Dr. Seuss Cancellation

[Anonymous No.17694775]

I can find PDFs of everything but this one. What are you doing to preserve Dr. Seuss' works?

[Anonymous No.17694790]

>>17694775
do you have a compiled link for all the books you found? I've been looking for one as well.

[Anonymous No.17694875]

>the holders of the rights decide to not publish some of this racist shit
>IT'S 1984 FUCKING LIBRULS SNOWFLAKES I'M BEING OPRESSED NOT MY DR SEUSS

[Anonymous No.17694899]

>preserve Dr. Seuss's works
nothing... they'll be preserved just fine by the library of congress and all the /pol/ doomsters like you

[Anonymous No.17694924]

>>17694775
Are /pol/tards seriously pretending to care about this reddit-tier author for kids now? Also wasn't he jewish?

[Anonymous No.17695075]

>>17694775
I got all of them from libgen.is and z library, could care less for his books though since he was a commie and am doing out of spite of the kike publishers

[Anonymous No.17695109]

[Anonymous No.17695114]

>>17695075
I couldn't find The Cat’s Quizzer and On Beyond Zebra! from libgen.

[Anonymous No.17695120]

>>17694924
>>17694899
>>17694875
Why are you guys so fragile?

[Anonymous No.17695128]

>>17695114
https://1lib.us/book/11744851/125d1f

[Anonymous No.17695136]

>>17695120
no u

[Anonymous No.17695144]

>>17695136
*respectfully disagrees*

[Anonymous No.17695153]

>>17694875
>>17694899
>>17695109
I have a completely apolitical aproach to this, I just don't want them hiding stuff from us, first some stupid kids books, than actual landmarks of literature will be changed. It is my right to read whatever I damn please without interference, whether that be from God or simply myself does not matter, it is what I will and want. I have all of project gutenberg, all of wikisource, the Great Books of The Western World, Encyclopedia Britannica 1911, and a few others.

[Anonymous No.17695154]

>>17695144
nothing respectful about polfaggotry

[Anonymous No.17695160]

>>17695154

[Anonymous No.17695163]

>>17695153
meh Carle was always better anyway

[Anonymous No.17695164]

He was a commie Jewish immigrant who used political cartoons to subvert during WWII. Him and his wife sued pro-life groups for using his work.

[Anonymous No.17695169]

>>17695163
For me it's Madeline

[Anonymous No.17695172]

>>17695160
case in point

[Anonymous No.17695177]

>>17695172
>case in point

[Anonymous No.17695183]

>>17695177

[Anonymous No.17695191]

>>17695183

[Anonymous No.17695199]

>>17694875
>racist shit
Got any examples?

[Anonymous No.17695203]

>>17695191
>>17695183
>playing wojak yugioh on 4chan

[Anonymous No.17695219]

>>17695199
it was a different time

[Anonymous No.17695233]

>>17695219
I have actually seen anything racist from him. This was a common idiom at the time, i don't think it means much. he actually see very progressive, especially for his time, based on the political cartoons I've seen. pic related is from 1942.

[Anonymous No.17695244]

>>17695233
like I said, it was a different time

[Anonymous No.17695251]

>>17695219
Heh, that's more blatant than I was expecting. Which book was this? I remember "nigger in a woodpile" being a euphemism for shenanigans being afoot. Granted, this is just silly caricatures, not actual racism.

[Anonymous No.17695257]

>>17695251
blackface is seen as pretty racist these days

[Anonymous No.17695263]

>>17695153
careful with that tinfoil hat. They stopped printing children's books with racist depictions in them. You can still buy twain and steinbeck and everyone else with the word "nigger" and that's not going to change
>I have all of
you mean you have saved to your hard drive? and I assume you use linux or BSD? or are you trusting your OS not to go in and edit the files?

[Anonymous No.17695276]

>>17695257
Is it really blackface if it's a drawing?

[Anonymous No.17695278]

>>17695251
From just a one page drawing i guess. Makes more sense in context

[Anonymous No.17695281]

>>17695257
Because critical theorist ideologues have conflated racism to be any form of acknowledgement of differences that isn't 100% positive, rather than limited to actual discrimination and prejudice. God forbid people poke fun at differences without some retard acting like it's an act of hatred.

