[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 220 KB, 945x1417, 1617632818929.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18004956 No.18004956 [Reply] [Original]

I've been reading some Curtis Yarvin and Nick Land lately and they regularly make the claim that multiculturalism and ethnic diversity has extremely negative consequences for large groups. All of the studies I can find seem to support this position so what are the best arguments against it? Most people seem to rely on the huge assumption that the negative consequences will ultimately be eliminated in a few generations as people get more accustomed to it. A lot of people also shamefully try to ignore the negatives by appealing to the fact that we gain access to different types of food and entertainment.

The struggle between the majority and minority groups is an extremely important part of their writing and I'd like to see the more cogent arguments against it.

>> No.18004969

The only argument against is it that if you say it in public your life will be ruined by cultist trannies.

>> No.18004993

really missed seeing this thread regularly

>> No.18005046

Such a pretty picture for such a dim and likely disingenuous thread.
“Oh noes! The people that look and act different are coming!” Perhaps altering or ending systems that bring this about is where you need to start. State-capitalism for instance. Halt and reverse the environmental degradation, simplify and localize a free economy, and eliminate the bureaucratic class.
You bring autonomous neighborhoods direct democracy and suddenly people can live where they want. Natural balkanization achieved without the use of borders

>>18004993

>> No.18005240

>>18005046
> Perhaps altering or ending systems that bring this about is where you need to start. State-capitalism for instance. Halt and reverse the environmental degradation, simplify and localize a free economy, and eliminate the bureaucratic class.

This doesn't have the slightest chance of happening nor is it a given that it would solve any of our problems.

>> No.18005251

>>18005046
>direct democracy
This would be disastrous.

>> No.18005256

>>18005046
For a Marxist tranny you have no grasp of the material reality underlying your ideology

>> No.18005261

>>18005240
>>18005251
Wrong.

>>18005256
Not a Marxist. See how pit of touch you are?

>> No.18005274

>>18004956
Curtis doesn't argue that multiculturalism and ethnic diversity have negative consequences, he argues that democracy has negative consequences. He says democracy creates a state of tension or "cold civil war" which often breaks down along racial/ethnic lines, but under autocratic regimes multiculturalism can work just fine.

>> No.18005330

>>18004956
You already posted this

>> No.18005335

>>18005330
No I didn't.

>> No.18005338

>>18005046
>>18005261
I don't consider the opinions of trannies.
You're mentally ill.

>> No.18005347
File: 34 KB, 474x440, yugoslavia.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18005347

>>18005046
>Such a pretty picture for such a dim and likely disingenuous thread.
>“Oh noes! The people that look and act different are coming!”
Look what happened to Yugoslavia faggot, it was a socialist state that collapsed do to multiculturalism

>> No.18006347

>>18004969
Why?

>> No.18006354

>>18005335
Yes, you did.
>>18005330
I agree I’m getting tired of people who post the same fucking thread like clockwork every week