/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17285248]

ITT we pretend to argue about an ideology and or philosopher/s that don't exist.

[Anonymous No.17285424]

>>17285248
The magnum opus of Phillip Weishofer "The Peak of the Absolute and its Consequences" regarding the rearticulation of Malthusian predictions in popular food culture in Malaysia has been refuted given the seeping influence of China's Two Child policy.
>BTFO Weishoferarians
>BTFO von Thünenerians

[Anonymous No.17285473]

As a linguistic nihilist, I fdsvbjiyffvnmouvbbnkfdszc cfthbczsfhb cfghnbvg.
>linguistic absolutists BTFO
>ffhjb jugccxsr hjfddcbnj

[Anonymous No.17285666]

>>17285424
I mean the history of the study of Malthusian ideology is just the history of Malthus getting dunked on so that's not particularly surprising.

[Anonymous No.17285776]

>>17285424
To be fair Weishofer arguments regarding the role of socio-gastronomic factors in the general power analysis of neo-Malthusian systems are still valid in my opinion, He just didnt account for self-reflexive typology adaptions as developed by Derrieux.

[Anonymous No.17285808]

>>17285776
>self-reflexive
Self-reflexive my ass, he dipped his toes into negativism in college and has gone full Post-Hoffian.

[Anonymous No.17285814]

>>17285424
>he unironically agrees with Weishofer
I prefer the absolute chad Gordon Smith Skwever
>Chose to live on the streets for ethical reasons
>Remarks on the classist structures of society from the bottom up
>Basically predicts and refutes Malthusian predictive systems through socio-behavioral observation as a third-person reporting source
>The Arnold-Robbins Fecal Essay
>Argues in favor of ethical population culling
>The demonstration live-in he did in the rubble of the World Trade Center
>Died in 2008 from lung disease, posthumous works' profits go to charity
How can one man be so absolutely based?

[Anonymous No.17285903]

>>17285808
>read Benjamin Hoff in undergrad
>stops buying from Canada-based retailers because “muh Inuitconomics”
>always brings up reptilonism when someone vaguely mentions crytocurrency
>shares posts from Instagram activist accounts run by (((Manichaeans)))
>drops out of college to move to South America

Hoffians are literally more retarded than nu-fems

[Anonymous No.17286074]

>>17285776
Derrieux discredited himself long ago after his publication of the scandalous essay "On the Monad of Deng Shiping's Ambulation as it relates to the Map of Saxony drawn by Juvenal Eilhard Lubinus". He ventured off into realms in which he is a stranger, i.e. metaphysical musings (pontifications if you will -- dedicated readers will remember his slighting of the last descendant of the Avignon anti-Popes) of sinologico-topological metaphysics. He has thusly exiled himself from Malthusian political gastronomy.

[Anonymous No.17286089]

>>17286074
Derrieux was also a sodomite and frequenter of mens-only clubs. Checkmate, Derrieuxists.

[Anonymous No.17286317]

>>17286089
I mean yea he was pretty explicit about it, as >>17286074 mentions he got into a lot of trouble with Avignon after the publication of that weird novel-treatise he did called 'avant le réflexif: l'extase du sodome'

[Anonymous No.17286569]

>>17286317
>agreeing with a boisterous sodomite
Fairly suspect.

[Anonymous No.17287543]

What about some philosophical blogs or essayists from the net anons? My favorite is the blog by the user known as Ropeman, called Ropeman's Digital Pathways. For the uninitiated (as I imagine most of you newfags are), the blog requires you to solve the question on each page to move onto another page, first it starts out with easy questions with clear answers, literally just middle school math, but it continues onto some of Ropeman's essays alongside easy questions that require little thought, and then difficult, actual philosophically challenging questions. What's so amazing to me about his essays is that he just has an absolutely tantalizing framework, there is little specialization or specificity. The best you can gleam from his blog his that he's a Panpsychist, and that fascinates me, he spends as much time trying to prove his points as he does trying to demystify his own points in a way. For any of you that haven't, give Ropeman's Digital Pathways a try.

[Anonymous No.17287554]

read and talk about real books instead of shitposting in the void you fucking moronic zoomers

[Anonymous No.17287565]

>>17285248
The spinal catastrophism of PostChina neointelligence hyperaccelerates metacapital takeoff so that alien teleoplexical neocategories get a grip on hypertrophic intfracategories.

[Anonymous No.17287668]

>>17285814
>>The Arnold-Robbins Fecal Essay
I could sleep for a small time before you reminded me ofnthe horrific crkmr against humanity

[Anonymous No.17287675]

>>17285814
>>The Arnold-Robbins Fecal Essay
I could sleep for a small time before you reminded me of that horrific crime against humanity, I shall never sleep again

[Anonymous No.17287719]

>>17287554
That’s rich coming from a Chantellerist. I mean his entire metaphysical apparatus presupposes a reality constituting void that sucks up expressive potentialities. Our activity surely exposes your ontological commitments but you fail to recognise it, and sublimate it as second order knowledge.