[Anonymous No.17695285]

>>17695233
He had it coming, fucker supported the New Deal, wanted to go into WWII just because "muh foreign children", attacked Charles Lindebergh, hated Hitler, disavowed anti Semitism and racism despite supporting putting Japanese US citizens in interment camps, sided with communism and was an environmentalist. Any depictions he made of certain races were just a sign of the times he lived in, though he did have dislike for some for no reason other than to protect the Jews. That cartoon illustrates how he today would support this crap, he wanted people to be cleansed by the government of "racis" thoughts. I guarantee you if he had a twitter today it would be filled with BLM crap and he would most likely be a Sanders supporter. But too bad, he died, and like all other good goys he will be sacrifice on the altar of Saturn despite being a devotee of the ideology of neo liberalism. Just goes to show that you should always, no matter what, put yourself and your people first, whether that be because of religion, Fascism, or simply self preservation. False charity is disgusting.

[Anonymous No.17695297]

>>17695281
lol dude they just stopped selling some of his more outmoded works, relax

[Anonymous No.17695304]

>>17695263
>you mean you have saved to your hard drive? and I assume you use linux or BSD? or are you trusting your OS not to go in and edit the files?

At least I am trying to do something with my limited technical knowledge, I doubt my OS has the capability to go through thousands of pages of pdfs and thousands of epubs and edit out stuff. A certain level of paranoia is unhealthy. Fuck you trying to seem smart with your obscure tech bullshit. I do what I can.

[Anonymous No.17695315]

>>17695297
And the Nazis were just burning some outmoded books

[Anonymous No.17695323]

>>17695315
yeah like einstein

[Anonymous No.17695328]

>>17695297
>they just
We all know this is a bold-faced lie

[Anonymous No.17695359]

>>17695328
no, it's the truth

[Anonymous No.17695390]

All the people crying 1984 need to realize this is only because it’s children’s literature. Children is very impressionable so yes you do need to control what they are exposed to.
For example is my child was exposed to 4chan at a very early age you can bet his development would become stunted

[Anonymous No.17695399]

>>17695297
>outmoded
What so we stop selling the Odyssey because it reflects ancient morality?

>>17695315
Most of those books were just crap about trannies and stuff from obscure Marxist and pedophile authors, and the book burnings were just for show, they were still readable in archives

[Anonymous No.17695410]

>>17695399
>Most of those books were just crap about trannies and stuff from obscure Marxist and pedophile authors,
Don't hold me on that stament actually some of the authors they banned I actually really like.

[Anonymous No.17695414]

>>17695390
>Children is very impressionable
That's exactly why we should show it to them. They should know what the white man naturally thinks of the nigger instead of being brainwashed by globohomo media where we're all equal and niggers aren't repulsive and unaesthetic. But I guess it's too late now.

[Anonymous No.17695424]

>>17695399
Odyssey isn't marketed to or meant to be read by children

[Anonymous No.17695429]

>>17695390
Fairy tales were quite gruesome in their early versions, when they were still mostly based on folk tales told in hope it will prevent children from getting into trouble. I don't recall most of population becoming murderous psychopaths back then.

[Anonymous No.17695437]

>>17695414
Sure, but you don't need to sell it to them, big brain.

[Anonymous No.17695447]

>>17695276
Kek

[Anonymous No.17695465]

>>17695304
>I do what I can
which is nothing. Imagine thinking that the all-powerful globohomo conspiracy is going to completely remove from history entire books, but they'll be incompetent enough to leave you alone

[Anonymous No.17695506]

>>17695128
The quality on this one is kinda trash desu

[Anonymous No.17695597]

>>17695465
People are so fucking demoralizing on this board all the fucking time. Never use capitalization either.

[Anonymous No.17695694]

>>17695597
>polfaggot whining about demoralization

lmao look at a mirror you hypocritical cocksucker

[Anonymous No.17695732]

>>17695597
>wahhhh why won't anyone entertain my fantasies of government oppression

[Anonymous No.17695743]

>>17695597
/lit/ is not your safe space. Dilate.

