/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17285455]

Yeah, I'm thinking based.

[Anonymous No.17285459]

I’m thinking not. Easily the most retarded Hitchens brother, and that’s saying something

[Anonymous No.17285462]

Brace for seething leftists.

[Anonymous No.17285487]

>>17285455
based Peter Hitchens poster

[Anonymous No.17285501]

Yeah, I'm thinking BASED.

[Anonymous No.17285512]

His new book doesn't have a bunch of /lit/ essays and criticism does it? It's mostly blog posts on the orangeman or whatever?

[Anonymous No.17285514]

>>17285455
>>17285487
Peter Hitchens

[Anonymous No.17285521]

>>17285512
It’ll probably be muh west is doomed because we hate Jesus. Your standard conservatard piffle

[Anonymous No.17285555]

>>17285521
I get the Christian thing but don't really understand conservative politics. Essays on what it was like to have a traditional education in English literature are my bread-and-butter tho, there's one essay where he namedrops every major poem he was taught in school that is just amazing. And another very abstract poetic essay where he sort of compares Celts and West Britons to birds which is really funny

[Anonymous No.17285578]

>>17285521
Do you even know who Peter Hitchens is?

[Anonymous No.17285589]

>>17285512
for /lit/ essays and criticism, you've gotta see Christopher's Lover, Poverty, and War, and Arguably

[Anonymous No.17285628]

>>17285589
Just got this, what am I in for? If these guys were writing blogs no one would remember them imo

[Anonymous No.17285630]

>>17285578
It’s Christopher going ‘muh KJV, muh Cranmer’s Prayer Book, the government not taking sides on religion is like anoda League of Militant Atheists’.

Basically the incel Hitchens

[Anonymous No.17285693]

Just finished The Abolition of Britain. Conservatism continues to be useless without ethnocentrism

[Anonymous No.17285756]

>wanna know how I got this tolerant, post-monarchic democratic republic?

[Anonymous No.17285763]

>>17285630
So you don't?

[Anonymous No.17285769]

based

[Anonymous No.17285819]

Isn't he a cycle-chad senior citizen who argues against bike lanes? What's the logic there?

[Anonymous No.17285831]

>>17285819
perfectly good roads for that, innit?

[Anonymous No.17285847]

>>17285819
That bikes are the perfect personal vehicles because the don't destroy the environment. They can use the infrastructure that is already there. Building new infrastructure for them misses the point. You can and should use them in medieval cities and new developments.

[Anonymous No.17285904]

>>17285831

[Anonymous No.17285944]

>>17285904
Total bicycle victory. From a conservative bicyclist this route should be covered by rail, not tarmac.

[Anonymous No.17285951]

>>17285487
Are you in possession of any illegal drugs, anon? If so, I shall report you forthwith to the local constabulary.

[Anonymous No.17285970]

>>17285951
the local constabulary ignores me, even supports me

[Anonymous No.17286094]

>>17285951
>>17285970
Robert Peel is rolling in his grave.