[Anonymous No.17287728]

>>17286074
I always see this same problem when I see critics of Derrieux- its nitpicking about his misreading of Zcaltok's Ontology which just drips with Encist resentment. His account of the Toroidal shapes Qualitatively are totally auxiliary to the central point self-reflexive typology. Even as an Alter-Malthusian, the Chinese Two Child Policy is still only conservatively employed as a critique Weishofer, especially in the Avignon school. The jury is still out on whether the Inter-Suppression Matrices are evidence of a deficiency in the Neo-Malthusian system.

[Anonymous No.17287854]

>>17287554
>only consume never create

nanosyntactic gerontomaximalists kill me. posts like these almost make me forget that schizosemiotics was debunked by Galbritter forty years ago (in his death knell writ "Oblivion-Optimism: Text As Body In Mallarmian Haemopoetics")

[Anonymous No.17287873]

>>17287854
>Oblivion-Optimism: Text As Body In Mallarmian Haemopoetics
I have yet to be foltered so hard by a book as I was by this one, please help anon

[Anonymous No.17287905]

>>17285248
I always see a lot of talk about Rudolph Najder, but not a lot about Isaac Gorkoniker, and granted while Najder was a far more active writer and researcher, had it not been for Gorkoniker, Neo-Babelics would not have been what it became, it was the work they did together at Fordham which led to what is in my opinion, Najder's most compelling and fascinating work 'Neo-Babelic Reason.'

[Anonymous No.17287919]

>>17287905
Give me a rundown on what Neo-Babelics are anon, I'm stoll a little confused.

[Anonymous No.17287925]

>>17287675
The Arnold-Robbins Fecal Essay makes Yasha Berezbeth's " Towards an Eschatology of the Ur-Self" look like John Minkmore Ledger's "Paradigm Palimpsest: Palindromes of Idea-ness".

[Anonymous No.17287969]

>>17287925
The Ur-Self as a concept remidns me of the Han dynasty's concept of the supreme ancestor but abstracted for people who cannot claim a place within the idealist historical cannon, Berezbeth is underrated desu. Qeird that her parents gave her a first name that's primarily for guys though. My favorite of her works is In Line with the Tiger Generals, which is an exploration of what constitutes as "loyalty".

[Anonymous No.17287991]

>>17287919
Okie dokie so:
Neo-Babelics is the theory that is central to Gorkoniker's brand of Bantic philosophy. Which if you're not already aware Banticism is the philosophy of speech-based communication and how interlocks itself into the religion and evolution of peoples. Gorkoniker was a Jewish theologian, and Neo-Babelics was his theory that speech is one of the most important and prominent portals in which we make contact with God. Of course there's a lot more to it and it's more complicated than I am capable of expressing, but that's the basically the shotgun explanation of it.

[Anonymous No.17287992]

>>17285424
you need to go back

[Anonymous No.17288015]

>>17287991
>speech-based communication and how interlocks itself into the religion and evolution of peoples
Sapir-Whorf theory but regarding theology?
>Gorkoniker was a Jewish theologian, and Neo-Babelics was his theory that speech is one of the most important and prominent portals in which we make contact with God. Of course there's a lot more to it and it's more complicated than I am capable of expressing, but that's the basically the shotgun explanation of it.
Then how did Najder add to Neo-Bablics in Neo-Bablic Reason?

[Anonymous No.17288028]

>>17288015
Babelics*

[Anonymous No.17288037]

>>17287969
yeah she spent a lot of time in bhutan and for my money has furnished us with the most subtly provocative synthesis of eastern thought and modern Lullardian biopoetics. ILwtTG is a work of immense power - the entendre of course being that "Tiger General" is also a Bhutani convenience store. lovely illustration of the phylogenetic recidivism of arcane martial memetics in our kleptofuturist consumerist apparatus

[Anonymous No.17288092]

>>17287543
>Ropeman
I put a few ropes on your mother's back last night.
What utter faggotry. Ropeman is a pseud as it gets, mistaking 2nd wave feminist thought for postcolonial liberation theology. I mean fuck, did he not even read Schoenstein?? Tautology masquerading as epistemology.

[Anonymous No.17288101]

>>17288037
The passage that really sticks in my mind is
>Today Guan Yu would be little more than a minor cartel officer, even if he were to remain the same man. Modernity doesn't extract loyalty out of soceity, it renders it useless.

[Anonymous No.17288116]

>>17288092
>he took the satirical essay on modern college as an ideology within itself literally
>he ignores every other interesting thing Ropeman talks about at length
Even if he were advocating what you think he is, you are a bugmen and a half.

