[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 17 KB, 588x207, PetersonTweet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586306 No.17586306[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Are there any books that argue for state-enforced monogamy?

>> No.17586318

What a failure he is.

>> No.17586371

>>17586318
He's worth at least $10MM and you will never be a real woman.

>> No.17586382

>>17586371
I don’t care how much money he has, he will never be a good father or intellectual of any sort

>> No.17586395

>>17586306
Why do incels have this deluded fantasy that somehow we're gonna go full 180 and remove all women's rights and give them free girlfriends?

>> No.17586403

>>17586306
Sorry, we're going to devolve back into powerful men having harems again. The 1950s sure were great, weren't they? You're lucky because we haven't given polygamous couples equal rights yet. Take this opportunity to make six figures and get a wife. Fuck everyone else.

>> No.17586405

>>17586382
>he will never be a good father

His daughter is a massive dumb whore but I think his son is doing alright.

>> No.17586410

>>17586395
Weimar Germany was possibly even more civilized, progressive and modern than we are, and they turned around in an extremely short period of time.

>> No.17586413

>>17586405
>His daughter is a massive dumb whore
What exactly has she done wrong?

>> No.17586414

>>17586410
No they didn’t.

>> No.17586441
File: 2.01 MB, 400x300, 1466458822957.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586441

>>17586413
She committed adultery.

>> No.17586446

>>17586306
It will happen as a result of the S.E.X. Act of 2045. The Simulacra Engagement Exclusion Act bans the production and importation of all gynoid companion machines and annuls any marriages to them on the state-level. The so-called "Waifu Proviso" included in the S.E.X. Act remains controversial, but the TERFocrat-controlled Congress seems unlikely to dispense with the rule requiring women to be legally married to obtain UBI payments.

>> No.17586449

>>17586446
Is this Nick Land posting

>> No.17586450

>>17586395
Not that dramatically, but it isn't inconceivable. Sub-populations which suppress women and keep them in the kitchen/babymaking have higher birthrates than more egalitarian ones. You can see this population trend in America with some of the more cultish Christian groups, and in Europe with Islamic populations. As time goes on and they become a majority of the population, their norms become the norms of the society. Do I think it's a good thing? No, but I do think it's inevitable.

>> No.17586459
File: 817 KB, 826x1032, 1610706302932.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586459

>>17586449
Neo-Amazonia arrives from the future.

>> No.17586465

>>17586459
Lmao that cannot be real

>> No.17586468

>>17586450
That kind of Christianity is on the decline. They're not becoming a majority.

>> No.17586473

>>17586465
Only a race of Sarah Connors can raise the next generation

>> No.17586480

>>17586395
It's a fact that in societies like ours sex truly represents a second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and as a system of differentiation it functions just as mercilessly. The effects of these two systems are, furthermore, strictly equivalent. Just like unrestrained economic liberalism, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute poverty. Some men make love every day; others five or six times in their life, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none. It's what's known as 'the law of the market'... In a totally liberal sexual system certain people have a varied and exciting erotic life; others are reduced to masturbation and solitude. Economic liberalism is an extension of the domain of the struggle, its extension to all ages and all classes of society. Sexual liberalism is likewise also an extension of the domain of the struggle, extending to all ages and all classes of society.

>> No.17586482

>>17586459
>one dumb redditor's possibly hallucinated experience is indicative of the rest of society

since you like posting reddit shit why don't you go back.

>> No.17586494

>>17586318
got a mad whore on OP's bait

>> No.17586495

>>17586480
That quote has never made any sense. For that analogy to work sex would have to be more scarce, not less.

>> No.17586503
File: 133 KB, 523x530, 1583793969098.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586503

>>17586482
I'm going to deterritorialize your ass

>> No.17586512

>>17586495
sex is scarce for a large segment of men that’s the point. Usually it’s just a small fraction of men who get the most out of sex and relationships on a consistent basis

>> No.17586529

>>17586512
But having monogamy doesn't change anything. Casual sex makes it easier to get laid, if everyone is just holding for an attractive partner you don't suddenly become more appealing.

>> No.17586558

>>17586529
He is viewing sex as a commodity distributed by a capitalist marketplace. So of course it is being accumulated and horded by some while others are deprived. He's French.

>> No.17586564

>>17586558
I understand what he means but it makes no sense. It's not like capital or property where if you get it then no one else can have it. One person having sex does not deprive other people of sex. If you're not getting sex you're not getting it no matter how much a chad fucks.

>> No.17586579

>>17586529
I think this point is that inequality increases; there's an increase in the supply of sex, but no commensurate lowering of standards. Having a woman reject you because she doesn't want to marry you is one thing; knowing she's a slut and still having her reject you is humiliating.

