[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 2.14 MB, 1920x2353, hume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17919083 No.17919083 [Reply] [Original]

*solves philosophy*

>> No.17919178

*btfo'd by Kant*

>> No.17919181
File: 23 KB, 400x280, AF6EF2A4-3E9C-4037-9486-7715A4BB5840.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17919181

*ruins philosophy*

>> No.17919182

>>17919083
Hey, this isn't al-Ghazali

>> No.17919185

>>17919083
What is he wearing on his head?

>> No.17919194

>>17919083
You have to admire the balls of a man who writes as many books as he did and by the end of it all is perfectly comfortable admitting that he couldn't possibly actually live by it and so just plays backgammon instead.

>> No.17919196

>>17919182
*btfo'd by Averroes*

>> No.17919211

>>17919196
*bullied by the Almohads*

>> No.17919217

>>17919211
Peak Jahiliyyah

>> No.17919225

>>17919181
And rapes North African boys

>> No.17919227

>>17919185
in the 1700s people started dressing up as arabs in europe

>> No.17919237

>>17919083
Based. Love Hume and his shrewd intellect. Commit to the flames all Philosophy that doesn’t abide by his fork.

>> No.17919267

>>17919217
Yes and no, Ibn Tumart had been quite influenced by al-Ghazali.

>> No.17919295

>>17919083
Was he really too autistic to understand that while some abstract hypothetical point-of-view of the universe itself may well not have any inherent oughts, the human perspective absolutely does (e.g. life and self-preservation, which is the basis for any perspective in the first place)?

>> No.17919336

>>17919295
>Was he really too autistic

Yes, but it was because he was smart, not because he was autistic

>> No.17919341

>>17919336
Missing the obvious wouldn't generally be considered smart.

>> No.17919427

>>17919196
>Averroes
btfo'd by the Holy Quran (PBUH)

>> No.17919535

>>17919083
Inb4 the fags who say Kant refuted him then don’t elaborate

>> No.17920320

>>17919427
Canadian