[Anonymous No.17288119]

>>17288015
>Sapir-Whorf theory but regarding theology?
Actually more like an anti-Sapir-Whorf theory. Banticism is acutally more focused on explaining how our history, psychology, religion, etc affects our conception of language, not the other way around. (Again it's more complex than that, but that's what I got for you.)
>How did Najder add to Neo-Babelics
Neo-Babelics were developed by both Gorkoniker and Najder together while working together at Fordham. Najder, unlike Gorkoniker, was Muslim, and so his Neo-Babelic Reason was informed by Islam rather than Judaism.

[Anonymous No.17288144]

>>17288116
holy fuck get off my board
unironically kys

[Anonymous No.17288145]

>>17288119
>Actually more like an anti-Sapir-Whorf theory. Banticism is acutally more focused on explaining how our history, psychology, religion, etc affects our conception of language, not the other way around. (Again it's more complex than that, but that's what I got for you.)
Ah my poor reading comprehension strikes again, that sounds very interesting and it makes me feel silly for not getting it yet.
>Najder, unlike Gorkoniker, was Muslim, and so his Neo-Babelic Reason was informed by Islam rather than Judaism.
Ah I imagine the Qur'anic promise of it's own incorruptible naturen in relation to it's preservation in the same form of Arabic would lend itself to Neo-Babelic analysis.

[Anonymous No.17288152]

>>17287675
You were filtered by Arnold-Robbins' neo-Jarrisian opus. NGMI

[Anonymous No.17288153]

Seth J. Goldsinger's Bamboo Letters are truly something else. How can one man dab on both Schweinian traditionalists and Yentabathian progressivists this hard and STILL manage to offer an actually effective political ideology?

[Anonymous No.17288155]

>>17288144
Reading comprehension, you do not have it. Probably just seething over the fact that you couldn't get to the end of his blog you midwit.

[Anonymous No.17288194]

>>17285248
Let's discuss Kapelstanel and the metaphysics of sentient flesh anons.

[Anonymous No.17288211]

>>17288194
Oh God not corn man again for the last time corn WILL NOT BECPME SENTIENT AND THEY WILL NOT CREATE A PERFECT MERITOCRACY. Unless you're confusing him with Adnil but I refuted Adnil in the last thread.

[Anonymous No.17288219]

>>17288155
>reading blog posts instead of books
who's the midwit here? you probably haven't even started reading Lorenz's work on Submersed Receptacle Fabrication and its impacts on social stratification in indigenous societies
knock off the fucking LARP

[Anonymous No.17288241]

>>17288211
The day a basement-dwelling NEET with a porn addiction refutes Adnil on a Somalian pirates recruitment forum is the day corn becomes sentient.

[Anonymous No.17288246]

>>17288219
>NOOO YOU CAN'T USE AN EXPERIMENTAL METHOD TO HELP YOUR READERS UNDERSTAND YOUR ESSAYS ON A DEEPER LEVEL NOOOO MY POOR MIDWIT BRAIN I CAN'T DO MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH AHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.17288254]

>>17288241
Do I need to post the cannibalism passages again you edgy fucking pseud cultist

[Anonymous No.17288357]

>>17288211
>can't into Kapelstanel because still misunderstanding Adnil's comprehensive methodology for empirical data analysis and computer modeling
i remember my freshman year

>>17288194
yes, anon, let's discuss Kapelstanel. probably the most surprising thing about his work to me is the multifocal nature of his research, studying maize telepathy one year and evolutionary linguistics the next. and he ties it all together with his grand Unified Theory of Adriatic Phrontistery. You have made it that far, anon, right?

[Anonymous No.17288369]

I highly recommend reading Rajneshacharya's commentary on the Masalajiva Upanishad. He completely destroys the misguided notion pushed by the Advaita Vedantins that the Atman is Brahman but that the jivas are not. If the Jivas were not Brahman then there would be no way to pilot the Atmangelion. Rajnesh also demonstrates in the Mahanastikakarikabhasya that the nihilist (Buddhist) assimilation of sunya to the pratityasamutpada doctrine is a misreading of Shankara's commentaries, which themselves are highly suspect as crypto-Buddhistic.

[Anonymous No.17288385]

>>17288357
>Adnil
>computer
He was a renaissance writer am I having a stoke? Unless you mean later works that use his methodology for computer modeling, in which case what books do this?

[Anonymous No.17288410]

>Do I need to post the cannibalism passages again you edgy fucking pseud cultist

[Anonymous No.17288456]

>>17288385
did i say he used a fucking computer, anon?? his METHODS are used in computer modeling today. and i know your room temp IQ keeps you from understanding the finer points of his binomial theorems but FUCK you can at least use google
picrel

[Anonymous No.17288475]

>>17288410
>"...and it cannot be denied, when sacrifice of men is made impermissible by the law of the land, all men of God must defy that legal body."
>"Consider the figure of Christ as one eaten by his disciples, consider the widow ritually burning herself, all is sanctified in man's consumption of man>"
>"There will come a time when among my followers, there will be those of make mischief and say 'There is great wonder in the message of out lamb the master Adnil! Surely one cannot say his words are as they seem!' These demons seek only one thing, to damn men to the realm of starvation. Blessed and those of full stomach, blessed are those who dine on flesh."
>>17288456
Okay that was a reasonable misunderstanding considering the dumb shit I've seen Adnilfags say.