The problem with this reasoning is that these people aren't getting rejected, they just aren't trying. People are more liberal than ever, and they're having less sex than ever. The problem runs deeper.

>> No.17586590

>>17586414
it did

weimar ended in the greatest show of a nation's will to live

a country the size wrought such anal-wreckage on the world that people are ass-pained at even its mention to this day

>> No.17586602

>>17586590
*the size of texas

>> No.17586605

>>17586579
Wouldn't be incelkino if the reasoning were good

>> No.17586611

>>17586306
Does this not undermine the ubermensch and top lobsters?

>> No.17586625

>>17586590
>will to live
To kill, you mean. And it nearly killed them. Same as Napoleons barbarity. More French died in those idiot wars than the revolution. All the wrong people.
And you aryan larpers shed tears for a myth golden age of blood tears and delusion. Shove it up your ass.

>> No.17586634
File: 440 KB, 802x791, 1608181644082.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586634

>>17586611
that's the secret, Jordan Peterson is a fucking idiot

>> No.17586638

>>17586529
You’re assuming that an increase in casual sex would mean that it increases uniformly across the entire population (it doesn’t)

When women prioritize having fun and fucking the most desirable man possible their looking for an extremely specific type of guy. A guy that the vast majority of men cant really measure up to.

Back when society prioritized women to look for suitable long term partners there’d be a much more even distribution of men getting laid. It’s alot easier for a guy to measure up to good long term goals rather than physical attributes that they just weren’t born with

That’s how you end up with attractive guys getting most of the sex. Whats the point of dating the nerd or the average guy if a girl just wants to fuck for the sake of getting the most amount of pleasure possible?

>> No.17586640

>>17586395
>deluded fantasy
I can see China doing this for the goal of social stability.

>> No.17586646
File: 550 KB, 786x642, kekboys.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586646

>> No.17586666

>>17586638
>back when society prioritized women to look for suitable long term partners there'd be a much more even distribution
No, there wasn't. I don't even think there's that uneven a distribution now, I think there are less people having sex in general but this idea that a small collection of men are fucking all the women is just the ressentiment talking

>> No.17586670

>>17586625
>she hates Napolean too
Could you be any more cringe?

>abloo abloo a bunch of people died for a cause greater than themselves
lol

>> No.17586677

>>17586611
yes it would. how ironic a warrior for "freedom", small government and "justified" hierarchies has to cry out for the state's help to marry off incels, the lowest of the low on the sexual totem pole.

>> No.17586678

>>17586666
ok Satan

>> No.17586679

>>17586590
Your idea of a great nation is one that rapes the world?

>> No.17586688

>>17586638
>>17586579
Damn, I fucking nailed it.

>> No.17586702
File: 13 KB, 540x119, 1613158062542.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586702

>>17586625
>napoleon barbarity
>idiot wars

>> No.17586715
File: 165 KB, 1200x650, D74DD526-9F01-4BEC-8F72-B54D28484642.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586715

>>17586702
I am an anarchist

>>17586670
>a cause greater than themselves
>to fail to establish France as the new Rome
IDIOT WAR.
FAILED STATIST

>> No.17586718

>>17586590
yeah a regime that lasted 12 years and lost greatest will to power ever

>> No.17586721

>>17586318
dumb fag butter shut your fucking face you will never be a real woman

>> No.17586724

>>17586715
Failure is noble. Also, rationality is peak bugman cringe.

>> No.17586726

>>17586718
neo nazis are either bitter incels or trailer trash rednecks, very little in between. curious that.

>> No.17586735

>>17586718
(((They))) shut it down.

>> No.17586738

>>17586318 (wnbaw)
not as big of a failure as yours has been in being a woman.

>> No.17586743

>>17586306
>when you're a benzo addict so you project your lack of responsibility on the whole world

>> No.17586747

>>17586743
gb2twitter with your gay ass memes

>> No.17586773

>>17586625
better to die a free man than live a slave to ((them))

>> No.17586777

>>17586715
at least statists actually have the ability to exist in real life and have a shot at achieve something lol anarchism will never exist in any meaningful way even if you win a thousand revolutions, its basically an ideological cop out where intellectually deficient little girls can avoid the tough questions sand the hard work by defaulting to the most completely and utterly retarded nonfunctional utopianism instead of actually trying to achieve real tangible solutions to problems and questions which is a lot more taxing

>> No.17586778

>>17586738
>>17586721
YWNHAW

>> No.17586785

>>17586371
I'm glad to know that Peterson fans think that your worth in money is more important than not being a deeply unhappy junkie with a cancer goblin wife and a dumb slut daughter puppeteering your physically and mentally disabled body to sell shit.

