[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 840 KB, 1200x1600, hans hermann hoppe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17778167 No.17778167 [Reply] [Original]

where do I start with this gentleman's body of work?

>> No.17778175

>>17778167
The toilet because his work is shit.

>> No.17778178
File: 19 KB, 198x316, 975CD5A3-75F5-4DBF-93A0-FB29C65C9B8D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17778178

Skip it. Poor thinking

>> No.17778179

please read a real book

>> No.17778186

>>17778175
>>17778178
not an argument, and this is encouraging me only further to become familiar with his works, since the scum of /lit/ are clearly so desperate to stop me.

>> No.17778192

>>17778186
you can read him just promise me you'll refrain from participating in discussions about real literature once you do

>> No.17778199
File: 105 KB, 423x600, 8C53506E-77FD-4BCE-9FA9-340CA1F3BC2B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17778199

>>17778186
1/10

Read Fotopoulos instead
Or Graeber, here. A delightful read

>> No.17778208

>>17778192
again, not an argument. can you please provide some refutations to some of core concepts?

>> No.17778209

>>17778208
can you please poo poo pee pee

>> No.17778210

>>17778186
He's an absolute brainlet though. Literally all he is is a pipeline from libertarianism to nazism. You might as well just start reading Mein Kampf now because you'll be reading it in a year or so anyway.

>> No.17778212

>>17778175
>>17778178
>>17778179
It is only natural that the genetic trash that populate this website make attempts to discourage others from discovering the body of work which shines light on the fallacies which constitute the ideology with which they have based their existence on.

OP, I recommend you are first at least familiar with Rothbard and then simply make your way through Hoppe's work chronologically.

>> No.17778214

>>17778209
not an argument

>>17778210
an ad hominem isn't an argument, perhaps you could first refute some of his theories and concepts?

>> No.17778216

>>17778167

Just get some of his shorter works in ebook form. Some of them are only 50 pages I think. Read these. See if you like the man. If you love him, read his corpus chronologically or reverse chronologically as per your preference.

>> No.17778221

>>17778212
I agree with this guy but instead of going chronologically from rothbard you should do this chronological reading correctly and read homer, aeschylus, sophocles, euripides, aristophanes, plato, aristotle, virgil, ovid, the bible, boethius, dante, chaucer, spenser, milton, shakespeare.... that should get you started. have fun anon

>> No.17778222

>>17778178
>>17778199

faggot

>> No.17778223
File: 33 KB, 640x360, FEE867BD-6031-44C8-84A7-4287C186C4FD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17778223

>>17778212
Block.
This is blatant racism and classism. Not allowed.

>> No.17778233
File: 1.12 MB, 920x1250, 1597960697775.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17778233

>>17778175
>>17778178
>>17778179
>>17778192
>>17778199
>>17778209
>>17778210
Hello, reddit!

>> No.17778235

>>17778175
>>17778178
These posts were made by mustard pumpers

>> No.17778240

>>17778214
he's refuted by morality

>> No.17778248

>>17778240
>Like a woman my good intentions are all that matter.
t.Femboi

>> No.17778257

>>17778240
morality are principals which concern the distinction between human behaviour that is 'right' or 'wrong', what is 'harmful' to society and what is not. there is no objective morality, clearly each individual has their own principals and behaves according to them. so the idea that 'morality' 'refutes' anything is absurd. It cant.

>> No.17778258

>>17778214
https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2013/12/hoppes-argumentation-ethics-argument-refuted-in-under-60-seconds/

>> No.17778273

>>17778223
>Everything I don't like is racism. Blacks could just as easily be Newtons or da Vincis or Tao, i-i-if they only had the magic "privilege".
t.Willnot "And that's a good thing!" Procreate

>> No.17778277

>>17778258
you cant convey a single argument, can you? all you can do is link an article to someone else's 'argument' and hope that sticks

if you cant explain it yourself, then you're full of shit.

>> No.17778285

>>17778258
What is this pseudo drivel?

>> No.17778295
File: 93 KB, 385x390, 1610229690161.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17778295

>>17778258
>bleedingheartlibertarians

>> No.17778303
File: 95 KB, 606x873, 31CB1B7F-9136-417C-A381-9E1D7092CD57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17778303

>>17778167
>god that failed
>any number of free lectures @misesinst

>> No.17779011
File: 134 KB, 1080x809, hoppe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17779011

>>17778175
>>17778178
>>17778179
>>17778192
>>17778199
>>17778210
>>17778240
>>17778258

>> No.17779044

>>17778167
Democracy - The God That Failed is the best introduction I think and a book that should be read widely anyway.

>> No.17779081

>>17779011
This meme doesn't make sense - wouldn't this imply Hoppe is okay with democracy? Why would he need "results"

>> No.17779137

>>17779081
The results are just that the person fits all the criteria for physical removal. what do you mean?

>> No.17779149

>>17778178
Why would I wan't more totalitarian democracy? That's like asking for terminal cancer

>> No.17779176
File: 44 KB, 564x675, fag.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17779176

>>17779011
>hoppe.jpg (134 KB, 1080x809)File: hoppe.jpg (134 KB, 1080x809) google yandex iqdb wait134 KB JPG
>>>17778175(You)
>>>17778178
>>>17778179
>>>17778192
>>>17778199
>>>17778210(You)
>>>17778240(You)
>>>17778258(You)