[Anonymous No.17288514]

>>17288153
If you thought he was dabbing on either the Yentabathians or the Schweinians, you clearly haven’t read any of Goldsinger’s later work, and you’re probably misinterpreting everything he said about the dictatorship of the consumer. Return after you finish TYB (if you’ve read TYB and still haven’t grasped the message, read it again or maybe just kill yourself).

[Anonymous No.17288545]

>>17288153
I hate being "the guy that shills Pugliesi" but his essay called "Mutilated Courts" might interest you. That being said, what this anon said >>17288514 is also something to keep in mind.

[Anonymous No.17288581]

>all these w*sterners chasing enlightenment inside the net
take the dhikkipasapill, the only net is the one you have cast over yourself.

[Anonymous No.17288618]

So what the fuck is Lipley’s Teleopathic Other supposed to be?
Is it just more “post”-neoromantic obscurantism?

[Anonymous No.17288652]

Unironically ironically good thread.

[Anonymous No.17288666]

>>17288145
It is very interesting anon, I highly recommend 'Neo-Babelic Reason' but honestly I wanted to discuss Gorkoniker more than Najder, hence my original thread.

Gorkoniker wasn't as prolific in philosopher as Najder, but he has one of the comfiest life-stories I've ever read, and has incredibly gorgeous prose, both in his philosophy and memoirs which I think is thanks to his Transcendentalist influences.

His little-known ornithological works are pure kino. Here's a small quote:

'As I ascend up across these white tops and gaze down into the depths of these valleys from my summit and I bask in the warmth of the sun and bathe in the beauty of these surroundings I find it impossible to conceive that any of this was accidental.'

That's from his book cataloging the birds of the White Mountains which he wrote when he was 75 years old.

[Anonymous No.17288672]

>>17288581
Teufelstammer's morbidarianism was greatly influenced by the early translations of the Dīkkhipassist texts into German, but his advocacy of them was hamstrung by the prevailing parentheist controversy. If it weren't for that I think we'd have seen a more flourishing exchange of ideas between East and West. Instead we have endless nitpicking between people who can't even read Dīkkhipassist literature in the original Benīskrtą.

[Anonymous No.17288690]

>>17288652
Previously on /hyperlit/
>>/lit/thread/17258375

[Anonymous No.17288706]

>>17288666
And if you're wondering, the bird on the cover is a White-Breasted Nuthatch

[Anonymous No.17288768]

>>17288581
deep as fuck, anon, based and kujaratipilled

[Anonymous No.17288775]

>>17288666
Surprised to see Gorkoniker's Birds on here. The only other place I've come across it is in the bibliography of Francis Molina's Hectacombs of Paleontology, which is about the evolution of avians as a morphophylentic response to the geotraumatics of the K-Pg extinction event.

[Anonymous No.17288815]

>>17288666
pseud lol

[Anonymous No.17288832]

>>17288775
It's a very niche work, not as I said, Gorkoniker is already an underappreciated writer as it is, and even of those who know him, very few know of his amateur ventures into ornithology. And you can pretty much chalk this up to there being only two written works by him on the subject, one of which has never been translated from the original Russian: Птицы и дepeвья Иpкyтcкoй oблacти.

I haven't read Francis Molina's work, I would assume it must've been written in the post-war period. Can you tell me anything about him?

[Anonymous No.17288838]

>>17288775
>still believing in the existence of non-mammals
Never gonna make it. Read Cowler’s Ontology and Qualia, specifically the section on synthesizing avian intelligence. There’s some postbehavioralist hogshit but her arguments are sound.

[Anonymous No.17288867]

>>17288514
Read the Zurich Correspondence, pseud.
He cucked his earlier beliefs to support his methamphetamine habit as his health was deteriorating. Do I need to point out TYB was published by a company owned by his ex-Yentabathian best friend who coaxed him into picking up Rimraudian commune fever dream dialectics over the years until his sick cancer-ridden brain must've given in? Such disgrace.

[Anonymous No.17288907]

>>17285248
>>17287919
>Adorno knowingly took the position on jazz despite being more Sephardic than Ashkenaz — the dialectical tension between Afroasiatic and Semitic Marxisms has amply played out over the last century in favor of the former, to which Maoism maybe said to be a true carrier of in the Gramscian spirit. Bakunin was right about Marx, but only half right.
Dialectical Bantics is the way of the future, and the way will be paved by the Banticist monumental art vanguard

[Anonymous No.17288913]

>>17288832
Molina's grandfather was a paleobotanist from I think what is now Estonia, so he did actually know some Russian during his youth in Uruguay. Hectacombs was largely ignored by mainstream academia because it was considered too teleological. But the fact of the matter is that avian life is a direct response to changes in the earth's aerospatiality and this is demonstrated not only in the fossil record, as Molina details rather exhaustively, but also well documented in the myths of the autochthonous Arroyojamavega people of Paraguay, where the sky god Guaguifueges is said to have emerged from a dragon-like creature that was struck by a plume of fire from heaven. Sadly the archival recordings of the Arroyojamavega that Molina made were lost in that Brazilian archival fire several years back.

