/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17998797]

If it's unnatural, it wouldn't exist.

[Anonymous No.17998800]

Average American circa 2070

[Anonymous No.17998803]

>>17998797
>If it's unnatural, it wouldn't exist.
true

[Anonymous No.17998817]

>>17998797
but it does exist anon, I'm looking at it right now
what do you say to that?
faggot

[Anonymous No.17998849]

>>17998817
you're crazy... there's no way you can say this is unnatural...

[Anonymous No.17998874]

>>17998849
Can say for certain that your use of ellipses is unnatural.

[Anonymous No.17998877]

>>17998800
They look more British to me.

[Anonymous No.17998880]

>If it’s unnatural it wouldn’t be possible

[Anonymous No.17998884]

>>17998874
for communication i would say it is very fitting

[Anonymous No.17998970]

>>17998884
Ellipsis signifies an omission which does not alter overall meaning, a comma or period is what you wanted. I am all for grammatical creativity, but this use is non-sense and built on ignorance of the rules, three periods does not mean it is a pause that is three times longer than a full stop. Learn the rules before you break them. The really painful thing is that there are a large number of people who read an ellipsis in its proper use as a long pause. I did the whole tutoring thing in college, 3/4 of the people were struggling through freshmen comp and almost all thought an ellipsis was a long pause. The conversations that resulted still give me headaches.

[Anonymous No.17998982]

>Homosexual behavior exists amongst nature
>B-but i-its unnatural!

???

[Anonymous No.17998996]

>>17998982
Two of the same sex choosing to be life long sexual partners is unique to humans. Butt sex is very common in all species with penis and vagina. I have never seen anything regarding lesbianism in other species, might be a human thing, no clue.

[Anonymous No.17999001]

>>17998797
Wrong.

[Anonymous No.17999007]

>>17998982
Btfo by >>17998996
/thread.

[Anonymous No.17999024]

>>17999007
I did not really back him the fuck off and the majority of people view sticking ones penis in the ass of another man as homosexual regardless of there being a lifetime commitment.

[Anonymous No.17999040]

>>17998982
Do you ever see an animal (that isn't mentally ill) refusing to breed with a female in the wild? No. It is nature that it has a desire to breed. The purpose for those animals is to 1) exist and to 2) breed.

As is ours, to 1) exist in god and 2) be fruitful & multiply

[Anonymous No.17999051]

[Anonymous No.17999083]

>>17999040
Eating or killing the male after mating, male on male, skipping the vagina and just penetrating through the abdomen are all common practices in the animal world, do you really want to use them as your standard for mental wellness?

[Anonymous No.17999227]

>>17998982
A different type of unnatural.

In the moral sense, it very well is!

[Anonymous No.17999249]

Reminder that most christcucks are closeted gay homos, and this thread is excellent proof of that

[Anonymous No.17999278]

>>17998797
>if it's unnatural, it wouldn't exist
>fucks dog

[Anonymous No.17999283]

>>17999051
I'm bisexual and I repress mild dysphoria. Was raised in a loving Christian home and never experienced abuse.

[Anonymous No.17999290]

>>17998849
I am a part of nature
this image is a part of nature
hitler was a part of nature (still is if you include ashes)

[Anonymous No.17999292]

>>17998996
>Two of the same sex choosing to be life long sexual partners is unique to humans

[Anonymous No.17999330]

>>17999283
Nigger, it is a fetish. You are not forced to have anything outside of procreative sex

[Anonymous No.17999395]

The whole "homosexuality is natural" argument was created by the American left as a way to fight against the religious right. The Christian right-wing would argue that homosexuality is immoral because it's a choice, whereas the left-wingers argued that it can't be a sin since they're born that way.

Of course, being inborn and being natural aren't equivalent, but Americans are too retarded to know anything about anything so here we are.

[Anonymous No.17999399]

>>17998996
there is a lot of lesbian bitches, and i'm not talking about human bitches, but canine bitches.

[Anonymous No.17999400]

>>17998982
There is a considerable improbability that women are capable of love. Likewise, there is a considerable improbability that men are actually capable of loving women for any duration beyond that which accompanies the refractory. Either the man is shackled by priapic chains, uses the woman as a vessel for egoism, or treats them like a bipedal labrador: the product of their intimacy is repugnant. Incidently, I am attracted to virtue—that which is scarcely observable in the fairer sex.

One would think that the seemingly increased prevalence of homosexual males in contemporary human society would assauge my transcendental desire and deliver unto me an object for my love. Your post, though, brings one unfortunate fact to my attention and shows me that human society does indeed possess something unnatural: for while homosexuality is evident in nature, faggots are not.

[Anonymous No.17999402]

>>17999395
>The whole "homosexuality is natural" argument was created by the American left as a way to fight against the religious right
your_meds_schizo.jpg

[Anonymous No.17999409]

>>17999402
You're mistaking me for yourself, and yourself with your doctor.

[Anonymous No.17999416]

>>17999400
>for while homosexuality is evident in nature, faggots are not.
lel

[Anonymous No.17999422]

Inarticulate people say unnatural instead of aberrant. You should already know this.

[Anonymous No.17999442]

>>17999283
yeah may be a fetish, because you are bisexual, not a homo
not liking women must be from child abuse?

[Anonymous No.17999566]

>>17998982
I'll correct your pompous faggot delusion right now.

Homosexuality has seemingly always existed in human society. But they are outlier minorities due to several concrete factors ranging from proportions of the population to psychic and behavioural anomalies which set the homosexuals apart from the majority of the population. The final and most decisive of these reasons is that the vast majority of homosexuals inevitably don't breed.

Faggots are the original genetic deadends. Faggots are welcome in society but not around children. Faggots are welcome in society so long as they manage to bottle up and restrain their tendency towards dysfunction. Infact there might even be a use for a small celibate or infertile caste which replenishes by means other than sexual intercourse. But faggotry has not and never will be a sign of health, it is a sign of weakness, dysfunction or perversion.

Thereby the inclination of most people to pick on homosexuals and exclude them is of course natural and healthy for the purposes of group management.

[Anonymous No.17999585]

>>17999566
meanwhile all the men in pre-modern society are psycho pederasts

[Anonymous No.17999605]

>>17998797
Correct
Also,
>What is natural is what is right
Why yes, that is what I believe, how could you tell?

[Anonymous No.18000270]

>>17999024
Ebin b8.