Chart thread

[Anonymous No.17883047]

post some /lit/ related charts

[Anonymous No.17883062]

>>17883047
/lit/ says all of mine are retarded but I'll post them anyway

[Anonymous No.17883066]

>>17883062
thats a cute chart uwu

[Anonymous No.17883068]

>>17883062

[Anonymous No.17883070]

[Anonymous No.17883118]

>>17883047
Honest question has literally anybody actually gone through every recommendation in a /lit/ flowchart?

[Anonymous No.17883156]

>>17883070
I was fully expecting to ask "Where's the Book of Mormon" after looking at this and you have pleasantly surprised me. But where's the Old Testament?

[Anonymous No.17883917]

>>17883047
>readin all of this before Basic Mathematics
this chart has got to be a high effort troll

[Anonymous No.17884306]

Moar

[Anonymous No.17884313]

[Anonymous No.17884546]

>>17883047
Awful math chart. You can use the internet to review high school math and then you do non-proof-based calculus and linear algebra to get a grasp of it. MIT OCW single variable, multivariable and linear are great resources. Then you do a proof/logic book (Velleman is indeed great) and then you study calculus again using spivak and linear algebra again using axler, now following the proofs and doing lots of exercises.


Then you're basically free to go anywhere in undergrad math. Rudin for analysis, Artin or Dummit/Foote for algebra, Munkres for topology...

[Anonymous No.17884749]

Does anyone have the one following the Greeks?

[Anonymous No.17885448]

[Anonymous No.17885476]

[Anonymous No.17885486]

[Anonymous No.17885490]

[Anonymous No.17885510]

>>17885486
>doomer bloomer koomer OOOOOOmer mermermermer peepeepoopoomer hehemer

[Anonymous No.17885563]

>>17883047
anyone have a chart on Hindu theology/ philosophy or know where I could start?

[Anonymous No.17885581]

[Anonymous No.17885596]

[Anonymous No.17885600]

Any charts about esoterism and Islam?

[Anonymous No.17885658]

Not a chart but an iceberg.

[Anonymous No.17886242]

>>17885658
What's the Japanese text at the bottom?

[Anonymous No.17886274]

>>17885510
>saltmer

[Anonymous No.17886277]

>>17883070
Really good. But it's missing the "Popol vuh" from the ancient Mayan people.

[Anonymous No.17886278]

Anyone got a Nietzsche chart?

[Anonymous No.17886290]

>>17883070
>no canada

[Anonymous No.17886295]

I'm not looking for a chart but a world map on which the most known work of every country is depicted. I think it had Faust for Germany and Alexis Sorbas for Greece.

[Anonymous No.17886315]

>>17886278
Go in chronological order. That's it. If you don't want to read all of his works I'd go something like The Gay Science > Beyond Good and Evil > On the Genealogy of Morals > Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Human, All Too Human is a fun read as far as philosophy goes, and if you'd read it I'd add it before GS.

[Anonymous No.17886650]

>>17883070
>Book of Mormon
kek

[Anonymous No.17886673]

[Anonymous No.17886744]

>>17885448
Has anyone read babyfucker? How was it?

[Anonymous No.17886754]

Anyone have an economics chart? specifically in the realms of human-level shit that plebs can do. (i.e. starting a business, long-term investments, stock market, etc.) An anon in another thread a few days ago said he would make one, but he never delivered. Though he did manage to make me interested in the topic.

[Anonymous No.17886788]

>>17886673
Cool list but modern monarchism is major larp desu

[Anonymous No.17886808]

>>17884749

[Anonymous No.17886854]

>>17886788
It's not.

[Anonymous No.17886894]

>>17885476
>Lord of the Rings
>Fiction

[Anonymous No.17886970]

>>17883047
What is even the point of this chart? It seems to spend far too much time on introductory material for aspiring mathematicians, and is too narrow in scope for people doing it as a hobby. I can’t imagine It would be useful to anyone other than a child prodigy who begins it at age 10-12.

[Anonymous No.17886999]

>>17883917
>>17884546
Glad to see others have commented on this as well. If anyone wants to get into analysis my new favorite series for undergrads is Princeton Lectures in Analysis by Stein and Shakarchi, and for those who want to know a little more about real analysis I recommend Axler’s new book. Rudin is tried and true, but it’s drier than it has to be in light of the state of modern analysis.