>> No.17586788

>>17586773
What I’m saying. All so tragic.

>>17586777
The manner of anarchism is too difficult for you to understand. Stop talking about it. You’re embarrassing yourself.

>> No.17586792

>>17586715
What stops me from taking you as a sex slave under anarchy if I have a gang of ultra-hardened warrior-mercenaries at my back?

>> No.17586797

>>17586792
Your deaths.
You miserable failure.

>> No.17586799
File: 121 KB, 1125x701, 1613200766055.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586799

>>17586318
seeth, tripfag

>> No.17586802

>>17586797
How are you going to stop me and my warrior-clan?

>> No.17586828

>>17586625
Napoléon mostly used germans as cannon food, tranny.

>> No.17586829

>>17586788
better dead than butters
disgusting

>> No.17586842

>>17586802
>me and my warrior-clan?
post chin

>> No.17586845

>>17586410
>>17586410
I thoroughly regret this post. But more than that, I regret knowing how fucking dumb the lot of you are.

>> No.17586869

>>17586802
post chin

>> No.17586905

>>17586842
>>17586869
>no argument

>> No.17586917

>>17586371
So money is the only thing that matters? The man's a mental and physical wreck, I'm glad I'm not in his situation. It shits on his whole "sort yourself oot" mentality.

>> No.17586919
File: 106 KB, 645x770, poljak.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586919

>>17586905
>

>> No.17586923

>>17586919
>funny picture means argument wrong

>> No.17586936

>>17586923
The argument depends entirely on your chin and it's slipping away due to the lack of chin

>> No.17586940

>>17586936
post yours and i'll post mine if you really want to argue from chins.

>> No.17586952

>>17586905
anyone who fantasizes about being a warrior will make a horrible one. si vis pacem para bellum, but the converse holds as well. but I guess your "macho" posturing comes from years of being bullied in school

>> No.17586955

>>17586940
Not how it works

>> No.17586963

>>17586952
>>17586955
>still no arguments, not even an argument from chin

>> No.17586965

>>17586318
fpbp
>>17586371
>>17586721
>>17586738
>they unironically think butterfly is transgender
lmao

>> No.17586984

>>17586564
>One person having sex does not deprive other people of sex.
It does though, women are much less likely to have sex with virgins and this gets amplified as the virgin gets older. Meanwhile the small portion of men that got sex in the beginning keep getting more sex

>> No.17586985

>>17586963
oh i'm not arguing with you, that's between you and butter-tranny. it's just funny how a lit-tard can ever see himself as some modern-day beowulf or attila

>> No.17586992 [DELETED] 

>>17586564
That's not true, women are much less likely to have sex with virgins and this gets amplified as the virgin gets older. The men who get the sex in the beginning keep getting more sex while the sexless remain sexless unless they want to surrender their humanity to women entirely

>> No.17586997

>>17586984
what a defeatist and etiological perspective
this is why you're a still a virgin

>> No.17587001

>>17586985
I never claimed I was.
The fact that Beowulf or Attila could exist though are living refutations of butterfly's anarchism, so my chin has literally nothing to do with this hypothetical thought experiment

>> No.17587027

>>17586984
Lmao no wonder incels can't get laid if they unironically believe this

>> No.17587038

>>17586965
Put on your trip, poop fly

>> No.17587064
File: 776 KB, 286x224, ec9[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17587064

>>17586965

>> No.17587134

>>17586306
Did Jordan Peterson unironically suggest enforced monogamy or is it just a meme?

>> No.17587197

>>17587134
Socially enforced, yes. Meaning he wants us to slut shame and prize virginity again.

>> No.17587368
File: 106 KB, 500x662, comment_1591050164niP3LZGYJCYkfXcCUZCQe7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17587368

>>17587134
There's nothing wrong with enforced monogamy. Hypergamous preferences of females lead to a sexual utopia where top 20% of men get everything and the rest of us gets nothing.

>> No.17587389

>>17586984
>women are much less likely to have sex with virgins
Don't tell them you're a virgin then

>> No.17587466

>>17586459
My parents barred me from having a phone until I was quite a bit older. Really resented them but god damn, I'm quite grateful for it now.

>> No.17587493

>>17586965
we know he is we saw the photos and he will never pass.

>> No.17587521

>>17586997
it's litteral math, read on the 80/20 principle retard.

>> No.17587532

>>17586306
>state enforced
you mean God enforced

>> No.17587612

>>17587493
she is a woman

>> No.17587879
File: 33 KB, 348x500, 51e8TatFKLL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17587879

>>17586306
Books that argue for state-enforced polygamy?

>> No.17587889

>>17587879
Brave New World