[Anonymous No.17289037]

Isn't this accelerationism?

[Anonymous No.17289051]

>>17288907
Based but cringe

[Anonymous No.17289069]

>>17288690
When I made the thread I decided against calling it /hyperlit/ because I felt like a bunch of people would just come to post about how creating a general thread for this is reddit shit, and I wanted to not start off the thread with shit quality posts.

[Anonymous No.17289088]

>>17289069
Ever the pomoanalysis scholar, OP asks: "What can a thread do?"

[Anonymous No.17289089]

>>17288913
Huh, I admit I know nothing about that, but it sounds interesting, I'll have to read up on it. Gorkoniker did not seek anywhere near that amount of depth in his ornithology, it was really just a hobby for him.

He wrote his first ornithological work (the one I mentioned) in 2027 in Angarsk because he could no longer serve after he was injured there during the Siege of Irkutsk.

[Anonymous No.17289092]

Let's discuss Sneed's On Feed and Seed: A Critique of Chuck

[Anonymous No.17289109]

>>17288907
You have no idea what you're talking about

[Anonymous No.17289117]

>>17289092
Can you ground the assumption that there even was a "Chuck?" Perhaps Chuck was a hallucination in the mind of the owners of Sneed's, perhaps he was a pious fraud, included only to give their humble store a claim to the locality's history. Perhaps it is a part of a marketing ploy; when one sees "Chuck," they ask themselves, who is he? Who was Chuck? And so they browse the internet for Chuck, but are only ever directed to the store's website.

[Anonymous No.17289128]

>>17288101
i see a thousand Guan Yus every day

[Anonymous No.17289131]

>>17289092
It has been demonstrated that Sneed's animal husbandry theories lead to a sharp decrease in fertility among not merely seeded but also feeded livestock populations. Although given the intensive carbon footprint of Chuckist production, this is considered an improvement in some more progressive-minded circles.

[Anonymous No.17289136]

lol imagine thinking Srivivanism is an experiential modality of Zauberfluss theory

[Anonymous No.17289269]

>>17288907
are you the samefag that was shilling this kike bullshit last week? why don't you go make a another thread about Talmudic dialectics that slides to the bottom of the catalog because no one fucking cares about this shit or wants to discuss it

[Anonymous No.17289317]

>>17289089
was that the study co-authored by Charles Parker?

[Anonymous No.17289427]

>>17289128
The point is that you may be right, but every one of their senses of loyalty is made useless by modernity due to the nature of mass culture and mass politics.

[Anonymous No.17289521]

>>17289427
interesting, i always read it more as a sort of attenuation of loyalty into other dimensions of maladaptive sociological syntagma...sublimation/repression but in the fiduciary cortex

[Anonymous No.17289609]

>>17289092
The absolutism inherent in the soil of the earth and soul of man is not refuted in any way. As the soil passes from man to man and the man passes from soil to soil, the true nature of both remains intact. Sneed flounders and runs before he walks. His stumbling prose jumps straight to the will of man and soil without truly defining either. His inability to define either renders him unable to understand either. His nihilism would be quaint were it not so morally repugnant.

[Anonymous No.17289717]

>>17285248
André Strom's reinterpretation of the Ideal is utter rubbish, but he does have some based critiques of Farrell's work
>inb4 SEETHING Harkists

[Anonymous No.17289732]

>>17289717
Its typical opinion of post-racleauxists. Did you use a crayon to copy this from the 1932 manuscript?

[Anonymous No.17289734]

>>17289717
Nathaniel Hark is one of the most interesting psychoanalysts of all time take it back Stormshitter. The Flower of Our Times is a MUST read for anyone interested in symbology and it's origins.

[Anonymous No.17289826]

>>17289717
>he does have some based critiques of Farrell's work
It's literal incoherent pseud nonsense, not once does he address Farrell's core concept of neo-materialism

[Anonymous No.17289855]

>>17289826
Not that guy but do elaborate on what Fareell's concept of neo-materialism is

[Anonymous No.17289892]

>>17289855
I'm not going to spoon feed you, read Farrell's "the being, mind, and the material (1975)" if you want to grasp the basics

[Anonymous No.17290171]

>>17289317
Who the hell is Charles Parker?