[Anonymous No.17887012]

>>17883047
I need a chart/guide/book anything on pre-socratics.
>because fuck plato

[Anonymous No.17887042]

>>17886970
>>17886999
Honestly, this chart is not deep enough. After set theory, you should start Group Theory immediately. Then you go into Galois theory to construct the algebraic numbers. Then you go into real analysis not even calculus) to construct the reals. In order to do that, you'll talk about limits. Once you do that, only then algebra will make sense, and then you can talk about functional analysis (derivatives & integration).

Then you talk about Linear Algebra & Dif Eq, then you go into multi-dimensional functional analysis. You can also put basic analytic geometry before what we know as "Calc 3" just so you know why it's useful.

After that, you can do whatever you want.

[Anonymous No.17887059]

>>17883070
>The Aneid
Sounds like one of those publisher mandated sequels like Go Set a Watchmen or The Girl in the Spider's Web

[Anonymous No.17887060]

>>17887012

[Anonymous No.17887076]

>>17886854
>its not
it is, tubby.

[Anonymous No.17887092]

I am working my way through the Guenon one and feel like it's been a pretty good recommendation. I feel like i'm understanding decently despite his difficulty.

[Anonymous No.17887102]

>>17887076
That's incorrect

[Anonymous No.17887120]

[Anonymous No.17887126]

[Anonymous No.17887135]

knocked the wine glass over
and over it fell
so suddenly
so useless

[Anonymous No.17887141]

[Anonymous No.17887153]

there’s water in the ocean
as far as I can tell
That’s the best place for It

[Anonymous No.17887166]

[Anonymous No.17887392]

>>17887042
I disagree - the point is to have a starting point from which you can decide what direction you want to head in. I would say your approach decided it was heading in the direction of algebra, which, as we now know, is one you can follow for more than ~3500 years.

[Anonymous No.17887556]

Does anybody have the Plato reading order chart, that lists half his works on the left column, half his works on the right, and Republic in the middle?

[Anonymous No.17887637]

>>17883047
My favourite chart

[Anonymous No.17887692]

>>17885658
So this represents the stages of eye opening and knowledge expansion or what?

[Anonymous No.17887706]

>>17885490
Any advice on getting past all the sci fi gobbledygook?

I got bored of it by chapter 3 of the first book and dropped it

[Anonymous No.17887737]

>>17887706
It gets heavier on characterization and espionage later on, but honestly it sounds like Dune just isn't for you.

[Anonymous No.17887803]

>>17886808
Without consulting this chart, I've already gone through Mythology, The Histories, Hesiod and Theognis, The Iliad, and am currently finishing up The Odyssey.

From what I have read so far, this chart is very solid but is sorely missing Jason and the Argonauts. I learned more about ancient greek culture from that myth than I did from any of the above works. Severely overlooked.

Anyone who wants to study the Greeks, use this chart, but supplement it with Jason and the Argonauts. Best place for it would be right after Mythology.

Odds are nobody in this thread will take this advice or remember I said it, but I still feel compelled to say it just in case.

[Anonymous No.17888291]

>>17887803
What's so great about Jason and the Argonauts?

[Anonymous No.17888335]

Any charts for being well read?

[Anonymous No.17888348]

>>17883070
the divine comedy is not an epic

[Anonymous No.17888357]

[Anonymous No.17888404]

this but readable ? someone posted it yesterday but i didnt save

[Anonymous No.17888414]

[Anonymous No.17888445]

>>17888291
It’s not so much that it’s any better than the other myths, but from everything I’ve read that’s the one I felt did a best job communicating what the values of the time were like. It was largely glorification of semirandom raids and they mostly didnt try to portray it as too much else (although they sometimes justify what they did a little bit). Jason era Greeks were not too far off from say, vikings, in terms of culture. that’s something you dont get from the iliad or other works.

There are also some allusions to Jason and his crew in Iliad although I dont remember them now, and Jason’s crew has never been too consistent so that could be retroactive. But it seems like the audience was expected to already be familiar with Jason’s adventures by the time they tackle Iliad/Odyssey, and that’s something modern readers may want to account for if they want an informed reading.

From a /his/ perspective it’s significant just for predating Iliad, as well. I believe it’s the oldest complete record of a piracy voyage we have, the only ones predating it being fractions of literal trade records mentioning piracy rather than full myths/stories.

On a personal note. I like Jason’s swashbuckling fantasy adventures as a genrepiece more than the more serious greek epics like Iliad/Odyssey. That’s just a personal preference for my enjoyment though. It’s very pulp.

It’s not as essential as Iliad/Odyssey but I think it’s criminally overlooked and should be recommended to anyone who wants a complete look at the greeks. If you’re just after literature, I can see why you might skip it. The other myths feel much more personal. But if you want historical understanding, I think it’s a must read.