[Anonymous No.17696024]

>>17695128
Thanks. I couldn't find a single thing in the book that can be considered racist. Maybe the "how old do you have to be to be Japanese" and the chop sticks questions, but that is a bizarre stretch.

[Anonymous No.17696047]

>>17696024
blame the free market

[Anonymous No.17696181]

There's a lot of companies that need to burn to the ground.

[Anonymous No.17696210]

>>17696181
oh no not zogbay

[Anonymous No.17696238]

>>17695424
We read it in class in freshman year at high school, so I'm calling bullshit. Besides, I binged old mythology in elementary and middle school (with all the bloody details) and I turned out fine. Kids aren't as fragile as adults seem to think. Hell, even the Animorphs series had some pretty brutal scenes of torture

[Anonymous No.17696271]

>>17696238
Did you read Dr. Seuss in high school too?

[Anonymous No.17696322]

>>17695597
Fuck them, we are right

[Anonymous No.17696328]

>>17696271
No, I read them by binging my grandma's collection and filling in the gaps with my elementary school library. Little did I know those evil books were grooming my impressionable mind into a lifetime of hatred and bigotry.

[Anonymous No.17696341]

>>17695160
>if you don't agree with me you're a TRANNY TRANNY TRANNY TRANNY TRANNY TRANNY TRANNY

[Anonymous No.17696357]

>>17696341
If it makes you feel better, widespread mockery is one of the early stages of normalization and eventually acceptance.

[Anonymous No.17696377]

when i spent a year as an ESL teacher in Asia, I taught the kids via Dr Seuss books, got them to all chant in unison, it was fun

[Anonymous No.17696408]

>>17696357
yeah something tells me /pol/ is mostly soros money too

[Anonymous No.17696438]

>>17696408
I don't know why people write off Soros' influence, especially since it's public record that he's got a fuck ton of politicians and prosecutors in his pocket and isn't shy about his plans to erode borders. What's even more bizarre is people constantly assume criticism of him is based on antisemitism, given that he worked for the Nazis to sell out his own people.

[Anonymous No.17697467]

>>17694875
obvious bait is obvious

[Anonymous No.17697485]

imagine when liberals find out about Henry Ford, you think they will cancel ford?

[Anonymous No.17697498]

has 4chan become so infested with trannies that there are people here actually offended over a children's book? Time to dial 8 and commit 41%, GUYS

[Anonymous No.17697510]

>>17697498
o b s e s s e d

[Anonymous No.17697518]

>>17694875
>being this afraid of children's books

[Anonymous No.17697539]

https://t.me/bannedbooksgeneral

Upload any pdfs her pricks. We need more people to gain up on the lit.

[Anonymous No.17697548]

>>17697498
not a single person cares about the book
righties can mock lefties for being offended about the racist kid's book
lefties can mock righties for thinking not republishing a kid's book is 1984

neither side actually thinks either of those things, they just insult the strawman of the other guy, and play up their own strawman to provoke, and then once they're together they can start the usual flamewar about politics. The book is just pretext 10million to have another political argument. Personally I don't even bother pretending to talk about the book, I just start spamming inflammatory racial images

[Anonymous No.17697561]

>>17697548
>not republishing
It's being thrown into the memory hole.
>>17696181

[Anonymous No.17697588]

>>17697518
nobody's "afraid" of anything

>>17697539
they aren't banned

[Anonymous No.17697606]

>>17697588
>They don't gotta burn tha books they just remove 'em
How does it feel that you sold your soul and are The Man now?

[Anonymous No.17697612]

>>17697588
Online retailers have been blocking re-selling the books by people that still own copies.

[Anonymous No.17697628]

>>17695263
>and that's not going to change

It’s the current year Anon.

[Anonymous No.17697638]

>>17697606
>>17697612
They're not getting removed, just not being sold.

[Anonymous No.17697646]

>>17697588
he supports a publisher not printing children's books cause he fears they will turn kids racist

[Anonymous No.17697650]

>>17697628
This isn't authoritarian China, no matter what Joe thinks

[Anonymous No.17697657]

>>17697646
Hey it's a free market

[Anonymous No.17697674]

>>17697638
see
>>17696181
This isn't the only case either. You'll know the cancer has metastasized when libraries start pulling their own copies off shelves. Sure it's not 1984, but it's pretty damn spot on for Fahrenheit 451. Can't be having books that make people think unhappy thoughts, right?

