[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 282 KB, 1310x2138, Lolita-Penguin-eating-apple.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17354977 No.17354977 [Reply] [Original]

this shit almost made me cum twice fuck y'all shitty meme books

>> No.17354981

30 pages in*

>> No.17354989

I hate the quotes always put on Lolita covers
>this book will make you COOM BUCKETS
>you will GET OFF dozens of times
>just buy it ok

>> No.17355013

>>17354977
>almost
Read The Enchanter. It will do the trick for you

>> No.17355037

>>17354977
There is only one book that has made me cum.
It was "The Name of the Rose".

>> No.17355065

>>17354977
>>17354989

I don’t understand why you fags act like it’s a smut, there are zero scenes that actually describe Lo being naked or having sex with him. The only time we know they’re having sex is when Humbert talks about how he’s had sex with her or that one time he jerks off to her without her knowing. Lo isn’t supposed to be sexualized and Nabokov goes out of his way to avoid describing her, herself. Stop being 7th grade level readers by projecting so hard because you want to jack off to little girls.

>> No.17355073

>>17354977
I don't think I masturbated to Lolita but I did do it to the Lolita-esque passage in Gravity's Rainbow twice. You know, that bit just before Slothrop goes inside his own dick.

>> No.17355077

>>17355065
You thought we're getting off of child rape? LOL
We're talking of getting off of perfectly executed prose. Language taken to its finest, you pseud

>> No.17355083

>>17355065
It's sort of a test to see if anyone actually read the book. Those who haven't bothered make comments like OP's.

>> No.17355092

>>17355065
You really need to read the book again. Everything you said is objectively incorrect.

>> No.17355099

>>17355037
For me it was diary of anne frank

>> No.17355109

>>17355099
For me it was x-rays of your mother's broken bones.

>> No.17355116

>>17355065
>I don't understand why you fags act like it's smut
anon, that's literally what I was commenting on -- how the book is always marketed as if it's smut.
>The only time we know they're having sex is when Humbert talks about how he's had sex with her
Anon... you need to slow down and read better. The book isn't smut, but there are some pretty graphic details of them having sex

>> No.17355129

>>17355109
Mommas broken bones r hot
Sperm on white can't make a spot
Dig her corpse up from the ground
Bones keep breaking while i pound

>> No.17355145

>>17355116
>the book is always marketed as if it's smut

They are trying to sell copies. You know that, right?

>> No.17355315

>>17355145
>I hate how Lolita is always marketed as smut
>ARE YOU RETARDED IT'S NOT SMUT DID YOU EVEN READ IT THEY DIDN'T EVEN HAVE SEX
>yeh, I know, I was just commenting on how it's kind of dum-
>ARE YOU RETARDED THEY'RE TRYING TO SELL COPIES OF COURSE THEY MARKET IT AS SMUT

>> No.17355433

>>17355013
Not OP. I'm reading it right now.

>> No.17355577
File: 277 KB, 469x452, 1505668240828.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17355577

>greatest prose work on the merit of it's prose alone in the english language
>femcels pretend it failed to elicit an erotic desire of the protagonist's love object
why are you people like this?

>> No.17356991

>>17355315
Homeboy isn’t me, he’s replying to a reply so I don’t blame you for reeeing, but that’s not me also
>>17355116
>but there are some pretty graphic details of them having sex
there’s nothing explicit about her sexual organs or body though, imo it doesn’t read like porn to me

>> No.17357221

>>17356991
mentions him taking her virginity kind of explicitly. not the point tho

>> No.17358052

>>17357221
>mentions him taking her virginity kind of explicitly.
No it doesn't. Read the fucking book

>> No.17358068

>>17354977
How do I stop my loli gf from telling her parents about me?

>> No.17358274

>>17358068
just dont give real cellphone or name lol

>> No.17358330

>>17355129
kek'd

>> No.17358371

>>17354977
Lmao in order to get off to this you have to a total pedo.

>> No.17358393

>>17358052
the lotus thing lol. He earlier talks about her being with a boy an camp but that was COPE for the narrative to make her look more sexual than she was. There's a pretty clear part where there's a reference to her losing her virginity

>> No.17358398

>>17355013
The Enchanter is a much more succinct but much worse version of Lolita

>> No.17358707

>>17354977
> only twice

>> No.17358721

>>17357221
There is zero real-time type sexual encounter between the two.

>> No.17358788

>>17355077
Yeah, whatever revisionist.