/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17370324]

YOU FUCKING FAGGOTS

No matter how many philosophy books I read 90% of the threads here STILL talk about books I haven't fucking read yet.

So I give you one more chance. Tell me 5 (FIVE) PHILOSOPHY books that I should read in the next month to maximize my ability to participate in /lit/ threads.

>inb4 DURrr just shitpost without reading the book XDD
No, fuck you.

[Anonymous No.17370331]

Philosophy doesn't really belong here. This is a literature board.

[Anonymous No.17370335]

>>17370324
Ethics, Spinoza
Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche
Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle
Rhetoric, Aristotle
Everything else by Aristotle

[Anonymous No.17370344]

>>17370324
>he fell for the reading books meme
oh no no no

[Anonymous No.17370345]

>>17370324
Why would you want to hang out with those weirdos? Come to the fiction side, anon, we enjoy life.

[Anonymous No.17370408]

>>17370324
Hegel’s Phenomology
Marx’s Capital
Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil
Plato’s Republic
Nozick’s Anarchy, State and Utopia

Those seem like the most discussed texts here, for better or worse.

[Anonymous No.17370419]

I feel like darwin, genetics, and evolutionary biology have made philosophy obsolete and a closed field.

[Anonymous No.17370425]

The foundation:
Anon as a phenomenological manifestation
Roastie Trilogy: Dye, Promiscuity, Settle
Janny, or, turbo-trannies and Deleuze

[Anonymous No.17370432]

>>17370408
>Nozick’s Anarchy, State and Utopia
Is this really discussed?

[Anonymous No.17370442]

>>17370408
You forgot all the Nick Land / Evola / Mishima / Guenon / what else?

[Anonymous No.17370457]

>>17370419
get a load of this guy

[Anonymous No.17370479]

Unique and its Property so you can shit post in Stirner threads.

[Anonymous No.17370480]

>>17370419

[Anonymous No.17370499]

>>17370408
>Hegel’s Phenomology
>Marx’s Capital
If you do read those 2 books you won't be able to participate in the threads anymore because you realise no one else read them.

[Anonymous No.17370514]

>>17370324
Why don't you make your own threads on the books you read? Surely you have questions or things you want to discuss? You aren't just mindlessly consuming if your goal is to participate in discussion, are you?

[Anonymous No.17370530]

>>17370324
Obvious question, what books have you read?

[Anonymous No.17370553]

>>17370425
Dang I wish these were actual books.

[Anonymous No.17370559]

>>17370514
>just participate only in your own threads lololol it's gonna be fun i promise lololol

[Anonymous No.17370604]

>>17370499
this kek

[Anonymous No.17370800]

>>17370432
Political philosophy gets discussed, and Rawls and Nozick are both mentioned fairly frequently.

>>17370442
These are threads that ought to just be ignored. Land is fine, the rest are just nonsense.

>>17370479
I should have said this desu.

>>17370499
This is true, but it’s a great way to feel smarter than other people.

[Anonymous No.17370836]

>>17370324
Thunders

[Anonymous No.17370867]

>>17370559
Seems to work for other people lmao, especially since you want to participate in theirs so bad.
If you truly think what you posted, you don't have the brain for philosophy or for discussing it.

[Anonymous No.17370880]

"What got me by during that period was conceiving of the history of philosophy as a kind of assfuck, or, what amounts to the same thing, an immaculate conception. I imagined myself approaching an author from behind and giving him a child that would indeed be his but would nonetheless be monstrous"

[Anonymous No.17371204]

>>17370867
Retard post

[Anonymous No.17371216]

>>17370419
This, but the other way around

[Anonymous No.17371267]

>>17371204
>YOU SERIOUSLY THINK MAKING MY OWN THREAD WOULD WORK
>LMAO UR SUCH A RETARD
>I MEAN LOOK AT ALL THESE PHILOSOPHY THREADS OTHER ANONS MADE THAT ARE GETTING REPLIES
>HAHA WHY DO YOU THINK MAKING THREAD WOULD WORK? ARE YOU A RETARD.
The mark of a true troglodyte.

[Anonymous No.17371286]

>>17370480
Any philosopher born after 1912 should reject the second statement with every fiber of their being. Philosophy has rightly been dethroned as the Queen of all sciences and as the act of polishing the mirror of nature by now. That statement is what scientists caricaturize philosophers as, and, if anyone takes that position, they should be insulted.

[Anonymous No.17371298]

>>17371267
I'm not reading your autistic sperging out faggot you can want to participate in other people's threads AND make your own threads. You must be an absolute cretin tot need this explained to you.

[Anonymous No.17371307]

>>17371286
>. Philosophy has rightly been dethroned as the Queen of all sciences
That happened with Galileo dumbass not in the 20th century.

[Anonymous No.17371321]

>>17371298
I'm not reading any of your autistic sperg out faggot. You must be a real cretin to not understand that OP was asking about participating in /lit/ threads. How retarded are you that you need an OR statement explained to you? You participate in threads by creating threads OR replying to existing ones.

Don't bother replying because your intellect is clearly so low you grasp onto the first strawman you can come up with.

[Anonymous No.17371339]

>>17371321
So he wants to participate in other people's threads too. Are you actually retarded?

[Anonymous No.17371388]

>>17371339
YoU cAn PaRtIcIpAtE iN tHrEaDs By MaKiNg YoUr OwN tHrEaDs ArE yOu ReTaRdEd?

[Anonymous No.17371448]

>>17371388
Disgusting subhuman.

[Anonymous No.17371454]

>>17370324
>complete works of plato
>compelte works of aristotle
>complete works of shakespere
>the bible
>Capital


Read all of these and you can participate in 90% of the threads on /lit/.

[Anonymous No.17371481]

>>17370331
This + OP is a faggot

/thread

[Anonymous No.17371529]

>>17371454
How are you gonna participate in any post-1600 philosophy thread?

[Anonymous No.17371552]

>>17370324
>he actually reads books
What a faggot

[Anonymous No.17371597]

>>17371216
Cope

[Anonymous No.17371636]

>>17371529
All you need to post in /lit/'s post-1600 philosophy threads is a collection of funny meme pictures about Nietzsche

[Anonymous No.17372075]

>>17371529
We have those?

[Anonymous No.17372370]

>>17370419
You're right, but you're not going to get a response worth your time on /lit/. Read some more books anon and be happy your life isn't a cope

[Anonymous No.17372376]

>feels like /lit/ talks about a book constantly every single day
>finally read it so I can engage in the discussions
>suddenly its like there only one good thread every few weeks at best

[Anonymous No.17372382]

>>17370499
this FOR FUCKS SAKE do not click on marx thread, ever

[Anonymous No.17372386]

>>17371388
cope

[Anonymous No.17372453]

>>17370331
This. Philosophy fags get a pass for making threads that have nothing to do with books. They should fuck off to /his/
Or just make a /Phil/ board to contain philosophy fags And religion cucks both

[Anonymous No.17372485]

>>17370335
Extremely based picks