[Anonymous No.17697676]

>>17697638
>this pathetic of a shill attempt
Yep. Soul gone.
>>17697657
>I used their argument against them; I am le clever
Then why aren't people allowed to sell it?

[Anonymous No.17697689]

>>17697674
again, not being sold. It's not like ebay called the cops and had his organs harvested...

[Anonymous No.17697693]

>>17697674
>only books /pol/ can reference are 1984, brave new world and farenheit 451, the absolute entriest fucking level of literature
Embarrassing

[Anonymous No.17697704]

>>17697676

[Anonymous No.17697705]

what is this american bullshit, why can't you be normal and read racist european fairytales and fables

[Anonymous No.17697711]

>>17697510
>>17697548

No. I refuse to believe that anyone but a tranny would get offended over this shit. Has this really what you people have come to?

[Anonymous No.17697715]

>>17697693
>say why I'm not allowed to run a red light
>haha all they ever bring up is safety and the law

[Anonymous No.17697726]

>>17697561
good riddance

[Anonymous No.17697729]

>>17697715
remember to dial 8 and kill yourself

[Anonymous No.17697756]

>>17697729
Wrong post? I was arguing that anti-censorship anons keep bringing up 1984 and 451 because it's the most apt description of how the left acts.

[Anonymous No.17697757]

>>17695153
>hiding stuff from us
There are thousands of texts that go out of publishing and thousands of texts that have never been published just sitting in some dark room. It isn't hiding it from you because someone else isn't making it commercially available to you.

[Anonymous No.17697777]

>>17697757
Keep pretending >>17696181 isn't happening, it makes you look honest and trustworthy.

[Anonymous No.17697778]

>>17697756
no, if anything you're being the most orweillian with how blurry you make the concept of censorship seem

[Anonymous No.17697795]

>>17697778
You tried.
Also
>filename
Shills really have no idea how often they give themselves away, do they?

[Anonymous No.17697812]

>>17697777
If you were honestly worried about the lack of availability of certain literature it wouldn't begin with a dr. seuss book. Why haven't you been crying about the thousands of unpublished manuscripts at universities, museums, or other archives?

[Anonymous No.17697840]

>>17697812
>wouldn't begin with a dr. seuss book.
It didn't.
However, there is a difference between removing something that was available, for ideological reasons, and not releasing archived content that was never published. Do you also think masturbation is mass murder?

[Anonymous No.17697858]

>>17697795
nice arguments

[Anonymous No.17697862]

>>17697840
>for ideological reasons
It isn't for ideological reasons it is for financial reasons. The publishing house is just doing what is financially beneficial.

[Anonymous No.17697874]

>>17697862
>>17696181
Not to mention bowing to the mob isn't actually beneficial.

[Anonymous No.17697885]

>>17697693
>implying Fahrenheit 451 wasn't dead accurate
Whether or not it's entry-level is irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.17697902]

>>17697874
They believe otherwise. The publishing house believes it is financially beneficial so they are acting accordingly. Perhaps you can email them your economic analysis of why it is more beneficial to publish the books and they will renege.

[Anonymous No.17697947]

>>17697862
stop publishing something that still sells massively for a few twitter sjws complaints are you being a retard on purpose anon

[Anonymous No.17697948]

>>17697756
kek friendly fire

[Anonymous No.17697964]

>Imagine supporting censorship of innocent children books
>Imagine blaming the people who oppose censorship
You shills are less then human. You're twisted manipulative worms.