[Anonymous No.17888457]

>>17887803
Where to read it?

[Anonymous No.17888477]

poorfag here, can someone please post a /lit/ approved chart on money?

[Anonymous No.17888512]

>>17888414
These will probably leave you even more confused.

[Anonymous No.17888537]

>>17888457
Read the sticky, newfag.

[Anonymous No.17888549]

>>17888537
no shit, are you aware that there are multiple sources or did you just read it in an Internet article?

[Anonymous No.17888573]

>>17888457
I’ve only read the Seaton translation so I can’t compare it to any others, but from what I understand it’s held in high regard. So I’d recommend that one. I enjoyed it very much.

[Anonymous No.17888579]

>>17888573
Thanks, I was almost certain that other retard wasn't you.

[Anonymous No.17888606]

>>17885476
Was gonna point out the Catholic bias then realized it's from /christian/ so that's probably intentional

[Anonymous No.17888667]

Buddha is based-man

[Anonymous No.17888675]

>>17888667
Or this

[Anonymous No.17888685]

>>17888579
No problem. Hope you enjoy it anon.

[Anonymous No.17888715]

>>17888667
I love the monke meme and how truthful it is. It's the ultimate state of well being.

[Anonymous No.17889469]

>>17887042
"CATEGORY THEORISTS could be here", he thought. "I've never been in this seminar before, there could be CATEGORY THEORISTS anywhere." The cool wind felt good on his chest. "I HATE CATEGORY THEORISTS", he thought. His pen scratched against the paper, marking it even as the strong black coffee circulated through his powerful thick veins and washed away his (merited) fear of having his theories become obsolete. "With the axiom of choice, you can prove anything you want", he said to himself, out loud.

[Anonymous No.17889529]

>>17883047
That's more /sci/ than anything
Also it's really fucking bad man
>>17883118
No
I have gotten recommendations off them though personally

[Anonymous No.17889534]

>>17887120
Thanks, I didn't know I needed this chart before I saw it.

[Anonymous No.17889760]

[Anonymous No.17889964]

How do I actually *learn* math? I have a degree in chemical engineering but they dont really teach much math there (only up to O/PDE's)

[Anonymous No.17889986]

>>17889964
Most math books have exercises. Read the book and do the exercises.

[Anonymous No.17889999]

>>17886242
The Book of Tea

[Anonymous No.17890268]

>>17889964
Do the exercises.
Try to create your own problems in whatever area of math you are studying - have you thought deeply about every conceivable component within that area, and how it contributes to the overall concept? Try to formulate additional questions that you might want to go back to and answer once you develop more mathematical maturity.
Learn how to write mathematics, and try to write as much as you can in your own words about what you have studied, but in an acceptably mathematical manner.
Don't worry about about how quick you are progressing, take your time and learn deeper, at the end of the day, only your own understanding of mathematics matters.

[Anonymous No.17890364]

>>17888667
>>17888675
What about the one on the posted sticky?

[Anonymous No.17890374]

>>17885510
>>17886274
Comedy gold

[Anonymous No.17890921]

[Anonymous No.17890966]

>>17889760
What's this one all about?

[Anonymous No.17891384]

>>17890966
older female love interest

[Anonymous No.17891387]

Does this count?

[Anonymous No.17891412]

>>17891384
Thank you.

[Anonymous No.17891522]

>>17888348
it absolutely is
'Canto' means song btw

[Anonymous No.17891690]

>>17885658
Cringe lefty meme

[Anonymous No.17891698]

>>17886315
That's not chronological also skipping Birth of Tragedy is retarded

[Anonymous No.17891702]

>>17886808
Worst greeks chart

[Anonymous No.17891749]

>>17888477
I second this motion.

[Anonymous No.17892634]

>>17886673
This is the fourth incarnation of that chart and it's still entirely too busy. You need either a reduced version with only 8-12 titles, or some way of breaking it up into categories to make it more digestible.

[Anonymous No.17893449]

>>17885658
dilate, dork.

[Anonymous No.17893473]

>>17883070
FTFY

[Anonymous No.17893631]

>>17887166
>Nick Land was our Hegel

[Anonymous No.17894207]

>>17889469
i haven't keked so hard for a while, thanks for exposing my (merited) fear of category theory

[Anonymous No.17894346]

>>17885448
a perfect book for this chart is Under This Terrible Sun by Carlos Busqued

[Anonymous No.17894368]

>>17889469
>"With the axiom of choice, you can prove anything you want", he said to himself, out loud.
physically lolled at this