[Anonymous No.17290336]

Material constructivism? Be serious, we're not talking about architecture here

[Anonymous No.17290409]

>>17285248
god i wish i was an orangutan

[Anonymous No.17290449]

>>17290171
Anglo poet and novelist from the early 20th century. He was traumatized in WW1 trench combat and afterwards turned to ornithology. He's best known for "A Comma-Shaped Beak," a landmark study in Macaw ethnography completed during a two-year stint in the Galapagos. He also co-authored various scientific papers with legends of birding such as Samuel Blake, Johann Graeb, and, of course, Gorkoniker. He died of suicide in 1945 after hearing about the holocaust; his last words were "not again."

[Anonymous No.17290544]

>>17290409
Things that don't exist, anon.
The urge to retvrn to monke is real

[Anonymous No.17291005]

wowe what a smart monke :)))))
smarter than niggers

[Anonymous No.17291123]

bump

[Anonymous No.17292081]

>>17289136
>Zauberfluss
>thread about esoteric writers that normies/pseuds have never even heard of
>starts actually making shit up
catch up, anon

[Anonymous No.17292424]

>>17285248
Just try to talk about Socrates with someone.

[Anonymous No.17292792]

I feel like Magoni's "Abstract sociology" puts too much emphasis on consumerism as a new pagan cult.
Clearly just another Nietzsche rip-off.

However I liked the part where he characterizes third worlders as hopeless reactionaries, really uncomfortable to read as an ex-leftist

[Anonymous No.17292801]

>>17285424
I actually found his work very life affirming, did you even read it?

[Anonymous No.17292810]

>>17292792
I think you would enjoy Emilio Pagliani's "Discourses on the Scholia of Pseudo-Demosthenes' 'On the Empire''. His futurist-protofascist take (inspired by Vladek Makokvsky's "Books? What are those?") uses Byzantine formal logical from the Suda as applied by Pseudo-Demosthenes to decry the invasion of Ethiopia, being that its inhabitants post-postmodern in their reactionary stance, i.e. reactionaries.

[Anonymous No.17292812]

>>17285473
Made me smile

[Anonymous No.17292851]

How do I start with Neo-Dialectical Metaphysics? I've already read Hehewel's Otorhinolaryngologist Ontologistic-Maximalistic Scatology, but I'm still looking for some more material to fill in the blanks.

[Anonymous No.17292873]

>>17292810
I find Pagliani's pro-Africanism is right from a tactical(not strategic) perspective.

Still better than Magoni, started his journey as a fascist, now idolized by post leftists BAKA

[Anonymous No.17292879]

>>17292851
anyone who considers xerself well read in ontologistic-maximalistic scatology considers Kenneth McCormick's work on psychoanalysis of eternal recurrence to be seminal and discipline-defining. you should start there.

[Anonymous No.17292909]

>>17292851
To expand on what the other anon said, I'd also recommend you to read Cheech Szymankowszczyzna. His work on Saletenian Devari Deutoronomics was also discipline-defining, and pretty much every competent Ontologistic-Maximalistic Scatologist has read him.

[Anonymous No.17292948]

>>17292909
i'm so embarrassed to admit this, but i've never read Szymankowaszczyzna. i was supposed to in my rheumatological thermal-cosmology class in undergrad, but had mono and never got caught up! should i go back and check him out, anon? is it worth it? what were your favorite points of his epistemology?

[Anonymous No.17293090]

Who are your favorite theologians/religious philosophers frens? My personal favorites are Theodore Dulgem and Ahmedi Gabr Abdelrahman. Dulgem, who is a Quaker for the uninitiated, is famous for his work The Murder of Us All in which he argues for everything in creation, even inanimate objects, having a soul. He kind of idealizes shamans and believes religion will evolve to become shamanistic in the near future (it's not quite that simple because he believes shamanism as it was thousands of years ago is a lost tradition) and he was a big fan of the filmmaker Jan Švankmajer who has been described as an animist director. Personally I enjoy his Post-Nietzschean Ethics much more, in which he argues for a sentimental post-familial system of ethics, he believes there no be only idiocy in harming what he considers to be "another fellow cell in the cosmic anatomy". Abdelrahman, a Sufi Muslim of the Maliki madhab, is famous for his work Outside Heaven But All Too Entranced in which he argues that mundane, ordinary pleasures are holy, and that the stories of Nasreddin could be used by a mystic to unravel their logical positivism. I recommend reading both very much they are very interesting thinkers.

[Anonymous No.17293137]

>ctrl+f 'Kyoto analytical accords'
>0 results
NGMI
Talentists were forever BTFO and yet you're still posting here

[Anonymous No.17293152]

>>17285248
>no Eronport posting yet
None of you are going to make it. Read Eronport's Methodology of Extramodalism.

[Anonymous No.17293227]

>>17293152
>Eronport's Methodology of Extramodalism
O I am laffin, read The Rats Outside, the Birds Inside by Rudolph Najder. Retroactively refutes Eronport, though I do like his work that I forgot the title of that critiques Romanticism pretty well.

[Anonymous No.17293408]

>>17285248
Stop the debate of Buddhism, Abrahamism, Hinduism, Taoism, Atheism and the Fifthism, everyone knows that the right way is in Zalahi. And they started before Islam, so Muhammad and Sufis BTFO.