[Anonymous No.17698010]

>>17697947
if you believe that some board of directors actually cares about a minor social grievance and it isn't just catering to consumers for future financial benefit or mitigated loss you are retarded and should go back

[Anonymous No.17698064]

>>17698010
troglodyte tier take look at the comic book industry it keeps pumping out sjw garabage that doesn't sell companies haven't been about profits in a long time

[Anonymous No.17698077]

>>17698064
>comic book industry keeps pumping out sjw garbage
so nothing has changed

[Anonymous No.17698084]

>>17697964
Imagine coming to a literature board with no respect for language

[Anonymous No.17698135]

https://youtu.be/jAo3YWFv6PI
OHNONONONONO NAZIBROS WE GOT TOO COCKY

[Anonymous No.17698161]

>>17698077
This, comics were always propaganda.

[Anonymous No.17698226]

>>17698135
>posting the leftist Rush Limbaugh
kek. I dunno how this brainlet has such a following, but then again I've seen literal piss drinkers get decently sized followings.

[Anonymous No.17698337]

Honestly I don't see anything wrong with racial caricatures if they're presented in a respectful way, as an artistic exploration of a certain culture. Some of the Dr. Seuss stuff that was banned seemed legitimately de-humanising, though. But it's worrying to see people say stuff like Aladdin and pic related are "racist" just because they're influenced by different cultures and feature characters of those cultures.

[Anonymous No.17698375]

>>17698226
That's unironically an insult to Rush Limbaugh.

[Anonymous No.17698383]

>>17694875
https://www.insider.com/moments-themes-in-disney-movies-that-havent-aged-well-problematic
Just read this article and tell me we're not hopelessly brainwashed.

[Anonymous No.17698433]

>>17697757
They stopped publishing it not because people didn't want to buy it but because of an ideological commitment. This is just pure censorship based on the desire to socially engineer kids into believing in multiculturalism.

[Anonymous No.17698434]

>>17698337
kill yourself tranny
Try to deny chinks have slits for eyes
And I will show you a liar

[Anonymous No.17698443]

>>17697711
this

[Anonymous No.17698459]

Reminder that (((Dr. Seuss))) was a commie fag.

[Anonymous No.17698461]

[Anonymous No.17698659]

>>17695263
>and that's not going to change
Are you so sure about that, anon?

[Anonymous No.17698671]

>>17698659
well I'm buying all my niggerbook physicals now just in case

[Anonymous No.17698913]

>>17698433
take your meds, they stopped publishing it because they think it will look good publically and bring them social credit, not because of any ideology they are secretly pushing themselves. It is just an attempt to appease consumers all for the end of profit.

[Anonymous No.17698994]

>>17694924
One of the things he's accused of is antisemitism, so...

[Anonymous No.17699008]

>>17694775

[Anonymous No.17699028]

Can someone post the 'offensive imagery" from the various discontinued books? All the articles I read list the books and give descriptions of some examples, but none show the actual imagery.

[Anonymous No.17699117]

>>17694775
Have we westerners got it so good that we need to have discourse over childrens' books? Imagine if a real crisis happens.

[Anonymous No.17699162]

>>17699117
Imagine people with strong opinions about some books and it's author arguing on a board about literature and some dumbass coming in like "lol what about real world problems"

[Anonymous No.17699167]

>>17694875
>racist shits
Idc and neither should you.
Also
>licking the corporate boot that hard
Anon idk what to say other than ask why would you defend a corporation instead of attacking them on all available lanes?

[Anonymous No.17699203]

>>17699167
You are really overthrowing the evil corporations right now. Keep posting schizo, your attacks have almost destroyed them

[Anonymous No.17699208]

>>17699028

[Anonymous No.17699216]

>>17699208

[Anonymous No.17699234]

>>17698913
nobody believes this lmao, you don't even believe it yourself

[Anonymous No.17699264]

>>17699234
yes anon, I definitely believe Nabisco cares about trannys more than money

[Anonymous No.17699272]

>>17699264
They care about following the state religion

[Anonymous No.17699281]

>>17699208
>>17699216
Oh my! How offensive!

[Anonymous No.17699302]

>>17697964
there is something wrong with them, I think in the end we're going to end up shooting at each other

[Anonymous No.17699305]

>>17694875
You will never be a womXn.

[Anonymous No.17699308]

>>17699208
>>17699216
wtf I hate minorities now!

[Anonymous No.17699318]

>HOW HORIBLE THAT THERE ARE NO MINORITIES REPRESENTED IN CHILDREN'S FICTION! WE MUST RECTIFY THIS!

