
Hylics are being filtered.
I myself have quite a few problems with him,as I think I understand a few specific things better than him,but I'm not going to talk about that here.
I really did enjoy Ellul's works too,he is way more detailed than Ted K,I am well aware he was inspired by Marx.
I am also well aware of the uneducted Ted trannies that started coming here,and that they are annoying,however I do agree with them that no matter how we develop technology,humanity will either end up ''enslaved'' or genocided.
>>18066681
/pol/acks don't read Guenon because he became a sufi.
>>18066117
>i wish Evolaposters were permabanned from this board
Massive seething
>>18064015
Correct
The OP chart is trash,probably made by a stormfront wigger that barely understood any of those books
>>18066881
>sweetie
bait
You're supposed to write ''sweatie'' for maximum bait power

[Anonymous No.18070156]

>>18067505
You didnt ready any of them did you?

[Anonymous No.18070252]

> It pains my intelligence that someone should think they can alter anything through political agitation. I’ve always considered violence, of any type, a particularly cock-eyed example of human stupidity. All revolutionaries are stupid as are all reformers, albeit to a lesser degree,
because less discomfiting.
Revolutionaries and reformers all make the same mistake. Lacking the power to master and reform their own attitude towards life, which is everything, or their own being, which is almost everything, they escape into wanting to change others and the external world. Every revolutionary, every reformer, is an escapee. To fight is proof of one’s inability to do battle with
oneself. To reform is proof that one is oneself beyond all help.
If a man of real sensitivity and correct reasoning feels concerned about the evil and injustice of the world, he naturally seeks to correct it first where it manifests itself closest to home, and that, he will find, is in his own being.
The task will take him his whole lifetime.
Pessoa, Book of Disquiet
>>18067505
>use google
braindead puppet
>>18067008
I wonder that too. Some posters here are obsessed with/terrified of pol. Why?

[Anonymous No.18070282]

>>18066790
>explicitly anti-rational
It's explicitly supra-rational. You were supremely filtered, either that or you never actually read him.

[Anonymous No.18070288]

>>18066881
>Um no sweetie
Midwit detected

[Anonymous No.18070323]

>>18066117
>you have to be truly retarded to take Evola or Kaczynski seriously
You'd have to be a midwit not to

[Anonymous No.18070354]

>>18063805
>>18068300
QRD? I've heard the slogan before and I've been considering moving to Maine lately, why's this book a blackpill?

[Anonymous No.18070792]

Remove the pajeet larper, literal Hitler and muh might is right shit and it's not bad at all imo

[Anonymous No.18070978]

>>18063721
Not impressed. It doesn't feel like there's a coherent link between these books. Having Might is Right and Guenon in the same chart shows how scatterbrained this is. I say this as a pro-NatSoc person.

[Anonymous No.18071356]

[Anonymous No.18071385]

[Anonymous No.18071395]

Everyone needs to stop sperging out over some online Nazis and POST SOME FUCKING CHARTS.

[Anonymous No.18071405]

Shit those first three got fucking compressed to the size of my dick sorry guys

[Anonymous No.18071424]

[Anonymous No.18071437]

>>18071395
what are these, charts for ants?

[Anonymous No.18071470]

>>18063721
>>18063721
>no spengler
>no Raspail
>no Sholzi
>no Ford
>no Irving
>no MacDonald
>no Toaff
>...
What are you even doing, kid?

[Anonymous No.18071473]

>>18071356
>>18071385
>>18071395
What are those, charts for ants?

[Anonymous No.18071474]

Are there any charts listing books on prehistoric epochs? I want to know more about my megafauna buddies

[Anonymous No.18071478]

>>18063827
He’s European anyway

[Anonymous No.18071480]

>>18071356
>>18071385
>>18071395
Based

>>18071437
Giants need to be genocided by the manlet masterrace

[Anonymous No.18071669]

>>18063721
I would replace Mein Kampf with the Elder Protocols. It doesn't matter whether they were based on a real document or not, since the antagonistic Jewish aspect within them is the least interesting part of this work.
This is a very well written essay analyzing the social structures of its era and the ones to come.
The self critical aspect that the author applies to himself could be easily seen as a general metaphor on how the aristocracy and the upper class views its peasants.
This is some of the most refined critique of the darkest aspects of the human souls and what leads it to ruin.
It's like a tragic villain's speech. There were moments when I couldn't help myself and just felt solidarity with the author.
Mein Kampf is a work of triumph made by an author that followed the same ignorant path that was described within the protocols.
You can learn how to improve yourself by reading the protocols since they point your arrogance.
I cannot say the same about Hitler's book, as it is a work of arrogance.

[Anonymous No.18071806]

>we have to get more than halfway through the thread before charts are posted due to derailment
based and retarded thread

[Anonymous No.18072233]

[Anonymous No.18072240]

[Anonymous No.18072249]

[Anonymous No.18072259]

[Anonymous No.18072263]

>>18063962

[Anonymous No.18072265]

[Anonymous No.18072280]

[Anonymous No.18072290]

[Anonymous No.18072294]

>>18064068
his ass

[Anonymous No.18072303]

[Anonymous No.18072318]

[Anonymous No.18072326]

[Anonymous No.18072335]

[Anonymous No.18072462]

[Anonymous No.18072637]

>>18063721
Pessoa would be repulsed.