>"The goal is to become a divine figure, discover the secret of faith, and the followers of this religion often practice rituals such as war cannibalism, human sacrifice, intense meditation, astral projection, martial arts regiments and the worship of mountains, sun, moon and lakes”
Zalahiism: A Very Short Introudciton by Milad Hafez

>"They (zalahiim) are often found in rural villages, far from civilization."
"They live in mediocre conditions, they are often poor, thoughtful, isolated, contemplative, anti-technological or skeptic of technology, and very defensive and territorial with who they deem foreigners. Their settlements are usually found in cave mountains, marshes and valleys. They build stone settlements which are centered around large ziggurat-like temples where rituals are practiced”
The Zalahi’s Believers - Mohammed Atta

>“Zalahiism values humility and self-sacrifice for the greater good. This causes many of them to sacrifice themselves and be born and suffer for their faith. They consider the zealot a benevolent force who will one day return.”
Zalahiist Faith - Ghymah Joajgher

>“The Zalahiis are people of immense wisdom and are self-mastered.”
Extremely popular exponent of Hinduism, Rajpuryat Shrikaranaawti

>"It becomes eternal life. They see Aghyya (equivalent of the demiurge) as the creator of life, as well as an evil force that must be challenged."
Zalahiist Faith - Ghymah Joajgher

[Anonymous No.17293428]

>>17293408
>OMG, Zalahiism

[Anonymous No.17293429]

>>17290409
But you are, what are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.17293445]

>>17293408
Muhammad Jibril Tawuthi refuted Zalahiism for it's infantile dualist metaphysics centuries ago man.

[Anonymous No.17293451]

>>17293428
“Yikes! Human sacrifice and war cannibalism is a dangerous aggression against our democracy and values of human rights!”

[Anonymous No.17293467]

>>17290449
Are you a schizo or something? You're telling me that Parker killed himself in 1945 yet he was somehow able to co-author works with Gorkoniker who wasn't born until 2002?

[Anonymous No.17293493]

>>17293451
This text is almost as bad as the cuck meme it was changed to.

[Anonymous No.17293500]

>>17293445
>Muhammad Jibril Tawuthi refuted Zalahiism for it's infantile dualist metaphysics centuries ago man. Agharma Rashid and Al-Uk, read them. Tawuthi never bothered to distinguish between Zalahiist traditions, or even engaged with Al-Uk’s writings.

[Anonymous No.17293523]

>>17293500
>Agharma Rashid and Al-Uk, read them. Tawuthi never bothered to distinguish between Zalahiist traditions, or even engaged with Al-Uk’s writings.
I mean okay I'll see what it's like but I'm not expecting too much. Can't say whether or not you're full of shit in saying Tawuthi didn't read them.

[Anonymous No.17293761]

Lol, have you pseuds really not read pic rel?
The absolute state of /lit/!
I can't believe no one is talking about it, this literally changed how I see individuals and their responsibilities, as they relate to society.
I learned so much from this one book, I honestly have a hard time believing I functioned without it. It's a must read.
~ My boy George was a Chad, btw no cap~

[Anonymous No.17293769]

>>17293761
Give me the rundown anon, what doe she say?

[Anonymous No.17293973]

>>17293227
>Najder
Fucking bullshit, Najder is just derivative of Panlierist theory, but where Panlier has a basis for his hypoepistemology, Najder can't even come up with a reason for it. Plus, you clearly haven't read early Eronport.

[Anonymous No.17294070]

>>17293973
>Plus, you clearly haven't read early Eronport
A meaningless retort if it isn't supported.
>Najder is just derivative of Panlierist theory, but where Panlier has a basis for his hypoepistemology
Are you even familiar with Neo-Babelic theory? See these posts here (though they are not my posts the anon who posted them described it better than I could) >>17287991 >>17288119. This lack of knowledge regarding the Neo-Babelic base of Najder's hypoepistemology makes me think that you haven't read him. If you have, you didn't understand a word of it.

[Anonymous No.17294359]

bump

[Anonymous No.17294949]

>>17287543
I like Richard Dunthersson's blog "Post-Poetry". The blog is largely a fictional blog supposedly written by a man who lives in an age where the written word has been forgotten, having been replaced by communication via drugs that expand consciousness beyond the self.

[Anonymous No.17295021]

Has anyone else read Janthy Höborts Treatise on Dialect? Just finished it, I thought it was really interesting when he talked meta-self processing.

[Anonymous No.17295080]

>>17295021
I dunno I kinda thought it was very similar to Lacan, obviously he had unique observations here and there but it was pretty similar. Like meta-self processing is just Lacan's ego-ideal. Correct me if I'm mistaken though anon. I think Höborts is a more interesting historian than he is a philosopher, his essays on states and engineering are very interesting.