>>17699208
>>17699216

>NO YOU CAN'T SHOW A REPRESENTATION OF A MINORITY IN A CHILDREN'S BOOK! IT IS RAY-SIST!!!!

The cognitive dissonance is astounding.

[Anonymous No.17699536]

>>17694775
>see Dr Seuss books getting cancelled online
>6 of them are no longer in publication as a result of this
>notice the vast trove of problematic, popular, common books and media just floating around
>see that there are Dr Seuss books now being sold as collectables online
>start ordering in bulk copies of famous stories that by today's standards are racist, sexist, transphobic, etc
>write articles calling for the cancellation of all these old books and force publishing houses to stop printing them
>sell old books to rich rightoids as collectables for profit

Already preserved. PDFs exist of all of them. Now excuse me, I have money to make

[Anonymous No.17699563]

imagine caring about retarded zippity zoop zip furry comics from the 1700s when you could be making a killing off of the cancellation of the Berenstein bears

[Anonymous No.17699577]

What annoys me the most is the doublethink/silence from liberals. It's them defending this laughably clear censorship while still proclaiming themselves advocates of free speech.

Just come out already and admit free speech is an outdated concept so there can be actual debate instead of continuously doubling down on whatever your liberal elite masters push.

[Anonymous No.17699636]

>>17699577
"Sounds like the free market to me :^)" Is what they'll say to you when pressed.

[Anonymous No.17699803]

>they aren't banned they're just not making new ones
>they aren't banned they're just not allowed to be resold
>it's a free market except when cake is involved
>I have nothing inside me, I'm just a hollow shell made of meat filled with dead words

[Anonymous No.17699817]

>>17699577
Fuck I didn't realize that was from the book until he said "three-dimensional sex-magazines".

[Anonymous No.17699845]

>>17694775
is anyone else here racist, or is it just me?

[Anonymous No.17699905]

>>17694775
Wait, why is Dr. Suess being "canceled"?

[Anonymous No.17699965]

>mfw I made thousands of dollars off of this shitstorm

[Anonymous No.17699981]

>the right being concerned over slippery slope censorship and doing nothing to stop it
>the left gaslighting and insisting this isn't a trend after almost a decade of it

some things never change

[Anonymous No.17700425]

>>17694775

[Anonymous No.17700506]

>>17695153
>I just don't want them hiding stuff from us, first some stupid kids books, than actual landmarks of literature will be changed.

This here. These are books that would continue to sell if kept in print, it's not a case of the books falling out of print because there's no interest in them. If you apply present-day censors' rules to books of decades past, there's plenty of still-popular books that could have their ongoing reprints ceased, all because a Twitter mob howled loud enough. Most of the books I read are reprints from the 20th century, and almost all would have "problematic" aspects according to the censorious views of today. Don't think these people will stop after just a handful of books, either. Their hunger to ban and censor will never be sated.

[Anonymous No.17700954]

>>17696181
>we have to buy illicit Dr. Seuss books from the shady man in a trenchcoat now
Is this what we've come to?

[Anonymous No.17700964]

>>17699028

[Anonymous No.17700974]

>>17700964

[Anonymous No.17700977]

>>17700954
The books are still on Abebooks (for now anyway). Saw someone selling a 2000s-era reprint of Scrambled Eggs Super for $1200.

[Anonymous No.17701308]

>>17694775
Can anyone share me their collection in mega or something?

[Anonymous No.17701558]

all i wanted to do is sell these books at ridiculous prices because of this stupid shit is that so much to ask?

[Anonymous No.17701595]

>>17700974
I'm russian and literally how the fuck this offends me?

[Anonymous No.17701943]

>>17699264
but..

[Anonymous No.17701957]

>>17699636
>NOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST NOT PUBLISH SOMETHING YOU'RE A PRIVATE ENTITY!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.17702291]

>>17696341
Yes.

[Anonymous No.17702463]

>>17695177
Anon, are these "trannies" here in the room with us now? What are they telling you to post?