[Anonymous No.17295154]

>>17295080
>I think Höborts is a more interesting historian than he is a philosopher, his essays on states and engineering are very interesting.
Based. I especially liked his essay on how state-sponsored AGI projects, but this must have happened after his methamphetamine binge.

[Anonymous No.17295248]

>>17294070
Get your head out of your ass, early Eronport is essential to understanding MoE and why he's more correct than Najder.
>Are you even familiar with Neo-Babelic theory?
Yes, I'm very familiar. But Eronport's critiques of Neo-Babelic theory are untouchable, dumbass. Najder's hypoepistemology is schizo-babble, and a poor rip of Panlier, if you can even call it a rip. If you need help understanding Eronport and why he's right, read Unmant's essays.

[Anonymous No.17295259]

>>17295154
I think his predictions on the future of state engineering are also pretty good but bro the medieval hydraulics essays are pure kino. Seeing states are webs of resource chains, similar to how historians see fronts during a war, isn't exactly wholly unique but his rhetorical skills and great wealth of knowledge is amazing. You really feel his passion for obscure engineering projects in Ming dynasty China or during the Arab Agricultural Revolution.

[Anonymous No.17295412]

>>17295259
(i wish this were real)

[Anonymous No.17295431]

>>17295412
Then write it bro, better do it quick or I'll take the glory eventually.
>>17295259
Seeing states as webs of resource chains*

[Anonymous No.17295582]

>>17293769
>Najder can't even come up with a reason for it.
What then is Neo-Babelics? That is literally the basis of his hypoepistemology.
And what does Eronport have to do with this? The Rats Outside, The Birds Inside is the greatest lamentation on Kantian methodology written so far, and it makes no sense without having first read 'Neo-Babelic Reason' which I think is clearly the case for you. Najder is the most untouchable Kant scholar in history, Eronport is a speck in comparison, retroactively refuted my ass.
>>17295248
>Poor rip of Panlier, if you can even call it a rip
You're right, you can't call it a rip because Panlier didn't come up with Neo-Babelics, Najder did. Panlier is a pseud who whines because everyone surpassed him, like you.

[Anonymous No.17295652]

I don't know if you guys heard of it but "Geopolitics applied to real life" by Ronnie Nelson was a little gem of political satire.

The part where the workers crew arrive late to the office due to a "intricate" council meeting(ended in a mexican standoff with fishes insted of guns LOL) was so hilarious i almost pissed myself laughing

[Anonymous No.17296365]

>>17293769
>she
Fuck off, the rumours that he was a tranny are fucking retarded and even modern (((academics))) admit that this rumour has no basis in historical reality.
Unironically kill yourself for shilling this defamatory "theory".

If you actually read him you would know that he would have abhorred trannies if he saw them in real life (there were virtually none then, a better time)
His chapter on "losing your soul" is enough evidence of this, can't remember where but he also BTFO homos kek.

[Anonymous No.17296373]

>>17285424
we tore down that CHUDS statue at uni m8

[Anonymous No.17296814]

>>17296365
Ah that was a typo, you can see that the word "does" before it is missing it's s.

[Anonymous No.17297067]

bump

[Anonymous No.17297134]

>read Brenner
>start endlessly analyzing the fabric of societyin day-to-day life
>all contact with other humans seen through the thin veil of neuschwaltigkeit

This man has ruined my life. How will I ever find hope again? What do I read, lit?

[Anonymous No.17297232]

>>17297134
Telvinser Belup's work, The Soft Touch, it's a work about approaching yourself and others with ease of mind and mercy. If we're not talking philosophy, The Selected Poetry of Maksim Zolimensky.

[Anonymous No.17297282]

>>17297134
Just gradually stop reading, listening and perceiving interpersonal phenomena. Every social action we take perpetuates the Aufstand gegen das Selbst.

[Anonymous No.17297743]

bump

[Anonymous No.17298017]

>>17285248
Neither the roerians or the gnosians were right on the decatheory
As always, start with the neo-dominicans, specially Bryan Yang, pbuh

[Anonymous No.17298090]

>>17298017
Fun fact: the founder of the Roerian order became a Muslim. He became a Sufi wali (saint, literally means friend) ironically.

[Anonymous No.17298094]

>>17285248
s

[Anonymous No.17298628]

>>17285424

Malthus gets a bad rap, at least according to Chomsky. In Understanding Power, Chomsky notes that Malthus's argument was really no different than most "realist" economic thinkers of the day. He just put into blunt words what everyone else had left as an implication, and so he gets all the hate.

In this regard, I consider Weishofer very respectable as an intellectual who is willing to associate himselves who have got undeservedly bad press. It highlights his intellectual honesty.

[Anonymous No.17298634]

>>17298090
kek you haven't even read the fundament so you think muslim literally means a muslim.

[Anonymous No.17298711]

>>17298634
As opposed to metaphysically being a Muslim of course, I'm sure he moved to Morocco and joined a Sufi Tariqah as a satirical move or something.