[Anonymous No.17702502]

>>17699216
can't wait to dm this to Nick Mullen

[Anonymous No.17702521]

>>17701957
>"heheh that will show then!! i will defend oligopolies and their ability to collude with eachother in order to censor what they don't like"
So.... you are for Anarcho capitalism them? anyone can do anything as long as they have the money?

[Anonymous No.17702541]

>>17701595
Get in like and shut the fuck up acting like i want you to or you aren't really Russian.

[Anonymous No.17702664]

>>17702521
It's not censorship when your publisher decides to stop selling something.

[Anonymous No.17702726]

>>17700964
To be fair, they do eat with sticks.

[Anonymous No.17702749]

This is directed to anyone who tries to preserve the past.

[Anonymous No.17702813]

>>17702664
No one cares about big jewish company
Big jewish company only does what rabid goys want so they can make more money
You think they would just stop selling it on their own initiative?
You are retarded
remember to dial 8 and off yourself, because life won't be easy for you if you are going to get offended over the smallest shit imaginable

[Anonymous No.17702825]

>>17700425
Arrest this man
The new turner diaries

[Anonymous No.17702838]

>>17697711
No trannies replied to this because they cannot refute

[Anonymous No.17702895]

>>17699208
>>17700964
>>17699216
So what exactly is so offensive about any of this? Holy fucking fragility, Batman! It's times like these that I wish observing the Offended page of Encyclopedia Dramatica was required to graduate. Maybe then people wouldn't be such chronic crybabies.

[Anonymous No.17702911]

>>17702895
imagine if these crybabies found the turner diaries or something
they would blow up (like a chinaman on a railroad)

[Anonymous No.17702931]

>>17702813
uh oh anon easy on the anti-Semitism there, this isn't /b/

[Anonymous No.17702939]

>>17702911
lmao nobody with higher than room temp IQ takes that trash seriously

[Anonymous No.17702977]

>>17699577
>>17697885
Isn't this part of the high school reading lists? Are too many lazy faggots just using Cliffnotes and not actually taking in any of the lessons they are supposed to be receiving? Seeing a bunch of my old friends openly be in support of all this madness is making me genuinely seethe.

[Anonymous No.17703062]

>>17702463
I'm dating one. I can confidently say that even my partner is frustrated with the sheer histrionics of the "community" and how most of the vocal ones are full blown commies hellbent on cultural destruction and making everyone as miserable as them.

[Anonymous No.17703081]

>>17702939
And yet these room temp IQs seem to have enough pull that major companies left and right are bending to their retarded whining.

[Anonymous No.17703164]

>Implying this isn't just a corporate scheme to play both sides and drive costs up at the same time
Bowing to the "woke" crowd will further their brand loyalty, these are the same people that say "Disney good for Lion King 2019 make diverse, make girl boss." By pulling the books it creates a market scramble where trumptrads buy as many copies as they can before product is pulled from the shelf. When the books are eventually reissued (and they will be) both sides will be clamoring to buy new copies simply because there's been no new copies for however long. Do you really think a company like Random House gives two shits about anything other than profits?

[Anonymous No.17703247]

>>17697902
Yeah but... 1984 MAN

[Anonymous No.17703322]

>>17701957
kill yourself collaborator vermin

[Anonymous No.17703373]

>>17703322
go back eledctionfag scum

[Anonymous No.17703706]

>>17702541
Чтo ты нecёшь, eбaнyтый?

[Anonymous No.17703793]

>>17702726
That's racist.

[Anonymous No.17703814]

>>17702838
God just fucking put this deformed sloth out of his misery. How pathetic.

[Anonymous No.17704160]

>>17697874
>All over amazon best sellers to own the libs
>Free 24/7 media advertising costing $0
>Value of these books skyrockets
isn't actually beneficial?

[Anonymous No.17705010]

>>17703062
>I'm dating one
like clockwork

[Anonymous No.17705374]

>>17694775
>this made fragile liberals shart and vomit their pants in 2021

[Anonymous No.17705775]

>>17703373
t. collaborator and terrorist

[Anonymous No.17706298]

>>17701957
my source tells me Chinese bootlegs will be printed and ready to ship by next week

[Anonymous No.17707149]

>>17697676
Because the market is free to make that decision?